Legal Barriers to the Growth of Health Information Exchange—Boulders or Pebbles?

Context: Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Milbank quarterly Jg. 96; H. 1; S. 110 - 143
Hauptverfasser: MELLO, MICHELLE M., ADLER-MILSTEIN, JULIA, DING, KAREN L., SAVAGE, LUCIA
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2018
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0887-378X, 1468-0009, 1468-0009
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Context: Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments. Methods: Analysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials. Findings: Although some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated—in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat "information blocking." Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance-abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state-law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate. Conclusions: Although patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers' expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.
AbstractList Policy Points: Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant obstacle to expanding electronic health information exchange (HIE) in the United States. Our review finds that over the past decade, several helpful developments have ameliorated the legal barriers to HIE, although variation in states' patient consent requirements remains a challenge. Today, health care providers' complaints about legal obstacles to HIE may be better understood as reflecting concerns about the economic and competitive risks of information sharing. Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments. Analysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials. Although some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated-in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat "information blocking." Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance-abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state-law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate. Although patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers' expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.
Policy Points: Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant obstacle to expanding electronic health information exchange (HIE) in the United States. Our review finds that over the past decade, several helpful developments have ameliorated the legal barriers to HIE, although variation in states’ patient consent requirements remains a challenge. Today, health care providers’ complaints about legal obstacles to HIE may be better understood as reflecting concerns about the economic and competitive risks of information sharing. Context Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients’ health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments. Methods Analysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials. Findings Although some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated—in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat “information blocking.” Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance‐abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state‐law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate. Conclusions Although patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers’ expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.
Context: Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments. Methods: Analysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials. Findings: Although some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated—in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat "information blocking." Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance-abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state-law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate. Conclusions: Although patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers' expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.
Policy Points:Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant obstacle to expanding electronic health information exchange (HIE) in the United States.Our review finds that over the past decade, several helpful developments have ameliorated the legal barriers to HIE, although variation in states’ patient consent requirements remains a challenge.Today, health care providers’ complaints about legal obstacles to HIE may be better understood as reflecting concerns about the economic and competitive risks of information sharing.ContextAlthough the clinical benefits of exchanging patients’ health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments.MethodsAnalysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials.FindingsAlthough some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated—in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat “information blocking.” Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance‐abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state‐law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate.ConclusionsAlthough patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers’ expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.
Policy Points: Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant obstacle to expanding electronic health information exchange (HIE) in the United States. Our review finds that over the past decade, several helpful developments have ameliorated the legal barriers to HIE, although variation in states' patient consent requirements remains a challenge. Today, health care providers' complaints about legal obstacles to HIE may be better understood as reflecting concerns about the economic and competitive risks of information sharing.Policy Points: Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant obstacle to expanding electronic health information exchange (HIE) in the United States. Our review finds that over the past decade, several helpful developments have ameliorated the legal barriers to HIE, although variation in states' patient consent requirements remains a challenge. Today, health care providers' complaints about legal obstacles to HIE may be better understood as reflecting concerns about the economic and competitive risks of information sharing.Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments.CONTEXTAlthough the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in health information exchange (HIE) has lagged behind adoption of electronic health records. Barriers erected by federal and state health information privacy law have been cited as a leading reason for the slow progress. A comprehensive assessment of these issues has not been undertaken for nearly a decade, despite a number of salient legal developments.Analysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials.METHODSAnalysis of federal and state health information privacy statutes and regulations and secondary materials.Although some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated-in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat "information blocking." Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance-abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state-law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate.FINDINGSAlthough some legal barriers to HIE persist, many have been ameliorated-in some cases, simply through improved understanding of what the law actually requires. It is now clear that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act presents no obstacles to electronically sharing protected health information for treatment purposes and does not hold providers who properly disclose information liable for privacy breaches by recipients. The failure of federal efforts to establish a unique patient identifier number does slow HIE by inhibiting optimal matching of patient records, but other action to facilitate matching will be taken under the 21st Century Cures Act. The Cures Act also creates the legal architecture to begin to combat "information blocking." Varying patient consent requirements under federal and state law are the most important remaining legal barrier to HIE progress. However, federal rules relating to disclosure of substance-abuse treatment information were recently liberalized, and development of a technical standard, Data Segmentation for Privacy, or DS4P, now permits sensitive data requiring special handling to be segmented within a patient's record. Even with these developments, state-law requirements for patient consent remain daunting to navigate.Although patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers' expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.CONCLUSIONSAlthough patient consent requirements make HIE challenging, providers' expressed worries about legal barriers to participating in HIE likely primarily reflect concerns that are economically motivated. Lowering the cost of HIE or increasing financial incentives may boost provider participation more than further reducing legal barriers.
