Frequency and Predictors of Virtual Visits in Patients With Heart Failure Within a Large Health System: Retrospective Cohort Study

Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities i...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Journal of medical Internet research Ročník 27; číslo 2; s. e70414
Hlavní autori: Maw, Anna M, Wright, Garth C, Bean, Meagan R, Allen, Larry A, Matlock, Daniel D, Cervantes, Lilia, Glasgow, Russell E, Huebschmann, Amy G, Colborn, Kathryn L, Houston, Thomas K, Trinkley, Katie E
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Canada Journal of Medical Internet Research 12.08.2025
JMIR Publications
Predmet:
ISSN:1438-8871, 1439-4456, 1438-8871
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the chi-square test for association and as a discrete outcome using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to capture potentially important predictor variables that could influence use or frequency of using virtual visits. The primary outcome of interest was the odds of at least one virtual visit during the 1-year evaluation period from 2021 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and care use. A logistic regression model was used to model at least one primary care or cardiology virtual visit. A total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access-for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, P≤.001), cell phone on file (OR 2.9, P≤.001), and active electronic health record patient portal (OR 2.8, P≤.001)-than those without. Age, race, ethnicity, rurality, and Social Vulnerability Index were not associated with virtual visits. Only a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.
AbstractList Background Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes. Objective This study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the chi-square test for association and as a discrete outcome using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to capture potentially important predictor variables that could influence use or frequency of using virtual visits. The primary outcome of interest was the odds of at least one virtual visit during the 1-year evaluation period from 2021 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and care use. A logistic regression model was used to model at least one primary care or cardiology virtual visit. Results A total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access—for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, P≤.001), cell phone on file (OR 2.9, P≤.001), and active electronic health record patient portal (OR 2.8, P≤.001)—than those without. Age, race, ethnicity, rurality, and Social Vulnerability Index were not associated with virtual visits. Conclusions Only a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.
Abstract BackgroundVirtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes. ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the ResultsA total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access—for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, PPP ConclusionsOnly a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.
Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes.BackgroundVirtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes.This study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits.ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the chi-square test for association and as a discrete outcome using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to capture potentially important predictor variables that could influence use or frequency of using virtual visits. The primary outcome of interest was the odds of at least one virtual visit during the 1-year evaluation period from 2021 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and care use. A logistic regression model was used to model at least one primary care or cardiology virtual visit.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the chi-square test for association and as a discrete outcome using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to capture potentially important predictor variables that could influence use or frequency of using virtual visits. The primary outcome of interest was the odds of at least one virtual visit during the 1-year evaluation period from 2021 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and care use. A logistic regression model was used to model at least one primary care or cardiology virtual visit.A total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access-for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, P≤.001), cell phone on file (OR 2.9, P≤.001), and active electronic health record patient portal (OR 2.8, P≤.001)-than those without. Age, race, ethnicity, rurality, and Social Vulnerability Index were not associated with virtual visits.ResultsA total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access-for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, P≤.001), cell phone on file (OR 2.9, P≤.001), and active electronic health record patient portal (OR 2.8, P≤.001)-than those without. Age, race, ethnicity, rurality, and Social Vulnerability Index were not associated with virtual visits.Only a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.ConclusionsOnly a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.
Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the chi-square test for association and as a discrete outcome using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to capture potentially important predictor variables that could influence use or frequency of using virtual visits. The primary outcome of interest was the odds of at least one virtual visit during the 1-year evaluation period from 2021 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and care use. A logistic regression model was used to model at least one primary care or cardiology virtual visit. A total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access—for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, P≤.001), cell phone on file (OR 2.9, P≤.001), and active electronic health record patient portal (OR 2.8, P≤.001)—than those without. Age, race, ethnicity, rurality, and Social Vulnerability Index were not associated with virtual visits. Only a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.
Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, concerns remain that these interventions might unintentionally create or widen existing disparities in care delivery and patient outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the health care use patterns of patients who have HFrEF, including specialty type and frequency of in-person and virtual visits. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF within a large health system. Inclusion criteria were patients alive with an ejection fraction ≤40% as of September 1, 2021, and at least one virtual or in-person outpatient visit to a primary care or cardiology clinician in the prior year. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and clinical use data and outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed both with virtual visits as a variable (received or did not receive) using the chi-square test for association and as a discrete outcome using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to capture potentially important predictor variables that could influence use or frequency of using virtual visits. The primary outcome of interest was the odds of at least one virtual visit during the 1-year evaluation period from 2021 to 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate baseline patient demographics and care use. A logistic regression model was used to model at least one primary care or cardiology virtual visit. A total of 8481 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65.9 years (SD 15.1), 5672 (66.9%) patients were male and 6608 (77.9%) patients were non-Hispanic White. The majority of patients had no cardiology (7938/8481, 93.6%) or primary care (7955/8481, 93.8%) virtual visits during the evaluation period. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher odds of having at least one virtual visit for patients with certain digital access-for example, email on file (odds ratio [OR] 9.3, P≤.001), cell phone on file (OR 2.9, P≤.001), and active electronic health record patient portal (OR 2.8, P≤.001)-than those without. Age, race, ethnicity, rurality, and Social Vulnerability Index were not associated with virtual visits. Only a minority of patients with HFrEF were seen via virtual visits. Patients who regularly used digital technology were more likely to have virtual visits. Patients were more likely to be seen in a cardiology clinic than by a primary care provider. Although there was no evidence of an association between social determinants of health factors like race, ethnicity, or rurality with digital divide indicators, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of these data. Future studies should aim to replicate the findings of this study and explore ways to enhance the effective and equitable use of virtual visits.
Audience Academic
Author Maw, Anna M
Bean, Meagan R
Allen, Larry A
Huebschmann, Amy G
Cervantes, Lilia
Wright, Garth C
Colborn, Kathryn L
Houston, Thomas K
Glasgow, Russell E
Trinkley, Katie E
Matlock, Daniel D
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anna M
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2829-7331
  surname: Maw
  fullname: Maw, Anna M
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Garth C
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9617-2792
  surname: Wright
  fullname: Wright, Garth C
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Meagan R
  orcidid: 0009-0006-9255-4124
  surname: Bean
  fullname: Bean, Meagan R
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Larry A
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2540-3095
  surname: Allen
  fullname: Allen, Larry A
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Daniel D
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9597-9642
  surname: Matlock
  fullname: Matlock, Daniel D
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lilia
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9912-5684
  surname: Cervantes
  fullname: Cervantes, Lilia
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Russell E
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4218-3231
  surname: Glasgow
  fullname: Glasgow, Russell E
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Amy G
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9329-3142
  surname: Huebschmann
  fullname: Huebschmann, Amy G
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Kathryn L
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8399-6330
  surname: Colborn
  fullname: Colborn, Kathryn L
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Thomas K
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2909-4018
  surname: Houston
  fullname: Houston, Thomas K
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Katie E
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2041-7404
  surname: Trinkley
  fullname: Trinkley, Katie E
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40795329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkktrGzEQx5eS0jyar1AEpdCLU71WK_UWTJ0EDA1NH0ehlUaOwnrlStqCr_3kke00tFB0GDHzmz_zOm2OxjhC05wTfEGJEh86zAl_0ZwQzuRMyo4c_fU_bk5zfsCYYq7Iq-aY4061jKqT5vciwc8JRrtFZnToNoELtsSUUfToe0hlMkO1OZSMwohuTQkw1v-PUO7RNZhU0MKEYUqwd1XEoKVJK9gFh8rcbXOB9Uf0BUqKeQO2hF-A5vE-1tS7Mrnt6-alN0OG8yd71nxbfPo6v54tP1_dzC-XM1vLLTPRGuiBekyI5JRjyvq-N1RRIVyNOCUwaSVIAYZhW5GWKCyp9J2X0jLBzpqbg66L5kFvUlibtNXRBL13xLTStZ1gB9Be9tYpz7HjkmODpVW0FYbZVkDnOala7w9amxTr-HLR65AtDIMZIU5ZM8oUIVR2vKJvD-jKVOUw-liSsTtcX0rBmeoU3gle_Ieqz8E62LpqH6r_n4Q3TxVM_Rrccz9_VluBdwfA1rnnBP4ZIVjvTkbvT4Y9AuQdr7k
Cites_doi 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000767
10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.011
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011140
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.10.010
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1231000
10.15420/cfr.2020.32
10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.004
10.1097/AIA.0000000000000389
10.1177/07334648211073605
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.037
10.3389/fcvm.2020.612818
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010158
10.1093/jamia/ocab170
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009462
10.1002/ejhf.2163
10.1002/clc.23848
10.1007/s11606-023-08029-2
10.3390/jpm12081214
10.1038/s41746-024-01184-8
10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101708
10.1093/jamia/ocab194
10.2196/55499
10.1177/00469580221096272
10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.04.008
10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547946
10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000123
10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.12295
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Anna M Maw, Garth C Wright, Meagan R Bean, Larry A Allen, Daniel D Matlock, Lilia Cervantes, Russell E Glasgow, Amy G Huebschmann, Kathryn L Colborn, Thomas K Houston, Katie E Trinkley. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org).
