Computer utilization and clinical judgment in psychological assessment reports
The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical psychology Jg. 62; H. 1; S. 19 - 32 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.01.2006
Wiley Periodicals Inc |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0021-9762, 1097-4679 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision‐making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer‐based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision‐making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer‐based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer‐based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision‐making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer‐based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision‐making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer‐based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer‐based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol. The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision-making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer-based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision-making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer-based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer-based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report. The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision-making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer-based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision-making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer-based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer-based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report.The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision-making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer-based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision-making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer-based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer-based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report. The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision-making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer-based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision-making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer-based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer-based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| Author | Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Elizabeth O. surname: Lichtenberger fullname: Lichtenberger, Elizabeth O. email: drlichtenberger@aol.com organization: Alliant International University, San Diego, CA |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16273518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kU1v1DAURS1URKeFDT8ARSxYVErxs5M4XqIRFEajwoKPpeVxXooHx05tR3T49aQzbRcVYuXFPefJuveEHPngkZCXQM-BUvZ2a9x4zihI8YQsgEpRVo2QR2Qxh1BK0bBjcpLSllJaUaifkWNomOA1tAtyuQzDOGWMxZSts390tsEX2neFcdZbo12xnbqrAX0urC_GtDM_gwtX-0SnhCnts4hjiDk9J0977RK-uHtPybcP778uP5brzxeflu_WpeGSiZIjrU0rsa3rRrZMt6Zv2kqg7jiYmnZAK2aaDdeGSbHRHDgVXQ897XoDKAw_JW8Od8cYridMWQ02GXROewxTUoLOfQCrZvD1I3AbpujnvynGm1a2HNgMvbqDps2AnRqjHXTcqfuaZoAeABNDShF7ZWzeV5Wjtk4BVbdLqNsl1H6JWTl7pDxc_RcMB_i3dbj7D6lWy_WXe6c8ODZlvHlwdPylGsFFrX5cXii2AslWgqvv_C-Ow6gl |
| CODEN | JCPYAO |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s40688_023_00455_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_pits_22126 crossref_primary_10_1093_arclin_acq060 crossref_primary_10_1080_00273171_2010_531232 crossref_primary_10_1080_00223890902935662 crossref_primary_10_1002_jclp_20199 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12207_022_09465_x crossref_primary_10_1080_07421656_2012_648091 crossref_primary_10_1002_jclp_20201 crossref_primary_10_1002_jclp_20195 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aip_2011_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aip_2010_05_008 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742646409990033 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11042_024_18209_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12094702 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.790 10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.395 10.1076/clin.12.1.101.1733 10.1037/h0062896 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.31 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_8 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.880 10.1126/science.221.4608.323 10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.18 10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_10 10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.369 10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.470 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.6 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.52 10.1016/0747-5632(85)90013-5 10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.213 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.14 10.1016/B0080-4270(73)00113-9 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.94 10.1037/10299-000 10.1037/0735-7028.28.3.271 10.1177/014662168400800203 10.1111/1468-2389.00243 10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200003)56:3<349::AID-JCLP11>3.0.CO;2-T 10.1002/jclp.10267 10.1016/0272-7358(84)90010-2 10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.2 10.1002/1097-4679(197210)28:4<505::AID-JCLP2270280419>3.0.CO;2-1 10.1037/1061-4087.52.4.248 10.1037/11281-000 10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.816 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jan 2006 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. – notice: Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Jan 2006 |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/jclp.20197 |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Psychology |