Author SAVAGE, LUCIA
MELLO, MICHELLE M.
DING, KAREN L.
ADLER-MILSTEIN, JULIA
AuthorAffiliation 2 Stanford University School of Medicine
3 University of California, San Francisco
4 Omada Health
1 Stanford Law School
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 University of California, San Francisco
– name: 2 Stanford University School of Medicine
– name: 4 Omada Health
– name: 1 Stanford Law School
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: MICHELLE M.
  surname: MELLO
  fullname: MELLO, MICHELLE M.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: JULIA
  surname: ADLER-MILSTEIN
  fullname: ADLER-MILSTEIN, JULIA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: KAREN L.
  surname: DING
  fullname: DING, KAREN L.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: LUCIA
  surname: SAVAGE
  fullname: SAVAGE, LUCIA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29504197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUc1uEzEYtFARTQtnTqCVuHDZ1l6v194LiFaljRTEj0DiZnnXnxNHjl3sXUpvPARPyJPgJE2BSghfbH2eGc03c4D2fPCA0GOCj0g-x6RuRIkxbo9IRQm9hya3kz00wULwknLxeR8dpLTMU0ypeID2q5bhmrR8gj7MYK5ccaJitBBTMYRiWEBxHsPVsCiCKS5AufyaehPiSg02-OLsW79Qfg4_v_84CaPTa16IxTvoOgfp5UN03yiX4NHNfYg-vT77eHpRzt6eT09fzcq-xoyWjGisjdB1BUJ3rDW1rjHnfUc1MWA60tUNkJZgVYnWYIMZVqJXjdHAOGWGHqIXW93LsVuB7sEPUTl5Ge1KxWsZlJV__3i7kPPwVTJBWcNFFnh-IxDDlxHSIFc29eCc8hDGJCtMsKhzaDxDn92BLsMYfV5vg6o4bRuSUU__dHRrZRd3BrAtoI8hpQhG9nbYhJoNWicJluta5bpEuS5RbmrNvOM7vJ30vxnNlnFlHVz_Dy7fTGfvd8QnW-IyDSH-XqHJkTWC0V-81r0W
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11690_w
crossref_primary_10_1188_22_CJON_308_312
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocab024
crossref_primary_10_2196_13306
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_japh_2022_11_005
crossref_primary_10_1590_1413_81232021266_39662020
crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2024_1332707
crossref_primary_10_14236_jhi_v25i4_1068
crossref_primary_10_2196_10654
crossref_primary_10_2105_AJPH_2023_307477
crossref_primary_10_2196_13665
crossref_primary_10_1126_science_abb9045
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techsoc_2022_102007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infoandorg_2023_100455
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_023_01907_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hfh_2024_100073
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2023_105156
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000004945
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2021_104418
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jemermed_2019_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_10598405251319770
crossref_primary_10_2196_19818
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2352_3018_19_30334_0
crossref_primary_10_2196_40959
crossref_primary_10_1108_DPRG_07_2023_0105
crossref_primary_10_1177_0098858820919552
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3777417
crossref_primary_10_1177_1049732320921143
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0040_1721784
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10729_023_09640_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2024_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2020_107992
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedhc_2021_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocy058