COPYRIGHT 2025 Journal of Medical Internet Research
Copyright_xml – notice: Anna M Maw, Garth C Wright, Meagan R Bean, Larry A Allen, Daniel D Matlock, Lilia Cervantes, Russell E Glasgow, Amy G Huebschmann, Kathryn L Colborn, Thomas K Houston, Katie E Trinkley. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 Journal of Medical Internet Research
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.2196/70414
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Library & Information Science
EISSN 1438-8871
EndPage e70414
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f8bcd9f40d4840a08c9256a3c56e7f41
A864397901
40795329
10_2196_70414
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Wyoming
Colorado
Nebraska
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Nebraska
– name: Colorado
– name: Wyoming
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS
  grantid: UH3 HL151297
– fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS
  grantid: K23 HL161352
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK137223
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: U01 DK137272
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 DK092923
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 CA282292
GroupedDBID ---
.4I
.DC
29L
2WC
36B
53G
5GY
5VS
77I
77K
7RV
7X7
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAKPC
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABUWG
ACGFO
ADBBV
AEGXH
AENEX
AFFHD
AFKRA
AFPKN
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
CCPQU
CITATION
CNYFK
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAP
EBD
EBS
EJD
ELW
EMB
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRP
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
ICO
IEA
IHR
INH
ISN
ITC
KQ8
M1O
M48
NAPCQ
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PRQQA
RNS
RPM
SJN
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-65aebe2f0118424023bbba29266daebd960158e86ea30c8425190828f7f88c363
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001553631600005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1438-8871
1439-4456
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:40:35 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 15:11:32 EDT 2025
Thu Nov 27 00:19:51 EST 2025
Tue Nov 25 03:42:26 EST 2025
Sat Oct 11 06:58:46 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:37:32 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords heart failure
health equity
telehealth
virtual care
digital technology
Language English
License Anna M Maw, Garth C Wright, Meagan R Bean, Larry A Allen, Daniel D Matlock, Lilia Cervantes, Russell E Glasgow, Amy G Huebschmann, Kathryn L Colborn, Thomas K Houston, Katie E Trinkley. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c407t-65aebe2f0118424023bbba29266daebd960158e86ea30c8425190828f7f88c363
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2540-3095
0000-0001-8399-6330
0009-0006-9255-4124
0000-0002-2829-7331
0000-0003-2041-7404
0000-0002-9617-2792
0000-0001-9597-9642
0000-0002-2909-4018
0000-0002-9912-5684
0000-0003-4218-3231
0000-0002-9329-3142
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/f8bcd9f40d4840a08c9256a3c56e7f41
PMID 40795329
PQID 3239112874
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f8bcd9f40d4840a08c9256a3c56e7f41
proquest_miscellaneous_3239112874
gale_infotracmisc_A864397901
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A864397901
pubmed_primary_40795329
crossref_primary_10_2196_70414
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-12
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-12
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-12
  day: 12
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
PublicationTitle Journal of medical Internet research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Med Internet Res
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Journal of Medical Internet Research
– name: JMIR Publications
References de Freitas (R8); 9
Silva-Cardoso (R13); 7
Asgari (R23); 12
Lopez de Coca (R5); 12
Tersalvi (R14); 7
Pearson (R26); 61
Rao (R1); 16
Choi (R4); 41
Heidari (R20); 19
Victoria-Castro (R29); 45
R27
Berry (R19); 228
Diamond (R28); 17
White-Williams (R22); 141
Masterson Creber (R3); 16
Lee (R15); 10
Wang (R21); 28
Goldberg (R9); 7
Bhatt (R2); 23
Gorodeski (R10); 26
Lu (R6); 54
Mubarak (R7); 59
Ingram (R11); 2
Walsh (R16); 38
Fang (R25); 25
R18
Harry (R24); 47
Ng (R12); 13
Canepa (R17); 15
Patra (R30); 28
References_xml – volume: 141
  start-page: e841
  issue: 22
  ident: R22
  article-title: Addressing social determinants of health in the care of patients with heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000767
– volume: 47
  start-page: 76
  issue: 2
  ident: R24
  article-title: Physician task load and the risk of burnout among US physicians in a national survey
  publication-title: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.011
– volume: 17
  issue: 2
  ident: R28
  article-title: Access to mobile health interventions among patients hospitalized with heart failure: insights into the digital divide from the CONNECT-HF mHealth substudy
  publication-title: Circ Heart Fail
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011140
– volume: 19
  start-page: 180
  issue: 1
  ident: R20
  article-title: Z-code documentation to identify social determinants of health among Medicaid beneficiaries
  publication-title: Res Social Adm Pharm
  doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.10.010
– volume: 10
  ident: R15
  article-title: Virtual healthcare solutions in heart failure: a literature review
  publication-title: Front Cardiovasc Med
  doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1231000
– volume: 7
  ident: R13
