Re-audit of radiotherapy waiting times 2003

There has been increasing concern, by clinical oncologists in the UK, about the continuing long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment. An audit of patients starting treatment in 1 week in 2003 was carried out to determine waiting times and to compare current results with those obtained from a sim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) Jg. 16; H. 6; S. 387 - 394
Hauptverfasser: Ash, D., Barrett, A., Hinks, A., Squire, C.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2004
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0936-6555, 1433-2981
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract There has been increasing concern, by clinical oncologists in the UK, about the continuing long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment. An audit of patients starting treatment in 1 week in 2003 was carried out to determine waiting times and to compare current results with those obtained from a similar audit in 1998. All centres in the UK completed the audit, which recorded waiting-list status and treatment intent for all new treatments started in 1 week, date of booking form completion and fractionation scheme used. Waiting times have lengthened in most centres for all categories of patients although, for palliative treatments, there was no additional increase in median waiting time compared with the last audit. Fewer patients in all categories are being treated within the Joint Collegiate Council for Oncology (JCCO) guidelines. Single-fraction treatments are now common for palliation. Most adjuvant treatment uses one of three prescriptions. In each Strategic Health Authority (StHA), the same proportion of the total number of patients with cancer seemed to be given radiotherapy. There was no obvious simple correlation of radiographer, physicist or treatment machine numbers with waiting times. The results of this survey suggest a continuing mismatch between capacity and demand. Increased complexity of radical treatments, and possibly more patients being referred for treatment, may have been offset in part by reduced fractionation for palliation.
AbstractList There has been increasing concern, by clinical oncologists in the UK, about the continuing long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment. An audit of patients starting treatment in 1 week in 2003 was carried out to determine waiting times and to compare current results with those obtained from a similar audit in 1998. All centres in the UK completed the audit, which recorded waiting-list status and treatment intent for all new treatments started in 1 week, date of booking form completion and fractionation scheme used. Waiting times have lengthened in most centres for all categories of patients although, for palliative treatments, there was no additional increase in median waiting time compared with the last audit. Fewer patients in all categories are being treated within the Joint Collegiate Council for Oncology (JCCO) guidelines. Single-fraction treatments are now common for palliation. Most adjuvant treatment uses one of three prescriptions. In each Strategic Health Authority (StHA), the same proportion of the total number of patients with cancer seemed to be given radiotherapy. There was no obvious simple correlation of radiographer, physicist or treatment machine numbers with waiting times. The results of this survey suggest a continuing mismatch between capacity and demand. Increased complexity of radical treatments, and possibly more patients being referred for treatment, may have been offset in part by reduced fractionation for palliation.
There has been increasing concern, by clinical oncologists in the UK, about the continuing long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment. An audit of patients starting treatment in 1 week in 2003 was carried out to determine waiting times and to compare current results with those obtained from a similar audit in 1998.AIMSThere has been increasing concern, by clinical oncologists in the UK, about the continuing long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment. An audit of patients starting treatment in 1 week in 2003 was carried out to determine waiting times and to compare current results with those obtained from a similar audit in 1998.All centres in the UK completed the audit, which recorded waiting-list status and treatment intent for all new treatments started in 1 week, date of booking form completion and fractionation scheme used.MATERIALS AND METHODSAll centres in the UK completed the audit, which recorded waiting-list status and treatment intent for all new treatments started in 1 week, date of booking form completion and fractionation scheme used.Waiting times have lengthened in most centres for all categories of patients although, for palliative treatments, there was no additional increase in median waiting time compared with the last audit. Fewer patients in all categories are being treated within the Joint Collegiate Council for Oncology (JCCO) guidelines. Single-fraction treatments are now common for palliation. Most adjuvant treatment uses one of three prescriptions. In each Strategic Health Authority (StHA), the same proportion of the total number of patients with cancer seemed to be given radiotherapy. There was no obvious simple correlation of radiographer, physicist or treatment machine numbers with waiting times.RESULTSWaiting times have lengthened in most centres for all categories of patients although, for palliative treatments, there was no additional increase in median waiting time compared with the last audit. Fewer patients in all categories are being treated within the Joint Collegiate Council for Oncology (JCCO) guidelines. Single-fraction treatments are now common for palliation. Most adjuvant treatment uses one of three prescriptions. In each Strategic Health Authority (StHA), the same proportion of the total number of patients with cancer seemed to be given radiotherapy. There was no obvious simple correlation of radiographer, physicist or treatment machine numbers with waiting times.The results of this survey suggest a continuing mismatch between capacity and demand. Increased complexity of radical treatments, and possibly more patients being referred for treatment, may have been offset in part by reduced fractionation for palliation.CONCLUSIONThe results of this survey suggest a continuing mismatch between capacity and demand. Increased complexity of radical treatments, and possibly more patients being referred for treatment, may have been offset in part by reduced fractionation for palliation.
