Physical principles for DNA tile self-assembly
DNA tiles provide a promising technique for assembling structures with nanoscale resolution through self-assembly by basic interactions rather than top-down assembly of individual structures. Tile systems can be programmed to grow based on logical rules, allowing for a small number of tile types to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical Society reviews Jg. 46; H. 12; S. 3808 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
England
19.06.2017
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1460-4744, 1460-4744 |
| Online-Zugang: | Weitere Angaben |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | DNA tiles provide a promising technique for assembling structures with nanoscale resolution through self-assembly by basic interactions rather than top-down assembly of individual structures. Tile systems can be programmed to grow based on logical rules, allowing for a small number of tile types to assemble large, complex assemblies that can retain nanoscale resolution. Such algorithmic systems can even assemble different structures using the same tiles, based on inputs that seed the growth. While programming and theoretical analysis of tile self-assembly often makes use of abstract logical models of growth, experimentally implemented systems are governed by nanoscale physical processes that can lead to very different behavior, more accurately modeled by taking into account the thermodynamics and kinetics of tile attachment and detachment in solution. This review discusses the relationships between more abstract and more physically realistic tile assembly models. A central concern is how consideration of model differences enables the design of tile systems that robustly exhibit the desired abstract behavior in realistic physical models and in experimental implementations. Conversely, we identify situations where self-assembly in abstract models can not be well-approximated by physically realistic models, putting constraints on physical relevance of the abstract models. To facilitate the discussion, we introduce a unified model of tile self-assembly that clarifies the relationships between several well-studied models in the literature. Throughout, we highlight open questions regarding the physical principles for DNA tile self-assembly. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | DNA tiles provide a promising technique for assembling structures with nanoscale resolution through self-assembly by basic interactions rather than top-down assembly of individual structures. Tile systems can be programmed to grow based on logical rules, allowing for a small number of tile types to assemble large, complex assemblies that can retain nanoscale resolution. Such algorithmic systems can even assemble different structures using the same tiles, based on inputs that seed the growth. While programming and theoretical analysis of tile self-assembly often makes use of abstract logical models of growth, experimentally implemented systems are governed by nanoscale physical processes that can lead to very different behavior, more accurately modeled by taking into account the thermodynamics and kinetics of tile attachment and detachment in solution. This review discusses the relationships between more abstract and more physically realistic tile assembly models. A central concern is how consideration of model differences enables the design of tile systems that robustly exhibit the desired abstract behavior in realistic physical models and in experimental implementations. Conversely, we identify situations where self-assembly in abstract models can not be well-approximated by physically realistic models, putting constraints on physical relevance of the abstract models. To facilitate the discussion, we introduce a unified model of tile self-assembly that clarifies the relationships between several well-studied models in the literature. Throughout, we highlight open questions regarding the physical principles for DNA tile self-assembly.DNA tiles provide a promising technique for assembling structures with nanoscale resolution through self-assembly by basic interactions rather than top-down assembly of individual structures. Tile systems can be programmed to grow based on logical rules, allowing for a small number of tile types to assemble large, complex assemblies that can retain nanoscale resolution. Such algorithmic systems can even assemble different structures using the same tiles, based on inputs that seed the growth. While programming and theoretical analysis of tile self-assembly often makes use of abstract logical models of growth, experimentally implemented systems are governed by nanoscale physical processes that can lead to very different behavior, more accurately modeled by taking into account the thermodynamics and kinetics of tile attachment and detachment in solution. This review discusses the relationships between