crossref_primary_10_1177_0033354918791544
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2021_4054
crossref_primary_10_2196_24109
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocaa039
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13132_024_02017_5
Cites_doi 10.1111/1468-0009.12247
10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006
10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.450
10.1056/NEJMp1703370
10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000432
10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0124
10.1002/lrh2.10021
10.1136/jamia.2010.003673
10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.w60
10.12788/jhm.2704
10.1023/A:1015044207315
10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090192
10.1007/s11414-015-9458-7
10.1287/mnsc.1090.1014
10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.428
10.1287/isre.2017.0745
10.1007/s11606-006-0275-9
10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568
10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1439
10.1287/mnsc.2015.2194
10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.483
10.1093/jamia/ocw063
10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01120.x
10.1056/NEJMp1709851
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund
2018 Milbank Memorial Fund.
Copyright © 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund
– notice: 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund.
– notice: Copyright © 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
7TQ
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/1468-0009.12313
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
PAIS Index
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
PAIS International (Ovid)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
PAIS International
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
Social Welfare & Social Work
Social Sciences (General)
Political Science
Economics
Law
DocumentTitleAlternate M.M. Mello et al
EISSN 1468-0009
EndPage 143
ExternalDocumentID PMC5835678
29504197
10_1111_1468_0009_12313
MILQ12313
26567685
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Stanford University's Cybersecurity Initiative
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
..I
.3N
.4L
.CB
.GA
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OC
29M
33P
36B
4.4
44B
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
8VB
930
A01
A04
AAAZS
AABCJ
AABNI
AAESR
AAFWJ
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKDD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AAONW
AAOUF
AARRQ
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABAWQ
ABBHK
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLWH
ABMXE
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABPVW
ABQIJ
ABQWH
ABSOO
ABXGK
ABXSQ
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACHJO
ACHQT
ACMXC
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADEPB
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADNFJ
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEMOZ
AENEX
AEUPB
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AHBTC
AHMBA
AHQJS
AIACR
AIAGR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIURR
AKVCP
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
AOIJS
ASTYK
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-C
D-D
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSSH
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBA
EBC
EBD
EBE
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
EHE
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPS
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F5P
FAC
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
G50
GENNL
GODZA
GX1
HGLYW
HYE
HZI
HZ~
IPSME
IX1
J0M
JAAYA
JAV
JBMMH
JBZCM
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JPL
JST
K1G
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSSH
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NF~
O66
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2Y
P2Z
P4B
P4C
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QWB
R.K
RIG
ROL
RPM
RWL
RX1
RXW
SA0
SJN
SUPJJ
SV3
TAE
TEORI
TH9
TN5
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIH
WII
WIJ
WOHZO
WOW
WQZ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XSW
YFH
YQT
ZL0
ZUP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WP
.GJ
.Y3
31~
AAHHS
AANHP
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADIYS
ADNMO
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFFNX
AFPWT
AFYRF
AIFKG
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJPNJ
AQSKT
ASPBG
AS~
AVWKF
AZFZN
BDRZF
BKOMP
CAG
COF
FAS
FEDTE
FJW
HGD
HVGLF
H~9
IHE
JSODD
MVM
WRC
XOL
YHZ
ZCG
ZGI
AAYXX
AGQPQ
CITATION
O8X
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
7TQ
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
K9.
