Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in The European Union Member States—Summary results from the second European screening report

The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer scre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer Jg. 142; H. 1; S. 44 - 56
Hauptverfasser: Basu, Partha, Ponti, Antonio, Anttila, Ahti, Ronco, Guglielmo, Senore, Carlo, Vale, Diama Bhadra, Segnan, Nereo, Tomatis, Mariano, Soerjomataram, Isabelle, Primic Žakelj, Maja, Dillner, Joakim, Elfström, Klara Miriam, Lönnberg, Stefan, Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2018
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0020-7136, 1097-0215, 1097-0215
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring (N = 80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population‐based approach was documented. Among the age‐eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population‐based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll‐out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population‐based screening increased to 72.4% of the age‐eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2–111% for breast cancer, 7.6–105% for cervical cancer and 1.8–127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes. What's new? In 2003 the European Union (EU) Council urged member states to devote greater attention to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The second report on progress in this regard was published in 2017. The present manuscript details implementation status, protocol, and organization of screening programs and screening invitation coverage of target populations in member states. The data show that within a decade, the proportion of eligible EU populations having access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening increased by 5.8, 11.9 and 33.6 percent respectively. Future Council recommendations may need to consider the incorporation of alternative screening strategies.
AbstractList The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring (N = 80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population‐based approach was documented. Among the age‐eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population‐based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll‐out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population‐based screening increased to 72.4% of the age‐eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2–111% for breast cancer, 7.6–105% for cervical cancer and 1.8–127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes. What's new? In 2003 the European Union (EU) Council urged member states to devote greater attention to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The second report on progress in this regard was published in 2017. The present manuscript details implementation status, protocol, and organization of screening programs and screening invitation coverage of target populations in member states. The data show that within a decade, the proportion of eligible EU populations having access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening increased by 5.8, 11.9 and 33.6 percent respectively. Future Council recommendations may need to consider the incorporation of alternative screening strategies.
The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring ( N  = 80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population‐based approach was documented. Among the age‐eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population‐based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll‐out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population‐based screening increased to 72.4% of the age‐eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2–111% for breast cancer, 7.6–105% for cervical cancer and 1.8–127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes. What's new? In 2003 the European Union (EU) Council urged member states to devote greater attention to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The second report on progress in this regard was published in 2017. The present manuscript details implementation status, protocol, and organization of screening programs and screening invitation coverage of target populations in member states. The data show that within a decade, the proportion of eligible EU populations having access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening increased by 5.8, 11.9 and 33.6 percent respectively. Future Council recommendations may need to consider the incorporation of alternative screening strategies.
The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring (N=80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population-based approach was documented. Among the age-eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population-based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll-out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population-based screening increased to 72.4% of the age-eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2-111% for breast cancer, 7.6-105% for cervical cancer and 1.8-127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes. What's new? In 2003 the European Union (EU) Council urged member states to devote greater attention to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The second report on progress in this regard was published in 2017. The present manuscript details implementation status, protocol, and organization of screening programs and screening invitation coverage of target populations in member states. The data show that within a decade, the proportion of eligible EU populations having access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening increased by 5.8, 11.9 and 33.6 percent respectively. Future Council recommendations may need to consider the incorporation of alternative screening strategies.
The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring (N = 80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population-based approach was documented. Among the age-eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population-based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll-out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population-based screening increased to 72.4% of the age-eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2-111% for breast cancer, 7.6-105% for cervical cancer and 1.8-127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes.The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring (N = 80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population-based approach was documented. Among the age-eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population-based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll-out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population-based screening increased to 72.4% of the age-eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2-111% for breast cancer, 7.6-105% for cervical cancer and 1.8-127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes.
The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation status, protocols and organization (updated till 2016) and invitation coverage (for index year 2013) of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the EU. Experts in screening programme monitoring (N = 80) from the EU Member States having access to requisite information in their respective countries provided data on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening through online questionnaires. Data was collected for screening performed in the framework of publicly mandated programmes only. Filled in questionnaires were received from 26 Member States for all three sites and from one Member State for breast cancer only. Substantial improvement in screening implementation using population-based approach was documented. Among the age-eligible women, 94.7% were residents of Member States implementing or planning population-based breast cancer screening in 2016, compared to 91.6% in 2007. The corresponding figures for cervical cancer screening were 72.3 and 51.3% in 2016 and 2007, respectively. Most significant improvement was documented for colorectal cancer screening with roll-out ongoing or completed in 17 Member States in 2016, compared to only five in 2007. So the access to population-based screening increased to 72.4% of the age-eligible populations in 2016 as opposed to only 42.6% in 2007. The invitation coverage was highly variable, ranging from 0.2-111% for breast cancer, 7.6-105% for cervical cancer and 1.8-127% for colorectal cancer in the target populations. In spite of the considerable progress, much work remains to be done to achieve optimal effectiveness. Continued monitoring, regular feedbacks and periodic reporting are needed to ensure the desired impacts of the programmes.
