Machine learning models and classification algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Objectives To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine. Background Due to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinic...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Headache Vol. 65; no. 4; pp. 695 - 708 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.04.2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0017-8748, 1526-4610, 1526-4610 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Objectives
To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine.
Background
Due to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinical, physical, and exploratory information is most crucial to diagnosing this disease. The use of artificial intelligence tools could streamline this process.
Methods
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines and searched for records from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational (case–control and cohort) studies were included to assess the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐AI tool.
Results
A total of 14 articles were included in the systematic review, and 10 were eligible for meta‐analysis. The main inputs included for the ML algorithms were anamnesis (medical history), physical examination, results from audiological and vestibular tests, and imaging. The global sensitivity was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.92, I2 = 96%), while the global specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84–0.93, I2 = 95%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.15 (95% CI 17.64–131.43, I2 = 97%). Using the bivariate model, the area under the curve and for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, using the 10 available studies, was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86–0.96).
Conclusion
Machine learning algorithms could be used as effective tools for the diagnosis process in VM. The use of models trained with three to four inputs yield the highest accuracy, compared to other strategies. However, the design and validation of these studies could be improved to ensure the reproducibility and generalizability of results.
Plain Language Summary
The diagnosis of vestibular migraine (VM) is based on a list of symptoms reported by patients, but this can sometimes lead to delays in diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to understand whether machine learning tools can help to diagnose patients with VM based on clinical and physical information, or other complementary tests. We found that combining clinical information and machine learning methods could facilitate and shorten the diagnostic process of VM. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Objectives
To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine.
Background
Due to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinical, physical, and exploratory information is most crucial to diagnosing this disease. The use of artificial intelligence tools could streamline this process.
Methods
This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines and searched for records from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational (case–control and cohort) studies were included to assess the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐AI tool.
Results
A total of 14 articles were included in the systematic review, and 10 were eligible for meta‐analysis. The main inputs included for the ML algorithms were anamnesis (medical history), physical examination, results from audiological and vestibular tests, and imaging. The global sensitivity was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.92, I2 = 96%), while the global specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84–0.93, I2 = 95%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.15 (95% CI 17.64–131.43, I2 = 97%). Using the bivariate model, the area under the curve and for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, using the 10 available studies, was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86–0.96).
Conclusion
Machine learning algorithms could be used as effective tools for the diagnosis process in VM. The use of models trained with three to four inputs yield the highest accuracy, compared to other strategies. However, the design and validation of these studies could be improved to ensure the reproducibility and generalizability of results.
Plain Language Summary