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-51d0df8d42e8db59f4d4077cb3d1fefb1b46e1910a289f0f050a8ca6fde5735f3
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISSN 0887-378X
1468-0009
IngestDate Tue Nov 04 01:46:48 EST 2025
Sun Sep 28 02:27:47 EDT 2025
Mon Nov 10 07:01:44 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:20 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:23:04 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:38:23 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:22:21 EST 2025
Thu Jul 03 22:44:02 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords legal
health information exchange
health information technology
electronic health record
Language English
License 2018 Milbank Memorial Fund.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4053-51d0df8d42e8db59f4d4077cb3d1fefb1b46e1910a289f0f050a8ca6fde5735f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5835678
PMID 29504197
PQID 2010273961
PQPubID 41127
PageCount 34
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5835678
proquest_miscellaneous_2010840007
proquest_journals_2010273961
pubmed_primary_29504197
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_1468_0009_12313
crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_0009_12313
wiley_primary_10_1111_1468_0009_12313_MILQ12313
jstor_primary_26567685
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20180301
March 2018
2018-03-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 3
  year: 2018
  text: 20180301
  day: 1
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle The Milbank quarterly
PublicationTitleAlternate Milbank Q
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References 2017; 1
2012
2010; 19
2010
2010; 17
2002; 13
2017; 24
2008; 16
2009
2008
2007
1996
1974
2012; 19
2006
2002
2008; 4
2008; 1
2017; 377
2016; 35
2011; 154
2009; 28
2010; 23
2017; 95
2009; 55
2013; 32
2006; 21
2008; 27
2017; 12
2016; 43
1999; 34
2018
2017
2016; 62
2016
2015
2014
2011; 48
2013
2007; 26
2016; 22
e_1_2_9_75_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_52_1
e_1_2_9_50_1
e_1_2_9_73_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_56_1
Weiser SJ (e_1_2_9_8_1) 2010; 19
e_1_2_9_54_1
McCarthy DB (e_1_2_9_61_1) 1999; 34
Dimitropoulos LL (e_1_2_9_12_1) 2007
Dimitropoulos L (e_1_2_9_11_1) 2009; 28
Schmit CD (e_1_2_9_46_1) 2017
e_1_2_9_71_1
Holmgren AJ (e_1_2_9_29_1) 2016; 22
Downing NL (e_1_2_9_41_1) 2017; 24
Christiansen J. (e_1_2_9_7_1) 2008; 1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
Adjerid I (e_1_2_9_79_1) 2018
e_1_2_9_64_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_62_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_68_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_66_1
Hoyt RE (e_1_2_9_60_1) 2014
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_48_1) 2017
Thaler RH (e_1_2_9_57_1) 2008
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_27_1) 2015
Markle Foundation (e_1_2_9_34_1) 2006
Bipartisan Policy Center (e_1_2_9_69_1) 2012
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and Office for Civil Rights (e_1_2_9_43_1) 2016
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_30_1) 2014
Mathematica Policy Research and Harvard School of Public Health (e_1_2_9_37_1) 2015
e_1_2_9_53_1
e_1_2_9_74_1
e_1_2_9_72_1
Adler‐Milstein J. (e_1_2_9_76_1) 2017
e_1_2_9_55_1
Greenberg MD (e_1_2_9_70_1) 2008; 4
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_59_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_63_1
e_1_2_9_40_1
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_45_1) 2015
Lewis MT (e_1_2_9_58_1) 2015
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_44_1
President's Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis (e_1_2_9_67_1) 2017
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_26_1) 2013
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_33_1) 2013
Simon SR (e_1_2_9_78_1) 2008; 16
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and Office for Civil Rights (e_1_2_9_42_1) 2016
Doebbeling BN (e_1_2_9_77_1) 2006; 21
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (e_1_2_9_28_1) 2016
Rothenberg LS (e_1_2_9_51_1) 2016; 43
e_1_2_9_9_1
Pritts J (e_1_2_9_47_1) 2009
e_1_2_9_25_1
Greenberg MD (e_1_2_9_13_1) 2009; 28
Wattenberg SA (e_1_2_9_65_1) 2010
Dullabh P (e_1_2_9_32_1) 2016
Johnson KB (e_1_2_9_49_1) 2016
References_xml – year: 2009
– volume: 34
  start-page: 417
  issue: 1 Pt 2
  year: 1999
  end-page: 425
  article-title: Medical records and privacy: empirical effects of legislation
  publication-title: Health Serv Res
– volume: 28
  start-page: 428
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 434
  article-title: A state‐based approach to privacy and security for interoperable health information exchange
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– volume: 22
  start-page: e395
  issue: 12
  year: 2016
  end-page: e402
  article-title: US hospital engagement in core domains of interoperability
  publication-title: Am J Manag Care
– year: 2017
  article-title: Moving past the EHR interoperability blame game
  publication-title: NEJM Catalyst
– volume: 377
  start-page: 907
  issue: 10
  year: 2017
  end-page: 909
  article-title: The HITECH era in retrospect
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 48
  start-page: 503
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 595