more abstract and more physically realistic tile assembly models. A central concern is how consideration of model differences enables the design of tile systems that robustly exhibit the desired abstract behavior in realistic physical models and in experimental implementations. Conversely, we identify situations where self-assembly in abstract models can not be well-approximated by physically realistic models, putting constraints on physical relevance of the abstract models. To facilitate the discussion, we introduce a unified model of tile self-assembly that clarifies the relationships between several well-studied models in the literature. Throughout, we highlight open questions regarding the physical principles for DNA tile self-assembly. DNA tiles provide a promising technique for assembling structures with nanoscale resolution through self-assembly by basic interactions rather than top-down assembly of individual structures. Tile systems can be programmed to grow based on logical rules, allowing for a small number of tile types to assemble large, complex assemblies that can retain nanoscale resolution. Such algorithmic systems can even assemble different structures using the same tiles, based on inputs that seed the growth. While programming and theoretical analysis of tile self-assembly often makes use of abstract logical models of growth, experimentally implemented systems are governed by nanoscale physical processes that can lead to very different behavior, more accurately modeled by taking into account the thermodynamics and kinetics of tile attachment and detachment in solution. This review discusses the relationships between more abstract and more physically realistic tile assembly models. A central concern is how consideration of model differences enables the design of tile systems that robustly exhibit the desired abstract behavior in realistic physical models and in experimental implementations. Conversely, we identify situations where self-assembly in abstract models can not be well-approximated by physically realistic models, putting constraints on physical relevance of the abstract models. To facilitate the discussion, we introduce a unified model of tile self-assembly that clarifies the relationships between several well-studied models in the literature. Throughout, we highlight open questions regarding the physical principles for DNA tile self-assembly. |
| Author | Winfree, Erik Evans, Constantine G |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Constantine G surname: Evans fullname: Evans, Constantine G organization: Evans Foundation for Molecular Medicine and California Institute of Technology, Physics, Pasadena, CA, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Erik surname: Winfree fullname: Winfree, Erik |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNjztPwzAURi1URB-w8ANQRpaUe51bOx6r8pQqYIA5cpwbCHKSEidD_j2RKBLTd4ajTzpLMWvahoW4RFgjJObGKRcANG0-TsQCSUFMmmj2j-diGcIXAKJW8kzMZUqpAaMWYv36OYbKWR8duqpx1cFziMq2i26ft1FfeY4C-zK2IXCd-_FcnJbWB7447kq839-97R7j_cvD0267jx0B9jHBJlEmByZrlStc4oxMC2VYO00yN-jIKCygcBOC4rRAo63SKCVLhYlcievf30PXfg8c-qyugmPvbcPtEDJMjUEgUjSpV0d1yGsusqmjtt2Y_TXKHwwdUmQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_anie_201913956 crossref_primary_10_3390_biom13030481 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevX_14_021004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24098177 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jconrel_2019_10_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules25153386 crossref_primary_10_1021_jacs_3c08205 crossref_primary_10_1002_adbi_202200203 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10118_023_2998_z crossref_primary_10_1002_cta_2806 crossref_primary_10_1002_cbic_202200138 crossref_primary_10_1002_smll_201901795 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40687_025_00514_w crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_chemrev_5c00386 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trac_2022_116723 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2119315119 crossref_primary_10_1002_ejic_201800037 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11047_024_09998_x crossref_primary_10_1021_acsnano_4c10964 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bios_2021_113164 crossref_primary_10_1021_jacs_2c02456 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_21755_7 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41586_023_06890_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_snb_2024_136547 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkaa835 crossref_primary_10_1002_ange_201913956 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41428_023_00788_3 crossref_primary_10_1039_D4MH01158A crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26061502 crossref_primary_10_1002_cbic_202400973 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsnano_5c03100 crossref_primary_10_1002_cbic_201700545 