Error analysis of estimators that use combinations of stochastic sampling strategies for direct illumination

We present a theoretical analysis of error of combinations of Monte Carlo estimators used in image synthesis. Importance sampling and multiple importance sampling are popular variance‐reduction strategies. Unfortunately, neither strategy improves the rate of convergence of Monte Carlo integration. J...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer graphics forum Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 93 - 102
Main Authors: Subr, Kartic, Nowrouzezahrai, Derek, Jarosz, Wojciech, Kautz, Jan, Mitchell, Kenny
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2014
Subjects:
ISSN:0167-7055, 1467-8659
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present a theoretical analysis of error of combinations of Monte Carlo estimators used in image synthesis. Importance sampling and multiple importance sampling are popular variance‐reduction strategies. Unfortunately, neither strategy improves the rate of convergence of Monte Carlo integration. Jittered sampling (a type of stratified sampling), on the other hand is known to improve the convergence rate. Most rendering software optimistically combine importance sampling with jittered sampling, hoping to achieve both. We derive the exact error of the combination of multiple importance sampling with jittered sampling. In addition, we demonstrate a further benefit of introducing negative correlations (antithetic sampling) between estimates to the convergence rate. As with importance sampling, antithetic sampling is known to reduce error for certain classes of integrands without affecting the convergence rate. In this paper, our analysis and experiments reveal that importance and antithetic sampling, if used judiciously and in conjunction with jittered sampling, may improve convergence rates. We show the impact of such combinations of strategies on the convergence rate of estimators for direct illumination.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-9GB6TNC2-P
ArticleID:CGF12416
istex:ED15226B180FB44C7791D91EC3A00426698015F7
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-7055
1467-8659
DOI:10.1111/cgf.12416