  article-title: A proposed national health information network architecture and complementary federal preemption of state health information privacy laws
  publication-title: Am Bus Law J
– volume: 17
  start-page: 288
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  end-page: 294
  article-title: Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assn
– year: 2017
  publication-title: Interim Report
– year: 2014
– start-page: 114
  year: 2016
  end-page: 255
– year: 2018
  article-title: Reducing Medicare spending through electronic health information exchange: the role of incentives and exchange maturity
  publication-title: Info Syst Res
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 49
  article-title: Legal speed bumps on the road to health information exchange
  publication-title: J Health Life Sci Law
– year: 2017
  article-title: Falling short: how state laws can address health information exchange barriers and enablers
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
– volume: 377
  start-page: 904
  issue: 10
  year: 2017
  end-page: 906
  article-title: The HITECH Era and the path forward
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 19
  start-page: 205
  year: 2010
  end-page: 211
  article-title: Breaking down the federal and state barriers preventing the implementation of accurate, reliable and cost effective electronic health records
  publication-title: Ann Health Law
– volume: 24
  start-page: 113
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 122
  article-title: Health information exchange policies of 11 diverse health systems and the associated impact on volume of exchange
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
– year: 2008
– volume: 27
  start-page: w60
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: w69
  article-title: The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– volume: 19
  start-page: 392
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 400
  article-title: Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
– volume: 43
  start-page: 319
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 329
  article-title: Possible legal barriers for PCP access to mental health treatment records
  publication-title: J Behav Health Serv Res
– volume: 12
  start-page: 193
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  end-page: 198
  article-title: Health information exchange in US hospitals: the current landscape and a path to improved information sharing
  publication-title: J Hosp Med
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1278
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1285
  article-title: The number of health information exchange efforts is declining, leaving the viability of broad clinical data exchange uncertain
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– volume: 154
  start-page: 666
  issue: 10
  year: 2011
  end-page: 671
  article-title: A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– year: 2015
– volume: 21
  start-page: S50
  issue: Suppl 2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 57
  article-title: Priorities and strategies for the implementation of integrated informatics and communications technology to improve evidence‐based practice
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
– volume: 16
  start-page: 129
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 137
  article-title: Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts
  publication-title: Inform Prim Care
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1042
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1063
  article-title: The impact of privacy regulation and technology incentives: the case of health information exchanges
  publication-title: Manage Sci
– volume: 28
  start-page: 483
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 492
  article-title: US regional health information organizations: progress and challenges
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– year: 2007
– year: 2015
  publication-title: Health Information Exchange Statewide Environmental Scan Findings
– year: 1996
– volume: 13
  start-page: 5
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Defaults, framing and privacy: why opting in‐opting out
  publication-title: Marketing Letters
– volume: 4
  start-page: 31
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 68
  article-title: Patient identifiers and the National Health Information Network: debunking a false front in the privacy wars
  publication-title: J Health & Biomed Law
– volume: 1
  start-page: e10021
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  article-title: The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor‐mediated health information exchange
  publication-title: Learning Health Sys
– year: 2016
– year: 2010
– volume: 95
  start-page: 117
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 135
  article-title: Information blocking: is it occurring and what policy strategies can address it
  publication-title: Milbank Q
– year: 2012
– volume: 28
  start-page: 450
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 452
  article-title: Crossed wires: how yesterday's privacy rules might undercut tomorrow's nationwide health information network
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– volume: 26
  start-page: w568
  issue: 5
  year: 2007
  end-page: w580
  article-title: The Santa Barbara County care data exchange: what happened?