The diagnosis of vestibular migraine (VM) is based on a list of symptoms reported by patients, but this can sometimes lead to delays in diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to understand whether machine learning tools can help to diagnose patients with VM based on clinical and physical information, or other complementary tests. We found that combining clinical information and machine learning methods could facilitate and shorten the diagnostic process of VM. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine.OBJECTIVESTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine.Due to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinical, physical, and exploratory information is most crucial to diagnosing this disease. The use of artificial intelligence tools could streamline this process.BACKGROUNDDue to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinical, physical, and exploratory information is most crucial to diagnosing this disease. The use of artificial intelligence tools could streamline this process.This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched for records from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational (case-control and cohort) studies were included to assess the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI tool.METHODSThis systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched for records from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational (case-control and cohort) studies were included to assess the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI tool.A total of 14 articles were included in the systematic review, and 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. The main inputs included for the ML algorithms were anamnesis (medical history), physical examination, results from audiological and vestibular tests, and imaging. The global sensitivity was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.92, I2 = 96%), while the global specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.93, I2 = 95%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.15 (95% CI 17.64-131.43, I2 = 97%). Using the bivariate model, the area under the curve and for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, using the 10 available studies, was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.96).RESULTSA total of 14 articles were included in the systematic review, and 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. The main inputs included for the ML algorithms were anamnesis (medical history), physical examination, results from audiological and vestibular tests, and imaging. The global sensitivity was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.92, I2 = 96%), while the global specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.93, I2 = 95%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.15 (95% CI 17.64-131.43, I2 = 97%). Using the bivariate model, the area under the curve and for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, using the 10 available studies, was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.96).Machine learning algorithms could be used as effective tools for the diagnosis process in VM. The use of models trained with three to four inputs yield the highest accuracy, compared to other strategies. However, the design and validation of these studies could be improved to ensure the reproducibility and generalizability of results.CONCLUSIONMachine learning algorithms could be used as effective tools for the diagnosis process in VM. The use of models trained with three to four inputs yield the highest accuracy, compared to other strategies. However, the design and validation of these studies could be improved to ensure the reproducibility and generalizability of results. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine. Due to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinical, physical, and exploratory information is most crucial to diagnosing this disease. The use of artificial intelligence tools could streamline this process. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched for records from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational (case-control and cohort) studies were included to assess the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI tool. A total of 14 articles were included in the systematic review, and 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. The main inputs included for the ML algorithms were anamnesis (medical history), physical examination, results from audiological and vestibular tests, and imaging. The global sensitivity was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.92, I = 96%), while the global specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.93, I = 95%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.15 (95% CI 17.64-131.43, I = 97%). Using the bivariate model, the area under the curve and for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, using the 10 available studies, was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.96). Machine learning algorithms could be used as effective tools for the diagnosis process in VM. The use of models trained with three to four inputs yield the highest accuracy, compared to other strategies. However, the design and validation