Author Lönnberg, Stefan
Basu, Partha
Dillner, Joakim
Anttila, Ahti
Soerjomataram, Isabelle
Ponti, Antonio
Vale, Diama Bhadra
Ronco, Guglielmo
Segnan, Nereo
Tomatis, Mariano
Elfström, Klara Miriam
Senore, Carlo
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
Primic Žakelj, Maja
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Partha
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0124-4050
  surname: Basu
  fullname: Basu, Partha
  email: BasuP@iarc.fr
  organization: Screening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Antonio
  surname: Ponti
  fullname: Ponti, Antonio
  organization: CPO Piemonte and University Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza”
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ahti
  surname: Anttila
  fullname: Anttila, Ahti
  organization: Mass Screening Registry/Finnish Cancer Registry
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Guglielmo
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3016-1131
  surname: Ronco
  fullname: Ronco, Guglielmo
  organization: CPO Piemonte and University Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza”
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Carlo
  surname: Senore
  fullname: Senore, Carlo
  organization: CPO Piemonte and University Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza”
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Diama Bhadra
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2423-0225
  surname: Vale
  fullname: Vale, Diama Bhadra
  organization: Universidade Estadual de Campinas
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Nereo
  surname: Segnan
  fullname: Segnan, Nereo
  organization: CPO Piemonte and University Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza”
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Mariano
  surname: Tomatis
  fullname: Tomatis, Mariano
  organization: CPO Piemonte and University Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza”
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Isabelle
  surname: Soerjomataram
  fullname: Soerjomataram, Isabelle
  organization: Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Maja
  surname: Primic Žakelj
  fullname: Primic Žakelj, Maja
  organization: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Joakim
  surname: Dillner
  fullname: Dillner, Joakim
  organization: Swedish Cervical Screening Registry
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Klara Miriam
  surname: Elfström
  fullname: Elfström, Klara Miriam
  organization: Regionalt cancercentrum Stockholm‐Gotland
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Stefan
  surname: Lönnberg
  fullname: Lönnberg, Stefan
  organization: Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Finnish Cancer Registry
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Rengaswamy
  surname: Sankaranarayanan
  fullname: Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
  organization: Screening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28940326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1O3DAURq2Kqgw_C16gssSGLgLXceJMlmhECxUVC2BtOZ5r8CixUzsRglUfotu-XJ-kHjK0EiorS9fnfLa-u0O2nHdIyAGDYwaQn9iVPuYMCv6OzBjUVQY5K7fILN1BVjEutslOjCsAxkooPpDtfF4XwHMxI7-uBzWMkXpDbde32KFLA-sdVW5JfbhTzj5Ng4Ro5TQGGnVAdNbdUevozT3SszH4HpWjt25NfsOuSdg6GuPvHz-vx65T4ZEGjGM7RGqC7-iQvIjap2f-6v-CA_Y-DHvkvVFtxP3NuUtuP5_dLM6zy6svF4vTy0wXUPHMlGUDqQC-rIUydalMUxkzb3ittSmEypUSjVBLznLgeq6VKMEUSje1EJhEvkuOptw--O8jxkF2NmpsW-XQj1GyusgrKJjIE3r4Cl35Mbj0u0QJqMW8YiJRHzfU2HS4lH2w6wbkS_EJOJkAHXyMAY3Udip-CMq2koFcr1am1crn1Sbj0yvjJfR_7Cb9wbb4-DYoL74uJuMPiPu2Eg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00604_020_4156_4
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2024_090631
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2019_00909
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33204
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radi_2023_06_010
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms19123854
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_l803
crossref_primary_10_14309_ctg_0000000000000243
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40880_019_0368_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13458
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2019_8258
crossref_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdz051
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_34494
crossref_primary_10_1002_bies_201900122
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcpo_2018_07_001
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2025_1580665
crossref_primary_10_1002_1878_0261_12432
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_32195
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckaf066
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annonc_2021_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1097_CEJ_0000000000000426
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08100_3
crossref_primary_10_5812_jamm_120371
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_32885
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcpo_2018_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_2667_24_00218_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13071578
crossref_primary_10_1080_0284186X_2020_1764095
crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_djab125
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08129_9
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41591_023_02315_6
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2018_025109
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12030556
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13051101
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_71735_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2025_2534098
crossref_primary_10_1080_0284186X_2019_1615637
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcpo_2023_100464
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_79274
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2023_107615
crossref_primary_10_1093_jjco_hyz161
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2021_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_018_4244_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_CEJ_0000000000000474
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcna_2020_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_cyt_13431
crossref_primary_10_1159_000536663
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMoa2208375
crossref_primary_10_3390_v10120729
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12061508
crossref_primary_10_1097_EE9_0000000000000182
crossref_primary_10_1158_1940_6207_CAPR_19_0192
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaceta_2025_102522
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_062824
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41416_020_0935_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44266_022_00012_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16468
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckaf119
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2020_04_022
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0233490
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurpub_ckad055
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13690_023_01137_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_018_0683_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12939_020_01275_4
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2020_12_068