| EISSN | 1097-4679 |
| EndPage | 32 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 959557581 16273518 10_1002_jclp_20197 JCLP20197 ark_67375_WNG_2J192J73_V |
| Genre | article Journal Article Review Feature |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -ET -W8 -~X .3N .GA .GJ .GO .Y3 05W 07C 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 31~ 33P 36B 3EH 3O- 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 8UM 930 9M8 A04 AAAHA AABNI AAESR AAHQN AAHSB AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABDPE ABEML ABIJN ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABPPZ ABPVW ABSOO ABUFD ACAHQ ACBKW ACBNA ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACNCT ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACTDY ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADXAS ADXHL ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AETEA AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGHSJ AGQPQ AGXDD AHBTC AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BKOMP BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CS3 D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS EDJ EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPL EPS ESX F00 F01 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N G50 GNP GODZA HAOEW HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IX1 J0M JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LPU LUTES LW6 LYRES M6U MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MVM MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NEJ NF~ NHB NNB O66 O9- OHT OIG OVD P-O P2P P2W P2Y P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RPD RX1 RXW RYL S10 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TAE TEORI TN5 TUS TWZ UB1 UBW UBX UBY UHB UPT UQL V2E V62 V8K VQP W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHDPE WHG WIB WIH WII WJL WOHZO WQZ WSUWO WXSBR XG1 XOL XPP XSW XV2 XZL YQI YQJ YQT YR5 YXB YZZ Z0I ZCA ZCG ZGI ZHY ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WP 0ZS AAHHS AAYOK ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AFYRF AIFKG AIWBW AJBDE ALUQN RVT RWI WRC XJT YCJ ZKG AAYXX CITATION O8X CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VXZ YIF YIN 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3927-3e05c89e8556982a8cf6847ead31c50d1042c6b3ac297ba31307df1f0dfc1e7c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 19 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000234437600003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0021-9762 |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 13:16:48 EST 2025 Mon Nov 17 23:22:14 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:43:16 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:13:37 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:42:30 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:21:32 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 03:32:16 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3927-3e05c89e8556982a8cf6847ead31c50d1042c6b3ac297ba31307df1f0dfc1e7c3 |
| Notes | ArticleID:JCLP20197 ark:/67375/WNG-2J192J73-V istex:EC2759D3A1FE596A2DCE0D565C25E479DB17CBCB SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 16273518 |
| PQID | 236898312 |
| PQPubID | 42414 |
| PageCount | 14 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_70201124 proquest_journals_236898312 pubmed_primary_16273518 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jclp_20197 crossref_primary_10_1002_jclp_20197 wiley_primary_10_1002_jclp_20197_JCLP20197 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_2J192J73_V |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2006-01 January 2006 2006-01-00 2006-Jan 20060101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2006 text: 2006-01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of clinical psychology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Clin. Psychol |
| PublicationYear | 2006 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company Wiley Periodicals Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company – name: Wiley Periodicals Inc |
| References | Ben-Porath, Y.S., Slutske, W.S., & Butcher, J.N. ( 1989). A real-data simulation of computerized administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 18-22. Groth-Marnat, G. ( 2000). Visions of clinical assessment: Then, now, and a brief history of the future. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 349-365. Handle, R.W., Ben-Porath, Y.S., & Watt, M. ( 1999). Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting. Psychological Assessment, 11, 369-380. Richman-Hirsch, W.L., Olson-Buchanan, J.B., & Drasgow, F. ( 2000). Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 880-887. Moreno, K.E., Wetzel, C.D., McBride, J.R., & Weiss, J.J. ( 1984). Relationship computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163. Feigelson, M.E., & Dwight, S.A. ( 2000). Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52(4), 248-255. Maloney, M.P., & Ward, M.P. ( 1976). Psychological assessment: A conceptual approach. New York: Oxford University Press. Schafer, R. ( 1949). Psychological tests in clinical research. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 328-334. Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S.L. ( 2004). Assisted self-adaptive testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 2-9. Tallent, N. ( 1993). Psychological report writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Roid, G.H. ( 1985). Computer-based test interpretation: The potential of quantitative methods of test interpretation. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 207-219. Beutler, L.E., & Williams, O.B. ( 1999). Systematic treatment selection (STS): A software package for treatment planning [Computer software]. Ventura, CA: Center for Behavioral Health Technology. Fowler, R.D., & Butcher, J.N. ( 1986). Critique of Matarazzo's views on computerized testing: All sigma and no meaning. American Psychologist, 41, 94-96. Meehl, P.E. ( 1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Butcher, J.N., Perry, J.N., & Atlis, M.M. ( 2000). Validity and utility of computer-based interpretation. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 6-18. American Psychological Association. ( 2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073. Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. ( 1995). Level of Service Inventory-Revised for Windows. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. Moreland, K.L. ( 1985). Validation of computer-based test interpretations: Problems and prospects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 816-825. Lichtenberger, E.O., Mather, N., Kaufman, N.L., & Kaufman, A.S. ( 2004). Essentials of assessment report writing. New York: Wiley. Garb, H.N. ( 1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Shectman, F. ( 1979). Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Hayworth. Salgado, J.F., & Moscoso, S. ( 2003). Internet-based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses' perceptions and reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 194-205. Snyder, D.K., Widiger, T.A., & Hoover, D.W. ( 1990). Methodological considerations in validating computer-based test interpretations: Controlling for response bias. Psychological Assessment, 2, 470-477. Harvey, V.S. ( 1997). Improving readability of psychological reports. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 271-274. Roper, B.L., Ben-Porath, Y.S., & Butcher, J.N. ( 1991). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-371. Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. ( 2004). When clinical description becomes statistical description. American Psychologist, 59(7), 595-613. Einhorn, J.H., & Hogarth, R.M. ( 1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395-416. Garb, H.N. ( 1992). The debate over the use of computer based test reports. The Clinical Psychologist, 45, 95-100. Shores, E.A., & Carstairs, J.R. ( 1998). Accuracy of the MMPI-2 computerized Minnesota Report in identifying fake-good and fake-bad response sets. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(1), 101-106. Tallent, N. ( 1987). Computer-generated psychological reports: A look at the modern psychometric machine. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(1), 95-108. Grove, W.M., Zald, D.H., Lebow, B.S., Snitz, B.E., & Nelson, C. ( 2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19-30. National Association of School Psychologists. ( 2000). Professional conduct manual. Principles for professional ethics. Bethesda, MD: Author. Groth-Marnat, G. ( 2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Wiley. Cull, J.G., & Gill, W.S. ( 1988). Suicide Probability Scale disk [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. Snyder, D.K. ( 2000). Computer-assisted judgment: Defining strengths and liabilities. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 52-60. Garb, H.N. ( 1984). The incremental validity information used in personality assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 641-655. Hedlund, J.L., Morgan, D.W., & Master, F.D. ( 1972). The Mayo Clinic automated MMPI program: Cross-validation with psychiatric patients in an army hospital. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 505-510. Matarazzo, J. ( 1983, July 22). Computerized psychological testing. Science, 221, p. 363. Matarazzo, J.D. ( 1986). Computerized clinical psychological test interpretations: Unvalidated plus all mean and no sigma. American Psychologist, 41, 14-24. Hoover, D.W., & Snyder, D.K. ( 1991). Validity of the computerized interpretive report for the Marital Satisfaction Inventory: A customer satisfaction study. Psychological Assessment, 3, 213-217. Butcher, J.N., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. ( 2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 331-345. Garb, H.N. ( 2000). Computers will become increasingly important for psychological assessment: Not that there's anything wrong with that! Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 31-39. Adams, K.M., & Heaton, R.K. ( 1985). Automated interpretation of neuropsychological test data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 790-802. 