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– volume: 23
  start-page: 655
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  end-page: 670
  article-title: Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices
  publication-title: J Am Board Fam Med
– year: 2002
– year: 2006
– year: 1974
– volume: 55
  start-page: 1077
  issue: 7
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1093
  article-title: Privacy protection and technology diffusion: the case of electronic medical records
  publication-title: Manage Sci
– year: 2017
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1486
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1492
  article-title: Operational health information exchanges show substantial growth, but long‐term funding remains a concern
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
– year: 2013
– volume-title: Privacy and Security Solutions for Interoperable Health Information Exchange: Report on State Law Requirements for Patient Permission to Disclose Health Information
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_9_47_1
– volume-title: Health information security & privacy collaboration (HISPC)
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
– volume-title: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_9_57_1
– volume-title: Connecting Health and Care For the Nation: A Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_71_1
  doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12247
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006
– volume-title: Privacy and Security Solutions for Interoperable Health Information Exchange: Nationwide Summary
  year: 2007
  ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_73_1
– volume-title: Frequently asked questions: applying the substance abuse confidentiality regulations to health information exchange (HIE)
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_9_65_1
– volume: 34
  start-page: 417
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_9_61_1
  article-title: Medical records and privacy: empirical effects of legislation
  publication-title: Health Serv Res
– volume: 28
  start-page: 450
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  article-title: Crossed wires: how yesterday's privacy rules might undercut tomorrow's nationwide health information network
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.450
– volume-title: Permitted uses and disclosures: exchange for health care operations
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_43_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_44_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1703370
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000432
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0124
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10021
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.003673
– ident: e_1_2_9_74_1
– volume-title: Department of Health and Human Services
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
– year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_46_1
  article-title: Falling short: how state laws can address health information exchange barriers and enablers
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
– volume-title: Report to Congress: Report on Health Information Blocking
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_9_45_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_63_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_66_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_55_1
– volume-title: Permitted uses and disclosures: exchange for treatment
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_42_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.w60
– ident: e_1_2_9_52_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.12788/jhm.2704
– volume-title: Getting the Right Information to the Right Health Care Providers at the Right Time: A Road Map for States to Improve Health Information Flow Between Providers
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_49_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_68_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_56_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1015044207315
– volume-title: 2016 Report to Congress on Health IT Progress: Examining the HITECH Era and the Future of Health IT
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
– volume: 19
  start-page: 205
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  article-title: Breaking down the federal and state barriers preventing the implementation of accurate, reliable and cost effective electronic health records
  publication-title: Ann Health Law
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090192
– volume-title: Principles and Strategy for Accelerating Health Information Exchange (HIE)
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
– volume: 43
  start-page: 319
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_51_1
  article-title: Possible legal barriers for PCP access to mental health treatment records
  publication-title: J Behav Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1007/s11414-015-9458-7
– year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_9_58_1
  publication-title: Health Information Exchange Statewide Environmental Scan Findings
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1014
– volume-title: State‐by‐state HIE consent laws
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_48_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_59_1
– volume: 28
  start-page: 428
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  article-title: A state‐based approach to privacy and security for interoperable health information exchange
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.428
– volume-title: Challenges and strategies for accurately matching patients to their health data
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_9_69_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_62_1
– year: 2018
  ident: e_1_2_9_79_1
  article-title: Reducing Medicare spending through electronic health information exchange: the role of incentives and exchange maturity
  publication-title: Info Syst Res
  doi: 10.1287/isre.2017.0745
– volume: 16
  start-page: 129
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_9_78_1
  article-title: Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts
  publication-title: Inform Prim Care
– volume: 21
  start-page: S50
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_9_77_1
  article-title: Priorities and strategies for the implementation of integrated informatics and communications technology to improve evidence‐based practice
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0275-9
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568
– volume-title: Health Informatics: Practical Guide for Healthcare and Information Technology Professionals
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_9_60_1
– volume-title: Connecting for Health: a Public‐Private Collaborative Convened by the Markle Foundation: Statement of Purpose
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_54_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_75_1
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1439
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2194
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.483
– ident: e_1_2_9_40_1
– year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_76_1
  article-title: Moving past the EHR interoperability blame game
  publication-title: NEJM Catalyst
– volume-title: Evaluation of the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program: Final Report
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
– volume: 24
  start-page: 113
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_41_1
  article-title: Health information exchange policies of 11 diverse health systems and the associated impact on volume of exchange
  publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc
  doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw063
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01120.x
– volume: 22
  start-page: e395
  issue: 12
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  article-title: US hospital engagement in core domains of interoperability
  publication-title: Am J Manag Care
– year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_67_1
  publication-title: Interim Report
– volume: 4
  start-page: 31
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_9_70_1
  article-title: Patient identifiers and the National Health Information Network: debunking a false front in the privacy wars
  publication-title: J Health & Biomed Law
– ident: e_1_2_9_72_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
– volume-title: Health Information Technology in the United States, 2015: Transition to a Post‐HITECH World
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1709851
– ident: e_1_2_9_64_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_50_1
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  article-title: Legal speed bumps on the road to health information exchange
  publication-title: J Health Life Sci Law
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1439
– ident: e_1_2_9_53_1
SSID ssj0000338
Score 2.4638536
Snippet Context: Although the clinical benefits of exchanging patients' health information electronically across providers have long been recognized, participation in...