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canep_2018_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijid_2020_02_051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jncc_2024_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_023_15686_9
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2021_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1177_1403494819845565
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12061409
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_023_11583_x
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_40540
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annonc_2023_01_010
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14092343
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_5162
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_33795
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_020_00905_3
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2025_3564012
crossref_primary_10_1080_14461242_2019_1601027
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003431
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bulcan_2019_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2020_05_011
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_868164
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2024_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1177_03000605251337577
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhealeco_2023_102803
crossref_primary_10_1002_cac2_12627
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_025_04213_2
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_96131_y
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_8152
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2021_02_006
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31629
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lana_2021_100084
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctarc_2025_100866
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2021_11_008
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_35263
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_34455
crossref_primary_10_1128_JCM_01176_18
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_862165
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2019_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2018_12_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_cac2_12197
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2022_107229
crossref_primary_10_1093_aje_kwab254
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31630
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2019_103401
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_1253_19_30147_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_phn_12842
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0287486
crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_311xpt139723
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_32968
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_079921
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_10327_8
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2020_322192
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_019_7846_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2018_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2020_03_063
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMp2113332
crossref_primary_10_1093_jbi_wbae091
crossref_primary_10_1177_09691413251320572
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_022_02291_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_3857
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2024_04_036
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_018_5125_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_34638
crossref_primary_10_3389_ijph_2025_1608183
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medp_2025_100082
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2022_115371
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_021_01204_9
crossref_primary_10_2196_17430
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13071520
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16061191
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcpo_2024_100499
crossref_primary_10_1002_1878_0261_12459
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v25_i21_2565
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_37989
crossref_primary_10_1097_CEJ_0000000000000603
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_1253_22_00084_X
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmi_2019_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2018_317293
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13486
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2024_11_027
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10389_023_02088_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2018_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_5647_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_12_013
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_025_22535_4
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0231422
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0039_1698772
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_28495
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00103_018_2833_9
crossref_primary_10_1177_0969141319871977
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1112172
crossref_primary_10_1177_0969141318820362
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31372
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31371
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0225667
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
10.1016/j.ejca.2014.10.022
10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C
10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.021
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.051
10.1258/096914107781261936
10.1016/j.canep.2015.05.009
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 UICC
2017 UICC.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 UICC
– notice: 2017 UICC.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7TO
7U9
H94
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1002/ijc.31043
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Immunology Abstracts
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Immunology Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-0215
EndPage 56
ExternalDocumentID 28940326
10_1002_ijc_31043
IJC31043
Genre article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: European Union Public Health Programme (Scientific and technical support to the European Partnership for Action against Cancer and follow‐up of the implementation of the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening)
– fundername: World Health Organization
  grantid: 001
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.3N
.GA
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
24P
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
5GY
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HZ~
IH2
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
L7B
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
UDS
V2E
V8K
V9Y
W2D
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WWO
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XPP
XV2
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
.55
.GJ
.Y3
31~
3O-
53G
8WZ
A6W
AAMMB
AANHP
AAYXX
ABEFU
ABEML
ACBWZ
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHEFC
AI.
