Abrahamic traditions and egg freezing: Religious Women's experiences in local moral worlds

In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—and how these religion-specific standpoints have affected the EEF experiences of women who self-identify as religiously observant. Through an analysi...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Social science & medicine (1982) Ročník 253; s. 112976 - 10
Hlavní autori:	Inhorn, Marcia C., Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna, Vale, Mira D., Patrizio, Pasquale
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	England Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2020 Pergamon Press Inc
Predmet:	Christianity Cryopreservation Eggs Elective egg freezing Ethnography Female Fertility preservation Freezing Humans Islam Israel Judaism Marriage Medicine Morality Morals Religion Spouses Technology Traditions United States Women United States Israel Fertility preservation Islam United States Religion Judaism Christianity Israel Elective egg freezing
ISSN:	0277-9536, 1873-5347, 1873-5347
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Abstract	In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—and how these religion-specific standpoints have affected the EEF experiences of women who self-identify as religiously observant. Through an analysis of religious women's narratives, the study explores the “local moral worlds” of religious women who chose to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons. It draws on ethnographic interviews with 14 women in the United States and Israel who had completed at least one EEF cycle, and who were part of a large, binational study that interviewed, between 2014 and 2016, 150 women who pursued EEF. These religious women, who were all highly educated, faced a particular challenge in finding appropriate marriage partners. Feeling pressured but still hopeful to marry and create large families, the women used EEF to extend their reproductive timelines and reduce their anxieties. As the study showed, the women reinterpreted or reconciled religious restrictions on the use of EEF in various ways, believing that their ultimate pursuit of religiously sanctioned reproduction justified the means. This study, which is the first to compare Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women's experiences of EEF, illustrates how this novel technology is now shaping the local moral worlds of religious women. •Abrahamic religious traditions demonstrate support for elective egg freezing (EEF).•Catholicism is the exception, prohibiting EEF for fertility preservation.•Religious women are turning to EEF when they cannot find a marital partner.•EEF extends reproductive timelines and reduces religious women's anxieties.•Religious women transgress EEF restrictions to accomplish future motherhood goals.
AbstractList	In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—and how these religion-specific standpoints have affected the EEF experiences of women who self-identify as religiously observant. Through an analysis of religious women's narratives, the study explores the “local moral worlds” of religious women who chose to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons. It draws on ethnographic interviews with 14 women in the United States and Israel who had completed at least one EEF cycle, and who were part of a large, binational study that interviewed, between 2014 and 2016, 150 women who pursued EEF. These religious women, who were all highly educated, faced a particular challenge in finding appropriate marriage partners. Feeling pressured but still hopeful to marry and create large families, the women used EEF to extend their reproductive timelines and reduce their anxieties. As the study showed, the women reinterpreted or reconciled religious restrictions on the use of EEF in various ways, believing that their ultimate pursuit of religiously sanctioned reproduction justified the means. This study, which is the first to compare Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women's experiences of EEF, illustrates how this novel technology is now shaping the local moral worlds of religious women. •Abrahamic religious traditions demonstrate support for elective egg freezing (EEF).•Catholicism is the exception, prohibiting EEF for fertility preservation.•Religious women are turning to EEF when they cannot find a marital partner.•EEF extends reproductive timelines and reduces religious women's anxieties.•Religious women transgress EEF restrictions to accomplish future motherhood goals. In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions-Judaism, Christianity, and Islam-and how these religion-specific standpoints have affected the EEF experiences of women who self-identify as religiously observant. Through an analysis of religious women's narratives, the study explores the "local moral worlds" of religious women who chose to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons. It draws on ethnographic interviews with 14 women in the United States and Israel who had completed at least one EEF cycle, and who were part of a large, binational study that interviewed, between 2014 and 2016, 150 women who pursued EEF. These religious women, who were all highly educated, faced a particular challenge in finding appropriate marriage partners. Feeling pressured but still hopeful to marry and create large families, the women used EEF to extend their reproductive timelines and reduce their anxieties. As the study showed, the women reinterpreted or reconciled religious restrictions on the use of EEF in various ways, believing that their ultimate pursuit of religiously sanctioned reproduction justified the means. This study, which is the first to compare Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women's experiences of EEF, illustrates how this novel technology is now shaping the local moral worlds of religious women. In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions-Judaism, Christianity, and Islam-and how these religion-specific standpoints have affected the EEF experiences of women who self-identify as religiously observant. Through an analysis of religious women's narratives, the study explores the "local moral worlds" of religious women who chose to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons. It draws on ethnographic interviews with 14 women in the United States and Israel who had completed at least one EEF cycle, and who were part of a large, binational study that interviewed, between 2014 and 2016, 150 women who pursued EEF. These religious women, who were all highly educated, faced a particular challenge in finding appropriate marriage partners. Feeling pressured but still hopeful to marry and create large families, the women used EEF to extend their reproductive timelines and reduce their anxieties. As the study showed, the women reinterpreted or reconciled religious restrictions on the use of EEF in various ways, believing that their ultimate pursuit of religiously sanctioned reproduction justified the means. This study, which is the first to compare Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women's experiences of EEF, illustrates how this novel technology is now shaping the local moral worlds of religious women.In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions-Judaism, Christianity, and Islam-and how these religion-specific standpoints have affected the EEF experiences of women who self-identify as religiously observant. Through an analysis of religious women's narratives, the study explores the "local moral worlds" of religious women who chose to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons. It draws on ethnographic interviews with 14 women in the United States and Israel who had completed at least one EEF cycle, and who were part of a large, binational study that interviewed, between 2014 and 2016, 150 women who pursued EEF. These religious women, who were all highly educated, faced a particular challenge in finding appropriate marriage partners. Feeling pressured but still hopeful to marry and create large families, the women used EEF to extend their reproductive timelines and reduce their anxieties. As the study showed, the women reinterpreted or reconciled religious restrictions on the use of EEF in various ways, believing that their ultimate pursuit of religiously sanctioned reproduction justified the means. This study, which is the first to compare Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women's experiences of EEF, illustrates how this novel technology is now shaping the local moral worlds of religious women.