1991; 3 2004; 20 1949; 13 1985; 1 1989; 1 1987; 51 2004; 60 2002; 57 2000; 85 1998 1976 1954 1997; 28 1995 1972 2004 1993 2003 2002 1991 1972; 28 1979 1978 2003; 11 1999 1990; 2 1983; 221 1986; 41 1984; 4 2000 2000; 12 2000; 56 1991; 65 1978; 85 1984; 8 2004; 59 2000; 52 1987 1999; 11 1985; 53 1992; 45 1998; 12 1988 Handle (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB25) 1999; 11 Beutler (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB5) 1999 Hedlund (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB27) 1972; 28 Butcher (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB10) 2000; 12 Groth-Marnat (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB23) 2003 Einhorn (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB14) 1978; 85 Snyder (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB46) 2000; 12 Adams (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB1) 1985; 53 Groth-Marnat (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB22) 2000; 56 Harvey (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB26) 1997; 28 Shores (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB45) 1998; 12 Roid (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB40) 1985; 1 Moreland (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB36) 1987 Garb (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB20) 1998 Butcher (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB9) 1998 Grove (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB24) 2000; 12 Hoover (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB29) 1991; 3 Garb (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB18) 1984; 4 Schafer (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB43) 1949; 13 Moreno (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB37) 1984; 8 American Psychological Association (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB2) 2002; 57 Garb (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB21) 2000; 12 Cull (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB12) 1988 Snyder (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB47) 1990; 2 Eichman (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB13) 1972 Butcher (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB11) 2004; 60 Fowler (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB17) 1986; 41 Moreland (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB35) 1985; 53 National Association of School Psychologists (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB38) 2000 Eyde (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB15) 1991 Matarazzo (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB32) 1983; 221 Maloney (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB31) 1976 Garb (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB19) 1992; 45 Ben-Porath (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB4) 1989; 1 Feigelson (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB16) 2000; 52 Andrews (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB3) 1995 Butcher (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB7) 1995 Roper (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB41) 1991; 65 Shectman (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB44) 1979 Tallent (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB49) 1993 Lichtenberger (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB30) 2004 Butcher (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB6) 1978 Hontangas (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB28) 2004; 20 Meehl (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB34) 1954 Tallent (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB48) 1987; 51 Matarazzo (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB33) 1986; 41 Westen (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB50) 2004; 59 Butcher (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB8) 2002 Richman-Hirsch (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB39) 2000; 85 Salgado (10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB42) 2003; 11 |
| References_xml | – reference: Garb, H.N. ( 2000). Computers will become increasingly important for psychological assessment: Not that there's anything wrong with that! Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 31-39. – reference: Fowler, R.D., & Butcher, J.N. ( 1986). Critique of Matarazzo's views on computerized testing: All sigma and no meaning. American Psychologist, 41, 94-96. – reference: Matarazzo, J.D. ( 1986). Computerized clinical psychological test interpretations: Unvalidated plus all mean and no sigma. American Psychologist, 41, 14-24. – reference: Snyder, D.K. ( 2000). Computer-assisted judgment: Defining strengths and liabilities. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 52-60. – reference: Beutler, L.E., & Williams, O.B. ( 1999). Systematic treatment selection (STS): A software package for treatment planning [Computer software]. Ventura, CA: Center for Behavioral Health Technology. – reference: Lichtenberger, E.O., Mather, N., Kaufman, N.L., & Kaufman, A.S. ( 2004). Essentials of assessment report writing. New York: Wiley. – reference: Handle, R.W., Ben-Porath, Y.S., & Watt, M. ( 1999). Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI-2 in a clinical setting. Psychological Assessment, 11, 369-380. – reference: Snyder, D.K., Widiger, T.A., & Hoover, D.W. ( 1990). Methodological considerations in validating computer-based test interpretations: Controlling for response bias. Psychological Assessment, 2, 470-477. – reference: Groth-Marnat, G. ( 2000). Visions of clinical assessment: Then, now, and a brief history of the future. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 349-365. – reference: Harvey, V.S. ( 1997). Improving readability of psychological reports. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 271-274. – reference: Roper, B.L., Ben-Porath, Y.S., & Butcher, J.N. ( 1991). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358-371. – reference: Cull, J.G., & Gill, W.S. ( 1988). Suicide Probability Scale disk [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. – reference: Tallent, N. ( 1987). Computer-generated psychological reports: A look at the modern psychometric machine. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51(1), 95-108. – reference: Garb, H.N. ( 1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. – reference: Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. ( 1995). Level of Service Inventory-Revised for Windows. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. – reference: National Association of School Psychologists. ( 2000). Professional conduct manual. Principles for professional ethics. Bethesda, MD: Author. – reference: Moreland, K.L. ( 1985). Validation of computer-based test interpretations: Problems and prospects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 816-825. – reference: American Psychological Association. ( 2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073. – reference: Meehl, P.E. ( 1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. – reference: Einhorn, J.H., & Hogarth, R.M. ( 1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395-416. – reference: Groth-Marnat, G. ( 2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Wiley. – reference: Hoover, D.W., & Snyder, D.K. ( 1991). Validity of the computerized interpretive report for the Marital Satisfaction Inventory: A customer satisfaction study. Psychological Assessment, 3, 213-217. – reference: Adams, K.M., & Heaton, R.K. ( 1985). Automated interpretation of neuropsychological test data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 790-802. – reference: Garb, H.N. ( 1984). The incremental validity information used in personality assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 641-655. – reference: Schafer, R. ( 1949). Psychological tests in clinical research. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 328-334. – reference: Shectman, F. ( 1979). Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Hayworth. – reference: Ben-Porath, Y.S., Slutske, W.S., & Butcher, J.N. ( 1989). A real-data simulation of computerized administration of the MMPI. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 18-22. – reference: Butcher, J.N., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. ( 2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 331-345. – reference: Shores, E.A., & Carstairs, J.R. ( 1998). Accuracy of the MMPI-2 computerized Minnesota Report in identifying fake-good and fake-bad response sets. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(1), 101-106. – reference: Butcher, J.N., Perry, J.N., & Atlis, M.M. ( 2000). Validity and utility of computer-based interpretation. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 6-18. – reference: Hedlund, J.L., Morgan, D.W., & Master, F.D. ( 1972). The Mayo Clinic automated MMPI program: Cross-validation with psychiatric patients in an army hospital. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 505-510. – reference: Garb, H.N. ( 1992). The debate over the use of computer based test reports. The Clinical Psychologist, 45, 95-100. – reference: Roid, G.H. ( 1985). Computer-based test interpretation: The potential of quantitative methods of test interpretation. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 207-219. – reference: Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. ( 2004). When clinical description becomes statistical description. American Psychologist, 59(7), 595-613. – reference: Maloney, M.P., & Ward, M.P. ( 1976). Psychological assessment: A conceptual approach. New York: Oxford University Press. – reference: Richman-Hirsch, W.L., Olson-Buchanan, J.B., & Drasgow, F. ( 2000). Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 880-887. – reference: Tallent, N. ( 1993). Psychological report writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. – reference: Moreno, K.E., Wetzel, C.D., McBride, J.R., & Weiss, J.J. ( 1984). Relationship computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 155-163. – reference: Feigelson, M.E., & Dwight, S.A. ( 2000). Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52(4), 248-255. – reference: Grove, W.M., Zald, D.H., Lebow, B.S., Snitz, B.E., & Nelson, C. ( 2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19-30. – reference: Hontangas, P., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., Revuelta, J., & Wise, S.L. ( 2004). Assisted self-adaptive testing: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 2-9. – reference: Matarazzo, J. ( 1983, July 22). Computerized psychological testing. Science, 221, p. 363. – reference: Salgado, J.F., & Moscoso, S. ( 2003). Internet-based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses' perceptions and reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 194-205. – volume: 12 start-page: 6 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 18 article-title: Validity and utility of computer‐based interpretation publication-title: Psychological Assessment – volume: 8 start-page: 155 year: 1984 end-page: 163 article-title: Relationship computerized adaptive testing (CAT) subtests publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement – start-page: 75 year: 1991 end-page: 123 – volume: 51 start-page: 95 issue: 1 year: 1987 end-page: 108 article-title: Computer‐generated psychological reports: A look at the modern psychometric machine publication-title: Journal of Personality Assessment – start-page: 277 year: 1998 end-page: 312 – start-page: 64 year: 1987 end-page: 86 – volume: 85 start-page: 880 issue: 6 year: 2000 end-page: 887 article-title: Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology – volume: 53 start-page: 816 year: 1985 end-page: 825 article-title: Validation of computer‐based test interpretations: Problems and prospects publication-title: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology – year: 1979 – year: 1998 – volume: 53 start-page: 790 year: 1985 end-page: 802 article-title: Automated interpretation of neuropsychological test data