Archetypes for organizational safety

We propose an initial set of six system safety archetypes that model common dynamic organizational behaviours that often lead to accidents. The archetypes help clarify why safety-related decisions do not always result in the desired behaviour, and how independent decisions in different pans of the o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Safety science Jg. 44; H. 7; S. 565 - 582
Hauptverfasser: Marais, Karen, Saleh, Joseph H., Leveson, Nancy G.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Amsterdam Elsevier India Pvt Ltd 01.08.2006
Elsevier
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0925-7535, 1879-1042
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract We propose an initial set of six system safety archetypes that model common dynamic organizational behaviours that often lead to accidents. The archetypes help clarify why safety-related decisions do not always result in the desired behaviour, and how independent decisions in different pans of the organization can combine to have a negative, and often unforeseen, impact on safety. Examples from the NASA manned space program and general industry are used to illustrate the archetypes. As accident analysis and investigation tools, the archetypes can be used to develop dynamic models that describe the systemic and organizational factors contributing to accidents. As risk analysis tools, the archetypes can be used to improve understanding of the ways that risk can arise in complex socio-technical systems.
AbstractList We propose an initial set of six system safety archetypes that model common dynamic organizational behaviours that often lead to accidents. The archetypes help clarify why safety-related decisions do not always result in the desired behaviour, and how independent decisions in different pans of the organization can combine to have a negative, and often unforeseen, impact on safety. Examples from the NASA manned space program and general industry are used to illustrate the archetypes. As accident analysis and investigation tools, the archetypes can be used to develop dynamic models that describe the systemic and organizational factors contributing to accidents. As risk analysis tools, the archetypes can be used to improve understanding of the ways that risk can arise in complex socio-technical systems.
Author Marais, Karen
Saleh, Joseph H.
Leveson, Nancy G.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Karen
  surname: Marais
  fullname: Marais, Karen
  email: karenm@mit.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Joseph H.
  surname: Saleh
  fullname: Saleh, Joseph H.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nancy G.
  surname: Leveson
  fullname: Leveson, Nancy G.
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17973506$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNqFkD9PwzAQRy0EEqXwBZg6AFvCnWPHtsRSVfyTkFhgthznAq5CUuyAVD49KUVCYoDphnvvN7wDttv1HTF2jJAjYHm-zFPyIecAMkeeA4gdNkGtTIYg-C6bgOEyU7KQ--wgpSUAYFHihJ3Mo3-mYb2iNGv6OOvjk-vChxtC37l2llwzPg_ZXuPaREffd8oery4fFjfZ3f317WJ-l_nC8CHzNTeaGoWGRKFAFc44bLAylQbFPUcsNLhaV1oJ4qauPAnHRUlc61pWUEzZ2XZ3FfvXN0qDfQnJU9u6jvq3ZLmRQpZK_AuikVwIhSN4-g265F3bRNf5kOwqhhcX1xaVUYWEcuT4lvOxTylS84OA3RS2S7spbDeFLXI7Fh4l_UvyYfgqN0QX2r_Vi61KY873QNGOBHWe6hDJD7buw1_6J3XVl1k
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psep_2014_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2012_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2017_11_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2010_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1061__ASCE_IS_1943_555X_0000328
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2024_106435
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_6486_2010_00959_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_su11041129
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2014_12_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_17477778_2022_2088306
crossref_primary_10_1002_j_2334_5837_2019_00624_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10111_009_0131_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2020_104762
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aei_2020_101062
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_proeng_2014_09_090
crossref_primary_10_1155_2019_2089763
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnucene_2014_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tust_2021_103944
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2009_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1080_03081079_2012_703386
crossref_primary_10_15392_2319_0612_2025_2819
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2011_07_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbvi_2022_e00331
crossref_primary_10_1177_0037549714533619
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0222389
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cja_2014_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2011_02_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_09617353_2019_1697917
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmst_2017_05_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2017_11_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2013_08_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2011_12_011
crossref_primary_10_1017_dsi_2019_348
crossref_primary_10_1080_01608061_2017_1341860
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2018_01_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2016_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2020_105077
crossref_primary_10_1080_08841241_2022_2076274
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOA_10_2018_1567
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2008_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aap_2015_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2008_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_proeps_2009_09_257
crossref_primary_10_1002_j_2334_5837_2018_00491_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_su151612283
crossref_primary_10_1002_sdr_464
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aap_2023_107277
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_125346
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anucene_2022_109189
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2016_01_014
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13020470
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2017_01_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsr_2018_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apergo_2016_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1000_9361_11_60454_8
crossref_primary_10_1680_jfoen_17_00006
crossref_primary_10_1002_rhc3_12159
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11115_012_0216_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2013_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2018_12_020