ArticleNumber	112976
Author	Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna Patrizio, Pasquale Inhorn, Marcia C. Vale, Mira D.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Marcia C. surname: Inhorn fullname: Inhorn, Marcia C. email: marcia.inhorn@yale.edu organization: Department of Anthropology, Yale University, 10 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Daphna surname: Birenbaum-Carmeli fullname: Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna email: daphna@research.haifa.ac.il organization: Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, 3498838, Haifa, Israel – sequence: 3 givenname: Mira D. surname: Vale fullname: Vale, Mira D. email: miravale@umich.edu organization: Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, 500 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48019, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Pasquale surname: Patrizio fullname: Patrizio, Pasquale email: pasquale.patrizio@yale.edu organization: Yale Fertility Center, 150 Sargent Drive, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32278236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqFkV1rFDEUhoO02G31L2jAC3szaz5mJonQi6XUDygIogjehHycWbPMJGsya21_vVm29aI3vUkgPO_J4XlP0VFMERB6TcmSEtq_2yxLcsWFCfySEVZfKVOif4YWVAredLwVR2hBmBCN6nh_gk5L2RBCKJH8OTrhjAnJeL9AP1c2m19mCg7P2fgwhxQLNtFjWK_xkAHuQly_x19hDOuQdgX_SBPEtwXD3y3kANFBwSHiMTkz4inlet6kPPryAh0PZizw8v4-Q98_XH27_NRcf_n4-XJ13Tiu1Ny0nTO2BcqMVc73LadASGd9bztDqVRSURBcMdl5AtYo2bfUgm0HD4M1A-Fn6Pwwd5vT7x2UWU-hOBhHE6EurBmXUrKuOqnom0foJu1yrNtp1nKhlJBCVOrVPbWzVbDe5jCZfKsfrFXg4gC4nErJMGgXZrNXVx2GUVOi9y3pjf7fkt63pA8t1bx4lH_44unk6pCEKvRPgKwrtO_Ahwxu1j6FJ2f8AysesXk
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jemep_2025_101149 crossref_primary_10_1080_13548506_2024_2407447 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_021_02164_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11133_021_09493_0 crossref_primary_10_1080_02646838_2024_2432533 crossref_primary_10_1111_maq_12643 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41649_022_00236_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s40656_022_00495_x crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_17472 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12958_024_01342_3 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0963180122000585 crossref_primary_10_36475_11_2_10 crossref_primary_10_1111_muwo_12444
Cites_doi	10.5153/sro.4187 10.1097/MED.0000000000000291 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.003 10.1177/104973239200200202 10.1111/1467-9566.12728 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.027 10.1080/0167482X.2018.1460352 10.1080/13691058.2017.1404643 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.014 10.1177/0003122418796807 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00378.x 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.024 10.1056/NEJMra1614676 10.1080/14636778.2018.1546574 10.1186/s12958-018-0389-z 10.1093/humupd/dmw007 10.1080/01459740.2019.1591394 10.1080/01459740.2019.1570186 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000269 10.3109/14647273.2014.939723 10.1080/02646838.2016.1275533 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.05.006 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.09.008 10.1007/s10815-018-1277-3 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000339 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.003 10.1007/s10815-018-1255-9 10.1177/1350506817742929 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.127 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.044 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.004 10.1007/s10815-017-0968-5 10.1007/s10943-007-9108-3 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.07.005 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.07.002 10.1007/s13224-015-0803-9 10.1080/13691058.2014.951881 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201 10.1007/s11013-006-9029-8 10.1093/humrep/deu317 10.1177/0891243215591504
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2020 Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. 2020
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2020 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. 2020
DBID	AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7U3 7U4 8BJ BHHNA DWI FQK JBE K9. WZK 7X8
DOI	10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976
DatabaseName	CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Social Services Abstracts Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts Sociological Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Sociological Abstracts (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Social Services Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine Religion Public Health Social Sciences (General)
EISSN	1873-5347
EndPage	10
ExternalDocumentID	32278236 10_1016_j_socscimed_2020_112976 S0277953620301957
Genre	Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article
GeographicLocations	United States Israel
GeographicLocations_xml	– name: Israel – name: United States
GroupedDBID	--- --K --M -DZ -~X .GJ .~1 07C 0R~ 123 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 85S 8P~ 9JM 9JO AABNK AACTN AADFP AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAGJA AAGJQ AAGUQ AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABIVO ABJNI ABLVK ABMAC ABMMH ABMZM ABOCM ABOYX ABPIV ABPPZ ABTAH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACRLP ACXNI ADBBV ADEZE AEBSH AEKER AENEX AFDAS AFFNX AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AFYLN AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BKOMP BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEH HMK HMO HMY HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B LCYCR M29 M3W M3Y M41 MO0 MVM N9A NHB O-L O9- OAUVE OHT OKEIE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ RXW SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSB SSH SSO SSS SSY SSZ T5K TAE TN5 UHB UQL WH7 WUQ X7L XJT XPP YHZ ZCA ZGI ZY4 ~G- 9DU AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ACIEU ACLOT ACVFH ADCNI ADXHL AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD AGCQF AGRNS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7U3 7U4 8BJ BHHNA DWI FQK JBE K9. WZK 7X8
