Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage

Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a prominent computational dual-systems framework, in these life-and-death dilemmas, deontological (nonsacrificial) moral judgments stem from a m...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Ročník 119; číslo 31; s. e2119072119
Hlavní autori: van Honk, Jack, Terburg, David, Montoya, Estrella R, Grafman, Jordan, Stein, Dan J, Morgan, Barak
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 02.08.2022
Predmet:
ISSN:1091-6490, 1091-6490
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a prominent computational dual-systems framework, in these life-and-death dilemmas, deontological (nonsacrificial) moral judgments stem from a model-free algorithm that emphasizes the intrinsic value of the sacrificial action, while utilitarian (sacrificial) moral judgments are derived from a model-based algorithm that emphasizes the outcome of the sacrificial action. Rodent decision-making research suggests that the model-based algorithm depends on the basolateral amygdala (BLA), but these findings have not yet been translated to human moral decision-making. Here, in five humans with selective, bilateral BLA damage, we show a breakdown of utilitarian sacrificial moral judgments, pointing at deficient model-based moral decision-making. Across an established set of moral dilemmas, healthy controls frequently sacrifice one person to save numerous others, but BLA-damaged humans withhold such sacrificial judgments even at the cost of thousands of lives. Our translational research confirms a neurocomputational hypothesis drawn from rodent decision-making research by indicating that the model-based algorithm which underlies outcome-based, utilitarian moral judgements in humans critically depends on the BLA.
AbstractList Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a prominent computational dual-systems framework, in these life-and-death dilemmas, deontological (nonsacrificial) moral judgments stem from a model-free algorithm that emphasizes the intrinsic value of the sacrificial action, while utilitarian (sacrificial) moral judgments are derived from a model-based algorithm that emphasizes the outcome of the sacrificial action. Rodent decision-making research suggests that the model-based algorithm depends on the basolateral amygdala (BLA), but these findings have not yet been translated to human moral decision-making. Here, in five humans with selective, bilateral BLA damage, we show a breakdown of utilitarian sacrificial moral judgments, pointing at deficient model-based moral decision-making. Across an established set of moral dilemmas, healthy controls frequently sacrifice one person to save numerous others, but BLA-damaged humans withhold such sacrificial judgments even at the cost of thousands of lives. Our translational research confirms a neurocomputational hypothesis drawn from rodent decision-making research by indicating that the model-based algorithm which underlies outcome-based, utilitarian moral judgements in humans critically depends on the BLA.
Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a prominent computational dual-systems framework, in these life-and-death dilemmas, deontological (nonsacrificial) moral judgments stem from a model-free algorithm that emphasizes the intrinsic value of the sacrificial action, while utilitarian (sacrificial) moral judgments are derived from a model-based algorithm that emphasizes the outcome of the sacrificial action. Rodent decision-making research suggests that the model-based algorithm depends on the basolateral amygdala (BLA), but these findings have not yet been translated to human moral decision-making. Here, in five humans with selective, bilateral BLA damage, we show a breakdown of utilitarian sacrificial moral judgments, pointing at deficient model-based moral decision-making. Across an established set of moral dilemmas, healthy controls frequently sacrifice one person to save numerous others, but BLA-damaged humans withhold such sacrificial judgments even at the cost of thousands of lives. Our translational research confirms a neurocomputational hypothesis drawn from rodent decision-making research by indicating that the model-based algorithm which underlies outcome-based, utilitarian moral judgements in humans critically depends on the BLA.Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a prominent computational dual-systems framework, in these life-and-death dilemmas, deontological (nonsacrificial) moral judgments stem from a model-free algorithm that emphasizes the intrinsic value of the sacrificial action, while utilitarian (sacrificial) moral judgments are derived from a model-based algorithm that emphasizes the outcome of the sacrificial action. Rodent decision-making research suggests that the model-based algorithm depends on the basolateral amygdala (BLA), but these findings have not yet been translated to human moral decision-making. Here, in five humans with selective, bilateral BLA damage, we show a breakdown of utilitarian sacrificial moral judgments, pointing at deficient model-based moral decision-making. Across an established set of moral dilemmas, healthy controls frequently sacrifice one person to save numerous others, but BLA-damaged humans withhold such sacrificial judgments even at the cost of thousands of lives. Our translational research confirms a neurocomputational hypothesis drawn from rodent decision-making research by indicating that the model-based algorithm which underlies outcome-based, utilitarian moral judgements in humans critically depends on the BLA.