publication-title: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology – volume: 52 start-page: 248 issue: 4 year: 2000 end-page: 255 article-title: Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta‐analytic perspective publication-title: Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research – volume: 60 start-page: 331 issue: 3 year: 2004 end-page: 345 article-title: Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychology – volume: 4 start-page: 641 year: 1984 end-page: 655 article-title: The incremental validity information used in personality assessment publication-title: Clinical Psychology Review – year: 2004 – volume: 28 start-page: 505 year: 1972 end-page: 510 article-title: The Mayo Clinic automated MMPI program: Cross‐validation with psychiatric patients in an army hospital publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychology – volume: 28 start-page: 271 year: 1997 end-page: 274 article-title: Improving readability of psychological reports publication-title: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice – volume: 59 start-page: 595 issue: 7 year: 2004 end-page: 613 article-title: When clinical description becomes statistical description publication-title: American Psychologist – start-page: 949 year: 1978 end-page: 52 – volume: 12 start-page: 19 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 30 article-title: Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta‐analysis publication-title: Psychological Assessment – year: 1976 – year: 1993 – volume: 20 start-page: 2 issue: 1 year: 2004 end-page: 9 article-title: Assisted self‐adaptive testing: A comparative study publication-title: European Journal of Psychological Assessment – start-page: 253 year: 1972 end-page: 255 – volume: 221 start-page: 363 year: 1983 article-title: Computerized psychological testing publication-title: Science – volume: 65 start-page: 358 year: 1991 end-page: 371 article-title: Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI‐2 publication-title: Journal of Personality Assessment – year: 2003 – year: 2000 – volume: 12 start-page: 52 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 60 article-title: Computer‐assisted judgment: Defining strengths and liabilities publication-title: Psychological Assessment – volume: 41 start-page: 14 year: 1986 end-page: 24 article-title: Computerized clinical psychological test interpretations: Unvalidated plus all mean and no sigma publication-title: American Psychologist – volume: 1 start-page: 207 year: 1985 end-page: 219 article-title: Computer‐based test interpretation: The potential of quantitative methods of test interpretation publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior – year: 1954 – volume: 11 start-page: 194 year: 2003 end-page: 205 article-title: Internet‐based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses' perceptions and reactions publication-title: International Journal of Selection and Assessment – volume: 2 start-page: 470 year: 1990 end-page: 477 article-title: Methodological considerations in validating computer‐based test interpretations: Controlling for response bias publication-title: Psychological Assessment – volume: 41 start-page: 94 year: 1986 end-page: 96 article-title: Critique of Matarazzo's views on computerized testing: All sigma and no meaning publication-title: American Psychologist – volume: 11 start-page: 369 year: 1999 end-page: 380 article-title: Computerized adaptive assessment with the MMPI‐2 in a clinical setting publication-title: Psychological Assessment – volume: 57 start-page: 1060 issue: 12 year: 2002 end-page: 1073 article-title: Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct publication-title: American Psychologist – volume: 1 start-page: 18 year: 1989 end-page: 22 article-title: A real‐data simulation of computerized administration of the MMPI publication-title: Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology – volume: 56 start-page: 349 issue: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 365 article-title: Visions of clinical assessment: Then, now, and a brief history of the future publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychology – volume: 45 start-page: 95 year: 1992 end-page: 100 article-title: The debate over the use of computer based test reports publication-title: The Clinical Psychologist – year: 2002 – year: 1988 – volume: 85 start-page: 395 year: 1978 end-page: 416 article-title: Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity publication-title: Psychological Review – volume: 12 start-page: 31 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 39 article-title: Computers will become increasingly important for psychological assessment: Not that there's anything wrong with that! publication-title: Psychological Assessment – volume: 3 start-page: 213 year: 1991 end-page: 217 article-title: Validity of the computerized interpretive report for the Marital Satisfaction Inventory: A customer satisfaction study publication-title: Psychological Assessment – year: 1995 – volume: 13 start-page: 328 year: 1949 end-page: 334 article-title: Psychological tests in clinical research publication-title: Journal of Consulting Psychology – volume: 12 start-page: 101 issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 106 article-title: Accuracy of the MMPI‐2 computerized Minnesota Report in identifying fake‐good and fake‐bad response sets publication-title: Clinical Neuropsychologist – year: 1999 – volume: 53 start-page: 790 year: 1985 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB1 publication-title: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.790 – volume-title: Psychological