Replacing coal in Georgia's power plants with woody biomass to increase carbon benefit: A mixed integer linear programming model

To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous mixed integer linear optimization model satisfying both traditional timber demand in Georgia and its neighboring states (Alabama, Florida, North...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Journal of environmental management Ročník 316; s. 115060
Hlavní autori: Masum, Farhad Hossain, Wang, Weiwei, Colson, Greg, Dwivedi, Puneet
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England Elsevier Ltd 15.08.2022
Predmet:
ISSN:0301-4797, 1095-8630, 1095-8630
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous mixed integer linear optimization model satisfying both traditional timber demand in Georgia and its neighboring states (Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and additional bioenergy demand to replace coal in the power plants of Georgia for 50 years, maximizing social welfare. We used Forest Inventory & Analysis unit level yield of five forest types (planted softwood, natural softwood, upland hardwood, bottomland hardwood, and mixed forest), timber demand, and price information, and developed three scenarios. In the Baseline scenario, traditional annual timber demand (152 million tons of wood) was satisfied with no coal replacement. In Scenario 1, 100% coal (7.34 million tons annually) was replaced using pulpwood only, along with traditional demand. In Scenario 2, also with traditional demand, 100% coal was replaced using pulpwood and logging residues. It would require approximately 336 and 98 thousand acres of additional annual timberland harvested in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively, compared to Baseline (1280 thousand acres). During 50 years, a total of 9.3, 10.2, and 9.6 billion tons of timber was produced in Baseline, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2, respectively. About one-third of all torrefaction plants would be located in the central region of Georgia. The net change in stand carbon was positive in all three scenarios—the highest in Baseline (1330 million tons C), followed by Scenario 2 (1261 million tons C), and the lowest in Scenario 1 (872 million tons C). About 240 million tons of carbon was avoided by using biomass instead of coal in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. In Baseline, with continued emission from coal usage in the power plant for 50 years (285 million tons C), net carbon benefit was 1046 million tons C. Replacing 100% of coal with both pulpwood and logging residues provided a net benefit of 1501 million tons C, about 43% higher compared to baseline. [Display omitted] •1.28 million acres of forest harvested annually from 6 states without biopower.•Forestland harvest can reach up to 1.62 million acres with biopower.•75 torrefaction plants will be required to meet Georgia's biopower demand.•Bioenergy demand in Georgia will be primarily satisfied by Georgia and Alabama.•Replacing coal with pulpwood and logging residue yields the highest carbon benefit.
AbstractList To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous mixed integer linear optimization model satisfying both traditional timber demand in Georgia and its neighboring states (Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and additional bioenergy demand to replace coal in the power plants of Georgia for 50 years, maximizing social welfare. We used Forest Inventory & Analysis unit level yield of five forest types (planted softwood, natural softwood, upland hardwood, bottomland hardwood, and mixed forest), timber demand, and price information, and developed three scenarios. In the Baseline scenario, traditional annual timber demand (152 million tons of wood) was satisfied with no coal replacement. In Scenario 1, 100% coal (7.34 million tons annually) was replaced using pulpwood only, along with traditional demand. In Scenario 2, also with traditional demand, 100% coal was replaced using pulpwood and logging residues. It would require approximately 336 and 98 thousand acres of additional annual timberland harvested in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively, compared to Baseline (1280 thousand acres). During 50 years, a total of 9.3, 10.2, and 9.6 billion tons of timber was produced in Baseline, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2, respectively. About one-third of all torrefaction plants would be located in the central region of Georgia. The net change in stand carbon was positive in all three scenarios-the highest in Baseline (1330 million tons C), followed by Scenario 2 (1261 million tons C), and the lowest in Scenario 1 (872 million tons C). About 240 million tons of carbon was avoided by using biomass instead of coal in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. In Baseline, with continued emission from coal usage in the power plant for 50 years (285 million tons C), net carbon benefit was 1046 million tons C. Replacing 100% of coal with both pulpwood and logging residues provided a net benefit of 1501 million tons C, about 43% higher compared to baseline.