  article-title: The future of telemedicine in the management of heart failure patients
  publication-title: Card Fail Rev
  doi: 10.15420/cfr.2020.32
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1
  issue: 154
  ident: R11
  publication-title: Vital Health Stat 2
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1995
  issue: 12
  ident: R25
  article-title: Natural language processing for automated classification of qualitative data from interviews of patients with cancer
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.004
– volume: 61
  start-page: 49
  issue: 1
  ident: R26
  article-title: Geospatial analysis of patients’ social determinants of health for health systems science and disparity research
  publication-title: Int Anesthesiol Clin
  doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000389
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1348
  issue: 5
  ident: R4
  article-title: Urban/rural digital divide exists in older adults: does it vary by racial/ethnic groups?
  publication-title: J Appl Gerontol
  doi: 10.1177/07334648211073605
– volume: 228
  ident: R19
  article-title: Z-codes: an underutilized strategy to identify social determinants of health (SDOH), eliminate health disparities, and achieve health equity
  publication-title: Am J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.037
– volume: 7
  ident: R14
  article-title: Telemedicine in heart failure during COVID-19: a step into the future
  publication-title: Front Cardiovasc Med
  doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.612818
– volume: 16
  issue: 2
  ident: R1
  article-title: In-hospital virtual peer-to-peer consultation to increase guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure: a pilot randomized trial
  publication-title: Circ Heart Fail
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010158
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2716
  issue: 12
  ident: R30
  article-title: Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
  doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab170
– ident: R18
– volume: 15
  issue: 8
  ident: R17
  article-title: Temporal trends of heart failure hospitalizations in cardiology versus noncardiology wards according to ejection fraction: 16-year data from the SwedeHF registry
  publication-title: Circ Heart Fail
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009462
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1191
  issue: 7
  ident: R2
  article-title: Virtual optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the IMPLEMENT-HF pilot study
  publication-title: Eur J Heart Fail
  doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2163
– volume: 45
  start-page: 839
  issue: 8
  ident: R29
  article-title: Pragmatic randomized trial assessing the impact of digital health technology on quality of life in patients with heart failure: design, rationale and implementation
  publication-title: Clin Cardiol
  doi: 10.1002/clc.23848
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2130
  issue: 9
  ident: R16
  article-title: Incorporating TechQuity in virtual care within the veterans health administration: identifying future research and operations priorities
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08029-2
– volume: 12
  issue: 8
  ident: R5
  article-title: Bridging the generational digital divide in the healthcare environment
  publication-title: J Pers Med
  doi: 10.3390/jpm12081214
– volume: 7
  issue: 1
  ident: R9
  article-title: UCHealth’s virtual health center: how Colorado’s largest health system creates and integrates technology into patient care
  publication-title: NPJ Digit Med
  doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01184-8
– volume: 54
  ident: R6
  article-title: Digital exclusion and functional dependence in older people: findings from five longitudinal cohort studies
  publication-title: EClinicalMedicine
  doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101708
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2608
  issue: 12
  ident: R21
  article-title: Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
  doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab194
– volume: 12
  ident: R23
  article-title: Impact of electronic health record use on cognitive load and burnout among clinicians: narrative review
  publication-title: JMIR Med Inform
  doi: 10.2196/55499
– volume: 59
  ident: R7
  article-title: Elderly forgotten? digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide
  publication-title: Inquiry
  doi: 10.1177/00469580221096272
– ident: R27
– volume: 26
  start-page: 448
  issue: 6
  ident: R10
  article-title: Virtual visits for care of patients with heart failure in the era of COVID-19: a statement from the heart failure society of America
  publication-title: J Card Fail
  doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.04.008
– volume: 13
  ident: R12
  article-title: Validating the Social Vulnerability Index for alternative geographies in the United States to explore trends in social determinants of health over time and geographic location
  publication-title: Front Public Health
  doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547946
– volume: 16
  issue: 11
  ident: R3
  article-title: Telehealth and health equity in older adults with heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
  doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000123
– volume: 9
  start-page: 101
  issue: 2
  ident: R8
  article-title: Heart failure in the elderly
  publication-title: J Geriatr Cardiol
  doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.12295
SSID ssj0020491
Score 2.4481442
Snippet Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart failure with...
Background Virtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic heart...
Abstract BackgroundVirtual care interventions have the potential to improve access to care and serial medication intensification for patients with chronic...
SourceID doaj
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage e70414
SubjectTerms Aged
Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data
Analysis
Cardiac patients
Cardiology - statistics & numerical data
Care and treatment
Colorado
Digital divide (Technology)
Electronic Health Records
Electronic records
Female
Health care industry
Healthcare Disparities - statistics & numerical data
Heart failure
Heart Failure - therapy
Humans
Male
Medical care
Medical records
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Middle Aged
Nebraska
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Primary nursing
Rankings
Retrospective Studies
Stroke Volume
Telemedicine - statistics & numerical data
Utilization
Wyoming
Title Frequency and Predictors of Virtual Visits in Patients With Heart Failure Within a Large Health System: Retrospective Cohort Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40795329
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3239112874
https://doaj.org/article/f8bcd9f40d4840a08c9256a3c56e7f41
Volume 27
WOSCitedRecordID wos001553631600005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8871
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020491
  issn: 1438-8871
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 19990101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Library Science Database (ProQuest)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8871
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020491
  issn: 1438-8871
  databaseCode: M1O
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/libraryscience
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8871
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020491
  issn: 1438-8871
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8871
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020491
  issn: 1438-8871
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8871
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020491
  issn: 1438-8871
  databaseCode: 7RV
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1438-8871
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020491
  issn: 1438-8871
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fa9RAEB60ShGKaLV62h4jiD6FXrL5sfGtLT0qeGc4tJ5PYbPZpXlJJEkLffUvd2aTK54--OLLBnbysNmZzcyw33wD8NaP41JEDMUprPFCGwdeoRxbXiTiyBihjHbNJpLlUq7XafZbqy_GhA30wMPGHVtZ6DK14awMKRdRM6lT8tJK6Cg2iXUl6wFFPZtkaky1KO71d2GPgc5kYsfJLPTDLc_jCPr__g3_EVw6JzN_Ao_H6BBPhlU9hXum3oejsbYA3-FYPMSbieOp3IfdxXg__gx-ztsBGn2Lqi4xa1nC_XSwsXhZtVwsQs-u6jusaswGUtUOv1X9FV6Q0fc4VxUj1d0UvaLwE2PFcShXwoHg_AOuTN82mypNPGuuKIpHxiTePoev8_MvZxfe2GXB05TM9V4cKVJkYLkENeS7FlEUhQpS8twlSUpKcfxIGhkbJWaab-18bpMubWKl1CIWB7BTN7V5CRgymMIamxhKO8vIpqSnNGLWuDCJtQ0mMN1oIP8xkGnklISwinKnogmcsl7uhMx97SbIIvLRIvJ_WcQE3rNWcz6hfau0GgsNaI3MdZWfSBeFUSA0gcOtN-lk6S3xm41d5CxiOFptmusuF4EgJ8GtAibwYjCYuzXTpqaRCNJX_-NbXsOjgBsOMwdvcAg7fXttjuChvumrrp3C_WR1yeM6caOcwoPT82W2mrrTQOPC_0xz2cdF9v0X3LMMsA
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency+and+Predictors+of+Virtual+Visits+in+Patients+With+Heart+Failure+Within+a+Large+Health+System%3A+Retrospective+Cohort+Study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+Internet+research&rft.au=Maw%2C+Anna+M&rft.au=Wright%2C+Garth+C&rft.au=Bean%2C+Meagan+R&rft.au=Allen%2C+Larry+A&rft.date=2025-08-12&rft.pub=Journal+of+Medical+Internet+Research&rft.issn=1439-4456&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F70414&rft.externalDocID=A864397901
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon