Quantitative and qualitative differences worth considering in approaching critical infrastructures resilience

Through the implicit connections between risk, safety, protection and, last but not least, resiliency, that need to be managed, critical infrastructures have become a subject of increasing interest both for specialists and for academics. Based on this premise, this article analyzes in terms of opera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:MATEC web of conferences Vol. 121; p. 11004
Main Authors: Badea, Dorel, Bârsan, Ghiță, Virca, Ioan, Iancu, Dumitru
Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: Les Ulis EDP Sciences 01.01.2017
Subjects:
Critical infrastructure
Curricula
Graduate studies
Infrastructure
Reliability engineering
Resilience
ISSN:2261-236X, 2274-7214, 2261-236X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Through the implicit connections between risk, safety, protection and, last but not least, resiliency, that need to be managed, critical infrastructures have become a subject of increasing interest both for specialists and for academics. Based on this premise, this article analyzes in terms of operational performance several internationally used solutions for assessing resilience, having in view the desire to choose the best in order to be presented in some specialized disciplines of the postgraduate curricula that are annually presented in the educational offer of the Land Forces Academy. The authors also present their own vision on approaching the resilience of critical infrastructures so that it can harmoniously be integrated into the security plans of the holders or operators of such special assets.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
content type line 21
ISSN:2261-236X
2274-7214
2261-236X
DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201712111004