of these studies could be improved to ensure the reproducibility and generalizability of results. Objectives To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine. Background Due to the absence of defined biomarkers for diagnosing vestibular migraine (VM), it is valuable to determine which clinical, physical, and exploratory information is most crucial to diagnosing this disease. The use of artificial intelligence tools could streamline this process. Methods This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines and searched for records from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Observational (case–control and cohort) studies were included to assess the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish VM from other vestibular disorders. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐AI tool. Results A total of 14 articles were included in the systematic review, and 10 were eligible for meta‐analysis. The main inputs included for the ML algorithms were anamnesis (medical history), physical examination, results from audiological and vestibular tests, and imaging. The global sensitivity was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.92, I2 = 96%), while the global specificity was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84–0.93, I2 = 95%). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.15 (95% CI 17.64–131.43, I2 = 97%). Using the bivariate model, the area under the curve and for the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, using the 10 available studies, was 0.94 (95% CI 0.86–0.96). Conclusion Machine learning algorithms could be used as effective tools for the diagnosis process in VM. The use of models trained with three to four inputs yield the highest accuracy, compared to other strategies. However, the design and validation of these studies could be improved to ensure the reproducibility and generalizability of results. The diagnosis of vestibular migraine (VM) is based on a list of symptoms reported by patients, but this can sometimes lead to delays in diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to understand whether machine learning tools can help to diagnose patients with VM based on clinical and physical information, or other complementary tests. We found that combining clinical information and machine learning methods could facilitate and shorten the diagnostic process of VM. |
| Author | Martín‐Lagos, Juan Gallego‐Martinez, Alvaro Lopez‐Escámez, Jose A. Parra‐Perez, Alberto M. Perez‐Carpena, Patricia Suarez‐Barcena, Pablo D. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Pablo D. surname: Suarez‐Barcena fullname: Suarez‐Barcena, Pablo D. organization: Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Ibs.GRANADA – sequence: 2 givenname: Alberto M. surname: Parra‐Perez fullname: Parra‐Perez, Alberto M. organization: Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada – sequence: 3 givenname: Juan surname: Martín‐Lagos fullname: Martín‐Lagos, Juan organization: Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, CIBERER – sequence: 4 givenname: Alvaro surname: Gallego‐Martinez fullname: Gallego‐Martinez, Alvaro organization: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas‐Universidad de Sevilla‐Universidad Pablo de Olavide (CSIC‐USE‐UPO), Av. Americo Vespucio – sequence: 5 givenname: Jose A. surname: Lopez‐Escámez fullname: Lopez‐Escámez, Jose A. organization: The University of Sydney – sequence: 6 givenname: Patricia orcidid: 0000-0003-2722-4947 surname: Perez‐Carpena fullname: Perez‐Carpena, Patricia email: percarpena@ugr.es organization: Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40079713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kbFuFDEURS0URDaBhg9AlmgQ0gTb4_XM0K1CIEhBNFBbb-w3u448drBnEm1HRc038iV4d5MmQrhxc-7R070n5CjEgIS85OyMl_dug2DPuOyEfEIWfClUJRVnR2TBGG-qtpHtMTnJ-ZoxJlWnnpFjyVjTNbxekF9fwGxcQOoRUnBhTcdo0WcKwVLjIWc3OAOTi4GCX8fkps2YqQt02iC1DtYhZpdpHOgt5sn1s4dER7dOUKzv6YrmbZ5wLAZDE946vNurR5zgz8_fEMBvS_45eTqAz_ji_j8l3z9efDu_rK6-fvp8vrqqTN3VsgLFEWVvejlY2ykEVKazoufYtO0SzcDY0i77VomhG1grbC2ZVUag6gB6yetT8ubgvUnxx1wO1qPLBr2HgHHOuuZNU5psurqgrx-h13FO5d4d1QrRtFKKQr26p-Z-RKtvkhshbfVDwwVgB8CkmHPCQRs37fucSkVec6Z3I-rdiHo_Yom8fRR5sP4T5gf4znnc_ofUlxerD4fMX2l9r-I |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fbinf_2025_1594971 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10162_025_00990_5 |