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BDRZF
CITATION
EX3
FEDTE
GLUZI
HF~
HVGLF
M6P
O8X
PALCI
RJQFR
SAMSI
VH1
WOW
X7M
Y6R
ZGI
ZXP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7TO
7U9
H94
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-f55b03103d96af95afb7ff8b39ccf46a2aa6b6ad31203c8ca650f4acb966e0313
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISSN 0020-7136
1097-0215
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 19:02:01 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 05:51:01 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:04:03 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:55:11 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:46:17 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 17:08:33 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords breast cancer
cancer screening
colorectal cancer
European Union
cervical cancer
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2017 UICC.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4073-f55b03103d96af95afb7ff8b39ccf46a2aa6b6ad31203c8ca650f4acb966e0313
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2423-0225
0000-0003-0124-4050
0000-0003-3016-1131
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ijc.31043
PMID 28940326
PQID 1960968716
PQPubID 105430
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1942704162
proquest_journals_1960968716
pubmed_primary_28940326
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_ijc_31043
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_31043
wiley_primary_10_1002_ijc_31043_IJC31043
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 1 January 2018
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2018
  text: 1 January 2018
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle International journal of cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Cancer
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2015; 39
2013; 49
2010
2015; 51
2008
2017
2006
2015
2003
2014
2012; 48
2013
2004; 329
2007; 14
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
Segnan N (e_1_2_8_11_1) 2010
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
WHO (e_1_2_8_19_1) 2014
Anttila A (e_1_2_8_10_1) 2015
Martin‐Moreno JM (e_1_2_8_14_1) 2013
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
Arbyn M (e_1_2_8_9_1) 2008
e_1_2_8_7_1
EUROSTAT (e_1_2_8_12_1) 2015
e_1_2_8_6_1
WHO (e_1_2_8_20_1) 2014
e_1_2_8_8_1
29732546 - Int J Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;143(1):E1. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31359.
29642254 - Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;56(4):401-403. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-102024.
References_xml – volume: 39
  start-page: S1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 10
  article-title: European code against Cancer 4th Edition: 12 ways to reduce your cancer risk
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol
– volume: 48
  start-page: 743
  year: 2012
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Determinants of successful implementation of population‐based cancer screening programmes
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
– volume: 14
  start-page: 81
  year: 2007
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Lessons learnt from a population‐based pilot programme for colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain)
  publication-title: J Med Screen
– year: 2008
– year: 2006
– year: 2003
– volume: 49
  start-page: 1374
  year: 2013
  end-page: 403
  article-title: Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
– year: 2017
– volume: 51
  start-page: 241
  year: 2015
  end-page: 51
  article-title: Towards better implementation of cancer screening in Europe through improved monitoring and evaluation and greater engagement of cancer registries
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
– volume: 39
  start-page: S139
  year: 2015
  end-page: 52
  article-title: European Code against Cancer, 4th Edition: Cancer screening
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol
– year: 2014
– year: 2015
– year: 2010
– year: 2013
– volume: 329
  start-page: 133
  year: 2004
  article-title: Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom
  publication-title: BMJ
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
– volume-title: Boosting Innovation and Cooperation in European Cancer Control: key Findings from the European Partnership for Action against Cancer
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
– volume-title: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.10.022
– volume-title: Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control ‐ a Guide to Essential Practice
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
– volume-title: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
– volume-title: Eurostat Regional Yearbook 2015
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.021
