Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Technique Versus Conventional Freehand Technique in Spine Surgery From Nine Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-analysis
A meta-analysis. To investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical indexes. Robot-assisted techniques are increasingly applied to spine surgery to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. However, c...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Ročník 45; číslo 2; s. E111 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
United States
15.01.2020
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1528-1159, 1528-1159 |
| On-line prístup: | Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | A meta-analysis.
To investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical indexes.
Robot-assisted techniques are increasingly applied to spine surgery to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. However, controversy about the superiority of robot-assisted techniques over conventional freehand techniques remains.
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for potentially eligible articles. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software and subgroup analyses were performed based on the robot type for the accuracy of pedicle screw placement.
Nine randomized controlled trials with 696 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the robot-assisted technique was more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. Subgroup analyses showed that the TINAVI robot-assisted technique was more accurate in screw positions Grade A (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14), Grade B (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75), and Grades C + D + E (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.45) than the freehand technique, whereas the Renaissance robot-assisted technique showed the same accuracy as the freehand technique in screw positions Grade A, Grade B, and Grades C + D + E. Furthermore, the robot-assisted techniques showed equivalent postoperative stay, visual analogue scale scores, and Oswestry disability index scores to those of the freehand technique and shorter intraoperative radiation exposure time, fewer radiation dose and proximal facet violations but longer surgical time than the freehand technique.
The robot-assisted technique is more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. And TINAVI robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a more accurate alternative to conventional techniques and the Renaissance robot-assisted procedure.
1. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | A meta-analysis.STUDY DESIGNA meta-analysis.To investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical indexes.OBJECTIVETo investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical indexes.Robot-assisted techniques are increasingly applied to spine surgery to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. However, controversy about the superiority of robot-assisted techniques over conventional freehand techniques remains.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATARobot-assisted techniques are increasingly applied to spine surgery to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. However, controversy about the superiority of robot-assisted techniques over conventional freehand techniques remains.We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for potentially eligible articles. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software and subgroup analyses were performed based on the robot type for the accuracy of pedicle screw placement.METHODSWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for potentially eligible articles. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software and subgroup analyses were performed based on the robot type for the accuracy of pedicle screw placement.Nine randomized controlled trials with 696 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the robot-assisted technique was more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. Subgroup analyses showed that the TINAVI robot-assisted technique was more accurate in screw positions Grade A (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14), Grade B (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75), and Grades C + D + E (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.45) than the freehand technique, whereas the Renaissance robot-assisted technique showed the same accuracy as the freehand technique in screw positions Grade A, Grade B, and Grades C + D + E. Furthermore, the robot-assisted techniques showed equivalent postoperative stay, visual analogue scale scores, and Oswestry disability index scores to those of the freehand technique and shorter intraoperative radiation exposure time, fewer radiation dose and proximal facet violations but longer surgical time than the freehand technique.RESULTSNine randomized controlled trials with 696 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the robot-assisted technique was more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. Subgroup analyses showed that the TINAVI robot-assisted technique was more accurate in screw positions Grade A (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14), Grade B (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75), and Grades C + D + E (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.45) than the freehand technique, whereas the Renaissance robot-assisted technique showed the same accuracy as the freehand technique in screw positions Grade A, Grade B, and Grades C + D + E. Furthermore, the robot-assisted techniques showed equivalent postoperative stay, visual analogue scale scores, and Oswestry disability index scores to those of the freehand technique and shorter intraoperative radiation exposure time, fewer radiation dose and proximal facet violations but longer surgical time than the freehand technique.The robot-assisted technique is more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. And TINAVI robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a more accurate alternative to conventional techniques and the Renaissance robot-assisted procedure.CONCLUSIONThe robot-assisted technique is more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. And TINAVI robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a more accurate alternative to conventional techniques and the Renaissance robot-assisted procedure.1.