| Cites_doi | 10.3389/fneur.2021.681140 10.1007/s00415-020-10061-9 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1175 10.4178/epih.e2019007 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.04.011 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01229 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825d644a 10.3390/jcm11164745 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3663 10.1111/ene.15448 10.1007/s00415-015-7905-2 10.1136/bmj.n71 10.2196/34126 10.1007/s00415-023-11922-9 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.08.016 10.1201/9780429492259 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.10.002 10.1155/2016/3182735 10.3233/VES-201644 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c2abb 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001930 10.1007/s12652-021-03612-z 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103402 10.1080/00016489950180720 10.3390/jcm10245726 10.3389/fneur.2021.670944 10.3109/00016489009122532 10.1038/s41591-021-01517-0 10.1007/s00415-023-12027-z 10.3389/fneur.2018.00029 10.1159/000276113 10.1007/s00415-023-11997-4 10.1212/01.WNL.0000036903.22461.39 10.1007/s00415-020-09931-z 10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001900 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 American Headache Society. 2025 American Headache Society |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 American Headache Society. – notice: 2025 American Headache Society |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7U7 C1K K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/head.14924 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Toxicology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1526-4610 |
| EndPage | 708 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40079713 10_1111_head_14924 HEAD14924 |
| Genre | reviewArticle Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Consejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía funderid: PREDOC2021/00343 – fundername: Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney funderid: K7013_B3413 – fundername: Instituto de Salud Carlos III funderid: PI22/01838 – fundername: Instituto de Salud Carlos III grantid: PI22/01838 – fundername: Consejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía grantid: PREDOC2021/00343 – fundername: Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney grantid: K7013_B3413 |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29I 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AI. AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS ECV EJD EMOBN EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FYBCS G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO L7B LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH YUY ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AIQQE CITATION O8X CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7U7 C1K K9. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-a61ee4bcb4fdd96eae6c9d2b1e7885ecf005d5b862f9f082d340d6c2e69aab413 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 3 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001455392400017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0017-8748 1526-4610 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 04:53:34 EDT 2025 Fri Oct 03 03:51:07 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 30 01:49:44 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:56:59 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:06:59 EST 2025 Sun Jul 06 04:45:32 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | classification algorithms differential diagnosis vestibular migraine machine learning |
| Language | English |
| License | 2025 American Headache Society. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3934-a61ee4bcb4fdd96eae6c9d2b1e7885ecf005d5b862f9f082d340d6c2e69aab413 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Review-4 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2722-4947 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/head.14924 |
| PMID | 40079713 |
| PQID | 3182278442 |
| PQPubID | 24968 |
| PageCount | 14 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3177149793 proquest_journals_3182278442 pubmed_primary_40079713 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_head_14924 crossref_primary_10_1111_head_14924 wiley_primary_10_1111_head_14924_HEAD14924 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | April 2025 2025-04-00 2025-Apr 20250401 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: April 2025 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Mt. Royal |
| PublicationTitle | Headache |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Headache |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | 2021; 27 2002; 59 2015; 16 2023; 14 2019; 10 2015; 33 2022; 24 2016; 2016 2022; 43 2020; 267 2012; 33 2016; 263 2016; 142 2022; 29 2014; 113 2016; 77 2018; 9 2011; 169 2018; 39 2023; 270 2021; 10 2021; 12 2019; 41 2008; 29 2019 2018 2021; 372 2022; 32 2022; 11 1990; 110 2010; 52 1999; 119 2024; 271 2005; 58 e_1_2_11_10_1 e_1_2_11_32_1 e_1_2_11_31_1 e_1_2_11_30_1 e_1_2_11_36_1 e_1_2_11_14_1 e_1_2_11_13_1 e_1_2_11_35_1 e_1_2_11_12_1 e_1_2_11_34_1 e_1_2_11_11_1 e_1_2_11_33_1 e_1_2_11_7_1 e_1_2_11_29_1 e_1_2_11_6_1 e_1_2_11_28_1 e_1_2_11_5_1 e_1_2_11_27_1 e_1_2_11_4_1 e_1_2_11_26_1 e_1_2_11_3_1 e_1_2_11_2_1 e_1_2_11_21_1 e_1_2_11_20_1 e_1_2_11_25_1 