To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous mixed integer linear optimization model satisfying both traditional timber demand in Georgia and its neighboring states (Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and additional bioenergy demand to replace coal in the power plants of Georgia for 50 years, maximizing social welfare. We used Forest Inventory & Analysis unit level yield of five forest types (planted softwood, natural softwood, upland hardwood, bottomland hardwood, and mixed forest), timber demand, and price information, and developed three scenarios. In the Baseline scenario, traditional annual timber demand (152 million tons of wood) was satisfied with no coal replacement. In Scenario 1, 100% coal (7.34 million tons annually) was replaced using pulpwood only, along with traditional demand. In Scenario 2, also with traditional demand, 100% coal was replaced using pulpwood and logging residues. It would require approximately 336 and 98 thousand acres of additional annual timberland harvested in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively, compared to Baseline (1280 thousand acres). During 50 years, a total of 9.3, 10.2, and 9.6 billion tons of timber was produced in Baseline, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2, respectively. About one-third of all torrefaction plants would be located in the central region of Georgia. The net change in stand carbon was positive in all three scenarios-the highest in Baseline (1330 million tons C), followed by Scenario 2 (1261 million tons C), and the lowest in Scenario 1 (872 million tons C). About 240 million tons of carbon was avoided by using biomass instead of coal in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. In Baseline, with continued emission from coal usage in the power plant for 50 years (285 million tons C), net carbon benefit was 1046 million tons C. Replacing 100% of coal with both pulpwood and logging residues provided a net benefit of 1501 million tons C, about 43% higher compared to baseline.To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous mixed integer linear optimization model satisfying both traditional timber demand in Georgia and its neighboring states (Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and additional bioenergy demand to replace coal in the power plants of Georgia for 50 years, maximizing social welfare. We used Forest Inventory & Analysis unit level yield of five forest types (planted softwood, natural softwood, upland hardwood, bottomland hardwood, and mixed forest), timber demand, and price information, and developed three scenarios. In the Baseline scenario, traditional annual timber demand (152 million tons of wood) was satisfied with no coal replacement. In Scenario 1, 100% coal (7.34 million tons annually) was replaced using pulpwood only, along with traditional demand. In Scenario 2, also with traditional demand, 100% coal was replaced using pulpwood and logging residues. It would require approximately 336 and 98 thousand acres of additional annual timberland harvested in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively, compared to Baseline (1280 thousand acres). During 50 years, a total of 9.3, 10.2, and 9.6 billion tons of timber was produced in Baseline, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2, respectively. About one-third of all torrefaction plants would be located in the central region of Georgia. The net change in stand carbon was positive in all three scenarios-the highest in Baseline (1330 million tons C), followed by Scenario 2 (1261 million tons C), and the lowest in Scenario 1 (872 million tons C). About 240 million tons of carbon was avoided by using biomass instead of coal in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. In Baseline, with continued emission from coal usage in the power plant for 50 years (285 million tons C), net carbon benefit was 1046 million tons C. Replacing 100% of coal with both pulpwood and logging residues provided a net benefit of 1501 million tons C, about 43% higher compared to baseline.
To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous mixed integer linear optimization model satisfying both traditional timber demand in Georgia and its neighboring states (Alabama, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and additional bioenergy demand to replace coal in the power plants of Georgia for 50 years, maximizing social welfare. We used Forest Inventory & Analysis unit level yield of five forest types (planted softwood, natural softwood, upland hardwood, bottomland hardwood, and mixed forest), timber demand, and price information, and developed three scenarios. In the Baseline scenario, traditional annual timber demand (152 million tons of wood) was satisfied with no coal replacement. In Scenario 1, 100% coal (7.34 million tons annually) was replaced using pulpwood only, along with traditional demand. In Scenario 2, also with traditional demand, 100% coal was replaced using pulpwood and logging residues. It would require approximately 336 and 98 thousand acres of additional annual timberland harvested in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, respectively, compared to Baseline (1280 thousand acres). During 50 years, a total of 9.3, 10.2, and 9.6 billion tons of timber was produced in Baseline, Scenario 1, and Scenario 2, respectively. About one-third of all torrefaction plants would be located in the central region of Georgia. The net change in stand carbon was positive in all three scenarios—the highest in Baseline (1330 million tons C), followed by Scenario 2 (1261 million tons C), and the lowest in Scenario 1 (872 million tons C). About 240 million tons of carbon was avoided by using biomass instead of coal in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. In Baseline, with continued emission from coal usage in the power plant for 50 years (285 million tons C), net carbon benefit was 1046 million tons C. Replacing 100% of coal with both pulpwood and logging residues provided a net benefit of 1501 million tons C, about 43% higher compared to baseline. [Display omitted] •1.28 million acres of forest harvested annually from 6 states without biopower.•Forestland harvest can reach up to 1.62 million acres with biopower.•75 torrefaction plants will be required to meet Georgia's biopower demand.•Bioenergy demand in Georgia will be primarily satisfied by Georgia and Alabama.•Replacing coal with pulpwood and logging residue yields the highest carbon benefit.