Author Hinks, A.
Ash, D.
Squire, C.
Barrett, A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: D.
  surname: Ash
  fullname: Ash, D.
  organization: Department of Oncology, Cookridge Hospital, Leeds, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A.
  surname: Barrett
  fullname: Barrett, A.
  email: ann.barrett@uea.ac.uk
  organization: School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: A.
  surname: Hinks
  fullname: Hinks, A.
  organization: PO Box 2376, Stafford ST17 0YQ, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: C.
  surname: Squire
  fullname: Squire, C.
  organization: Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15487130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOl5ewIV05UZaT5o2TcSNDN5AEETXIZOcasZOMyYZZd7eDqMuXOjqcOD_zuXbJZu975GQQwoFBcpPp4XpfF-UAFUBvADgG2REK8byUgq6SUYgGc95Xdc7ZDfGKQCUQshtskPrSjSUwYicPGCuF9alzLdZ0Nb59IJBz5fZh3bJ9c9ZcjOM2bCE7ZOtVncRD77qHnm6unwc3-R399e344u73FTAUj6phAGpeVVJKUU5dCgmtKqNFcy2iCiFsRZqIQRHLqRsjGxY2zJthvuYYHvkeD13HvzbAmNSMxcNdp3u0S-i4lw2Td00Q_DoK7iYzNCqeXAzHZbq-70hINYBE3yMAVtlXNLJ-T4F7TpFQa1MqqlamVQrkwq4GkwOaPkL_Zn-F3S-hnDQ8-4wqGgc9gatC2iSst79jZ_9wk3nemd094rL_-BPDbWdoQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_dji166
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bjc_6602463
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11864_018_0534_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2005_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radi_2011_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2011_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2012_06_046
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2013_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00761_007_1212_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2009_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1186_1748_717X_5_121
crossref_primary_10_1080_02841860802266680
crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_12_4013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2008_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2407_7_71
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1460396907005079
crossref_primary_10_1038_sj_bjc_6604571
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2007_05_022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2007_11_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2012_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_29536247
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_70461912
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2005_11_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2010_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2005_10_006
Cites_doi 10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74
10.1097/01.MLR.0000083742.29541.BC
10.1016/S0936-6555(96)80041-0
10.1016/S0936-6555(03)00065-7
10.1007/s001740050046
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02606-2
10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00036-7
10.1053/clon.2000.9139
10.1053/clon.2002.0178
10.1016/S0360-3016(98)80498-7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2004 The Royal College of Radiologists
Copyright_xml – notice: 2004 The Royal College of Radiologists
CorporateAuthor On behalf of the Royal College of Radiologists
Royal College of Radiologists
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: On behalf of the Royal College of Radiologists
– name: Royal College of Radiologists
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1433-2981
EndPage 394
ExternalDocumentID 15487130
10_1016_j_clon_2004_06_006
S0936655504002213
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29B
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFGL
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DM4
DU5
EBS
EFBJH
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HED
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LAS
M27
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OC~
OO-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SDH
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UDS
UHS
WOW
WUQ
Z5R
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
LCYCR
RIG
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-b48c09a6449998248ce8b145cd83dfeee98cdd058886e68997c973ff3ac028383
ISICitedReferencesCount 33
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000223887500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0936-6555
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 14:46:37 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:42:43 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 20:27:39 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:06:52 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:30:39 EST 2024
Tue Oct 14 19:35:57 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords capacity and demand
Radiotherapy
waiting times
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c403t-b48c09a6449998248ce8b145cd83dfeee98cdd058886e68997c973ff3ac028383
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 15487130
PQID 66977577
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_66977577
pubmed_primary_15487130
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_clon_2004_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clon_2004_06_006
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clon_2004_06_006
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clon_2004_06_006
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2004-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2004-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2004
  text: 2004-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
PublicationYear 2004
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Royal College of Radiologists (BIB5) 2002
Macbeth, Bolger, Hopwood (BIB8) 1996; 8
O'Rourke, Edwards (BIB16) 2000; 12
Royal College of Radiologists (BIB2) 1998
