Re-conceptualizing the role(s) of science in biodiversity conservation

Science, as both a body of knowledge and a process of acquiring new knowledge, is widely regarded as playing a central role in biodiversity conservation. Science undoubtedly enhances our understanding of the drivers of biodiversity loss and assists in the formulation of practical and policy response...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental conservation Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 151 - 160
Main Author: Evans, Megan C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2021
Subjects:
Biodiversity
biodiversity conservation
Biodiversity loss
Conservation
Endangered & extinct species
Extinction
issues and policy
Knowledge acquisition
Literature reviews
Narratives
Science
Social sciences
Subject Review
Systematic review
Taxonomy
Thematic Section: Biodiversity Revisited
Threats
Trends
Wildlife conservation
co-production
conservation
biodiversity
framing
research philosophy
ISSN:0376-8929, 1469-4387, 1469-4387
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Science, as both a body of knowledge and a process of acquiring new knowledge, is widely regarded as playing a central role in biodiversity conservation. Science undoubtedly enhances our understanding of the drivers of biodiversity loss and assists in the formulation of practical and policy responses, but it has not yet proved sufficiently influential to reverse global trends of biodiversity decline. This review seeks to critically examine the science of biodiversity conservation and to identify any hidden assumptions that, once interrogated and explored, may assist in improving conservation science, policy and practice. By drawing on existing reviews of the literature, this review describes the major themes of the literature and examines the historical shifts in the framing of conservation. It highlights the dominance of research philosophies that view conservation through a primarily ecological lens, changes in the goal(s) of conservation and a lack of clarity over the role(s) of science in biodiversity conservation. Finally, this review offers a simple framework to more clearly and consistently conceptualize the role(s) of science in biodiversity conservation in the future. Greater critical reflection on how conservation science might better accommodate multiple knowledges, goals and values could assist in ‘opening up’ new, legitimate pathways for biodiversity conservation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0376-8929
1469-4387
1469-4387
DOI:10.1017/S0376892921000114