e_1_2_11_24_1 e_1_2_11_9_1 e_1_2_11_23_1 e_1_2_11_8_1 e_1_2_11_22_1 e_1_2_11_18_1 e_1_2_11_17_1 e_1_2_11_16_1 e_1_2_11_15_1 e_1_2_11_37_1 e_1_2_11_38_1 Varpa K (e_1_2_11_39_1) 2011; 169 e_1_2_11_19_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 32 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2022 end-page: 6 article-title: Vestibular migraine: Diagnostic criteria1 publication-title: J Vestib Res – volume: 142 start-page: 351 issue: 4 year: 2016 end-page: 356 article-title: Development of a statistical model for the prediction of common vestibular diagnoses publication-title: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg – volume: 33 start-page: 577 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 599 article-title: TiTrATE: a novel approach to diagnosing acute dizziness and vertigo publication-title: Neurol Clin – volume: 12 year: 2021 article-title: Using base‐ml to learn classification of common vestibular disorders on DizzyReg registry data publication-title: Front Neurol – volume: 41 year: 2019 article-title: Diagnostic test accuracy: application and practice using R software publication-title: Epidemiol Health – volume: 9 year: 2018 article-title: Predictive capability of an iPad‐based medical device (medx) for the diagnosis of vertigo and dizziness publication-title: Front Neurol – volume: 267 start-page: 160 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2020 end-page: 167 article-title: Development and validation of a classification algorithm to diagnose and differentiate spontaneous episodic vertigo syndromes: results from the DizzyReg patient registry publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 14 start-page: 8459 issue: 7 year: 2023 end-page: 8486 article-title: Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda publication-title: J Ambient Intell Human Comput – volume: 2016 year: 2016 article-title: The intimate relationship between vestibular migraine and Meniere disease: a review of pathogenesis and presentation publication-title: Behav Neurol – volume: 12 year: 2021 article-title: A set of eight key questions helps to classify common vestibular disorders—results from the DizzyReg patient registry publication-title: Front Neurol – volume: 39 start-page: 1037 issue: 8 year: 2018 end-page: 1044 article-title: The epidemiology of vestibular migraine: a population‐based survey study publication-title: Otol Neurotol – volume: 77 start-page: 240 year: 2016 end-page: 248 article-title: Mining balance disorders' data for the development of diagnostic decision support systems publication-title: Comput Biol Med – volume: 33 start-page: 1235 issue: 7 year: 2012 end-page: 1244 article-title: Auditory and vestibular symptoms and chronic subjective dizziness in patients with Ménière's disease, vestibular migraine, and Ménière's disease with concomitant vestibular migraine publication-title: Otol Neurotol – year: 2018 – volume: 29 start-page: 3092 issue: 10 year: 2022 end-page: 3101 article-title: Validation of a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm for patients with acute vertigo and dizziness publication-title: Eur J Neurol – volume: 59 start-page: 1700 issue: 11 year: 2002 end-page: 1704 article-title: Migraine and Ménière's disease: is there a link? publication-title: Neurology – volume: 110 start-page: 161 issue: 3–4 year: 1990 end-page: 167 article-title: ‘Carnisel’: an expert system for vestibular diagnosis publication-title: Acta Otolaryngol – volume: 10 start-page: 1229 year: 2019 article-title: Differential proinflammatory signature in vestibular migraine and meniere disease publication-title: Front Immunol – volume: 271 start-page: 3426 issue: 6 year: 2024 end-page: 3438 article-title: Machine learning models help differentiate between causes of recurrent spontaneous vertigo publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 27 start-page: 1663 issue: 10 year: 2021 end-page: 1665 article-title: A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence‐centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS‐AI publication-title: Nat Med – volume: 270 start-page: 6170 issue: 12 year: 2023 end-page: 6192 article-title: Neurological update: neuro‐otology 2023 publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 16 start-page: 1175 issue: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 1187 article-title: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers‐part I. General guidance and tips publication-title: Korean J Radiol – volume: 169 start-page: 579 year: 2011 end-page: 583 article-title: Applying one‐vs‐one and one‐vs‐all classifiers in k‐nearest neighbour method and support vector machines to an otoneurological multi‐class problem publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – volume: 10 issue: 24 year: 2021 article-title: History taking in non‐acute vestibular symptoms: a 4‐step approach publication-title: J Clin Med – volume: 29 start-page: 93 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 96 article-title: Familial clustering of migraine, episodic vertigo, and Ménière's disease publication-title: Otol Neurotol – volume: 43 issue: 3 year: 2022 article-title: Supervised machine learning models for classifying common causes of dizziness publication-title: Am J Otolaryngol – volume: 58 start-page: 982 issue: 10 year: 2005 end-page: 990 article-title: Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol – volume: 52 start-page: 96 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 103 article-title: Expert systems as a diagnostic aid in otoneurology publication-title: ORL – volume: 267 start-page: 143 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2020 end-page: 152 article-title: Modern machine‐learning can support diagnostic differentiation of central and peripheral acute vestibular disorders publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 24 issue: 8 year: 2022 article-title: A questionnaire‐based ensemble learning model to predict the diagnosis of vertigo: model development and validation study publication-title: J Med Internet Res – volume: 113 start-page: 162 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 174 article-title: The methodology of dynamic uncertain causality graph for intelligent diagnosis of vertigo publication-title: Comput Methods Prog Biomed – volume: 263 start-page: S82 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2016 end-page: S89 article-title: Vestibular migraine: the most frequent entity of episodic vertigo publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 372 year: 2021 article-title: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews publication-title: BMJ – volume: 119 start-page: 517 issue: 5 year: 1999 end-page: 521 article-title: Otoneurological expert system for vertigo publication-title: Acta Otolaryngol – volume: 39 start-page: 1163 issue: 9 year: 2018 end-page: 1171 article-title: Unique clinical language patterns among expert vestibular providers can predict vestibular diagnoses publication-title: Otol Neurotol – year: 2019 – volume: 271 start-page: 887 issue: 2 year: 2024 end-page: 898 article-title: Subjective and objective responses to caloric stimulation help separate vestibular migraine from other vestibular disorders publication-title: J Neurol – volume: 11 issue: 16 year: 2022 article-title: Development and validation of the predictive model for the differentiation between vestibular migraine and Meniere's disease publication-title: J Clin Med – ident: e_1_2_11_27_1 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.681140 – ident: e_1_2_11_26_1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10061-9 – ident: e_1_2_11_17_1 doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1175 – ident: e_1_2_11_19_1 doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019007 – ident: e_1_2_11_35_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.04.011 – ident: e_1_2_11_14_1 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01229 – ident: e_1_2_11_7_1 doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825d644a – ident: e_1_2_11_28_1 doi: 10.3390/jcm11164745 – volume: 169 start-page: 579 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_11_39_1 article-title: Applying one‐vs‐one and one‐vs‐all classifiers in k‐nearest neighbour method and support vector machines to an otoneurological multi‐class problem publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: e_1_2_11_23_1 doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3663 – ident: e_1_2_11_20_1 doi: 10.1111/ene.15448 – ident: e_1_2_11_4_1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7905-2 – ident: e_1_2_11_15_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 – ident: e_1_2_11_25_1 doi: 10.2196/34126 – ident: e_1_2_11_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11922-9 – ident: e_1_2_11_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.08.016 – ident: e_1_2_11_37_1 doi: 10.1201/9780429492259 – ident: e_1_2_11_29_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.10.002 – ident: e_1_2_11_5_1 doi: 10.1155/2016/3182735 – ident: e_1_2_11_2_1 doi: 10.3233/VES-201644 – ident: e_1_2_11_8_1 doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c2abb – ident: e_1_2_11_24_1 doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001930 – ident: e_1_2_11_36_1 doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03612-z – ident: e_1_2_11_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 – ident: e_1_2_11_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103402 – ident: e_1_2_11_33_1 doi: 10.1080/00016489950180720 – ident: e_1_2_11_34_1 doi: 10.3390/jcm10245726 – ident: e_1_2_11_22_1 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.670944 – ident: e_1_2_11_32_1 doi: 10.3109/00016489009122532 – ident: e_1_2_11_16_1 doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01517-0 – ident: e_1_2_11_11_1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12027-z – ident: e_1_2_11_21_1 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00029 – ident: e_1_2_11_31_1 doi: 10.1159/000276113 – ident: e_1_2_11_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11997-4 – ident: e_1_2_11_6_1 doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000036903.22461.39 – ident: e_1_2_11_10_1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09931-z – ident: e_1_2_11_38_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6 – ident: e_1_2_11_3_1 doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001900 |