ArticleNumber 115060
Author Wang, Weiwei
Colson, Greg
Dwivedi, Puneet
Masum, Farhad Hossain
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Farhad Hossain
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6279-5545
  surname: Masum
  fullname: Masum, Farhad Hossain
  email: masum@uga.edu, mfhmasum@gmail.com
  organization: Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Weiwei
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1244-9249
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Weiwei
  email: weiwei.wang23@gmail.com
  organization: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Greg
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9863-4399
  surname: Colson
  fullname: Colson, Greg
  email: gcolson@uga.edu
  organization: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Puneet
  surname: Dwivedi
  fullname: Dwivedi, Puneet
  email: puneetd@uga.edu
  organization: Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkc1uEzEURi1URNPCI4C8g80E_8T2DCxQVUFBqoSEYG157twJjmbsYDsN3fHoOEpgwaasvPD5Pvvec0HOQgxIyHPOlpxx_Xqz3GC4m11YCibEknPFNHtEFpx1qmm1ZGdkwSTjzcp05pxc5LxhjEnBzRNyLpVqW23Egvz6gtvJgQ9rCtFN1Ad6gzGtvXuZ6TbuMdF6H0qme1--032Mwz3tfZxdzrTEykNCl5GCS30MtMeAoy9v6BWd_U8cKlBwXVsmH9DVshTXyc3z4cE5Djg9JY9HN2V8djovybcP779ef2xuP998ur66bUB2bWm47AdtQCq50tC1AoCbTgK2Qw-aSzOCEWw0gjtpBtMz4GrVdsJhK1qhcZSX5NWxt_7gxw5zsbPPgFMdDuMuW6G1MZ0QavU_aFUgNFcVfXFCd_2Mg90mP7t0b_8suALqCECKOScc_yKc2YNIu7EnkfYg0h5F1tzbf3Lgiys-hpKcnx5MvzumsW70zmOyGTwGwMEnhGKH6B9o-A0ZE7z7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2024_103401
crossref_primary_10_3390_en16062725
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_renene_2024_120625
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2022_113032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2025_107972
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esr_2025_101698
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_120311
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sftr_2025_100831
crossref_primary_10_3390_f13091460
crossref_primary_10_3103_S1068364X24701291
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109514
10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00079-5
10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.003
10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00010-7
10.1287/opre.1040.0169
10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.09.008
10.1111/gcbb.12276
10.1111/gcbb.12199
10.1111/gcbb.12554
10.1287/opre.1070.0472
10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.064
10.1007/s12010-008-8407-9
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.037
10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.006
10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00057-4
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.008
10.1016/j.tre.2010.03.002
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.031
10.1371/journal.pone.0100030
10.1002/bbb.1803
10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00033-3
10.3732/ajb.1000150
10.1021/acs.est.1c04301
10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.125
10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.121
10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.022
10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00354-0
10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.012
10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.028
10.1111/gcbb.12386
10.1093/sjaf/35.2.80
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7S9
L.6
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1095-8630
ExternalDocumentID 35588672
10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115060
S0301479722006338
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations North Carolina
Georgia
Alabama
Florida
Tennessee
South Carolina
GeographicLocations_xml – name: South Carolina
– name: Tennessee
– name: Alabama
– name: Florida
– name: North Carolina
– name: Georgia
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-~X
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
9JN
9JO
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAHCO
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AARJD
AAXUO
ABFRF
ABFYP
ABJNI
ABLST
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AHHHB
AHIDL
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJOXV
AKIFW
AKYCK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AOMHK
AVARZ
AXJTR
BELTK
BKOJK
BKOMP
BLECG
BLXMC
CS3
DM4
DU5
EBS
EFBJH
EFLBG
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HMC
IHE
J1W
JARJE
KCYFY
KOM
LG5
LY8
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
PRBVW
Q38
ROL
RPZ
RXW
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SPC
SPCBC
SSB
SSJ
SSO
SSR
SSZ
T5K
TAE
TWZ
WH7
XSW
Y6R
YK3
ZCA
ZU3
~02
~G-
~KM
29K
3EH
53G
9DU
AAHBH
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYJJ
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABEFU
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADFGL
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADXHL
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGQPQ
AI.