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-45cab4e12ab9cd6431e005bd6b5a1189891e739285d0eba98641beb4fdefbaf03
ISICitedReferencesCount	17
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000533531900026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0277-9536 1873-5347
IngestDate	Mon Sep 29 02:40:35 EDT 2025 Mon Nov 24 18:40:48 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:56:34 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:21:04 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:42:31 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:48:55 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Keywords	Fertility preservation Islam United States Religion Judaism Christianity Israel Elective egg freezing
Language	English
License	Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c399t-45cab4e12ab9cd6431e005bd6b5a1189891e739285d0eba98641beb4fdefbaf03
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23
PMID	32278236
PQID	2437997877
PQPubID	46002
PageCount	10
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_2388825534 proquest_journals_2437997877 pubmed_primary_32278236 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_socscimed_2020_112976 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2020_112976 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_socscimed_2020_112976
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	May 2020 2020-05-00 20200501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2020-05-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 05 year: 2020 text: May 2020
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	England
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: England – name: Oxford
PublicationTitle	Social science & medicine (1982)
PublicationTitleAlternate	Soc Sci Med
PublicationYear	2020
Publisher	Elsevier Ltd Pergamon Press Inc
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Pergamon Press Inc
References	Evans, Hudson (bib27) 2007; 46 Sallam, Sallam (bib61) 2016; 8 Kleinman (bib53) 2007 James (bib45) 2012 (bib60) 2018 Waldby (bib69) 2015; 17 Stoop, Maes, Polyzos, Verheyen, Tournaye, Nekkebroeck (bib64) 2015; 30 Cioffi (bib19) Birenbaum-Carmeli (bib12) 2009; 69 Carroll, Kroløkke (bib18) 2018; 20 Office of Technology Assessment (bib56) 1988 Santo, Dieamant, Petersen, Mauri, Vagnini, Renzi, Zamara, Oliveira, Baruffi, Franco (bib62) 2017; 21 Schon, Shapiro, Gracia, Senapati (bib63) 2017; 34 Birger (bib15) 2015 Donnez, Dolmans (bib26) 2017; 377 Pritchard, Kirkman, Hammarberg, McBain, Agresta, Bayly, Hickey, Peate, Fisher (bib59) 2017; 35 Baldwin, Culley, Hudson, Mitchell (bib9) 2019; 40 Baldwin (bib6) 2018; 40 Hammarberg, Kirkman, Pritchard, Hickey, Peate, McBain, Agresta, Bayly, Fisher (bib33) 2017; 32 Kahn (bib47) 2006; 30 Inhorn, Birenbaum-Carmeli, Westphal, Doyle, Gleicher, Meirow, Dirnfeld, Seidman, Kahane, Patrizio (bib42) 2018; 35 Tremayne, Akhondi (bib67) 2016; 2 Argyle, Harper, Davies (bib4) 2016; 22 Baldwin (bib5) 2017; 22 Baldwin (bib7) 2019 Kleinman (bib52) 1992; 2 Larijani, Zahedi (bib54) 2007; 46 Teman (bib65) 2010 Gunnala, Schattman (bib31) 2017; 29 Alawi (bib1) 2019 Inhorn (bib38) 2003 (bib44) 2012 Nahman (bib55) 2013 (bib68) 2009 Greenwood, Pasch, Hastie, Cedars, Huddleston (bib30) 2018; 109 Baldwin, Culley, Hudson, Mitchell (bib8) 2014; 17 Brown, Patrick (bib17) 2018; 83 Traina, Georges, Inhorn, Kahn, Ryan (bib66) 2008 Inhorn (bib37) 1996 Cromer (bib24) 2019; 38 Czarnecki (bib25) 2015; 29 Kahn (bib46) 2000 Kim, Yoon, Kang, Koong, Kim, Kim, Lee, Kim (bib50) 2018; 35 Khalife, Kutteh, Tarhini, Khalil, Beyrouthy, Ghazeeri (bib49) 2019; 32 Baldwin, Culley, Hudson, Mitchell, Lavery (bib10) 2015; 31 Inhorn, Birenbaum-Carmeli, Tremayne, Gürtin (bib40) 2017; 4 Cromer (bib23) 2018; 37 Goldman, Grifo (bib29) 2016; 23 Birenbaum-Carmeli (bib13) 2016; 2 (bib14) 2010 Clark (bib20) 2015 Göçmen, Kılıç (bib28) 2018; 25 Broadway (bib16) 2012 Allahbadia (bib2) 2016; 66 Cobo, García-Velasco (bib22) 2016; 28 Inhorn, Patrizio, Serour (bib43) 2010; 21 Hodes-Wertz, Druckenmiller, Smith, Noyes (bib34) 2013; 100 Kılıç, Göçmen (bib51) 2018; 203 Inhorn (bib36) 1994 Hollan (bib35) 2001 Inhorn, Birenbaum-Carmeli, Birger, Westphal, Doyle, Gleicher, Meirow, Dirnfeld, Seidman, Kahane, Patrizio (bib41) 2018; 16 Waldby (bib70) 2019 (bib72) 2018; 110 Clarke (bib21) 2009 Kanaaneh (bib48) 2002 Potdar, Gelbaya, Nardo (bib58) 2014; 29 Gürtin, Shah, Wang, Ahuja (bib32) 2019; 38 Balkenende, Dahhan, van der Veen, Repping, Goddijn (bib11) 2018; 37 Parler (bib57) 2014 Andruchow (bib3) 2010 Zanini (bib71) 2019; 38 Inhorn (bib39) 2012 Andruchow (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib3) 2010 (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib60) 2018 Larijani (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib54) 2007; 46 Santo (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib62) 2017; 21 Kılıç (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib51) 2018; 203 Goldman (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib29) 2016; 23 Cromer (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib24) 2019; 38 Kahn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib46) 2000 Göçmen (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib28) 2018; 25 Balkenende (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib11) 2018; 37 Donnez (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib26) 2017; 377 Kleinman (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib53) 2007 Hodes-Wertz (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib34) 2013; 100 Argyle (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib4) 2016; 22 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib37) 1996 Parler (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib57) 2014 Clarke (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib21) 2009 Baldwin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib7) 2019 Czarnecki (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib25) 2015; 29 Potdar (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib58) 2014; 29 Office of Technology Assessment (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib56) 1988 Nahman (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib55) 2013 Schon (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib63) 2017; 34 (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib44) 2012 Allahbadia (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib2) 2016; 66 Baldwin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib6) 2018; 40 Baldwin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib9) 2019; 40 Broadway (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib16) 2012 James (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib45) 2012 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib40) 2017; 4 (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib72) 2018; 110 Hollan (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib35) 2001 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib39) 2012 Baldwin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib5) 2017; 22 Birenbaum-Carmeli (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib12) 2009; 69 Birger (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib15) 2015 Waldby (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib69) 2015; 17 Kahn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib47) 2006; 30 Tremayne (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib67) 2016; 2 Brown (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib17) 2018; 83 Cobo (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib22) 2016; 28 (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib68) 2009 Greenwood (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib30) 2018; 109 Evans (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib27) 2007; 46 Cromer (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib23) 2018; 37 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib36) 1994 Hammarberg (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib33) 2017; 32 Khalife (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib49) 2019; 32 Kanaaneh (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib48) 2002 Cioffi (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib19) Gunnala (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib31) 2017; 29 Carroll (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib18) 2018; 20 Teman (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib65) 2010 Clark (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib20) Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib38) 2003 Stoop (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib64) 2015; 30 Baldwin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib8) 2014; 17 Pritchard (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib59) 2017; 35 Alawi (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib1) 2019 Baldwin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib10) 2015; 31 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib41) 2018; 16 (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib14) 2010 Sallam (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib61) 2016; 8 Kleinman (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib52) 1992; 2 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib43) 2010; 21 Inhorn (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib42) 2018; 35 Kim (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib50) 2018; 35 Birenbaum-Carmeli (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib13) 2016; 2 Zanini (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib71) 2019; 38 Traina (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib66) 2008 Gürtin (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib32) 2019; 38 Waldby (10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib70) 2019
References_xml	– year: 2013 ident: bib55 article-title: Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism – year: 2019 ident: bib1 article-title: Egg Freezing Permissible in Islam, According to Egypt's Dar Al-Ifta, September 23 – volume: 16 start-page: 70 year: 2018 ident: bib41 article-title: Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications publication-title: Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. – volume: 35 start-page: 108 year: 2017 end-page: 118 ident: bib59 article-title: Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications publication-title: J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. – volume: 22 start-page: 440 year: 2016 end-page: 449 ident: bib4 article-title: Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? publication-title: Hum. Reprod. Update – volume: 83 start-page: 959 year: 2018 end-page: 982 ident: bib17 article-title: Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction publication-title: Am. Socio. Rev. – volume: 46 start-page: 565 year: 2007 end-page: 581 ident: bib27 article-title: Religion and reproductive genetics: beyond views of embryonic life? publication-title: J. Sci. Stud. Relig. – volume: 2 start-page: 127 year: 1992 end-page: 134 ident: bib52 article-title: Local worlds of suffering: an interpersonal focus for ethnographies of illness experience publication-title: Qual. Health Res. – volume: 40 start-page: 166 year: 2019 end-page: 173 ident: bib9 article-title: Running out of time: exploring women's motivations for social egg freezing publication-title: J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. – volume: 8 start-page: 33 year: 2016 end-page: 48 ident: bib61 article-title: Religious aspects of assisted reproduction publication-title: Facts, Views, Vis. Obstetr. Gynecol. – volume: 40 start-page: 859 year: 2018 end-page: 873 ident: bib6 article-title: Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay publication-title: Soc. Health Illness – volume: 31 start-page: 239 year: 2015 end-page: 245 ident: bib10 article-title: Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online – year: 2012 ident: bib16 article-title: Banking on God Alone: Why I Won't Be Freezing My Eggs – volume: 109 start-page: 1097 year: 2018 end-page: 1104 ident: bib30 article-title: To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation publication-title: Fertil. Steril. – year: 1994 ident: bib36 article-title: Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility and Egyptian Medical Traditions – volume: 377 start-page: 1657 year: 2017 end-page: 1665 ident: bib26 article-title: Fertility preservation in women publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med. – year: 2012 ident: bib39 article-title: The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East – year: 2007 ident: bib53 article-title: What Really Matters: Living a Moral Life amidst Uncertainty and Danger – volume: 17 start-page: 470 year: 2015 end-page: 482 ident: bib69 article-title: “Banking time”: Egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility publication-title: Cult. Health Sex. – start-page: 15 year: 2008 end-page: 85 ident: bib66 article-title: Compatible contradictions: religion and the naturalization of assisted reproduction publication-title: Altering Nature-Volume II: Religion, Biotechnology, and Public Policy – volume: 29 start-page: 716 year: 2015 end-page: 742 ident: bib25 article-title: Moral women, immoral technologies: how devout women negotiate gender, religion, and assisted reproductive technologies publication-title: Gend. Soc. – volume: 29 start-page: 59 year: 2017 end-page: 63 ident: bib31 article-title: Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future publication-title: Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. – year: 2018 ident: bib60 article-title: Statement on Egg Freezing – volume: 23 start-page: 458 year: 2016 end-page: 464 ident: bib29 article-title: Elective oocyte cryopreservation for deferred childbearing publication-title: Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. – volume: 32 start-page: 575 year: 2017 end-page: 581 ident: bib33 article-title: Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons publication-title: Hum. Reprod. – volume: 69 start-page: 1018 year: 2009 end-page: 1024 ident: bib12 article-title: The politics of ‘the natural family’ in Israel: state policy and kinship ideologies publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med. – volume: 35 start-page: 1623 year: 2018 end-page: 1630 ident: bib50 article-title: Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation publication-title: J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. – volume: 2 start-page: 16 year: 2016 end-page: 23 ident: bib13 article-title: Thirty-five years of assisted reproductive technologies in Israel publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online – volume: 32 start-page: 525 year: 2019 end-page: 529 ident: bib49 article-title: Parental attitudes toward fertility preservation in female adolescent cancer patients in Lebanon publication-title: J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. – volume: 110 start-page: 1022 year: 2018 end-page: 1028 ident: bib72 article-title: Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: An ethics committee opinion publication-title: Fert. Steril. – volume: 4 start-page: 41 year: 2017 end-page: 51 ident: bib40 article-title: Assisted reproduction and Middle East kinship: a regional and religious comparison publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online – year: 2015 ident: bib20 article-title: Freeze your eggs, free your career? – volume: 29 start-page: 159 year: 2014 end-page: 176 ident: bib58 article-title: Oocyte vitrification in the 21st century and post-warming fertility outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online – start-page: 364 year: 1988 end-page: 368 ident: bib56 article-title: Appendix F. Religious perspectives publication-title: Infertility: Medical and Social Choices – volume: 34 start-page: 1207 year: 2017 end-page: 1215 ident: bib63 article-title: Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation publication-title: J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. – volume: 30 start-page: 467 year: 2006 end-page: 480 ident: bib47 article-title: Making technology familiar: Orthodox Jews and infertility support, advice, and inspiration publication-title: Cult. Med. Psychiatr. – year: 2010 ident: bib65 article-title: Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Mother and the Pregnant Self – volume: 35 start-page: 2003 year: 2018 end-page: 2011 ident: bib42 article-title: Ten pathways to elective egg freezing: a binational analysis publication-title: J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. – volume: 203 start-page: 19 year: 2018 end-page: 27 ident: bib51 article-title: Fate, morals and rational calculations: freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med. – volume: 38 start-page: 356 year: 2019 end-page: 369 ident: bib71 article-title: Jesus is in favor: Catholicism and assisted reproduction in Italy publication-title: Med. Anthropol. – volume: 28 start-page: 206 year: 2016 end-page: 210 ident: bib22 article-title: Why all women should freeze their eggs publication-title: Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. – year: 2002 ident: bib48 article-title: Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel – year: 2003 ident: bib38 article-title: Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion and in Vitro Fertilization in Egypt – volume: 17 start-page: 170 year: 2014 end-page: 179 ident: bib8 article-title: Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing publication-title: Hum. Fertil. – year: 2009 ident: bib68 article-title: Reproductive Technology – year: 2010 ident: bib3 article-title: Medical Bioethics: an Orthodox Christian Perspective for Orthodox Christians – volume: 20 start-page: 992 year: 2018 end-page: 1005 ident: bib18 article-title: Freezing for love: enacting "responsible" reproductive citizenship through egg freezing publication-title: Cult. Hlth. Sexuality – volume: 66 start-page: 213 year: 2016 end-page: 217 ident: bib2 article-title: Social egg freezing: developing countries are not exempt publication-title: J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India – year: 1996 ident: bib37 article-title: Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt – volume: 22 start-page: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 15 ident: bib5 article-title: I suppose I think to myself, that's the best way to be a mother": how ideologies of parenthood shape women's use of social egg freezing technology publication-title: Socio. Res. Online – volume: 38 start-page: 603 year: 2019 end-page: 619 ident: bib24 article-title: Making the ethnic embryo: enacting race in US embryo adoption publication-title: Med. Anthropol. – year: 2010 ident: bib14 publication-title: Kin, Gene, Community: Reproductive Technologies Among Jewish Israelis – volume: 38 start-page: 