Policy Points: Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant...
Policy Points: Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant...
Policy Points:Historically, in addition to economic and technical hurdles, state and federal health information privacy laws have been cited as a significant...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
jstor
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 110
SubjectTerms 21st century
Accountability
Adoption of innovations
Archives & records
Barriers
Blocking
Breaches
Complaints
Computerized medical records
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Consent
Constraints
Data exchange
Disclosure
Drug abuse
Economics
electronic health record
Electronic health records
Electronic Health Records - legislation & jurisprudence
Electronic medical records
Federal Government
Financial incentives
Government Regulation
Health care industry
Health care policy
Health information
health information exchange
Health Information Exchange - legislation & jurisprudence
Health Information Interoperability - legislation & jurisprudence
health information technology
Health insurance
Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act 1996-US
Health records
Health services
Humans
Incentives
Information dissemination
Information sharing
Informed consent
Law
legal
Matching
Medical personnel
Medical records
Medical treatment
Original Scholarship
Participation
Patient Identification Systems
Patients
Privacy
Privacy - legislation & jurisprudence
Regulation
Risk assessment
Segmentation
State Government
Statutes
Substance abuse
Substance abuse treatment
United States
Title Legal Barriers to the Growth of Health Information Exchange—Boulders or Pebbles?
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/26567685
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1468-0009.12313
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29504197
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2010273961
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2010840007
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5835678
Volume 96
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1468-0009
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000338
  issn: 0887-378X
