Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging in the Congo Basin

•We quantified baseline selective logging emissions in DRC, Gabon and Republic of Congo.•Selective logging transfered up to 9% of live AGB and BGB tree carbon biomass into necromass.•No significant difference between FSC and non-certified concessions.•Logging emissions represented 40% of total emiss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest ecology and management Vol. 437; pp. 360 - 371
Main Authors: Umunay, Peter M., Gregoire, Timothy G., Gopalakrishna, Trisha, Ellis, Peter W., Putz, Francis E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 01.04.2019
Subjects:
ISSN:0378-1127, 1872-7042
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We quantified baseline selective logging emissions in DRC, Gabon and Republic of Congo.•Selective logging transfered up to 9% of live AGB and BGB tree carbon biomass into necromass.•No significant difference between FSC and non-certified concessions.•Logging emissions represented 40% of total emissions from deforestation.•Implementing RIL-C practices can cut half of emissions without reducing timber yields. To estimate carbon emissions from selective logging in Central Africa, we employed the reduced-impact logging for carbon emissions reductions (RIL-C) protocol to quantify baseline carbon emissions from legal timber harvests by source (i.e., hauling, skidding, and felling). We modeled the relationships between emissions and biophysical conditions, logging practices, and forest policies and then used these models to estimate potential emission reductions from full implementation of RIL-C practices. We applied the method in 8 forest management enterprises (FMEs; i.e., concessions) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), 9 in Gabon, and 6 in the Republic of Congo (RoC). Committed logging emissions expressed per cubic meter of timber harvested (to control for differences in logging intensities) ranged from 0.63 Mg C m−3 in a FME in RoC to 4.8 Mg C m−3 in a FME in Gabon, with an overall average of 2.1 Mg C m−3. Logging emissions were dominated by damage caused by road and log landing construction (i.e., hauling; 50%) and felling (43%; includes carbon in extracted logs). Total emissions represented only about 9% of unlogged forest biomass carbon stocks. Average emissions were highest in Gabon (2.65 Mg C m−3) followed by DRC (1.84 Mg C m−3) and RoC (1.54 Mg C m−3). Emissions from concessions certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC, N = 6) and those that were not certified (N = 17) did not differ. Nearly half (51%) of logging emissions could be avoided without reducing timber yields if all best examples of RIL-C logging practices observed were applied in the same FME. At the country level, if all FMEs were to utilize these practices, emissions reductions would be 34% in RoC, 45% in DRC, and 62% in Gabon. When combined with country-level logging statistics, emissions from selective logging as currently practiced in the six countries of the Congo Basin are equivalent to 40% of the region’s total emissions from deforestation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-1127
1872-7042
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.049