(BIB4) 2002
Barbera, Zhang-Salomons, Huang (BIB10) 2003; 41
Fortin, Bairati, Albert (BIB18) 2002; 52
Hoskin, Yarnold, Roos (BIB7) 2001; 13
NHS Modernisation Agency (BIB13) 2003
Pollack, Hanlon, Horwitz (BIB9) 2004; 171
Start trial management group (BIB6) 1999; 11
Thomas (BIB11) 2003; 5
O'Sullivan, Mackillop, Grice (BIB17) 1998; 42
Waaijer, Terhaard, Dehnad (BIB19) 2003; 66
Joint Council for Clinical Oncology (BIB1) 1993
Department of Health (BIB3) 2000
Moore (BIB14) May 2004
Coles, Burgess, Tan (BIB15) 2003; 15
Thomas, Williams, Burnett (BIB12) 2001; 13
Start trial management group (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB6) 1999; 11
Royal College of Radiologists (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB2) 1998
Fortin (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB18) 2002; 52
Waaijer (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB19) 2003; 66
O'Sullivan (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB17) 1998; 42
Thomas (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB11) 2003; 5
Royal College of Radiologists (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB5) 2002
Department of Health (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB3) 2000
Thomas (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB12) 2001; 13
Pollack (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB9) 2004; 171
O'Rourke (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB16) 2000; 12
Joint Council for Clinical Oncology (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB1) 1993
Macbeth (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB8) 1996; 8
Hoskin (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB7) 2001; 13
NHS Modernisation Agency (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB13) 2003
(10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB4) 2002
Barbera (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB10) 2003; 41
Coles (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB15) 2003; 15
Moore (10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB14) 2004
References_xml – volume: 13
  start-page: 88
  year: 2001
  end-page: 90
  ident: BIB7
  article-title: Second workshop on radiotherapy and symptom control. Radiotherapy for bone metastases
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– year: 2000
  ident: BIB3
  article-title: NHS cancer plan
– volume: 13
  start-page: 23
  year: 2001
  end-page: 28
  ident: BIB12
  article-title: How much surplus capacity is required to maintain low waiting times?
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– volume: 52
  start-page: 929
  year: 2002
  end-page: 936
  ident: BIB18
  article-title: Effect of treatment delay on outcome of patients with early stage head and neck carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 8
  start-page: 167
  year: 1996
  end-page: 175
  ident: BIB8
  article-title: Randomized trial of palliative two-fraction versus more intensive 13-fraction radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and good performance status. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1074
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1085
  ident: BIB10
  article-title: Defining the need for radiotherapy for lung cancer in the general population: a criterion-based, benchmarking approach
  publication-title: Med Care
– volume: 5
  start-page: 353
  year: 2003
  end-page: 358
  ident: BIB11
  article-title: Capacity and demand models for radiotherapy treatment machines
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– year: 2003
  ident: BIB13
  article-title: Radiotherapy toolkit
– volume: 66
  start-page: 271
  year: 2003
  end-page: 276
  ident: BIB19
  article-title: Waiting times for radiotherapy: consequences of volume increase for the TCP in oropharyngeal carcinoma
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
– year: 1998
  ident: BIB2
  article-title: A national audit of waiting times for radiotherapy
– year: 2002
  ident: BIB4
  article-title: A survey of radiotherapy services in the UK
– year: 1993
  ident: BIB1
  article-title: Reducing delays in cancer treatment: some targets
– volume: 15
  start-page: 47
  year: 2003
  end-page: 54
  ident: BIB15
  article-title: An audit of delays before and during radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer: effect on tumour cure probability
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– volume: 42
  start-page: 323
  year: 1998
  ident: BIB17
  article-title: The influence of delay in the initiation of definitive radiotherapy in carcinoma of the tonsillar region
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 11
  start-page: 145
  year: 1999
  end-page: 147
  ident: BIB6
  article-title: Standardization of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trial
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– volume: 171
  start-page: 1132
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1136
  ident: BIB9
  article-title: Prostate cancer radiotherapy dose response: an update of the Fox Chase experience
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 141
  year: 2000
  end-page: 144
  ident: BIB16
  article-title: Lung cancer treatment waiting times and tumour growth
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– year: 2002
  ident: BIB5
  article-title: Equipment, workload and staffing for Radiotherapy in the UK, 1997–2002
– year: May 2004
  ident: BIB14
  article-title: Living with cancer: waiting for treatment, a report by CancerBACUP
– year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB1
– volume: 171
  start-page: 1132
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB9
  article-title: Prostate cancer radiotherapy dose response: an update of the Fox Chase experience
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74
– volume: 13
  start-page: 88