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1ba9RAFD7o1geh1Lpaja5lBJH6kJrbJJMn8dJVYS21WNy3kMyFli6JJNvqoz_CX-gv8cwladcLIvgWcs4kTOacM9-ZnAvAozLmMc8y7qeyEn4iMq1SjOOClCHHLSULBDPNJrL9fTaf5wcumlDnwtj6EMOBm9YMY6-1gpdVd0nJTc6Qhgi7aHx139q1CKWXjmDt1eH0aHZhjmPTztppE5u7-j46nOenR6xsTTY68Xe489fwycuw1uxL0xv_YUabsOFAKXlupegmXJH1GDZdaBwSnAEYw7o95SM2eWkMns3u7Rk6suPKWD8Zw8TRPsqFKltJHpP-RtOe3oLDmcTNibwoW90zryPLhiAWJa_b5vPymDTKvYO4fCktP2Tvi81T_v71m-6HrWOwSdOSA1lVC9k9uw1H070PL9_4rsGDzxEnxj4NRSAUE0kkmahorhKB_mXGq1iESqoqrJJUokMZlOgWqkAFNCgZL1MlJM1iquItGNVNLe8CSXXlszgJEN1VicwFSwMRoXcby0ixMOQe7PZrW3BX_Vw34VgUvRekv77-FZ8X5ut7sDMM-GQLf_yZdcsIy8AXIUhGN456MOmlp3CmoSt0-AFixjwNPXg4kFGp9Z-aspbNmeVBzxvxmwd3rLBdPDynQRLmSMlWxHBg0AXDVyn1ybEpHE4RbiM48eCpEcO_zat493b23lzd--cR9-E6ToLZaL0JjJbtmXwA1_j58qRrt-FqNmfbTlN_AD38N9o
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1ba9RAFD5IKyiI1tXatKuOIFIfUpPNbfIkXrq2mC5aWty3kMyFli6JJNvqY3-Ev9Bf4plL0l0viOBbyDmTMJlzznxnci4AT4uABSxJmBuLkrshT5RKUYYLUvgMt5TE41Q3m0gmEzqdpou5MKY-RH_gpjRD22ul4OpAekHLddKQwgg7aH1V49rVEIUJpXz17eH4OLuyx4HuZ23ViU5tgR8Vz_PTI5b2JhOe-Dvg-Wv85CKu1RvT-M7_mNIa3LawlLwycnQXrolqAGs2OA4J1gQM4JY55yMmfWkAjsnv7Rhasm0LWT8fwNDSPomZLBpBnpHuRt2c3YPDTOD2RF4Xjeqa15J5TRCNkndN_WV-Qmpp30FsxpSSILL71WQqf7_8pjpiqyhsUjfkgyjLmWhf3ofj8e7Rmz3XtnhwGSLFwI187nFJeTgSlJdRKkOOHmbCyoD7UsjSL8NYoEvpFegYSk96kVdQVsSSiygJIhmsw0pVV2IDSKxqnwWhh_iuDEXKaezxEfq3gRhJ6vvMgZ1ucXNm65-rNhyzvPOD1NdXP-PTXH99B7b7AZ9N6Y8_s65raen5RgiT0ZGLHBh24pNb49DmKgABUWMa-w486cmo1upfTVGJ-tzwoO-NCM6BB0barh6eRl7op0hJluSwZ1Alw5cp1emJLh0eIeBGeOLACy2Hf5tXfrCffdRXm_884jHc2Ds6yPJsf_J-C27ihKiJ3RvCyrw5Fw_hOruYn7bNI6uwPwCWozri
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1ba9RAFD7IVkQQravV6KojiNSH1MnmNnkStV0trkstFvctJHOhxSUpyVZ99Ef4C_0lnrkk3fWCCL6FnDMJkznnzHcm5wLwqAh5yNOU-4kshR-JVKsU47ggRcBxS0mpYKbZRDqbsfk8W82FsfUh-gM3rRnGXmsFl6dCrWi5SRrSGGEHra9uXLsR6VYyA9jYPZwcTc_tcWj6WTt1YnNX4EfH8_z0iLW9yYYn_g54_ho_uYprzcY0ufY_prQJVx0sJc-tHF2HC7IawqYLjkOCMwFDuGLP-YhNXxqCZ_N7O4aWbLtC1k-GMHK0D3KhikaSx6S7UTcfb8DhVOL2RF4Uje6a15JlTRCNkldN_Xl5TGrl3kFcxpSWILL3xWYqf__6TXfE1lHYpG7IgSzLhWyf3YSjyd77l6991-LB54gUQz8OBBWKiWgsmSjjTEUCPcyUl6EIlFRlUEaJRJeSFugYKqpoTAvGi0QJGadhrMItGFR1JW8DSXTtszCiiO_KSGaCJVSM0b8N5VixIOAe7HSLm3NX_1y34VjknR-kv77-GZ_l5ut7sN0POLWlP_7MumWkpecbI0xGRy72YNSJT-6MQ5vrAAREjVkSePCwJ6Na6381RSXrM8uDvjciOA9uWWk7f3gW0yjIkJKuyWHPoEuGr1Oqk2NTOjxGwI3wxIOnRg7_Nq_87f70nbm6888jHsClg91JPt2fvbkLl3E-zIbujWCwbM7kPbjIPy1P2ua-09cfyMg6XQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legal+Barriers+to+the+Growth+of+Health+Information+Exchange%E2%80%94Boulders+or+Pebbles%3F&rft.jtitle=The+Milbank+quarterly&rft.au=MELLO%2C+MICHELLE+M.&rft.au=ADLER-MILSTEIN%2C+JULIA&rft.au=DING%2C+KAREN+L.&rft.au=SAVAGE%2C+LUCIA&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0887-378X&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1468-0009.12313&rft.externalDocID=26567685
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0887-378X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0887-378X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0887-378X&client=summon