AIDBO
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
CAG
CITATION
COF
D-I
EFKBS
EJD
FEDTE
FGOYB
G-2
HVGLF
HZ~
R2-
SEN
SEW
UHS
UQL
VH1
WUQ
XPP
YV5
ZMT
ZY4
~HD
AGCQF
AGRNS
BNPGV
NPM
SSH
7S9
L.6
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-13bd67c35346c982cc1793ce8dbc6137fc720f721a37d7b0c154892ae82826ef3
ISICitedReferencesCount 12
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000805766600003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0301-4797
1095-8630
IngestDate Mon Sep 29 06:20:19 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 02 11:10:05 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:27 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:25:29 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:38:25 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:38:39 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords CO2e
US South
BTU
MMBTU
C
$
CO2
GHG
Growth and Yield
ppm
Forest biomass
Supply Chain Optimization
lb
tons
Biopower
Electricity generation
Language English
License Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c398t-13bd67c35346c982cc1793ce8dbc6137fc720f721a37d7b0c154892ae82826ef3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-1244-9249
0000-0002-6279-5545
0000-0002-9863-4399
PMID 35588672
PQID 2661012615
PQPubID 24069
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2667792254
proquest_miscellaneous_2661012615
pubmed_primary_35588672
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115060
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115060
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115060
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-08-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-08-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-08-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of environmental management
PublicationTitleAlternate J Environ Manage
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Honey (bib25) 2019
(bib43) 2019
Hoque, Sokhansanj, Mani, Jafari, Lim, Zaini (bib26) July 16–19, 2006
Searcy, Flynn (bib47) 2009; 154
(bib16) 2010; vol. 4
Brandeis, Hartsell (bib3) 2014
Murphy, Sosa, McDonnell, Devlin (bib38) 2016; 109
Xu, Latta, Lee, Lewandrowski, Wang (bib61) 2021; 55
Costanza, Abt, McKerrow, Collazo (bib8) 2017; 9
Timmons, Buchholz, Veeneman (bib49) 2016; 8
Pre Consultants (bib7) 2013
Dwivedi, Khanna (bib14) 2015; 7
(bib20) 2018
(bib41) 2020
(bib2) 2018
Dwivedi, Khanna (bib13) 2014; 9
Dale, Parish, Kline, Tobin (bib9) 2017; 396
Constantino, Martins, Borges (bib6) 2008; 56
Duden, Verweij, Junginger, Abt, Henderson, Dale (bib11) 2017; 11
US (bib52) 2020
Jernigan, Gallagher, Mitchell, Smidt L (bib63) 2016; 66
Nagel (bib39) 2000; 16
Ekşioğlu, Acharya, Leightley, Arora (bib15) 2009; 57
Parajuli, Bardon (bib44) 2017
(bib40) 2020
(bib19) 2020
Kim, Wear, Coulston, Li (bib31) 2018; 93
Latta, Baker, Beach, Rose, McCarl (bib33) 2013; 19
bib57
Khanna, Önal, Dhungana, Wander (bib29) 2011; 35
McNamee, Adams, McManus, Dooley, Darvell, Williams (bib36) 2016; 113
Guo, Hodges, Abt (bib23) 2011; 35
Masum, Dwivedi, Anderson (bib35) 2020; 117
Duden, Rubino, Tarr, Verweij, Faaij, van der Hilst (bib12) 2018
Manouchehrinejad, Bilek, Mani (bib62) 2021; 178
Rosson (bib46) 2020
US (bib53) 2020
Frombo, Minciardi, Robba, Rosso, Sacile (bib18) 2009; 33
(bib59) 2020
Abt, Abt, Galik (bib1) 2012; 58
(bib58) 2018
Lamlom, Savidge (bib32) 2003; 25
TMS (bib48) 2020
Niklas, Spatz (bib42) 2010; 97
Moore, Williams, Rodriguez, Hepinstall-Cymmerman (bib37) 2011
Gunnarsson, Rönnqvist, Lundgren (bib22) 2004; 158
US (bib51) 2018
Huang, Chen, Fan (bib27) 2010; 46
Kim, Realff, Lee, Whittaker, Furtner (bib30) 2011; 35
Phanphanich, Mani (bib45) 2011; 102
Bridgwater, Toft, Brammer (bib4) 2002; 6
Domalski, Jobe, Milne (bib10) 1986
Hodges, Court, Rahmani (bib24) 2017
(bib55) 2015; vol. 3
Freppaz, Minciardi, Robba, Rovatti, Sacile, Taramasso (bib17) 2004; 26
Lin, Rodríguez, Shastri, Hansen, Ting (bib34) 2014; 156
(bib56) 2018; vol. 5
(bib50) 2020
Goycoolea, Murray, Barahona, Epstein, Weintraub (bib21) 2005; 53
Vukašinović, Gordić (bib60) 2016; 178
Brown, Dwivedi, Mani, Matisoff, Mohan, Mullen (bib5) 2021
Khanal, Straka, Willis (bib28) 2017
US (bib54) 2021
Huang (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib27) 2010; 46
Moore (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib37) 2011
Xu (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib61) 2021; 55
Nagel (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib39) 2000; 16
Dale (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib9) 2017; 396
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib20) 2018
Masum (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib35) 2020; 117
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib58) 2018
Costanza (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib8) 2017; 9
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib55) 2015; vol. 3
Phanphanich (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib45) 2011; 102
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib16) 2010; vol. 4
Bridgwater (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib4) 2002; 6
Kim (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib30) 2011; 35
Goycoolea (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib21) 2005; 53
Ekşioğlu (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib15) 2009; 57
Hoque (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib26) 2006
Parajuli (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib44) 2017
Timmons (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib49) 2016; 8
Abt (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib1) 2012; 58
Honey (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib25) 2019
Brandeis (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib3) 2014
Constantino (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib6) 2008; 56
Guo (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib23) 2011; 35
Murphy (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib38) 2016; 109
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib40) 2020
US (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib52) 2020
Dwivedi (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib14) 2015; 7
Jernigan (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib63) 2016; 66
TMS (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib48) 2020
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib2) 2018
Searcy (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib47) 2009; 154
Brown (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib5) 2021
Niklas (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib42) 2010; 97
Freppaz (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib17) 2004; 26
US (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib54)