Author Grafman, Jordan
Stein, Dan J
Montoya, Estrella R
van Honk, Jack
Terburg, David
Morgan, Barak
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jack
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7955-6500
  surname: van Honk
  fullname: van Honk, Jack
  organization: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584CS, The Netherlands
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2356-8734
  surname: Terburg
  fullname: Terburg, David
  organization: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584CS, The Netherlands
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Estrella R
  surname: Montoya
  fullname: Montoya, Estrella R
  organization: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584CS, The Netherlands
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jordan
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8645-4457
  surname: Grafman
  fullname: Grafman, Jordan
  organization: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Dan J
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7218-7810
  surname: Stein
  fullname: Stein, Dan J
  organization: Medical Research Council Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Barak
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9380-431X
  surname: Morgan
  fullname: Morgan, Barak
  organization: Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNj0tPwzAQhC1URB9w5oZy5JKyfqS2j1DxVCUucI42sV2l2HGJE6H-e4IoEpfdT7OjGe2cTNrYWkIuKSwpSH6zbzEtGaUa5M88ITMKmuYroWHyj6dkntIOAHSh4IxMeaGkAq5n5OWus_hh4lebRZcNfeObHrsG2yzEDn22G8zWBtv2GbredlmFKXocabxhOGwNeswMBtzac3Lq0Cd7cdwL8v5w_7Z-yjevj8_r201ecy10LgxQZA4MYAVKSlGoWlDpqHYFZ7ouam5q45jhtBbKUicqJg06O-qmcsgW5Po3d9_Fz8GmvgxNqq332No4pJKtxpqVBAWj9epoHapgTbnvmoDdofz7n30D8TZgGQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_70108
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2500692122
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2025_115456
crossref_primary_10_1097_WNN_0000000000000344
crossref_primary_10_1080_21507740_2023_2257159
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_02842_8
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X22003193
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2119072119
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
EISSN 1091-6490
ExternalDocumentID 35878039
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
0R~
123
29P
2FS
2WC
4.4
53G
5RE
5VS
85S
AACGO
AAFWJ
AANCE
ABOCM
ABPLY
ABPPZ
ABTLG
ABZEH
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACNCT
ACPRK
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOSN
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BKOMP
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
D0L
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EIF
F5P
FRP
GX1
H13
HH5
HYE
JLS
JSG
JST
KQ8
L7B
LU7
N9A
NPM
N~3
O9-
OK1
PNE
PQQKQ
R.V
RHF
RHI
RNA
RNS
RPM
RXW
SJN
TAE
TN5
UKR
VQA
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XSW
Y6R
YBH
YIF
YIN
YKV
YSK
ZCA
~02
~KM
2AX
7X8
ABBHK
AEUPB
AEXZC
DCCCD
IPSME
JAAYA
JBMMH
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLXEF
JPM
SA0
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3949-4d01a2f0d0ab0877458c417f19f5329c5c3dcdf2d31c48e1f4b27dafec3ddbfa2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISSN 1091-6490
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 09:58:15 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:26:07 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 31
Keywords basolateral amygdala
social decision-making
computational framework
moral judgement
brain lesion
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3949-4d01a2f0d0ab0877458c417f19f5329c5c3dcdf2d31c48e1f4b27dafec3ddbfa2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-7218-7810
0000-0002-9380-431X
0000-0001-7955-6500
0000-0003-2356-8734
0000-0001-8645-4457
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9351380
PMID 35878039
PQID 2694967080
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2694967080
pubmed_primary_35878039
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-08-02
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-08-02
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-08-02
  day: 02
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
PublicationTitleAlternate Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
PublicationYear 2022
SSID ssj0009580
Score 2.4716382
Snippet Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage e2119072119
SubjectTerms Basolateral Nuclear Complex
Decision Making
Humans
Judgment
Morals
Title Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35878039
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2694967080
Volume 119
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qevCirs_1RQQPeqjbJG2TnETFRQSXPSjsraR5yOpuu1pX8N87abvoSQQvPQQKYfgy800y8w1CJyQRiXDKBllmWRABgYUzJyTkPBSCZWwVU_WwCd7vi-FQDpoLt7Ipq5z7xMpRm0L7O_Ku77iUCQeCczF9DfzUKP-62ozQWEQtBlTGl3TxofghuitqNQJJgiSS4Vzah7PuNFfluVc38_pg5Bd-WcWZ3tp_d7iOVhuGiS9rSLTRgs03ULs5wyU-bYSmzzbR3RUwxhcDeTguHAYEesFuAGSOJ75vHz_PTF0Zg6tJ4hgiHiTCvmV5jNXk88moscJGTcAlbaHH3s3D9W3QzFYININtBpEJiaIuNKHKvCZgFAsdEe6IdDGjUseaGW0cNYzoSFjiooxyo5yFdZM5RbfRUl7kdhdhSk1GdALeQEH6Y7jkzACvASJhZegU76Djub1SwK5_kFC5LWZl-m2xDtqpjZ5Oa5GNlMWAmZDJvT_8vY9WqO9K8JUc9AC1HJxce4iW9cf7qHw7qkAB3_7g_gusxMGC
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breakdown+of+utilitarian+moral+judgement+after+basolateral+amygdala+damage&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences+-+PNAS&rft.au=van+Honk%2C+Jack&rft.au=Terburg%2C+David&rft.au=Montoya%2C+Estrella+R&rft.au=Grafman%2C+Jordan&rft.date=2022-08-02&rft.issn=1091-6490&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=31&rft.spage=e2119072119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073%2Fpnas.2119072119&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1091-6490&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1091-6490&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1091-6490&client=summon