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE1. A meta-analysis. To investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical indexes. Robot-assisted techniques are increasingly applied to spine surgery to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. However, controversy about the superiority of robot-assisted techniques over conventional freehand techniques remains. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for potentially eligible articles. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software and subgroup analyses were performed based on the robot type for the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Nine randomized controlled trials with 696 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the robot-assisted technique was more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. Subgroup analyses showed that the TINAVI robot-assisted technique was more accurate in screw positions Grade A (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14), Grade B (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75), and Grades C + D + E (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.45) than the freehand technique, whereas the Renaissance robot-assisted technique showed the same accuracy as the freehand technique in screw positions Grade A, Grade B, and Grades C + D + E. Furthermore, the robot-assisted techniques showed equivalent postoperative stay, visual analogue scale scores, and Oswestry disability index scores to those of the freehand technique and shorter intraoperative radiation exposure time, fewer radiation dose and proximal facet violations but longer surgical time than the freehand technique. The robot-assisted technique is more accurate in pedicle screw placement than the freehand technique. And TINAVI robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a more accurate alternative to conventional techniques and the Renaissance robot-assisted procedure. 1. |
| Author | Zhang, Ren-Jie Shen, Cai-Liang Li, Hui-Min |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hui-Min surname: Li fullname: Li, Hui-Min organization: Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Ren-Jie surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Ren-Jie – sequence: 3 givenname: Cai-Liang surname: Shen fullname: Shen, Cai-Liang |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0E4v0HCHnJJmDHSZ2wKxUvCWjVAtvKHU_ByLGLnYDK__FfuAIE3ow1OnPuaHbIuvMOCTng7JizWp6cjSfH7N8TvBZrZJuXeZVxXtbr__5bZCfGlwT1ErVJtgQvWMFKsU0--wBdULCkfk5HqA1YpBMI-E5HVgE26FqqnKYDa5wBZemwa8E3GFcDYz_zbaZiNLFFTe8Rnp157ZA-YohdpAPv3pLAeJcGLwLi80r1hxlHJwvjUmIXnjAsE-MberfqjBPpG_ORtMnSBm_tKiEYZeMp7dNbbFWmkneZwvfIxjz1cf-n7pKHi_P7wVV2M7y8HvRvMigYF9lMV0IJUWjJhKjrXs14OUeQWkFdVnWlsac0F4XUQhW9AoBBJUohsdSQy6LKd8nRt3cRfNo_ttPGREBrlUPfxWmey1wKyThP6OEP2s0a1NNFMI0Ky-nv6fMvCFGLUA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10121345 crossref_primary_10_1177_15563316211026647 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682231196456 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2023_1241923 crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2025_2523564 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e26334 crossref_primary_10_25259_SNI_522_2022 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcs_2171 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare10122519 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_020_03491_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2024_104165 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000004348 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2024_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e19696 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2020_12_145 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_024_02600_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2024_2378080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medengphy_2025_104388 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000002654 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_01_037 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_03774_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2022_12_065 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_020_01796_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_024_01996_6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_899923 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10439_023_03291_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2023_10_049 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000004132 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682211057491 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_025_02770_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nec_2023_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_rheumatology_keaa644 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000039261 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_020_02003_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_025_08990_y crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2021_578674 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12306_021_00714_x crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682211029867 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682241282277 crossref_primary_10_25259_JNRP_147_2023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_025_01060_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43390_025_01066_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_os_14295 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1344802 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_06681_7 crossref_primary_10_3233_BME_221456 crossref_primary_10_1111_os_13513 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_03714_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_023_07865_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_024_05447_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10143_024_02682_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_023_08019_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_s23167307 crossref_primary_10_55275_JPOSNA_2020_81 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000003632 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000004721 crossref_primary_10_3171_2021_10_FOCUS21509 crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000001474 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nec_2023_05_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13142402 crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2025_2467779 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000003952 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_025_08315_6 crossref_primary_10_1093_ons_opaa405 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_021_02452_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00132_022_04288_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12893_022_01826_2 