| SSID | ssj0004696 |
| Score | 2.460701 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Objectives
To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular... The diagnosis of vestibular migraine (VM) is based on a list of symptoms reported by patients, but this can sometimes lead to delays in diagnosis. We conducted... To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine. Due... Objectives To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular... To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 695 |
| SubjectTerms | Accuracy Algorithms Artificial intelligence Biomarkers Bivariate analysis Classification Algorithms Diagnosis differential diagnosis Effectiveness Headache Humans Learning algorithms Machine Learning Meta-analysis Migraine Migraine Disorders - diagnosis Quality assessment Quality control Reviews Systematic review Vestibular Diseases - diagnosis vestibular migraine Vestibular system Vestibular tests |
| Title | Machine learning models and classification algorithms in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.14924 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40079713 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3182278442 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3177149793 |
| Volume | 65 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001455392400017&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1526-4610 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004696 issn: 0017-8748 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1PT9swFH-CgiYusME2AgwZbReQIqWJk9SISwVUHABNaEy9RY79UiLRFDWFMyfOfMZ9kj07bgGBkKbdouTFjuz3N37v_QB-RILLgrdDXwWq8Mm_Rb8jAunHUYCxJIMR2GbVv0_T8_NOvy9-zsHBtBam6Q8x--FmJMPqayPgMq-fCbnBsCc5p_hhHhZCYlzegoWji97l6bO6SIvP1WjilHdce1KTyfP09kuD9MrLfOm0WqvTW_m_7_0Iy87bZN2GPT7BHFar8OHMnaevwcOZzaVE5sAjBswi49RMVpop41ibTCK7eUxeD0bjcnI1rFlZMfIbmW7S9MqajQpm23XkJqmVDcuBAZ7AfdZlT52iWVMlY4ce4kT-uX-UriPKZ7jsHf86PPEdMoOvIhFxXyZtRJ6rnBdaiwQlJkroMG8jRdQxqoJkW8c5RUuFKMjJ0BEPdKJCTISUOdnNL9CqRhWuA0NMuZChCoSmUEhpoVUsQxnQrSJqR9yD3en2ZMq1LTfoGdfZNHwxC5vZhfXg-4z2pmnW8SbV1nSXMyewdUaqzRQFcx56sDN7TKJmzk9khaNbQ5OmNAJpNA--Ntwxm8bAywsK-D3Ys0zwzvzZyXH3yF5t_AvxJiyFBnvYZg1tQWsyvsVvsKjuJmU93ob5tN_ZdgLwFzT3CvU |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEB5BiigX3hRDgUVwAcmSY6_tLLeINgoiiRBqUW_WenccLDUOilPOnDjzG_klzKw3aSsQEuJm2eO1tTvP3Zn5AF4mSupK9uPQRKYKyb_FcKAiHaZJhKkmgxG5ZtWfJvlsNjg5UR98bg7XwnT9IbYbbiwZTl-zgPOG9AUpZxB7EnQKIK7CjiQ-Snuwc_BxdDy5UBjpALo6VZzLge9Pyqk8529ftki_uZmXvVZndka3_vOHb8NN72-KYccgd-AKNnfh-tSfqN-D71OXTYnCw0fMhcPGaYVurDDsWnMukVs-oU_ny1W9_rxoRd0I8hyF7RL16lYsK-EadpSc1ioW9ZyhJ_CNGIrzXtGiq5NxQy9wrX9--6F9T5T7cDw6PHo7Dj02Q2gSlchQZ31EWZpSVtaqDDVmRtm47CPF1CmaiqTbpiXFS5WqyM2wiYxsZmLMlNYlWc4H0GuWDT4EgZhLpWMTKUvBkLHKmlTHOqJbVdJPZACvNutTGN-4nPEzTotNAMMTW7iJDeDFlvZL167jj1T7m2UuvMi2BSk3LguWMg7g-fYxCRufoOgGl2dMk-c0Aum0APY69th-hgHmFYX8Abx2XPCX7xfjw-GBu3r0L8TPYHd8NJ0Uk3ez94_hRsxIxC6HaB9669UZPoFr5uu6bldPvRz8AtWADf0 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fb9MwED7BNk28sA0YZD-YEbyAFClNnKTeW7WuGqKrpomhvUWOfS6R1nRqOp554nl_I38JZ8ftNoGQEG9RcrEj29_5Lr67D-BdIrg0vBOHKlImJPsWw66IZJgmEaaSNozIFav-MsxHo-7lpTjzsTk2F6atD7H84WaR4fS1BThea3MP5ZbEnoBODsRjWOWpyAiXq_3zwcXwXmKkI-hqVXHOu74-qQ3luXv74Y70m5n50Gp1285g4z8_eBOeenuT9doFsgWPsH4G66f-RP05_Dh10ZTIPH3EmDlunIbJWjNlTWsbS-Smj8mr8XRWzb9OGlbVjCxHpttAvaphU8NcwY7ShrWySTW21BN4yHrsrlY0a_NkXNMTnMuf32-lr4nyAi4Gx5-PTkLPzRCqRCQ8lFkHkZeq5EZrkaHETAkdlx0knzpFZQjdOi3JXzLCkJmhEx7pTMWYCSlL2jm3YaWe1vgKGGLOhYxVJDQ5Q0oLrVIZy4humaST8ADeL-anUL5wueXPuCoWDowd2MINbABvl7LXbbmOP0rtLaa58JBtClJuNi2Y8ziAN8vHBDZ7giJrnN5YmTynFkinBfCyXR7LbizBvCCXP4APbhX8pf_i5LjXd1c7_yJ8AOtn_UEx_Dj6tAtPYktE7EKI9mBlPrvBfVhT3-ZVM3vtYfALTckNeA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine+learning+models+and+classification+algorithms+in+the+diagnosis+of+vestibular+migraine%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Suarez-Barcena%2C+Pablo+D&rft.au=Parra-Perez%2C+Alberto+M&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADn-Lagos%2C+Juan&rft.au=Gallego-Martinez%2C+Alvaro&rft.date=2025-04-01&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fhead.14924&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40079713&rft.externalDocID=40079713 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |