Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?

To evaluate the role of punch biopsy in reducing the occurrence of negative histology provided by large loop excision of the transformation zone in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Retrospective review of computerised data base and clinic files. Colposcopy Clinic, Groote Schuur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 102; no. 7; p. 545
Main Authors: Denny, L A, Soeters, R, Dehaeck, K, Bloch, B
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01.07.1995
Subjects:
ISSN:0306-5456
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract To evaluate the role of punch biopsy in reducing the occurrence of negative histology provided by large loop excision of the transformation zone in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Retrospective review of computerised data base and clinic files. Colposcopy Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Two hundred and ninety-eight women considered suitable for the local outpatient management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Two groups of patients were identified: group A consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and who underwent directed punch biopsy; group B consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and were referred for large loop excision of the transformation zone without confirmatory punch biopsy. In Group A (n = 184) 123 women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed on punch biopsy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone was performed on 116 women and 7 were lost to follow up. The procedure confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 95 cases (82%), but there was no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 21 cases (18%). Sixty-one women had negative punch biopsies. Of these, 13 underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone, 31 had persistently negative follow up cytology, and 9 had positive cervical smears of which 7 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone, and 8 were lost to follow up. Overall, 25% of all negative punch biopsies were falsely negative. In group B 114 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed in 97 cases (85%); one woman had unsuspected microinvasion (1%) and 16 women (14%) had no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone was not statistically different in groups A and B. Punch biopsy does not reduce the occurrence of negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone.
AbstractList To evaluate the role of punch biopsy in reducing the occurrence of negative histology provided by large loop excision of the transformation zone in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Retrospective review of computerised data base and clinic files. Colposcopy Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Two hundred and ninety-eight women considered suitable for the local outpatient management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Two groups of patients were identified: group A consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and who underwent directed punch biopsy; group B consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and were referred for large loop excision of the transformation zone without confirmatory punch biopsy. In Group A (n = 184) 123 women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed on punch biopsy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone was performed on 116 women and 7 were lost to follow up. The procedure confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 95 cases (82%), but there was no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 21 cases (18%). Sixty-one women had negative punch biopsies. Of these, 13 underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone, 31 had persistently negative follow up cytology, and 9 had positive cervical smears of which 7 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone, and 8 were lost to follow up. Overall, 25% of all negative punch biopsies were falsely negative. In group B 114 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed in 97 cases (85%); one woman had unsuspected microinvasion (1%) and 16 women (14%) had no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone was not statistically different in groups A and B. Punch biopsy does not reduce the occurrence of negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone.
To evaluate the role of punch biopsy in reducing the occurrence of negative histology provided by large loop excision of the transformation zone in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the role of punch biopsy in reducing the occurrence of negative histology provided by large loop excision of the transformation zone in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Retrospective review of computerised data base and clinic files.DESIGNRetrospective review of computerised data base and clinic files.Colposcopy Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.SETTINGColposcopy Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.Two hundred and ninety-eight women considered suitable for the local outpatient management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.SUBJECTSTwo hundred and ninety-eight women considered suitable for the local outpatient management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Two groups of patients were identified: group A consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and who underwent directed punch biopsy; group B consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and were referred for large loop excision of the transformation zone without confirmatory punch biopsy.METHODSTwo groups of patients were identified: group A consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and who underwent directed punch biopsy; group B consisted of women who had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia confirmed colposcopically and were referred for large loop excision of the transformation zone without confirmatory punch biopsy.In Group A (n = 184) 123 women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed on punch biopsy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone was performed on 116 women and 7 were lost to follow up. The procedure confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 95 cases (82%), but there was no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 21 cases (18%). Sixty-one women had negative punch biopsies. Of these, 13 underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone, 31 had persistently negative follow up cytology, and 9 had positive cervical smears of which 7 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone, and 8 were lost to follow up. Overall, 25% of all negative punch biopsies were falsely negative. In group B 114 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed in 97 cases (85%); one woman had unsuspected microinvasion (1%) and 16 women (14%) had no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone was not statistically different in groups A and B.RESULTSIn Group A (n = 184) 123 women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed on punch biopsy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone was performed on 116 women and 7 were lost to follow up. The procedure confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 95 cases (82%), but there was no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 21 cases (18%). Sixty-one women had negative punch biopsies. Of these, 13 underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone, 31 had persistently negative follow up cytology, and 9 had positive cervical smears of which 7 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone, and 8 were lost to follow up. Overall, 25% of all negative punch biopsies were falsely negative. In group B 114 were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was confirmed in 97 cases (85%); one woman had unsuspected microinvasion (1%) and 16 women (14%) had no cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone was not statistically different in groups A and B.Punch biopsy does not reduce the occurrence of negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone.CONCLUSIONPunch biopsy does not reduce the occurrence of negative histology after large loop excision of the transformation zone.
Author Soeters, R
Dehaeck, K
Denny, L A
Bloch, B
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: L A
  surname: Denny
  fullname: Denny, L A
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
– sequence: 2
  givenname: R
  surname: Soeters
  fullname: Soeters, R
– sequence: 3
  givenname: K
  surname: Dehaeck
  fullname: Dehaeck, K
– sequence: 4
  givenname: B
  surname: Bloch
  fullname: Bloch, B
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7647056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNotkE1Lw0AYhPdQqbX6E4TFg7fE3c1-JCeRWj8gIEi9eAnJu2_tlnQ3ZhOx_96AncMMAw9zmAsy88EjITecpXzS3T7l0vCEKZGnvChUOjScZypPf2dkwTKmEyWVPicXMe4ZY8ZoOSfzyQ1TekHeHwNGCqHtQoTQOajb9kit6xEGtLQbPexo40IXj7RHOwLSYYfUeXAW_dTClnr8qgf3g7Qs15vP-0tytq3biFenXJKPp_Vm9ZKUb8-vq4cygazIVcIZCuRGKaG0bpRClheF1RJqmVlmUTJjTZ3lOUqQYABUDoWwXBmz5dyiWJLb_92uD98jxqE6uAjYtrXHMMbKGKm1yMQEXp_AsTmgrbreHer-WJ1OEH9hCGBu
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2005_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2025_102913
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2006_02_047
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0301_2115_02_00058_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2010_05_033
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2008_07_007
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0412_2010_01062_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prp_2024_155283
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1479_828X_1996_tb02725_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0090_8258_03_00202_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_00006254_199604000_00021
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2000_tb11103_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anndiagpath_2022_151929
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_10618
crossref_primary_10_1002_lsm_1097
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13392
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2013_02_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0020_7292_98_00042_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0301_2115_99_00026_3
crossref_primary_10_1097_00130404_200309000_00008
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2303_2003_00047_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2303_2010_00754_x
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0034_89102009000500014
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11358.x
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
ExternalDocumentID 7647056
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID --K
.55
.GA
.GJ
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
1~5
23N
3O-
4G.
51W
51X
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52W
52X
53G
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6J9
7-5
7PT
8-1
930
A01
A03
AAEDT
AAEVG
AAIKC
AALRI
AAMNW
AANHP
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABWVN
ACBWZ
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADMGS
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEIMD
AEUQT
AFFNX
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFTJW
AI.
AIURR
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMBMR
BDRZF
BY8
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
LP6
LP7
M41
NEJ
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OZT
P4B
P4D
QB0
R2-
ROL
RPZ
RWI
SSZ
SUPJJ
UHS
VH1
WH7
WIH
WIJ
WQJ
WUP
WXI
X7M
XG1
XV2
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
7X8
AGQPQ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-10e2e17552566b55e0899d64ca43d0de407d7a388e4c4c7cc58c92d1577f11de2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 35
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=10_1111_j_1471_0528_1995_tb11358_x&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0306-5456
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 04:32:53 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:34:24 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3985-10e2e17552566b55e0899d64ca43d0de407d7a388e4c4c7cc58c92d1577f11de2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 7647056
PQID 77466232
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_77466232
pubmed_primary_7647056
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate July 1995
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1995-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 1995
  text: July 1995
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Br J Obstet Gynaecol
PublicationYear 1995
SSID ssj0007764
Score 1.6345806
Snippet To evaluate the role of punch biopsy in reducing the occurrence of negative histology provided by large loop excision of the transformation zone in the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 545
SubjectTerms Adult
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - surgery
Cervix Uteri - pathology
Colposcopy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Middle Aged
Referral and Consultation
Retrospective Studies
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Title Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7647056
https://www.proquest.com/docview/77466232
Volume 102
WOSCitedRecordID wos10_1111_j_1471_0528_1995_tb11358_x&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEF6qFfHiu1ife_AaNZtsdwNCEW3x0JYiFYqXkN2d1YIksalC_72zSYon8eAlt4VlZjLzzc7MN4RchgaDpgHmacHBC8FEntJWeTfcovODwFpTsusPxGgkp9No3CC3q1kY11a58omlozaZdm_k1whTOhiqWTf_8NzOKFdbrRdorJFmgEDGNXSJ6Q9XuBA1eRTmzA4n1JSjdR8POmW8EJNuXI9fLZTvB1yWBEi_AM0y4PR3_nfVXbJdA016V1nGHmlAuk82h3Up_YA8PWRQUDSDPHOTKU5X70taRTgwNMd490bVLMuLJZ07flegiBWpe5ov15DSzNIUXkvecDoY9CYv3UPy3O9N7h-9esGCp1FcjoEUGCB-4Ih7OopzcDVA0wl1EgbmxgAme0YkgZQQ6lALrbnUETM-F8L6TsMtsp5mKRwR6jMmDGgfE-oQj0WJlYFOpLKKBTYUqk0uVrKK0YBdVSJJIfss4pW02qRViTvOK56NGPUnEJ8d_3n0hGxVk-aui_aUNC3-uXBGNvTXYlbMz0uzwO9oPPwGZ3TBRA
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does+colposcopically+directed+punch+biopsy+reduce+the+incidence+of+negative+LLETZ%3F&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynaecology&rft.au=Denny%2C+L+A&rft.au=Soeters%2C+R&rft.au=Dehaeck%2C+K&rft.au=Bloch%2C+B&rft.date=1995-07-01&rft.issn=0306-5456&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.1995.tb11358.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0306-5456&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0306-5456&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0306-5456&client=summon