272 year: 2019 end-page: 282 ident: bib32 article-title: Reconceiving egg freezing: insights from an analysis of 5 years of data from a UK clinic publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online – volume: 37 start-page: 362 year: 2018 end-page: 386 ident: bib23 article-title: Saving embryos in stem cell science and embryo adoption publication-title: New Genet. Soc. – year: 2014 ident: bib57 article-title: Egg Freezing and the Facts of Life, November 14 – volume: 25 start-page: 168 year: 2018 end-page: 182 ident: bib28 article-title: Egg freezing experiences of women in Turkey: from the social context to the narratives of reproductive ageing and empowerment publication-title: Eur. J. Wom. Stud. – volume: 21 start-page: 848 year: 2010 end-page: 853 ident: bib43 article-title: Third-party reproductive assistance around the Mediterranean: comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and multisectarian Lebanon publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online – year: 2000 ident: bib46 article-title: Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel – year: 2009 ident: bib21 article-title: Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon – ident: bib19 article-title: Dignitas Personae on freezing oocytes and genetic selection: a commentary on Dignitas Personae, Part Two – volume: 30 start-page: 338 year: 2015 end-page: 344 ident: bib64 article-title: Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers publication-title: Hum. Reprod. – year: 2012 ident: bib44 publication-title: Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives – volume: 37 start-page: 425 year: 2018 end-page: 433 ident: bib11 article-title: Reproductive outcomes after oocyte banking for fertility preservation publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online – year: 2019 ident: bib7 article-title: Egg Freezing, Fertility and Reproductive Choice: Negotiating Responsibility, Hope and Modern Motherhood – volume: 21 start-page: 101 year: 2017 end-page: 104 ident: bib62 article-title: Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women publication-title: JBRA Assist Reprod. – year: 2012 ident: bib45 article-title: Rabbis Urge Single, Orthodox Women to Freeze Eggs at 38 – volume: 46 start-page: 399 year: 2007 end-page: 408 ident: bib54 article-title: Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran publication-title: J. Relig. Health – volume: 2 start-page: 62 year: 2016 end-page: 70 ident: bib67 article-title: Conceiving IVF in Iran publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online – year: 2019 ident: bib70 article-title: The Oocyte Economy: The Changing Meaning of Human Eggs – year: 2015 ident: bib15 article-title: Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game – start-page: 48 year: 2001 end-page: 67 ident: bib35 article-title: Developments in person-centered ethnography publication-title: The Psychology of Cultural Experience – volume: 100 start-page: 1343 year: 2013 end-page: 1349 ident: bib34 article-title: What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? publication-title: Fertil. Steril. – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib7 – volume: 22 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib5 article-title: I suppose I think to myself, that's the best way to be a mother": how ideologies of parenthood shape women's use of social egg freezing technology publication-title: Socio. Res. Online doi: 10.5153/sro.4187 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib16 – ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib19 – volume: 23 start-page: 458 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib29 article-title: Elective oocyte cryopreservation for deferred childbearing publication-title: Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000291 – start-page: 48 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib35 article-title: Developments in person-centered ethnography – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib1 – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib48 – volume: 4 start-page: 41 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib40 article-title: Assisted reproduction and Middle East kinship: a regional and religious comparison publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.003 – volume: 2 start-page: 127 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib52 article-title: Local worlds of suffering: an interpersonal focus for ethnographies of illness experience publication-title: Qual. Health Res. doi: 10.1177/104973239200200202 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib57 – volume: 40 start-page: 859 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib6 article-title: Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay publication-title: Soc. Health Illness doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12728 – volume: 110 start-page: 1022 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib72 article-title: Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: An ethics committee opinion publication-title: Fert. Steril. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.027 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib3 – volume: 40 start-page: 166 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib9 article-title: Running out of time: exploring women's motivations for social egg freezing publication-title: J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2018.1460352 – volume: 20 start-page: 992 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib18 article-title: Freezing for love: enacting "responsible" reproductive citizenship through egg freezing publication-title: Cult. Hlth. Sexuality doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1404643 – volume: 203 start-page: 19 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib51 article-title: Fate, morals and rational calculations: freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.014 – volume: 83 start-page: 959 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib17 article-title: Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction publication-title: Am. Socio. Rev. doi: 10.1177/0003122418796807 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib21 – volume: 46 start-page: 565 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib27 article-title: Religion and reproductive genetics: beyond views of embryonic life? publication-title: J. Sci. Stud. Relig. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00378.x – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib44 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib15 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib39 – ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib20 – volume: 31 start-page: 239 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib10 article-title: Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.010 – volume: 29 start-page: 159 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib58 article-title: Oocyte vitrification in the 21st century and post-warming fertility outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.024 – volume: 377 start-page: 1657 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib26 article-title: Fertility preservation in women publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1614676 – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib36 – start-page: 364 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib56 article-title: Appendix F. Religious perspectives – volume: 37 start-page: 362 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib23 article-title: Saving embryos in stem cell science and embryo adoption publication-title: New Genet. Soc. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2018.1546574 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib55 – volume: 16 start-page: 70 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib41 article-title: Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications publication-title: Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0389-z – volume: 22 start-page: 440 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib4 article-title: Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? publication-title: Hum. Reprod. Update doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw007 – volume: 8 start-page: 33 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib61 article-title: Religious aspects of assisted reproduction publication-title: Facts, Views, Vis. Obstetr. Gynecol. – start-page: 15 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib66 article-title: Compatible contradictions: religion and the naturalization of assisted reproduction – volume: 38 start-page: 603 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib24 article-title: Making the ethnic embryo: enacting race in US embryo adoption publication-title: Med. Anthropol. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2019.1591394 – volume: 38 start-page: 356 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib71 article-title: Jesus is in favor: Catholicism and assisted reproduction in Italy publication-title: Med. Anthropol. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2019.1570186 – volume: 32 start-page: 575 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib33 article-title: Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons publication-title: Hum. Reprod. – volume: 28 start-page: 206 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib22 article-title: Why all women should freeze their eggs publication-title: Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000269 – volume: 17 start-page: 170 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib8 article-title: Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing publication-title: Hum. Fertil. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2014.939723 – volume: 35 start-page: 108 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib59 article-title: Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications publication-title: J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2016.1275533 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib45 – volume: 32 start-page: 525 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib49 article-title: Parental attitudes toward fertility preservation in female adolescent cancer patients in Lebanon publication-title: J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.05.006 – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib53 – volume: 21 start-page: 848 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib43 article-title: Third-party reproductive assistance around the Mediterranean: comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and multisectarian Lebanon publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.09.008 – volume: 35 start-page: 2003 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib42 article-title: Ten pathways to elective egg freezing: a binational analysis publication-title: J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1277-3 – volume: 29 start-page: 59 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib31 article-title: Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future publication-title: Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000339 – volume: 38 start-page: 272 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib32 article-title: Reconceiving egg freezing: insights from an analysis of 5 years of data from a UK clinic publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.003 – volume: 35 start-page: 1623 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib50 article-title: Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation publication-title: J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1255-9 – volume: 25 start-page: 168 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib28 article-title: Egg freezing experiences of women in Turkey: from the social context to the narratives of reproductive ageing and empowerment publication-title: Eur. J. Wom. Stud. doi: 10.1177/1350506817742929 – volume: 109 start-page: 1097 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib30 article-title: To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation publication-title: Fertil. Steril. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.127 – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib60 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib65 – volume: 21 start-page: 101 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib62 article-title: Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women publication-title: JBRA Assist Reprod. – volume: 69 start-page: 1018 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib12 article-title: The politics of ‘the natural family’ in Israel: state policy and kinship ideologies publication-title: Soc. Sci. Med. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.044 – volume: 2 start-page: 16 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib13 article-title: Thirty-five years of assisted reproductive technologies in Israel publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.004 – volume: 34 start-page: 1207 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib63 article-title: Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation publication-title: J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0968-5 – volume: 46 start-page: 399 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib54 article-title: Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran publication-title: J. Relig. Health doi: 10.1007/s10943-007-9108-3 – volume: 37 start-page: 425 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib11 article-title: Reproductive outcomes after oocyte banking for fertility preservation publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.07.005 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib14 – volume: 2 start-page: 62 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib67 article-title: Conceiving IVF in Iran publication-title: Reprod. Biomed. Soc. Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.07.002 – volume: 66 start-page: 213 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib2 article-title: Social egg freezing: developing countries are not exempt publication-title: J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0803-9 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib68 – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib70 – volume: 17 start-page: 470 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib69 article-title: “Banking time”: Egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility publication-title: Cult. Health Sex. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.951881 – volume: 100 start-page: 1343 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib34 article-title: What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? publication-title: Fertil. Steril. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201 – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib46 – volume: 30 start-page: 467 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib47 article-title: Making technology familiar: Orthodox Jews and infertility support, advice, and inspiration publication-title: Cult. Med. Psychiatr. doi: 10.1007/s11013-006-9029-8 – volume: 30 start-page: 338 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib64 article-title: Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers publication-title: Hum. Reprod. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu317 – year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib37 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib38 – volume: 29 start-page: 716 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976_bib25 article-title: Moral women, immoral technologies: how devout women negotiate gender, religion, and assisted reproductive technologies publication-title: Gend. Soc. doi: 10.1177/0891243215591504
SSID	ssj0001083
Score	2.4184306
Snippet	In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—and how... In this article, we elucidate how elective egg freezing (EEF) has been received within the three Abrahamic traditions-Judaism, Christianity, and Islam-and how...
SourceID	proquest pubmed crossref elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	112976
SubjectTerms	Christianity Cryopreservation Eggs Elective egg freezing Ethnography Female Fertility preservation Freezing Humans Islam Israel Judaism Marriage Medicine Morality Morals Religion Spouses Technology Traditions United States Women
Title	Abrahamic traditions and egg freezing: Religious Women's experiences in local moral worlds
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112976 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32278236 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2437997877 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2388825534
Volume	253
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000533531900026&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1873-5347 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001083 issn: 0277-9536 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1baxNBFB7SVkpBROMtWssIgkrZsJdMZrdvsVSsaPGhSvBlmdk906Ykm5BNS-kP8fd65raJ1lJ98GUJO5zd7H7fnjlz5lwIeQUli3nclwEUWRn0ClYGMlEq6EsRMohDkSqD9Cd-dJQOh9mXVuuHz4W5GPOqSi8vs9l_hRrPIdg6dfYf4G4uiifwN4KOR4Qdj38F_ECa5OdRods_lDYiy2wRwMnJrpoDXLkcZxeNrENgdRkG47mHpvKxiZM1M93uxGTxm9qq9aox61J7fWaQJpHfqjf1n7I0XnE0HFanUxc5rPsXiaV_9h2q3UqK80mwL-YTGLvc99lp1cwZ33zY82gulkHKpr_A1WhqTeFaJ4jCqhsjDpdBg12wqjflScASW3_T6-aYJSvaVduGtlvMNcVvfRBnXaQ0PjU-bFffpHtdAt_vbGKgT3QWcJz8VojbTu1uaI1sxJxlqC03BocHw4_NHB-h5fpLtOAf77tFNv2VbjJ7blrWGPPm-D6559YldGD59IC0oGqTzc8Ozja5a_271KattUnHgk_d3FDTN66A-duH5HtDQbqkIEUKUqQg9RTcow0BqSHg65qu0I-OKmroRw39qKXfI_L1_cHx_ofA9fAICjR9F0GPFUL2IIqFzIoSzd8IUO_Lsi-ZwLVtlmYRcLTRU1aGIIVuFhBJkD1VgpJChcljsl5NK3hKaMR4xFUBUQZZD61uqQWEQhmeMhWrDun7V5wXrsC97rMyzn0k41newJRrmHILU4eEjeDM1ni5XWTPY5i7r8yaoDkS8nbhbY967hRHnZvCoBlOn7xDXjbDqOv1Bp6oAMHI0bzGBTHDj6RDnli2NH_YE-3ZjSPPydbyw9sm64v5Obwgd4qLxaie75A1Pkx3HM9_AhGMz4o
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abrahamic+traditions+and+egg+freezing%3A+Religious+Women%27s+experiences+in+local+moral+worlds&rft.jtitle=Social+science+%26+medicine+%281982%29&rft.au=Inhorn%2C+Marcia+C&rft.au=Birenbaum-Carmeli%2C+Daphna&rft.au=Vale%2C+Mira+D&rft.au=Patrizio%2C+Pasquale&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.volume=253&rft.spage=112976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.socscimed.2020.112976&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32278236&rft.externalDocID=32278236
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0277-9536&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0277-9536&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0277-9536&client=summon