assessment: A conceptual approach year: 1976 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB31 – volume: 85 start-page: 395 year: 1978 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB14 publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.395 – volume: 12 start-page: 101 year: 1998 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB45 publication-title: Clinical Neuropsychologist doi: 10.1076/clin.12.1.101.1733 – volume-title: Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches year: 1995 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB7 – volume: 13 start-page: 328 year: 1949 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB43 publication-title: Journal of Consulting Psychology doi: 10.1037/h0062896 – volume: 12 start-page: 19 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB24 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 – volume: 12 start-page: 31 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB21 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.31 – volume: 51 start-page: 95 year: 1987 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB48 publication-title: Journal of Personality Assessment doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_8 – volume: 85 start-page: 880 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB39 publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.880 – volume: 221 start-page: 363 year: 1983 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB32 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.221.4608.323 – volume: 1 start-page: 18 year: 1989 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB4 publication-title: Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.18 – volume: 65 start-page: 358 year: 1991 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB41 publication-title: Journal of Personality Assessment doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_10 – volume: 11 start-page: 369 year: 1999 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB25 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.369 – volume: 45 start-page: 95 year: 1992 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB19 publication-title: The Clinical Psychologist – start-page: 64 volume-title: Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner's guide year: 1987 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB36 – volume-title: Using computers in clinical practice year: 1979 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB44 – start-page: 949 volume-title: Eighth mental measurements yearbook year: 1978 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB6 – volume: 2 start-page: 470 year: 1990 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB47 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.470 – volume: 12 start-page: 6 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB10 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.6 – volume: 12 start-page: 52 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB46 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.52 – volume: 1 start-page: 207 year: 1985 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB40 publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(85)90013-5 – volume: 3 start-page: 213 year: 1991 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB29 publication-title: Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.213 – volume-title: Level of Service Inventory—Revised for Windows year: 1995 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB3 – volume: 41 start-page: 14 year: 1986 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB33 publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.14 – start-page: 277 volume-title: Comprehensive clinical psychology: Sociocultural and individual differences year: 1998 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB9 doi: 10.1016/B0080-4270(73)00113-9 – volume-title: Professional conduct manual. Principles for professional ethics year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB38 – volume-title: Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches year: 2002 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB8 – volume-title: Handbook of psychological assessment year: 2003 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB23 – volume: 59 start-page: 595 year: 2004 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB50 publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595 – volume: 41 start-page: 94 year: 1986 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB17 publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.94 – volume-title: Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment year: 1998 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB20 doi: 10.1037/10299-000 – volume-title: Suicide Probability Scale disk [Computer software] year: 1988 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB12 – start-page: 75 volume-title: The computer and the decision-making process year: 1991 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB15 – volume: 28 start-page: 271 year: 1997 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB26 publication-title: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.28.3.271 – volume: 8 start-page: 155 year: 1984 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB37 publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement doi: 10.1177/014662168400800203 – volume: 11 start-page: 194 year: 2003 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB42 publication-title: International Journal of Selection and Assessment doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00243 – volume: 