Manouchehrinejad (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib62) 2021; 178
Frombo (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib18) 2009; 33
McNamee (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib36) 2016; 113
Khanna (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib29) 2011; 35
Duden (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib12) 2018
US (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib53) 2020
Khanal (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib28) 2017
Rosson (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib46) 2020
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib43) 2019
Latta (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib33) 2013; 19
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib56) 2018; vol. 5
Domalski (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib10) 1986
Hodges (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib24) 2017
Vukašinović (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib60) 2016; 178
Lin (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib34) 2014; 156
(10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib50) 2020
Pre Consultants (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib7) 2013
Gunnarsson (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib22) 2004; 158
Kim (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib31) 2018; 93
Dwivedi (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib13) 2014; 9
Lamlom (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib32) 2003; 25
Duden (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib11) 2017; 11
US (10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib51) 2018
References_xml – year: 2013
  ident: bib7
  article-title: US LCI Database Simapro LCA Software
– volume: 46
  start-page: 820
  year: 2010
  end-page: 830
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Multistage optimization of the supply chains of biofuels
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Part E Logist Transp Rev
– year: 2020
  ident: bib59
  article-title: Evalidator version 1.8.0.0.1 2020
– ident: bib57
  article-title: Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide volume 1: field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots
– volume: 25
  start-page: 381
  year: 2003
  end-page: 388
  ident: bib32
  article-title: A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1474
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1484
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Economics of herbaceous bioenergy crops for electricity generation: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
– volume: 7
  start-page: 945
  year: 2015
  end-page: 957
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Abatement cost of wood-based energy products at the production level on afforested and reforested lands
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
– start-page: 15
  year: July 16–19, 2006
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Economics of pellet production for export market
  publication-title: Proc. Can. Soc. Bioeng.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 372
  year: 2009
  end-page: 383
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Planning woody biomass logistics for energy production: a strategic decision model
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1342
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1352
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Analyzing the design and management of biomass-to-biorefinery supply chain
  publication-title: Comput. Ind. Eng.
– volume: 66
  start-page: 185
  year: 2016
  end-page: 191
  ident: bib63
  article-title: Teeter High tonnage harvesting and skidding for loblolly pine energy plantations
  publication-title: For. Prod. J.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib41
  article-title: Global climate change, vital signs of the planet: carbon dioxide 2020
– year: 2019
  ident: bib43
  article-title: OriginPro, Version 2019b
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1029
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Modeling the impacts of wood pellet demand on forest dynamics in southeastern United States
  publication-title: Biofuel., Bioprod. Bioref.
– volume: 156
  start-page: 256
  year: 2014
  end-page: 266
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Integrated strategic and tactical biomass-biofuel supply chain optimization
  publication-title: Bioresour. Technol.
– volume: 102
  start-page: 1246
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1253
  ident: bib45
  article-title: Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass
  publication-title: Bioresour. Technol.
– volume: 58
  start-page: 523
  year: 2012
  end-page: 539
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Effect of bioenergy demands and supply response on markets, carbon, and land use
  publication-title: For. Sci.
– volume: 158
  start-page: 103
  year: 2004
  end-page: 123
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Supply chain modelling of forest fuel
  publication-title: Eur. J. Oper. Res.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib50
  article-title: South-wide Logging Rates: 4th Quarter 2019
– volume: 9
  start-page: 924
  year: 2017
  end-page: 939
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Bioenergy production and forest landscape change in the southeastern United States
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
– year: 2011
  ident: bib37
  article-title: Quantifying the Value of Non-timber Ecosystem Services from Georgia's Private Forests
– year: 2017
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Economic Contributions of the Forest Industry and Forest-based Recreation in Florida in 2016
– volume: 154
  start-page: 92
  year: 2009
  end-page: 107
  ident: bib47
  article-title: The impact of biomass availability and processing cost on optimum size and processing technology selection
  publication-title: Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
– start-page: 118
  year: 2021
  ident: bib5
  article-title: A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
– volume: 117
  year: 2020
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Estimating unit production cost, carbon intensity, and carbon abatement cost of electricity generation from bioenergy feedstocks in Georgia, United States
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
– volume: 6
  year: 2002
  ident: bib4
  article-title: A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy
– volume: 93
  start-page: 45
  year: 2018
  end-page: 52
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Forest land use responses to wood product markets
  publication-title: For. Pol. Econ.