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gky857 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cclet_2022_108106 crossref_primary_10_1039_D2NR05404C crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevX_14_041061 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2116373119 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBCAS_2023_3342704 crossref_primary_10_1002_cnma_202000265 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcp_2022_111439 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcp_2020_109764 crossref_primary_10_1039_D2NR04556G crossref_primary_10_1038_s41586_019_1014_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_chem_201902421 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_19882_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_math13060895 crossref_primary_10_1002_smll_201805428 crossref_primary_10_1038_natrevmats_2017_68 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1039/c6cs00745g |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Chemistry |
| EISSN | 1460-4744 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 28489096 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -JG -~X 0-7 0R~ 29B 2WC 4.4 53G 5GY 6J9 705 70~ 7~J 85S AAEMU AAHBH AAIWI AAJAE AAMEH AANOJ AAWGC AAXHV AAXPP ABASK ABDVN ABEMK ABJNI ABPDG ABRYZ ABXOH ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACLDK ACNCT ADMRA ADSRN AEFDR AENEX AENGV AESAV AETIL AFLYV AFOGI AFRDS AFRZK AFVBQ AGEGJ AGKEF AGRSR AGSTE AHGCF ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ANBJS ANUXI APEMP ASKNT AUDPV AZFZN BLAPV BSQNT C6K CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF DU5 EBS ECGLT ECM EE0 EF- EIF EJD F5P GGIMP GNO H13 HZ~ H~N IDZ J3I M4U N9A NPM O9- OK1 P2P R7B R7D RAOCF RCNCU RNS RPMJG RRA RRC RSCEA SKA SKH SLH TN5 TWZ UPT VH6 WH7 YIN Z5M ~02 7X8 AKMSF ALUYA R56 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-405369b0e4aa6cdc3c928d69e7c742b91c4961d0dc91c06e8d197a67122e26132 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 77 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000403555500009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1460-4744 |
| IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 18:26:38 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:43:13 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c401t-405369b0e4aa6cdc3c928d69e7c742b91c4961d0dc91c06e8d197a67122e26132 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 28489096 |
| PQID | 1899104464 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1899104464 pubmed_primary_28489096 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20170619 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-06-19 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 6 year: 2017 text: 20170619 day: 19 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Chemical Society reviews |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Chem Soc Rev |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| SSID | ssj0011762 |
| Score | 2.5239296 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | DNA tiles provide a promising technique for assembling structures with nanoscale resolution through self-assembly by basic interactions rather than top-down... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 3808 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms DNA - chemical synthesis DNA - chemistry Kinetics Models, Chemical Thermodynamics |
| Title | Physical principles for DNA tile self-assembly |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489096 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1899104464 |
| Volume | 46 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000403555500009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qCnrx_VhfVPBaN2nTPE4iq4sHLXtQ2VtJpqkIa3e1q-C_d9Jt2ZMgeCm9JLSTycz3zbT5CLnQVBtJGYTGqSTkgprQ2gS3e6F4DNY4qP_if76XaapGIz1sCm5V81llGxPrQJ1PwNfIewyJAfPdR341fQ-9apTvrjYSGsukEyOU8V4tR4suApO1oCgGAxpyyXl7PGmseyCg8ukzefkdWtYpZrD534fbIhsNuAyu596wTZZcuUPW-q2m2y65HDbLEkzbInsVIGwNbtLrYIYBIqjcuAgRULs3O_7eI0-D28f-XdgoJoSAPGmGZDCJhbbUcWME5BCjpVUutJOAFNhqBlwLltMc8JYKp3KmpRGSRZFDKhVH-2SlnJTukAQRB89WICly62dTFBKrGLcSZ8WxXXLemiLDl_BtBlO6yWeVLYzRJQdze2bT-dEZGSZDhe4hjv4w-pisRz6HeqEgfUI6Be5Hd0pW4Wv2Wn2c1UuN13T48AMS2bJr |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical+principles+for+DNA+tile+self-assembly&rft.jtitle=Chemical+Society+reviews&rft.au=Evans%2C+Constantine+G&rft.au=Winfree%2C+Erik&rft.date=2017-06-19&rft.eissn=1460-4744&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3808&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039%2Fc6cs00745g&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28489096&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28489096&rft.externalDocID=28489096 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1460-4744&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1460-4744&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1460-4744&client=summon |