Response from the authors of the article “Critical review of the role of personal protective Equipment (PPE) in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use” to the letter to the editor from the European crop protection association (ECPA) Occupational and bystander exposure expert group (OBEEG)

In March 2020, Safety Science published the article “Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use” by an international group of researchers working for public research organisations. An expert group from an association representing the interests...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Safety science Ročník 138; s. 105191
Hlavní autoři: Garrigou, A., Laurent, C., Baldi, I., Berthet, A., Colosio, C., Daubas-Letourneux, V., Galey, L., Goutille, F., Jackson Filho, J.-M., Jas, N., Jouzel, J.-N., Judon, N., Lebailly, P., Samuel, O.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
Elsevier BV
Elsevier
Témata:
Agricultural chemicals
Agriculture
Agrochemicals
Humanities and Social Sciences
Marketing authorisation
Occupational exposure
Occupational health
Personal protective equipment
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Pesticides
Plant protection
Political science
Prevention
Protective equipment
Marketing authorisation
Occupational health
Agriculture
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Pesticides
ISSN:0925-7535, 1879-1042
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In March 2020, Safety Science published the article “Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use” by an international group of researchers working for public research organisations. An expert group from an association representing the interests of the agricultural pesticide industry at European level (the European Crop Protection Association -ECPA-) then published a letter challenging the relevance of the discussion and the conclusions of this article. The authors of the review have decided to use their right to reply.
Bibliografie:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0925-7535
1879-1042
DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105191