crossref_primary_10_1002_rhc3_12119
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2016_02_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2009_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_risa_13468
crossref_primary_10_1002_hfm_20795
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cja_2024_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2020_104831
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2020_104678
crossref_primary_10_1080_00140139_2020_1745268
crossref_primary_10_1108_DPM_04_2016_0081
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsr_2019_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2018_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2010_08_006
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0229825
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jobe_2023_106599
crossref_primary_10_1002_pds_1578
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2016_06_018
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
10.2514/1.11950
10.2307/41166101
10.1002/sdr.259
10.1109/47.7814
10.1061/JCCEAZ.0000624
10.1111/1467-6486.00116
10.2307/2392455
10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00045-X
10.2307/2392809
10.2139/ssrn.305718
10.2307/2393986
10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 Elsevier Ltd
2006 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
7T2
7U1
C1K
7TB
8FD
FR3
DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)
Risk Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Risk Abstracts
Health & Safety Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Technology Research Database
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
DatabaseTitleList
Risk Abstracts
Technology Research Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Public Health
EISSN 1879-1042
EndPage 582
ExternalDocumentID 17973506
10_1016_j_ssci_2005_12_004
S0925753505001876
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.~1
0R~
123
13V
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29P
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
9JN
9JO
AABNK
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKBG
ABLVK
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABMVD
ABMZM
ABNUV
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHRH
ACIWK
ACJTP
ACNNM
ACNTT
ACPRK
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEWK
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADTZH
AEBSH
AECPX
AEKER
AENEX
AFKWA
AFRAH
AFTJW
AFXBA
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGJBL
AGUBO
AGUMN
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHJVU
AHPOS
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AISVY
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJRQY
AKURH
AKYCK
ALEQD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
ANZVX
AOMHK
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BJAXD
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BNSAS
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
ENUVR
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F3I
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEH
HMK
HMO
HMY
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
JJJVA
KOM
LCYCR
M29
M3W
M3Y
M41
MO0
N9A
NAHTW
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
PRBVW
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SES
SEW
SNG
SPC
SPCBC
SSB
SSG
SSH
SSL
SSO
SSS
SST
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WH7
WUQ
YHZ
~02
~G-
9DU
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACIEU
ACLOT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AGQPQ
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
CITATION
EFKBS
~HD
AGCQF
AGRNS
IQODW
7T2
7U1
C1K
7TB
8FD
FR3
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-cd298ef719e437073a9a1f1b9b8072c211380ad8b874e29dbce4a246e288d5b03
ISICitedReferencesCount 80
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000239719500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0925-7535
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 05:26:50 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 09:27:36 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:16:54 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:28:02 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:29:50 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:27:17 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords Root cause analysis
Organizational behaviour
Risk dynamics
Accident model
Human
Archetype
Modeling
Occupational accident
Work safety
Accident
Cause
Risk factor
Models
Behavior
Occupational medicine
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c392t-cd298ef719e437073a9a1f1b9b8072c211380ad8b874e29dbce4a246e288d5b03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PQID 19524471
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_29545674
proquest_miscellaneous_19524471
pascalfrancis_primary_17973506
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2005_12_004
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ssci_2005_12_004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ssci_2005_12_004
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Amsterdam
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Amsterdam
PublicationTitle Safety science
PublicationYear 2006
Publisher Elsevier India Pvt Ltd
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd
– name: Elsevier
References Rasmussen (bib18) 1997; 27
Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, 1993. An assessment of space shuttle flight software development processes, Committee for Review of Oversight Mechanisms for Space Shuttle Flight Software Processes. Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, National Research Council, National Academies Press. Available from
Winsor (bib26) 1988; 31
Carroll, J.S., Rudolph, J.W., Hatakenaka, S., 2002. Organizational learning from experience in high-hazard industries: problem investigations as off-line reflective practice. MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4359-02, April 2002. Available from
Sterman (bib23) 2000
Tamuz, M., 1994. Developing organizational safety information systems. In: Apostolakis, G.E., Wu, J.S. (Eds.), Proceedings of PSAM II, vol. 2, University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 71, 7–12.
Wolstenholme (bib27) 2003; 19
Braun, W., 2002. The system archetypes. Available from
Adler, Borys (bib1) 1996; 41
Merton (bib15) 1968
Masuch (bib14) 1985; 30
Miller, Friesen (bib16) 1980; 25
Argyris, Schön (bib4) 1978
Amalberti (bib3) 2001; 37
Rogers, W.P., 1986. Chairman, Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
Leveson (bib12) 2004; 41
Press Release 88-01-05. Available from
Sterman, J.D., 2002. System dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. In: Proceedings of the ESD Internal Symposium, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Shrivastava (bib21) 1992
Sitkin (bib22) 1992; 14
Repenning, Sterman (bib19) 2001; 43
Carroll (bib6) 1998; 35
.