– year: 2019
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Economic Impacts of Forestry and Forest Product Industries in Tennessee
– year: 2020
  ident: bib40
  article-title: World of Change: Global Temperatures
– year: 2020
  ident: bib19
  article-title: GAMS version 31.2.0 2020
– volume: 396
  start-page: 143
  year: 2017
  end-page: 149
  ident: bib9
  article-title: How is wood-based pellet production affecting forest conditions in the southeastern United States?
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manag.
– volume: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Abatement cost of GHG emissions for wood-based electricity and ethanol at production and consumption levels
  publication-title: PLoS One
– year: 2018
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Economic Benefits of the Forest Industry in Georgia
– volume: 8
  start-page: 631
  year: 2016
  end-page: 643
  ident: bib49
  article-title: Forest biomass energy: assessing atmospheric carbon impacts by discounting future carbon flows
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
– year: 1986
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Thermodynamic Data for Biomass Conversion and Waste Incineration
– volume: 26
  start-page: 15
  year: 2004
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Optimizing forest biomass exploitation for energy supply at a regional level
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
– year: 2020
  ident: bib53
  article-title: Electricity Data Browser. Electr Data
– volume: 53
  start-page: 490
  year: 2005
  end-page: 500
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions: exploring exact approaches
  publication-title: Oper. Res.
– volume: 56
  start-page: 542
  year: 2008
  end-page: 551
  ident: bib6
  article-title: A new mixed-integer programming model for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions
  publication-title: Oper. Res.
– year: 2014
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Forests of Georgia
  publication-title: Resource Update FS-72
– volume: vol. 4
  year: 2010
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Biomass and Air Emission
– year: 2018
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Forest Resource Report
– year: 2021
  ident: bib54
  article-title: How much carbon dioxide is produced per kilowatthour of U.S. electricity generation? Freq Asked Quest 2021
– start-page: 841
  year: 2018
  end-page: 860
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Impact of increased wood pellet demand on biodiversity in the south-eastern United States
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
– volume: 178
  start-page: 483
  year: 2021
  end-page: 493
  ident: bib62
  article-title: Techno-economic analysis of integrated torrefaction and pelletization systems to produce torrefied wood pellets
  publication-title: Renew. Energy
– volume: 113
  start-page: 177
  year: 2016
  end-page: 188
  ident: bib36
  article-title: An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions
  publication-title: Energy Convers. Manag.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib48
  article-title: Timber Stumpage Price Summary 4th Quarter 2019
– volume: 55
  start-page: 14806
  year: 2021
  end-page: 14816
  ident: bib61
  article-title: Regionalized life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of forest biomass use for electricity generation in the United States
  publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol.
– volume: 178
  start-page: 250
  year: 2016
  end-page: 259
  ident: bib60
  article-title: Optimization and GIS-based combined approach for the determination of the most cost-effective investments in biomass sector
  publication-title: Appl. Energy
– volume: 35
  start-page: 853
  year: 2011
  end-page: 871
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Design of biomass processing network for biofuel production using an MILP model
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
– volume: vol. 3
  year: 2015
  ident: bib55
  publication-title: Clean Power Plan, State at a Glance: Georgia - United States Environmental Protection Agency
– year: 2018
  ident: bib58
  article-title: The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and User Guide for Phase 2
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1587
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1594
  ident: bib42
  article-title: Worldwide correlations of mechanical properties and green wood density
  publication-title: Am. J. Bot.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 80
  year: 2011
  end-page: 86
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Forest biomass supply for bioenergy production and its impacts on roundwood markets in Tennessee
  publication-title: South. J. Appl. For.
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1040
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1055
  ident: bib38
  article-title: Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-energy systems in Ireland modelled with biomass supply chain optimisation based on greenhouse gas emission reduction
  publication-title: Energy
– volume: vol. 5
  year: 2018
  ident: bib56
  publication-title: Emission Factors for Greenhouse Gas Inventories
– year: 2018
  ident: bib51
  article-title: How Much Electricity Is Lost in Transmission and Distribution in the United States?
– year: 2020
  ident: bib46
  article-title: Personal Communication with James F Rosson, Research Forester, Forest Service
– year: 2017
  ident: bib44
  article-title: Economic Contribution of the Forest Sector
– start-page: 264
  year: 2020
  ident: bib52
  article-title: August 2020 Monthly Energy Review
– volume: 19
  start-page: 361
  year: 2013
  end-page: 383
  ident: bib33
  article-title: A multi-sector intertemporal optimization approach to assess the GHG implications of U.S. forest and agricultural biomass electricity expansion
  publication-title: J. For. Econ.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 91
  year: 2000
  end-page: 102
  ident: bib39
  article-title: Determination of an economic energy supply structure based on biomass using a mixed-integer linear optimization model
  publication-title: Ecol. Eng.