– volume-title: European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.051
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1258/096914107781261936
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.05.009
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
– volume-title: WHO Position Paper on Mammography Screening
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
– reference: 29642254 - Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;56(4):401-403. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-102024.
– reference: 29732546 - Int J Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;143(1):E1. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31359.
SSID ssj0011504
Score 2.6040275
Snippet The second report on the implementation status of cancer screening in European Union (EU) was published in 2017. The report described the implementation...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 44
SubjectTerms Age
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Cancer
Cancer screening
Cervical cancer
Cervix
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
European Union
Female
Humans
Male
Mammography
Mass Screening - organization & administration
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical research
Medical screening
Surveys and Questionnaires
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Title Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in The European Union Member States—Summary results from the second European screening report
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fijc.31043
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28940326
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1960968716
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1942704162
Volume 142
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1097-0215
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011504
  issn: 0020-7136
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19960101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7BglAv0PIoW7bIRRy4RIQ4D684oYVVQQVVPKS9RbZjS1vRLNrs9twfwZU_xy_pTJxkQYCE1FukjGPLnrG_z46_Adi1JkuyxIRISyT3cL3VnlA68oQMImETaWMtymQTycWFGAy6P-fgsL4L4_Qhmg03ioxyvqYAl6rYn4mGDn9pJJx-yOdhIUC_jVqwcHzZv_nRHCIg1qlEmH0PuVhcCwv5wX5T-Ply9AJjPoes5ZrTX_mv1n6E5QpqsiPnG59gzuSrsHReHaavwQMBzWnBRpYNf9e_kdM4MZlnbPTkkiaZaHKPMcNZBpkvrndsmDP0MVZv5zNEr2h5bijDCHMY9vHv_ZW7HMeQ1U9vJwWj6ywMQScriIlns-KzD7tjjHW46Z9c9757VbYGTyMp5J6NIkU6ozzrxtJ2I2lVYq1QvKu1DWMZSBmrWGb8IPC5FloiNrSh1AoJlyEFyQ1o5aPcbAKTItIy5GhuFNJHrjJym0SpwCAaVLYNe_WgpbqSMqeMGrepE2EOUuzutOzuNuw0pndOv-M1o0498mkVwkV6QFp8MfHJNnxrXmPw0YmKzM1oSjYhuh5i2qANn53HNLUgkw19BMfY2NIx3q4-PT3rlQ9f3m-6BR8Qugm3GdSB1mQ8NV9hUf-ZDIvxNswnA7FdxcM_ADUQ8w
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB7xEnBpoUC7lIKpOHCJCHEeXqmXCrrisbtCLUjcItuxpUU0W212OfMjuPbP9ZcwEydZUFsJiVukjGPLnrG_bxx_BtizJkuyxIRISyT3cL3VnlA68oQMImETaWMtyssmkn5fXF-3L2bgS30WxulDNAk3ioxyvqYAp4T0wVQ1dHCjkXH6IZ-F-RDdCP17_vh756rb7CIg2KlUmH0PyVhcKwv5wUFT-Pl69BfIfI5Zy0Wn8_Z1zV2BNxXYZF-dd6zCjMnfwWKv2k5fg98ENScFG1o2-Fn_SE4jxWSeseGTY5pkoslBRgznGeS-uOKxQc7Qy1id0GeIX9GyZ-iOEeZQ7J_7hx_ueBxDXj-5HReMDrQwhJ2sIC6eTYtPP-w2MtbhqvPt8ujEq-5r8DTSQu7ZKFKkNMqzdixtO5JWJdYKxdta2zCWgZSximXGDwOfa6ElokMbSq2QchnSkNyAuXyYmw_ApIi0DDmaG4UEkquMHCdRKjCIB5VtwX49aqmuxMzpTo3b1MkwByl2d1p2dws-N6a_nILHv4y26qFPqyAu0kNS44uJUbZgt3mN4Ud7KjI3wwnZhEHiI6oNWvDeuUxTC3LZ0Ed4jI0tPeP_1aenZ0flw-bLTXdg6eSy1027p_3zj7CMQE641NAWzI1HE_MJFvTdeFCMtquweATVQRP7
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NT9wwEB3RBSEuQGmBBdoaxIFLRIjz4ZW4VNBV-VohChK3yHZsaRFk0WaXMz-i1_45fgkzcZItKpWQuEXKOLbsGfs9O34DsG1NlmSJCZGWSO7heqs9oXTkCRlEwibSxlqUySaSXk9cX3fOp2C_vgvj9CGaDTeKjHK-pgA395ndnaiG9m80Mk4_5B9gOqQkMi2YPrzoXp02pwgIdioVZt9DMhbXykJ-sNsUfrke_QMyX2LWctHpLryvuYswX4FN9t15x0eYMvkSzJ5Vx-mf4A9BzXHBBpb17-ofyWmkmMwzNvjrmiaZaHKQIcN5BrkvrnisnzP0MlZv6DPEr2h5ZijHCHMo9unx9y93PY4hrx_fjgpGF1oYwk5WEBfPJsUnH3YHGZ_hqvvj8uCnV-Vr8DTSQu7ZKFKkNMqzTixtJ5JWJdYKxTta2zCWgZSximXG9wKfa6ElokMbSq2QchnSkFyGVj7IzSowKSItQ47mRiGB5Cojx0mUCgziQWXbsFOPWqorMXPKqXGbOhnmIMXuTsvubsNWY3rvFDxeM9qohz6tgrhI90iNLyZG2YbN5jWGH52pyNwMxmQTBomPqDZow4pzmaYW5LKhj_AYG1t6xv-rT4-OD8qHtbebfoPZ88NuenrUO1mHOcRxwu0MbUBrNBybLzCjH0b9Yvi1iopnRSQTdg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status+of+implementation+and+organization+of+cancer+screening+in+The+European+Union+Member+States%E2%80%94Summary+results+from+the+second+European+screening+report&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+cancer&rft.au=Basu%2C+Partha&rft.au=Ponti%2C+Antonio&rft.au=Anttila%2C+Ahti&rft.au=Ronco%2C+Guglielmo&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=56&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fijc.31043&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fijc.31043&rft.externalDocID=IJC31043
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0020-7136&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0020-7136&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0020-7136&client=summon