Leveson (bib11) 2004; 42
Leveson (bib10) 1995
Albee, A. et al., 2000. Report on the Loss of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions, JPL Special Review Board, JPL D-18709, March 29.
Levitt, Parker (bib13) 1976; 102
Kemeny, J.G., 1979. Chairman, Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island, October, 1979. Available from
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib20
Leveson (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib11) 2004; 42
Miller (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib16) 1980; 25
Argyris (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib4) 1978
Rasmussen (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib18) 1997; 27
Leveson (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib10) 1995
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib2
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib5
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib25
Levitt (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib13) 1976; 102
Shrivastava (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib21) 1992
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib24
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib7
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib9
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib8
Sitkin (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib22) 1992; 14
Leveson (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib12) 2004; 41
Sterman (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib23) 2000
Carroll (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib6) 1998; 35
Winsor (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib26) 1988; 31
Adler (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib1) 1996; 41
Masuch (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib14) 1985; 30
10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib17
Repenning (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib19) 2001; 43
Wolstenholme (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib27) 2003; 19
Amalberti (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib3) 2001; 37
Merton (10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib15) 1968
References_xml – reference: Rogers, W.P., 1986. Chairman, Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
– year: 1995
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Safeware: System Safety and Computers
– reference: Braun, W., 2002. The system archetypes. Available from: <
– volume: 25
  start-page: 268
  year: 1980
  end-page: 299
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Archetypes of organizational transition
  publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly
– volume: 35
  start-page: 699
  year: 1998
  end-page: 717
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Organizational learning activities in high-hazard industries: the logics underlying self-analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Management Studies
– volume: 27
  start-page: 183
  year: 1997
  end-page: 213
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem
  publication-title: Safety Science
– reference: Carroll, J.S., Rudolph, J.W., Hatakenaka, S., 2002. Organizational learning from experience in high-hazard industries: problem investigations as off-line reflective practice. MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4359-02, April 2002. Available from: <
– year: 2000
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World
– volume: 14
  start-page: 231
  year: 1992
  end-page: 266
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses
  publication-title: Research in Organizational Behavior
– volume: 43
  start-page: 64
  year: 2001
  end-page: 88
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: creating and sustaining process improvement
  publication-title: California Management Review
– reference: Press Release 88-01-05. Available from: <
– year: 1992
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis
– volume: 37
  start-page: 109
  year: 2001
  end-page: 126
  ident: bib3
  article-title: The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems
  publication-title: Safety Science
– volume: 31
  start-page: 101
  year: 1988
  end-page: 107
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: an example for technical communicators
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
– volume: 41
  start-page: 61
  year: 1996
  end-page: 89
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive
  publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly
– year: 1978
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Organizational Learning
– reference: Albee, A. et al., 2000. Report on the Loss of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions, JPL Special Review Board, JPL D-18709, March 29.
– reference: Sterman, J.D., 2002. System dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. In: Proceedings of the ESD Internal Symposium, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 7
  year: 2003
  end-page: 26
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Toward the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics
  publication-title: System Dynamics Review
– reference: >.
– volume: 102
  start-page: 465
  year: 1976
  end-page: 478
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Reducing construction accidents—top management’s role
  publication-title: ASCE Journal of the Construction Division
– reference: Tamuz, M., 1994. Developing organizational safety information systems. In: Apostolakis, G.E., Wu, J.S. (Eds.), Proceedings of PSAM II, vol. 2, University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 71, 7–12.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 14
  year: 1985
  end-page: 33
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Vicious circles in organizations
  publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly
– volume: 42
  start-page: 237
  year: 2004
  end-page: 270
  ident: bib11
  article-title: A new accident model for engineering safety systems
  publication-title: Safety Science
– reference: Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, 1993. An assessment of space shuttle flight software development processes, Committee for Review of Oversight Mechanisms for Space Shuttle Flight Software Processes. Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, National Research Council, National Academies Press. Available from: <
– volume: 41
  start-page: 564
  year: 2004
  end-page: 575
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Role of software in spacecraft accidents
  publication-title: Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
– reference: Kemeny, J.G., 1979. Chairman, Report of the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island, October, 1979. Available from: <
– year: 1968
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Social Theory and Social Structure
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib2
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib24
– volume: 27
  start-page: 183
  issue: 2/3
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib18
  article-title: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem
  publication-title: Safety Science
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
– year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib10
– volume: 41
  start-page: 564
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib12
  article-title: Role of software in spacecraft accidents
  publication-title: Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets
  doi: 10.2514/1.11950
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib8
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib20
– year: 1968
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib15
– volume: 43
  start-page: 64
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib19
  article-title: Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: creating and sustaining process improvement
  publication-title: California Management Review
  doi: 10.2307/41166101
– year: 1978
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib4
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib17
– volume: 19
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib27
  article-title: Toward the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics
  publication-title: System Dynamics Review
  doi: 10.1002/sdr.259
– year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib23
– volume: 31
  start-page: 101
  issue: 3
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib26
  article-title: Communication failures contributing to the Challenger accident: an example for technical communicators
  publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  doi: 10.1109/47.7814
– volume: 102
  start-page: 465
  issue: CO3
  year: 1976
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib13
  article-title: Reducing construction accidents—top management’s role
  publication-title: ASCE Journal of the Construction Division
  doi: 10.1061/JCCEAZ.0000624
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib25
– volume: 35
  start-page: 699
  issue: 6
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib6
  article-title: Organizational learning activities in high-hazard industries: the logics underlying self-analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Management Studies
  doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00116
– volume: 25
  start-page: 268
  issue: 2
  year: 1980
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib16
  article-title: Archetypes of organizational transition
  publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly
  doi: 10.2307/2392455
– volume: 37
  start-page: 109
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib3
  article-title: The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems
  publication-title: Safety Science
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00045-X
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib5
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib9
– volume: 30
  start-page: 14
  issue: 1
  year: 1985
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib14
  article-title: Vicious circles in organizations
  publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly
  doi: 10.2307/2392809
– year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib21
– ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib7
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.305718
– volume: 14
  start-page: 231
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib22
  article-title: Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses
  publication-title: Research in Organizational Behavior
– volume: 41
  start-page: 61
  issue: 1
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib1
  article-title: Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive
  publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly
  doi: 10.2307/2393986
– volume: 42
  start-page: 237
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004_bib11
  article-title: A new accident model for engineering safety systems
  publication-title: Safety Science
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
SSID ssj0001361
Score 2.1411552
Snippet We propose an initial set of six system safety archetypes that model common dynamic organizational behaviours that often lead to accidents. The archetypes help...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 565
SubjectTerms Accident model
Biological and medical sciences
Legislation. Organization
Medical sciences
Occupational medicine
Organizational behaviour
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk dynamics
Root cause analysis
Title Archetypes for organizational safety
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.004
https://www.proquest.com/docview/19524471
https://www.proquest.com/docview/29545674
Volume 44
WOSCitedRecordID wos000239719500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1879-1042
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001361
  issn: 0925-7535
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3fb9MwED7BhsSkCcEArfwYeZh4mYJqJ47txwl1AlQVpHWob5adOBoTykrTTRN_PefYblamDXigD1Fl5Ufrz747n3PfB7Av0eW6_bq00AUuUIw1qbCUpCXNa83xQzvphK9jPpmI2Ux-CQrZbScnwJtGXF3J-X-FGtsQbFc6-w9wr26KDfgdQccjwo7HvwLecclal1ntmBaCbNPPmPNrdR2YP2JIety1HARX2GeoF9rTD6yVix2jPzntdw760oaxvbSxeMsZ7KDZdS2fIGI-ISQGncAt8yQi0UZ6jsYwFvg1g8e80kPwncwLCd0wyz5DcPauxf_i81guBet1h9c5sCef1dHJeKymo9n07fxH6uTB3DZ60Eq5D5uUM4nma_Pw42j2aeV0SdZR465-fKiP8q_y_f7Y22KQ7blucWbUXtLkhnfuQo7pY3gU1grJocf4CdyzzQ48jKXk7Q5s-6Rr4mvJnsJ-j32C2Cfr2Cce-2dwcjSavv-QBhmMtMTgdZmWFU4nW3MibZ5xNMlaalITI40YclriCj4TQ10JI3huqaxMaXNN88JSISpmhtlz2GjOG7sLCRWlY1wzWsg61xXGpobpynKNYWBlmRwAiR2jysAR76RKvqv4MuCZcp3pxEuZIlRhZw7gYHXN3DOk3Hk2i_2twsD2sZvCsXLndXtr4PSP4pJnbFgM4E1ES6GFdNteurHnF60ikmEMy8ntZ7i9blbw_MUf7_EStvo58wo2losL-xoelJfLb-1iLwzKX3tkkBg
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archetypes+for+organizational+safety&rft.jtitle=Safety+science&rft.au=Marais%2C+Karen&rft.au=Saleh%2C+Joseph+H&rft.au=Leveson%2C+Nancy+G&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ssci.2005.12.004&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0925-7535&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0925-7535&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0925-7535&client=summon