– year: 2017
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Economic Contribution Analysis of South Carolina's Forestry Sector
– volume: 117
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib35
  article-title: Estimating unit production cost, carbon intensity, and carbon abatement cost of electricity generation from bioenergy feedstocks in Georgia, United States
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109514
– volume: vol. 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib16
– volume: 26
  start-page: 15
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib17
  article-title: Optimizing forest biomass exploitation for energy supply at a regional level
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00079-5
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1342
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib15
  article-title: Analyzing the design and management of biomass-to-biorefinery supply chain
  publication-title: Comput. Ind. Eng.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.003
– volume: 6
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib4
  article-title: A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion
  publication-title: Renew. Sustain. Energy
  doi: 10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00010-7
– volume: 53
  start-page: 490
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib21
  article-title: Harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions: exploring exact approaches
  publication-title: Oper. Res.
  doi: 10.1287/opre.1040.0169
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib7
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib24
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib20
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib46
– start-page: 15
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib26
  article-title: Economics of pellet production for export market
  publication-title: Proc. Can. Soc. Bioeng.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 361
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib33
  article-title: A multi-sector intertemporal optimization approach to assess the GHG implications of U.S. forest and agricultural biomass electricity expansion
  publication-title: J. For. Econ.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 372
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib18
  article-title: Planning woody biomass logistics for energy production: a strategic decision model
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.09.008
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib25
– volume: 8
  start-page: 631
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib49
  article-title: Forest biomass energy: assessing atmospheric carbon impacts by discounting future carbon flows
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12276
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib50
– volume: 7
  start-page: 945
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib14
  article-title: Abatement cost of wood-based energy products at the production level on afforested and reforested lands
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12199
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib2
– start-page: 841
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib12
  article-title: Impact of increased wood pellet demand on biodiversity in the south-eastern United States
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12554
– volume: 56
  start-page: 542
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib6
  article-title: A new mixed-integer programming model for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions
  publication-title: Oper. Res.
  doi: 10.1287/opre.1070.0472
– volume: 178
  start-page: 483
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib62
  article-title: Techno-economic analysis of integrated torrefaction and pelletization systems to produce torrefied wood pellets
  publication-title: Renew. Energy
  doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.064
– volume: 154
  start-page: 92
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib47
  article-title: The impact of biomass availability and processing cost on optimum size and processing technology selection
  publication-title: Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.
  doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8407-9
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib43
– volume: vol. 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib56
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib58
– volume: 178
  start-page: 250
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib60
  article-title: Optimization and GIS-based combined approach for the determination of the most cost-effective investments in biomass sector
  publication-title: Appl. Energy
  doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.037
– volume: 113
  start-page: 177
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib36
  article-title: An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions
  publication-title: Energy Convers. Manag.
  doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.006
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib51
– volume: 66
  start-page: 185
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib63
  article-title: Teeter High tonnage harvesting and skidding for loblolly pine energy plantations
  publication-title: For. Prod. J.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 91
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib39
  article-title: Determination of an economic energy supply structure based on biomass using a mixed-integer linear optimization model
  publication-title: Ecol. Eng.
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00057-4
– volume: vol. 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib55
– volume: 35
  start-page: 853
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib30
  article-title: Design of biomass processing network for biofuel production using an MILP model
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.008
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib53
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib28
– volume: 46
  start-page: 820
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib27
  article-title: Multistage optimization of the supply chains of biofuels
  publication-title: Transport. Res. Part E Logist Transp Rev
  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.03.002
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib37
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1474
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib29
  article-title: Economics of herbaceous bioenergy crops for electricity generation: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.031
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib44
– ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib54
– volume: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib13
  article-title: Abatement cost of GHG emissions for wood-based electricity and ethanol at production and consumption levels
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100030
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib40
– year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib10
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1007
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib11
  article-title: Modeling the impacts of wood pellet demand on forest dynamics in southeastern United States
  publication-title: Biofuel., Bioprod. Bioref.
  doi: 10.1002/bbb.1803
– year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib3
  article-title: Forests of Georgia
– volume: 25
  start-page: 381
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib32
  article-title: A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species
  publication-title: Biomass Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00033-3
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1587
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib42
  article-title: Worldwide correlations of mechanical properties and green wood density
  publication-title: Am. J. Bot.
  doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000150
– volume: 55
  start-page: 14806
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib61
  article-title: Regionalized life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of forest biomass use for electricity generation in the United States
  publication-title: Environ. Sci. Technol.
  doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04301
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1040
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib38
  article-title: Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-energy systems in Ireland modelled with biomass supply chain optimisation based on greenhouse gas emission reduction
  publication-title: Energy
  doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.125
– volume: 156
  start-page: 256
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib34
  article-title: Integrated strategic and tactical biomass-biofuel supply chain optimization
  publication-title: Bioresour. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.121
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib48
– volume: 396
  start-page: 143
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib9
  article-title: How is wood-based pellet production affecting forest conditions in the southeastern United States?
  publication-title: For. Ecol. Manag.
  doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.022
– start-page: 264
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib52
– volume: 158
  start-page: 103
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib22
  article-title: Supply chain modelling of forest fuel
  publication-title: Eur. J. Oper. Res.
  doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00354-0
– volume: 93
  start-page: 45
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib31
  article-title: Forest land use responses to wood product markets
  publication-title: For. Pol. Econ.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.012
– start-page: 118
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib5
  article-title: A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
– volume: 102
  start-page: 1246
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib45
  article-title: Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass
  publication-title: Bioresour. Technol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.028
– volume: 9
  start-page: 924
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib8
  article-title: Bioenergy production and forest landscape change in the southeastern United States
  publication-title: GCB Bioenergy
  doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12386
– volume: 58
  start-page: 523
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib1
  article-title: Effect of bioenergy demands and supply response on markets, carbon, and land use
  publication-title: For. Sci.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 80
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060_bib23
  article-title: Forest biomass supply for bioenergy production and its impacts on roundwood markets in Tennessee
  publication-title: South. J. Appl. For.
  doi: 10.1093/sjaf/35.2.80
SSID ssj0003217
Score 2.4561741
Snippet To combat climate change, reducing carbon emissions from coal consumption in the power sector can be an effective strategy. We developed a price-exogenous...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 115060
SubjectTerms Alabama
bioenergy
Biopower
carbon
climate change
coal
Electricity generation
environmental management
Florida
Forest biomass
forest inventory
Georgia
Growth and Yield
hardwood
highlands
mixed forests
North Carolina
power plants
prices
pulpwood
social welfare
softwood
South Carolina
Supply Chain Optimization
Tennessee
US South
woody biomass
Title Replacing coal in Georgia's power plants with woody biomass to increase carbon benefit: A mixed integer linear programming model
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115060
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588672
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2661012615
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2667792254
Volume 316
WOSCitedRecordID wos000805766600003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-8630
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003217
  issn: 0301-4797
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEF6lLRJcEBQK4VEtEhKHysHP7C63CKUCJKpKFDU3a71eq45SJ4qTNtz4RfxGZnbXTqQSCkhcrMiyvXbm88w343kQ8jrI4kAywb1cgYsSF9xHPVh4LJYZ436W55kdNsFOTvhoJE47nR9NLczVhFUVX63E7L-KGvaBsLF09i_E3V4UdsBvEDpsQeyw_SPBA6WeSGVraU1HDRv3xqRYVh_NcCoazo5uC9sw6ebbEZbhA49GKlpWyCQxjV3OMwBHBuqwKG0I8eiyXOncNpmA6yBHxV7ZNsnrEhc1o3W2UN6NqjosWrmRefNZ1nbs8rGcX8gch5rUsmzhe-5i2-e6vNZl-_Vk2jScxHqblphfgxrPTarC6bLSrszbhTfAM8Z2s8k65tbU3ayTnEytlx9gTNCaam1VN5BFj_fdVx6n2yNbyHnDTtiQxbg3hgeHp-3hyr3AdFtcG8Y2XfGLcTxhuRADMODU75C9kCUCtOje4ONw9Km1_VFoZjy397euGXv7y8W2saFt3o5hPWcPyH0nOzqwMHtIOrraJ3ebavZ6nxwMN2VKnamoH5HvLQ4p4pCWFXU4fFNTg0JqUUgRhdSgkDoU0sWUNiikFoXUofAdHVCDQeowSC0G6QYGqcHgY_L1eHj2_oPnxn14KhJ84QVRlveZipIo7ivBQ6XQeCjN80wB6WSFYqFfsDCQEctZ5iv0tkUoNQ_BR9ZFdEB2q2mlnxIa9VUmikCHfqLiWCaigMtJlYhYREjguyRu_vZUuV74OJJlkjZJj-PUSStFaaVWWl3Sa0-b2WYwt53AG5mmjtFappoCEG879VWDgRQ0Pn7Gk5WeLusUKTXQSnBFfnsMYwJsddwlTyyA2jvGgQq8z8Jn_35zz8m99bv6guwu5kv9ktxRV4uynh-SHTbih-7V-AkiTO3H
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Replacing+coal+in+Georgia%27s+power+plants+with+woody+biomass+to+increase+carbon+benefit%3A+A+mixed+integer+linear+programming+model&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+environmental+management&rft.au=Masum%2C+Farhad+Hossain&rft.au=Wang%2C+Weiwei&rft.au=Colson%2C+Greg&rft.au=Dwivedi%2C+Puneet&rft.date=2022-08-15&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.volume=316&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jenvman.2022.115060&rft.externalDocID=S0301479722006338
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0301-4797&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0301-4797&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0301-4797&client=summon