Evaluation of artificial intelligence clinical applications: Detailed case analyses show value of healthcare ethics approach in identifying patient care issues
This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI‐based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bioethics Jg. 35; H. 7; S. 623 - 633 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2021
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0269-9702, 1467-8519, 1467-8519 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI‐based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response, a plethora of ethical guidelines and principles for general AI use have been published, with some convergence about which ethical concepts are relevant to this new technology. However, few of these frameworks are healthcare‐specific, and there has been limited examination of actual AI applications in healthcare. Our ethical evaluation identifies context‐ and case‐specific healthcare ethical issues for two applications, and investigates the extent to which the general ethical principles for AI‐assisted healthcare expressed in existing frameworks capture what is most ethically relevant from the perspective of healthcare ethics. We provide a detailed description and analysis of two AI‐based systems for clinical decision support (Painchek® and IDx‐DR). Our results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promissory claims, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and lack of attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships. Our analysis also highlights the close connection between evaluation and technical development and reporting. Critical appraisal frameworks for healthcare AIs should include explicit ethical evaluation with benchmarks. However, each application will require scrutiny across the AI life‐cycle to identify ethical issues specific to healthcare. This level of analysis requires more attention to detail than is suggested by current ethical guidance or frameworks. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI‐based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response, a plethora of ethical guidelines and principles for general AI use have been published, with some convergence about which ethical concepts are relevant to this new technology. However, few of these frameworks are healthcare‐specific, and there has been limited examination of actual AI applications in healthcare. Our ethical evaluation identifies context‐ and case‐specific healthcare ethical issues for two applications, and investigates the extent to which the general ethical principles for AI‐assisted healthcare expressed in existing frameworks capture what is most ethically relevant from the perspective of healthcare ethics. We provide a detailed description and analysis of two AI‐based systems for clinical decision support (Painchek
®
and IDx‐DR). Our results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promissory claims, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and lack of attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships. Our analysis also highlights the close connection between evaluation and technical development and reporting. Critical appraisal frameworks for healthcare AIs should include explicit ethical evaluation with benchmarks. However, each application will require scrutiny across the AI life‐cycle to identify ethical issues specific to healthcare. This level of analysis requires more attention to detail than is suggested by current ethical guidance or frameworks. This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI-based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response, a plethora of ethical guidelines and principles for general AI use have been published, with some convergence about which ethical concepts are relevant to this new technology. However, few of these frameworks are healthcare-specific, and there has been limited examination of actual AI applications in healthcare. Our ethical evaluation identifies context- and case-specific healthcare ethical issues for two applications, and investigates the extent to which the general ethical principles for AI-assisted healthcare expressed in existing frameworks capture what is most ethically relevant from the perspective of healthcare ethics. We provide a detailed description and analysis of two AI-based systems for clinical decision support (Painchek® and IDx-DR). Our results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promissory claims, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and lack of attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships. Our analysis also highlights the close connection between evaluation and technical development and reporting. Critical appraisal frameworks for healthcare AIs should include explicit ethical evaluation with benchmarks. However, each application will require scrutiny across the AI life-cycle to identify ethical issues specific to healthcare. This level of analysis requires more attention to detail than is suggested by current ethical guidance or frameworks.This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI-based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response, a plethora of ethical guidelines and principles for general AI use have been published, with some convergence about which ethical concepts are relevant to this new technology. However, few of these frameworks are healthcare-specific, and there has been limited examination of actual AI applications in healthcare. Our ethical evaluation identifies context- and case-specific healthcare ethical issues for two applications, and investigates the extent to which the general ethical principles for AI-assisted healthcare expressed in existing frameworks capture what is most ethically relevant from the perspective of healthcare ethics. We provide a detailed description and analysis of two AI-based systems for clinical decision support (Painchek® and IDx-DR). Our results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promissory claims, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and lack of attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships. Our analysis also highlights the close connection between evaluation and technical development and reporting. Critical appraisal frameworks for healthcare AIs should include explicit ethical evaluation with benchmarks. However, each application will require scrutiny across the AI life-cycle to identify ethical issues specific to healthcare. This level of analysis requires more attention to detail than is suggested by current ethical guidance or frameworks. This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI‐based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response, a plethora of ethical guidelines and principles for general AI use have been published, with some convergence about which ethical concepts are relevant to this new technology. However, few of these frameworks are healthcare‐specific, and there has been limited examination of actual AI applications in healthcare. Our ethical evaluation identifies context‐ and case‐specific healthcare ethical issues for two applications, and investigates the extent to which the general ethical principles for AI‐assisted healthcare expressed in existing frameworks capture what is most ethically relevant from the perspective of healthcare ethics. We provide a detailed description and analysis of two AI‐based systems for clinical decision support (Painchek® and IDx‐DR). Our results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promissory claims, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and lack of attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships. Our analysis also highlights the close connection between evaluation and technical development and reporting. Critical appraisal frameworks for healthcare AIs should include explicit ethical evaluation with benchmarks. However, each application will require scrutiny across the AI life‐cycle to identify ethical issues specific to healthcare. This level of analysis requires more attention to detail than is suggested by current ethical guidance or frameworks. This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a detailed analysis of AI-based systems for clinical decision support. AI is increasingly being deployed across multiple domains. In response, a plethora of ethical guidelines and principles for general AI use have been published, with some convergence about which ethical concepts are relevant to this new technology. However, few of these frameworks are healthcare-specific, and there has been limited examination of actual AI applications in healthcare. Our ethical evaluation identifies context- and case-specific healthcare ethical issues for two applications, and investigates the extent to which the general ethical principles for AI-assisted healthcare expressed in existing frameworks capture what is most ethically relevant from the perspective of healthcare ethics. We provide a detailed description and analysis of two AI-based systems for clinical decision support (Painchek and IDx-DR). Our results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promissory claims, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and lack of attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships. Our analysis also highlights the close connection between evaluation and technical development and reporting. Critical appraisal frameworks for healthcare AIs should include explicit ethical evaluation with benchmarks. However, each application will require scrutiny across the AI life-cycle to identify ethical issues specific to healthcare. This level of analysis requires more attention to detail than is suggested by current ethical guidance or frameworks. |
| Author | Rogers, Wendy A. Draper, Heather Carter, Stacy M. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Wendy A. orcidid: 0000-0001-9186-870X surname: Rogers fullname: Rogers, Wendy A. email: Wendy.rogers@mq.edu.au organization: Macquarie University – sequence: 2 givenname: Heather orcidid: 0000-0002-0020-4252 surname: Draper fullname: Draper, Heather organization: University of Warwick – sequence: 3 givenname: Stacy M. orcidid: 0000-0003-2617-8694 surname: Carter fullname: Carter, Stacy M. organization: University of Wollongong |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kc9u1DAQxi1URLeFCw-ALHFBSCl2HCcxNygLVKrUC5ytWWfSuPI6i51Q7dPwqkx220uFmIv_6DffZ39zxk7iGJGx11JcSKoPGz_ihSzbVj9jK1nVTdFqaU7YSpS1KUwjylN2lvOdoDJav2CnqhJVbWS7Yn_WvyHMMPkx8rHnkCbfe-chcB8nDMHfYnTIXfDRO7qF3S7QZuHzR_4FJ_ABO-4gI4cIYZ8x8zyM93zRxUVzQAjT4CAhx2nwLi8iaQQ3kAf3HUby3Pt4y3ekSyd-YH3OM-aX7HkPIeOrh_Wc_fy6_nH5vbi--XZ1-em6cMooXfTSbFoUrVFYGVBO9SgqXXcNSqWgb4U0utEgug7aDVVZNQKw1F0lalSlVufs3VGXXvaLfCe79dlRABBxnLMlpKqlampF6Nsn6N04J_r7QtVkVepWEPXmgZo3W-zsLvktpL19jJ4AcQRcGnNO2Fvnp0OwU6JQrRR2ma5dpmsP06WW909aHlX_CcsjfE8T2v-HtJ-vbtbHnr-zAbfF |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_17483107_2024_2351495 crossref_primary_10_62610_RJOR_2025_1_17_82 crossref_primary_10_1108_EJIM_01_2024_0078 crossref_primary_10_1080_23311975_2025_2551809 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12687_023_00678_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jjcc_2021_10_016 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14144984 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_17204 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_023_00980_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20156499 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_023_01376_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_1467_9566_70055 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm14050443 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44206_024_00121_2 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_5250701 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2024_101587 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_waojou_2025_101078 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11019_024_10222_x crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocac006 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pdig_0000514 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43681_023_00324_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_08404704241291226 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10559_024_00736_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2022_107296 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11023_021_09579_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43681_023_00387_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare13161972 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjd_ljae434 crossref_primary_10_2196_48633 crossref_primary_10_56083_RCV5N8_071 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3501332 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40670_023_01815_x crossref_primary_10_3390_ph18060788 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11070975 crossref_primary_10_25118_2763_9037_2024_v14_1318 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: 2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 8BJ FQK JBE K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12885 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Biology Philosophy |
| EISSN | 1467-8519 |
| EndPage | 633 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 34046918 10_1111_bioe_12885 BIOE12885 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Canadian Institute for Advanced Research – fundername: National Health and Medical Research Council funderid: 1181960 |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -ET .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 04C 05W 0R~ 10A 186 1OB 1OC 23N 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 4.4 44B 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A04 AABCJ AABNI AAESR AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMNL AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABPPZ ABPVW ABQWH ABSOO ABTAH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACJZB ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADNMO ADOJX ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFPWT AFWVQ AFYRF AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AIFKG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BMSDO BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-C D-D DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSSH DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS ECF ECT ECV EHE EIHBH EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ENC EPT ESX F00 F01 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N G50 GODZA GXZFM HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ H~9 IHE IX1 J0M KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSSH MSFUL MSMAN MSSSH MVM MXFUL MXMAN MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2Y P2Z P4B P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWL RX1 RXW SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TAE TEORI TN5 TUS UB1 UPT V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WGLLI WH7 WIH WII WIJ WOHZO WQ9 WQZ WRC WSUWO WXI WXSBR XG1 XJT XSW YCJ YUY ZGI ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~WP AAMMB AAYXX ABUFD AEFGJ AETEA AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE CITATION O8X CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 8BJ FQK JBE K9. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-f19b8e0893e49a3c3fe0456d7e133af8019575a0dda8bbbb2470ae25d406e3253 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 36 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000655470900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0269-9702 1467-8519 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 09:55:38 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 08 23:37:41 EST 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:59:48 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:38:09 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:11:19 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:27:55 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 7 |
| Keywords | ethical evaluation AI applications in healthcare ethics of new technologies artificial Intelligence healthcare ethics ethical frameworks |