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB7
  article-title: Second workshop on radiotherapy and symptom control. Radiotherapy for bone metastases
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1074
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB10
  article-title: Defining the need for radiotherapy for lung cancer in the general population: a criterion-based, benchmarking approach
  publication-title: Med Care
  doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083742.29541.BC
– volume: 8
  start-page: 167
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB8
  article-title: Randomized trial of palliative two-fraction versus more intensive 13-fraction radiotherapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and good performance status. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S0936-6555(96)80041-0
– year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB5
– volume: 5
  start-page: 353
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB11
  article-title: Capacity and demand models for radiotherapy treatment machines
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S0936-6555(03)00065-7
– volume: 11
  start-page: 145
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB6
  article-title: Standardization of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trial
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1007/s001740050046
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB13
– volume: 52
  start-page: 929
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB18
  article-title: Effect of treatment delay on outcome of patients with early stage head and neck carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02606-2
– year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB3
– year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB4
– volume: 66
  start-page: 271
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB19
  article-title: Waiting times for radiotherapy: consequences of volume increase for the TCP in oropharyngeal carcinoma
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00036-7
– volume: 12
  start-page: 141
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB16
  article-title: Lung cancer treatment waiting times and tumour growth
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1053/clon.2000.9139
– volume: 15
  start-page: 47
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB15
  article-title: An audit of delays before and during radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer: effect on tumour cure probability
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1053/clon.2002.0178
– year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB14
– year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB2
– volume: 42
  start-page: 323
  issue: suppl
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB17
  article-title: The influence of delay in the initiation of definitive radiotherapy in carcinoma of the tonsillar region
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)80498-7
– volume: 13
  start-page: 23
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006_BIB12
  article-title: How much surplus capacity is required to maintain low waiting times?
  publication-title: Clin Oncol
SSID ssj0002889
Score 1.8431417
Snippet There has been increasing concern, by clinical oncologists in the UK, about the continuing long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment. An audit of patients...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 387
SubjectTerms capacity and demand
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Humans
Management Audit - organization & administration
Management Audit - statistics & numerical data
Medical Audit
Patient Care - standards
Patient Care - statistics & numerical data
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy - standards
Radiotherapy - statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
United Kingdom
Waiting Lists
waiting times
Title Re-audit of radiotherapy waiting times 2003
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0936655504002213
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2004.06.006
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15487130
https://www.proquest.com/docview/66977577
Volume 16
WOSCitedRecordID wos000223887500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1433-2981
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002889
  issn: 0936-6555
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Za9wwEBZtUkpeSu9sj9QPfVu87FqyJD8u24S00FCSFPbNyLIMG4Kdrjdt-u87o8PrnD2gL2ZXWJbQjGe-Gc9ByHtKCyMm2NyFF1XMFDZyTziNM8OTTFWa6aywzSbEwYGcz7Mv3qfb2nYCoq7lxUV29l9JDWNAbEyd_Qtydw-FAfgNRIcrkB2uf0T4QxMrTLVAGLhU5cKnWP0c_lAL1xXCFmjCcLE-Mp2FFMmm1q4u003OhUN8oMsaam_yMPQdC6312HwYrZ2lXVTwtBvcxw_Il4eOvoXcs9noklOCdVFX3lMWsmXWoUnW5Uh5zFNXlreTvrzHZX1RSr0idlqZulbI1wS-8z2cjPRpY6vZMluNdXylurbV10e4Pi6PcitJsNXxZiLSDGTh5vTj7vxTp8ETKV2NRr9fn2zl4gKvrnQboLnNYLHA5fgxeeQtjmjqOOUJuWfqp-ThZx9T8YwMA8NETRX1GSbyDBNZhomQYZ6Tr3u7x7P92LfQiDUb01VcMKnHmQLQC4aATOCfkcWEYUUIWlbGmEzqshynUkpuONjeQmeCVhVVGoGnpC_IRt3UZptEXBS6MvBGg4nJhKwkBeRYpoUCgJgoVQ7IJJxDrn19eWxzcpqHQMKTHM8OG5-y3EZT8gEZdnPOXHWVO--m4XjzkDcMmi4HXrhzVtrN8qjSocXfznsXKJiDyMXvaKo2zXmbcw5GUyrEgLx0hF3vHe1_QIWv_mmnr8nW-l16QzZWy3PzljzQ31eLdrlD7ou53PGs-gs7Jqk9
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-audit+of+radiotherapy+waiting+times+2003&rft.jtitle=Clinical+oncology+%28Royal+College+of+Radiologists+%28Great+Britain%29%29&rft.au=Ash%2C+D.&rft.au=Barrett%2C+A.&rft.au=Hinks%2C+A.&rft.au=Squire%2C+C.&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0936-6555&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clon.2004.06.006&rft.externalDocID=S0936655504002213
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0936-6555&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0936-6555&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0936-6555&client=summon