crossref_primary_10_3171_2021_10_FOCUS21635 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682221126116 crossref_primary_10_3171_2020_3_SPINE20208 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00586_024_08273_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2023_101717 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bas_2024_102904 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2024_106374 crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2020_1699405 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_616380 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60122112 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2025_123721 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semss_2024_101117 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_13964 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xnsj_2022_100121 crossref_primary_10_1302_2046_3758_910_BJR_2020_0064_R2 crossref_primary_10_18203_issn_2455_4510_IntJResOrthop20252893 crossref_primary_10_1177_21925682221145651 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_025_02713_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2021_04_117 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xnsj_2021_100065 crossref_primary_10_1302_0301_620X_105B5_BJJ_2022_0810_R3 crossref_primary_10_3171_2020_8_FOCUS20600 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11657_023_01234_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2021_08_139 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0295196 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003193 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1528-1159 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 31404053 |
| Genre | Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .-D .XZ .Z2 01R 0R~ 123 1J1 354 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 6PF 71W 77Y 7O~ A9M AAAAV AAAXR AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAMOA AAMTA AAQKA AAQQT AARTV AASCR AASOK AAUEB AAWTL AAXQO ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABOCM ABPXF ABVCZ ABXVJ ABXYN ABZAD ABZZY ACDDN ACDOF ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ACZKN ADGGA ADHPY AE3 AE6 AEBDS AENEX AFBFQ AFDTB AFEXH AFMBP AFNMH AFSOK AFUWQ AGINI AHOMT AHQNM AHQVU AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC BOYCO BQLVK BYPQX C45 CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIWNM DU5 E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FL- GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HZ~ IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI L-C L7B N9A NPM N~7 N~B O9- OAG OAH ODMTH OHH OHYEH OL1 OLG OLH OLU OLV OLY OLZ OPUJH OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OVOZU OWBYB OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P2P R2J RIG RLZ S4R S4S SJN TEORI TSPGW V2I VVN W3M WH7 WOQ WOW X3V X3W XXN XYM YFH YOC ZB8 ZFV ZY1 7X8 ADKSD ADSXY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4013-bd83a334d70339969015fec7dac95898de6ad1347d3a464cc0c83537e5dc27482 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 132 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=00007632-202001150-00017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1528-1159 |
| IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 11:58:03 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:59:16 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4013-bd83a334d70339969015fec7dac95898de6ad1347d3a464cc0c83537e5dc27482 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 31404053 |
| PQID | 2272737011 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2272737011 pubmed_primary_31404053 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-Jan-15 20200115 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-15 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2020 text: 2020-Jan-15 day: 15 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Spine (Phila Pa 1976) |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| SSID | ssj0006319 |
| Score | 2.6211164 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | A meta-analysis.
To investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement... A meta-analysis.STUDY DESIGNA meta-analysis.To investigate whether robot-assisted techniques are superior to conventional techniques in terms of the accuracy... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | E111 |
| SubjectTerms | Humans Length of Stay Odds Ratio Operative Time Pain, Postoperative - etiology Pedicle Screws Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Prosthesis Implantation - methods Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Spine - surgery |
| Title | Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Technique Versus Conventional Freehand Technique in Spine Surgery From Nine Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-analysis |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404053 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2272737011 |
| Volume | 45 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos00007632-202001150-00017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La-MwEBbbB6WX7vbdfTGFvYoklh9SL0s2bNhLsiHJQm5BlmQIJHYaJy3t_-v_6oyt0F4WCvXBBzOyhWc0T-kbxn6kKpMmlk3eNDLmobItnpos5NopnQZCEMhT1Wwi6fflZKIGPuFW-m2VW51YKWpbGMqRN4KALG2C4vhzecupaxRVV30LjR22J9CVIalOJi9o4bGoGnugicJICe329uicShq_hqMautBfoio9_8_JrIxN9-N7p_mJHXk3E9q1XByzDy4_YQc9X0g_ZU9tYzYrbR6gyIDadSAVjNCDvIcBJdYpZwg6t-BxQ-fwd7PGGbiSBgyLtFhzdLtJRiyMtziwQNm3TQmdV1vZobtyjtLzr8hmOYyWOA8Y1YeykaZYQJ-eDJGyWMwe8bWdehf9nL5QLZMbaEPPrTXXHknljP3r_h53_nDf0YEbiuN4aqXQQoQW9Qyyi5phRZkzidVGRVJJ62Jt6XCrFTqMQ2NQgkQkEhdZg-GzDM7Zbl7k7pJB2EothrM6U05jDBwpkQY6tk40VZYGMrpi11sGTXHFUBlE567YlNMXFl2xi5rL02UN7TEVhDaEeunzG0Z_YYcBBd_NFm9FX9lehj_CfWP75m49K1ffK1HEe3_QewZrNupH |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy+of+Pedicle+Screw+Placement+and+Clinical+Outcomes+of+Robot-assisted+Technique+Versus+Conventional+Freehand+Technique+in+Spine+Surgery+From+Nine+Randomized+Controlled+Trials%3A+A+Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Spine+%28Philadelphia%2C+Pa.+1976%29&rft.au=Li%2C+Hui-Min&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Ren-Jie&rft.au=Shen%2C+Cai-Liang&rft.date=2020-01-15&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FBRS.0000000000003193&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31404053&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31404053&rft.externalDocID=31404053 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1528-1159&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1528-1159&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1528-1159&client=summon |