The Benefit-Risk Balance of Nab-Paclitaxel in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The benefit-risk balance of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin versus gemcitabine assessed using generalized pairwise comparison was strongly positive. We sought to assess the benefit-risk balance of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine using the data of the MPACT trial, as it is an...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Pancreas Ročník 48; číslo 2; s. 275
Hlavní autori: Péron, Julien, Giai, Joris, Maucort-Boulch, Delphine, Buyse, Marc
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.02.2019
ISSN:1536-4828, 1536-4828
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract The benefit-risk balance of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin versus gemcitabine assessed using generalized pairwise comparison was strongly positive. We sought to assess the benefit-risk balance of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine using the data of the MPACT trial, as it is an alternative to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin. This statistical method allows for the simultaneous analysis of several prioritized outcomes. The first priority outcome was survival time (overall survival). The second priority outcome was toxicity. The overall treatment effect was quantified using the overall net benefit. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the consistency of the results according to possible patients' preferences. In this trial, 861 patients received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone. The overall net benefit favored strongly and significantly the combination group. When only large survival differences were considered clinically relevant, the net benefit was not in favor of the combination group. The overall net benefit is a clinically intuitive way of comparing patients with respect to all important efficacy and toxicity outcomes. The nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination has a positive benefit-risk balance, but it might not be suitable for patients who would consider losing several months of survival to avoid a significant toxic event.
AbstractList The benefit-risk balance of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin versus gemcitabine assessed using generalized pairwise comparison was strongly positive. We sought to assess the benefit-risk balance of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine using the data of the MPACT trial, as it is an alternative to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin.OBJECTIVESThe benefit-risk balance of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin versus gemcitabine assessed using generalized pairwise comparison was strongly positive. We sought to assess the benefit-risk balance of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine using the data of the MPACT trial, as it is an alternative to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin.This statistical method allows for the simultaneous analysis of several prioritized outcomes. The first priority outcome was survival time (overall survival). The second priority outcome was toxicity. The overall treatment effect was quantified using the overall net benefit. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the consistency of the results according to possible patients' preferences.METHODSThis statistical method allows for the simultaneous analysis of several prioritized outcomes. The first priority outcome was survival time (overall survival). The second priority outcome was toxicity. The overall treatment effect was quantified using the overall net benefit. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the consistency of the results according to possible patients' preferences.In this trial, 861 patients received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone. The overall net benefit favored strongly and significantly the combination group. When only large survival differences were considered clinically relevant, the net benefit was not in favor of the combination group.RESULTSIn this trial, 861 patients received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone. The overall net benefit favored strongly and significantly the combination group. When only large survival differences were considered clinically relevant, the net benefit was not in favor of the combination group.The overall net benefit is a clinically intuitive way of comparing patients with respect to all important efficacy and toxicity outcomes. The nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination has a positive benefit-risk balance, but it might not be suitable for patients who would consider losing several months of survival to avoid a significant toxic event.CONCLUSIONSThe overall net benefit is a clinically intuitive way of comparing patients with respect to all important efficacy and toxicity outcomes. The nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination has a positive benefit-risk balance, but it might not be suitable for patients who would consider losing several months of survival to avoid a significant toxic event.
The benefit-risk balance of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin versus gemcitabine assessed using generalized pairwise comparison was strongly positive. We sought to assess the benefit-risk balance of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine using the data of the MPACT trial, as it is an alternative to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin. This statistical method allows for the simultaneous analysis of several prioritized outcomes. The first priority outcome was survival time (overall survival). The second priority outcome was toxicity. The overall treatment effect was quantified using the overall net benefit. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the consistency of the results according to possible patients' preferences. In this trial, 861 patients received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone. The overall net benefit favored strongly and significantly the combination group. When only large survival differences were considered clinically relevant, the net benefit was not in favor of the combination group. The overall net benefit is a clinically intuitive way of comparing patients with respect to all important efficacy and toxicity outcomes. The nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination has a positive benefit-risk balance, but it might not be suitable for patients who would consider losing several months of survival to avoid a significant toxic event.
Author Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Buyse, Marc
Péron, Julien
Giai, Joris
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Julien
  surname: Péron
  fullname: Péron, Julien
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Joris
  surname: Giai
  fullname: Giai, Joris
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Delphine
  surname: Maucort-Boulch
  fullname: Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Marc
  surname: Buyse
  fullname: Buyse, Marc
  organization: International Drug Development Institute, San Francisco, CA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkEtPwzAQhC1URB_wDxDykUuK7ThxfCwVL6mFqirnaGtvhCFxSuxK8O-JoEidw84cPq1GMyYD33ok5JKzKWda3SxXsyk7EhepPCEjnqV5IgtRDI7ykIxDeO8ZlWb6jAxTlgvNhByR9eYN6S16rFxM1i580FuowRukbUWfYZuswNQuwhfW1Hm6xAghQnSGrnqqw984s-hbA51xvm3gnJxWUAe8OPiEvN7fbeaPyeLl4Wk-WyRGMhWTAnRWgQJT5WCswRyNUIXQVmzB9PVsfyVnXAvGrAK0aWYtWrBWm1yhEBNy_fd317WfewyxbFwwWPf1sd2HUnClUyG0lD16dUD32wZtuetcA913-b-D-AEl22LF
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biomaterials_2020_119907
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2021_106400
crossref_primary_10_1177_09622802211037067
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD011044_pub3
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_8788
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2021_03_018
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9690
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9648
crossref_primary_10_1080_10543406_2022_2141769
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2025_07_021
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001234
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1536-4828
ExternalDocumentID 30629024
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.XZ
.Z2
0R~
123
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5RE
5VS
8L-
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMTA
AARTV
AASCR
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADGGA
ADHPY
AE3
AE6
AEBDS
AENEX
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFUWQ
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BQLVK
C45
CS3
DIWNM
DU5
E.X
EBS
EEVPB
EX3
F2K
F2L
F5P
FCALG
FL-
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
N9A
NPM
O9-
OAG
OAH
ODA
ODMTH
OHYEH
OJAPA
OL1
OLG
OLV
OLW
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OWW
OWY
OXXIT
P2P
RLZ
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VVN
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
YFH
ZFV
7X8
ABPXF
ABXYN
ABZZY
ACBKD
ADKSD
AFBFQ
AFNMH
AHQVU
AOQMC
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-8a95fa7acf6acdce6ec27829d2bac629dac641019200d7aed35ddedadd9c67e22
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 15
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000456715300026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1536-4828
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 14:11:30 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:34:41 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c407t-8a95fa7acf6acdce6ec27829d2bac629dac641019200d7aed35ddedadd9c67e22
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 30629024
PQID 2179322944
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2179322944
pubmed_primary_30629024
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Pancreas
PublicationTitleAlternate Pancreas
PublicationYear 2019
SSID ssj0017359
Score 2.3199522
Snippet The benefit-risk balance of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin versus gemcitabine assessed using generalized pairwise comparison was...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 275
Title The Benefit-Risk Balance of Nab-Paclitaxel in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629024
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2179322944
Volume 48
WOSCitedRecordID wos000456715300026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3dS8MwEA_qRHzx-2N-EcHXsDXL0uZJNnH4YEsRhb2N7HqBobZzm-Kf76Xt2JMg2If0JQ0l3P3ud7nLHWM3Osu83QtE4NAKZRGF8SVcwUVRQOCIXSgvCj-GSRINhyatD9zmdVrlEhNLoM4K8GfkLeklSUqj1O30Q_iuUT66WrfQWGeNDlEZr5jhcBVFCDtlszRSai0UuRbLq3MmbMVprypdWD8E4Op3klkam8Huf39zj-3UNJP3KrnYZ2uYH7CtuA6kH7InEg_eJ5xzE19GZP7K-z7HEZAXjid2LFILvnz3N77xSc5jXFh_9WgCPKVZJdEE3iPMIlM4oyWLd3vEXgb3z3cPom6vIIC8uIWIrOk6G1pw2kIGqBEk8QWTybEFTW8aVeApYLudhRazTpewMCNANKBDlPKYbeRFjqeMazXW1o01EDlSRmKkwFpaIJDosONck10vd2tE4utjEjbH4nM-Wu1Xk51UWz6aVnU2RuTNSEMc4uwPX5-zbaIypsqnvmANR8qLl2wTvhaT-eyqlAsakzT-AdCYwvU
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Benefit-Risk+Balance+of+Nab-Paclitaxel+in+Metastatic+Pancreatic+Adenocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Pancreas&rft.au=P%C3%A9ron%2C+Julien&rft.au=Giai%2C+Joris&rft.au=Maucort-Boulch%2C+Delphine&rft.au=Buyse%2C+Marc&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.issn=1536-4828&rft.eissn=1536-4828&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMPA.0000000000001234&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1536-4828&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1536-4828&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1536-4828&client=summon