Investigating Advanced Building Envelopes for Energy Efficiency in Prefab Temporary Post-Disaster Housing

Prefabricated temporary buildings are a promising solution for post-disaster scenarios for their modularity, sustainability and transportation advantages. However, their low thermal mass building envelope shows a fast response to heat flux excitations. This leads to the risk of not meeting the occup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energies (Basel) Jg. 17; H. 9; S. 2008
Hauptverfasser: Rapone, Lorenzo, Butt, Afaq A., Loonen, Roel C. G. M., Salvadori, Giacomo, Leccese, Francesco
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Basel MDPI AG 01.05.2024
Schlagworte:
Architecture
Architecture and energy conservation
Building construction
building envelope
Case studies
Coatings
Cost control
Disasters
Displaced persons
Earthquakes
Energy conservation
Energy consumption
energy demand
Energy efficiency
Energy industry
Energy management systems
energy savings
energy storage system
Energy use
Green buildings
Heat
Investigations
Netherlands
passive systems
Prefabricated buildings
Renovation & restoration
Seismic engineering
sustainability
Temporary housing
Netherlands
ISSN:1996-1073, 1996-1073
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Prefabricated temporary buildings are a promising solution for post-disaster scenarios for their modularity, sustainability and transportation advantages. However, their low thermal mass building envelope shows a fast response to heat flux excitations. This leads to the risk of not meeting the occupant comfort and HVAC energy-saving requirements. The literature shows different measures implementable in opaque surfaces, like vacuum insulation panels (VIPs), phase change materials (PCMs) and switchable coatings, and in transparent surfaces (switchable glazing) to mitigate thermal issues, like overheating, while preserving the limited available internal space. This paper investigates the energy and overheating performance of the mentioned interventions by using building performance simulation tools to assess their effectiveness. The optimization also looks at the transportation flexibility of each intervention to better support the decision maker for manufacturing innovative temporary units. The most energy-efficient measures turn to be VIPs as a better energy solution for winter and PCMs as a better thermal comfort solution for summer.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1996-1073
1996-1073
DOI:10.3390/en17092008