| Language | English |
| License | 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3935-f19b8e0893e49a3c3fe0456d7e133af8019575a0dda8bbbb2470ae25d406e3253 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2617-8694 0000-0001-9186-870X 0000-0002-0020-4252 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12885 |
| PMID | 34046918 |
| PQID | 2568012580 |
| PQPubID | 32153 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2534613763 proquest_journals_2568012580 pubmed_primary_34046918 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_bioe_12885 crossref_primary_10_1111_bioe_12885 wiley_primary_10_1111_bioe_12885_BIOE12885 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | September 2021 2021-09-00 20210901 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2021 text: September 2021 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Bioethics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Bioethics |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | 35441394 - Bioethics. 2022 Apr 20 |
| References_xml | – reference: 35441394 - Bioethics. 2022 Apr 20;: |
| SSID | ssj0000955 |
| Score | 2.4282484 |
| Snippet | This paper is one of the first to analyse the ethical implications of specific healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and the first to provide a... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 623 |
| SubjectTerms | AI applications in healthcare Analysis Application Artificial Intelligence Attention Bioethics Citizen participation Clinical decision making Convergence Decision support systems Delivery of Health Care Deployment Ethical dilemmas ethical evaluation ethical frameworks Ethics ethics of new technologies Evaluation Health care Health Facilities Health services healthcare ethics Humans Intelligence Medical decision making New technology Patient Care Patients Scrutiny |
| Title | Evaluation of artificial intelligence clinical applications: Detailed case analyses show value of healthcare ethics approach in identifying patient care issues |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbioe.12885 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046918 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2568012580 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2534613763 |
| Volume | 35 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000655470900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1467-8519 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000955 issn: 0269-9702 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La9wwEB6STVtySZrta5M0TGkvLbjYllXJIZc8dmmhTUNpYG9GlsdkoaxLnLTk1_SvRiM_siGlUOKTwWNJoJnRJ2nmG4A3ZRSTslIFSRmaINGGAk5nDITOySEKK4mMLzahjo_1dJqeLMFelwvT8EP0B25sGd5fs4GbvF4w8nxW0XvnXbVchpXYKa4cwMrRt8np5xtPnPqqp26bkQap4kiejS6S5-bv2wvSHZR5G7T6VWeyfr_xPoa1Fm3ifqMeG7BE8yE8bOpPXg3h0Zf2Zn0IqyddTYOrJ_Bn3HOAY1Uia1dDNIGzBQZP7LIqcfEWfBePfFQqFWjdConGs55QjfVZ9Ru5XeI2z_q4MyQfco8du7nrA2c-fdinYGHL_Ipe1qtJ_RROJ-Pvhx-DtpJDYDn1NyijNNcUOmxESWqEFSUxlCwUuS2yKTVnLSppwqIwOndPnKjQUCwLBzdIxFI8g8G8mtMLQCNTIvoQaaNFkpfCOCeU20iZ0EphYz2Ct910ZralOedqGz-ybrvDE5H5iRjB6172Z0Pu8Vep7U4rstbA68whRV7bpQ5H8Kr_7EyT71vMnKpLlhGJQ0vOg4_geaNNfTci4YOJyA33nVeaf_SfHXz6OvZvm_8jvAWrMcff-Hi4bRhcnF_SS3hgf13M6vMdWFZTvdMazDWZwRrg |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB-09aMvas-v06oj-qIQSbJZs_FN7R0tXs8iLfQtbDYTeiAXaVqlf43_qjObj15RBDFPgUx2F3Zm9re7M78BeFlFMaVOp0FShTZIjKVA0hkDZQpiROE0kfXFJtL53BwdZftdbI7kwrT8EMOBm1iG99di4HIgvWLlxaKmN-xejb4K6wnrESv4-vaX6eHswhVnvuwp7zOyIEsllGezD-W5-PvyivQbzLyMWv2yM739nwO-A7c6vInvWwXZhCu0HMH1tgLl-Qhu7HV36yPY2O-rGpzfhZ-TgQUc6wpFv1qqCVyscHhin1eJq_fg73Dbx6VSiY7XSLSe94QabI7rHyjtkrR5PESeIfmge-z5zbkPXPgEYp-EhR33K3pZryjNPTicTg4-7gRdLYfASfJvUEVZYShkdERJZpVTFQmYLFPiTbKtjOQtptqGZWlNwU-cpKGlWJcMOEjFWt2HtWW9pIeAVmdE9DYy1qikqJRlN1S4KLWh08rFZgyv-vnMXUd0LvU2vub9hkcmIvcTMYYXg-y3lt7jj1JbvVrknYk3OWNFWd21CcfwfPjMxik3LnZJ9ZnIqITxEvvwMTxo1WnoRiVyNBHxcF97rflL__mH3c8T__boX4Sfwc2dg71ZPtudf3oMG7FE4_jouC1YOz05oydwzX0_XTQnTzu7-QXMpB3o |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fT9RAEJ7goYQXgVPxFGGMvmhS03a7dOubcneBiOfFSMJbs91OwyXkSihI-Gv4V9nZ_uCIxoTYpyad7m6yM7Pf7s58A_C-CEKKjYy9qPC1FylNHqczekJlZBGFkUTaFZuIJxN1fJxMm9gczoWp-SG6Aze2DOev2cDpLC8WrDyblfTJulclH8FyxFVkerA8_Dk-OrxzxYkre2r3GYmXxBzKs9GG8tz9fX9F-gNm3ketbtkZr_3ngNfhaYM38UutIBuwRPM-PKkrUF73YeV7c7feh9VpW9Xg-hncjDoWcCwLZP2qqSZwtsDhiW1eJS7eg3_GoYtLpRyNXSNRO94TqrA6Ka-Q2yVu86SLPENyQffY8pvbPnDmEohdEhY23K_oZJ2iVM_haDz6tbfvNbUcPMPJv14RJJki36IjihItjCiIwWQek90k60Jx3mIstZ_nWmX2CaPY1xTK3AIOEqEUL6A3L-f0ElDLhIh2A6WViLJCaOuGMhPE2jdSmFAN4EM7n6lpiM653sZp2m54eCJSNxEDeNfJntX0Hn-V2mrVIm1MvEotVuTVXSp_AG-7z9Y4-cZFz6m8ZBkRWbxkffgANmt16roRER9NBHa4H53W_KP_9OvBj5F7e_UQ4R1YmQ7H6eHB5NtrWA05GMcFx21B7-L8kt7AY_P7YladbzdmcwstUx1j |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation+of+artificial+intelligence+clinical+applications%3A+Detailed+case+analyses+show+value+of+healthcare+ethics+approach+in+identifying+patient+care+issues&rft.jtitle=Bioethics&rft.au=Rogers%2C+Wendy+A&rft.au=Draper%2C+Heather&rft.au=Carter%2C+Stacy+M&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0269-9702&rft.eissn=1467-8519&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=623&rft.epage=633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fbioe.12885&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0269-9702&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0269-9702&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0269-9702&client=summon |