57 start-page: 1060 year: 2002 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB2 publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060 – start-page: 253 volume-title: Seventh mental measurements yearbook year: 1972 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB13 – volume-title: Essentials of assessment report writing year: 2004 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB30 – volume: 56 start-page: 349 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB22 publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200003)56:3<349::AID-JCLP11>3.0.CO;2-T – volume-title: Systematic treatment selection (STS): A software package for treatment planning [Computer software] year: 1999 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB5 – volume: 60 start-page: 331 year: 2004 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB11 publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1002/jclp.10267 – volume: 4 start-page: 641 year: 1984 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB18 publication-title: Clinical Psychology Review doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(84)90010-2 – volume: 20 start-page: 2 year: 2004 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB28 publication-title: European Journal of Psychological Assessment doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.2 – volume-title: Psychological report writing year: 1993 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB49 – volume: 28 start-page: 505 year: 1972 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB27 publication-title: Journal of Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197210)28:4<505::AID-JCLP2270280419>3.0.CO;2-1 – volume: 52 start-page: 248 year: 2000 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB16 publication-title: Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research doi: 10.1037/1061-4087.52.4.248 – volume-title: Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence year: 1954 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB34 doi: 10.1037/11281-000 – volume: 53 start-page: 816 year: 1985 ident: 10.1002/jclp.20197-BIB35 publication-title: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.816 |
| SSID | ssj0004015 |
| Score | 1.859343 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 19 |
| SubjectTerms | Clinical assessment Clinical decision making Computers Data Data analysis Decision Making Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted Errors Evaluation Humans Judgment Medical decision making Medical personnel Medical Records Narration Psychological assessment Psychological Tests Psychology Psychology, Clinical - education Psychology, Clinical - methods Psychometrics Report writing Susceptibility Test validity and reliability Tests User-Computer Interface |
| Title | Computer utilization and clinical judgment in psychological assessment reports |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-2J192J73-V/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjclp.20197 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16273518 https://www.proquest.com/docview/236898312 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70201124 |
| Volume | 62 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000234437600003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1097-4679 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004015 issn: 0021-9762 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19960101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3_S9wwFH_o3Rj-ok7n1vllgclA4bBNmiYFfxH1HIc7RKa730KapEN3VLnzZP73Jm3aKshA_K2lLxBe3pdPk7zPA9jW0pmKzno2nee9mGjXDdC-UhZmlCkZZaEsm02w4ZCPRunZHOzXtTAVP0Sz4eY8o4zXzsFlNt1rSUOv1djxTUYpm4cutoYbd6B7dN6_OG3rIkPfwcBdQ7Be39CT4r129LOE1HW6_fcS2nwOXsvs019627yXYdGjTnRQmckHmDPFCrz_6c_VV2ChiYMPqzCsOz0ga5RjX6eJZKFRXUaJrmf6j9tWRFcFun0aQpFsmD6RP474CBf941-HP3q-7UJPWbBkQ44JqeKp4ZQmKceSqzyxOcyaHIkUDbX9gcMqyYhUOGWZJDYLMp1HeahzFRmmyBp0ipvCfAYUYWlChpVOdRYrLXmsaM4klZQ4XjsTwE6te6E8J7lrjTEWFZsyFk5botRWAN8a2duKieNFqe_lEjYicvLX3V1jVPwengg8sIh2wIi4DGC9XmPh3XYqMEl4ykmEA_jafLX-5g5RZGFuZlPBQgeZcBzAp8ow2skkFgrSiAewW67_f2YpBoenZ-XTl9cIr8NCuwO0AZ27ycxswjt1f3c1nWzBPBvxLe8Dj17BCO8 |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3_S9wwFH_Mu6H-MqebW-e3wMZgg8M2aZr0R9Gd7jyLDN3ut5Am6dAdVe48cf_9kjbXThBB_K2lrxBeP-9LX_I-D-CTlg4qOu_ZcF70YqLdNEB7S1mYU6ZklIeyGjbBsoyPRumpP5vjemFqfoim4OYso_LXzsBdQXq3ZQ29VGNHOBmlbAG6scUR7UD34Ef_fNg2RoZ-hIE7h2DNvuEnxbvt2_ciUtcp9-6hdPN-9lqFn_7KMxf-Gl75vBPt1UBZhRemXIPFE7-zvgbLjSf8-way-awHZGE59p2aSJYazRsp0eVM_3aFRXRRouv_nSiSDdcn8hsSb-G8_-1s_6jnBy_0lE2XrNMxIVU8NZzSJOVYclUkNopZ0JFI0VDbXziskpxIhVOWS2LjINNFVIS6UJFhiqxDp7wqzXtAEZYmZFjpVOex0pLHihZMUkmJY7YzAXyZK18oz0ruhmOMRc2njIXTlqi0FcDHRva65uJ4UOpz9Q0bETn5406vMSp-ZYcCD2xOO2BE_AxgY_6RhTfcqcAk4SknEQ5gp3lqLc5to8jSXM2mgoUuacJxAO9qZLSLSWwySCMewNcKAI-sUgz2h6fV1YenCO_A0tHZyVAMv2fHG7Dc1oM2oXMzmZkteKluby6mk21vCv8A9iYL9w |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ba9swFD5szSh96bZevW6rYKXQQogtWZb8ONplW5aZUHp7E7Ikl7bBDUkztn8_yVbsFUqh7M3GRyCOzuWzpPMdgD0tnanovGvTedGNiXbdAO0rZWFOmZJRHsqq2QTLMn55mY783RxXC1PzQzQbbs4zqnjtHNxMdNFrWUNv1NgRTkYpewmdmKaJ9cvO8Un_bNgWRoa-hYG7h2DdvuEnxb129IOM1HHK_f0Y3HyIXqv003_9nxN_A6sed6LPtaG8hRemXIPln_5kfQ1Wmkj4Zx2yRa8HZM1y7Cs1kSw1WhRSopu5vnIbi-i6RJN_gyiSDdcn8gcSG3DW_3J69K3rGy90lYVLNuiYkCqeGk5pknIsuSoSm8Ws0ZFI0VDbXziskpxIhVOWS2LzINNFVIS6UJFhimzCUnlXmm1AEZYmZFjpVOex0pLHihZMUkmJY7YzARwslC-UZyV3zTHGouZTxsJpS1TaCuBTIzupuTgeldqv1rARkdNbd3uNUXGRfRV4YDHtgBFxHsDOYpGFd9yZwCThKScRDmC3-Wo9zh2jyNLczWeChQ404TiArdoy2skkFgzSiAdwWBnAE7MUg6PhqHp69xzhXVgeHffF8Hv2YwdW2u2g97B0P52bD_BK_bq_nk0_ek_4C3CWC3I |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computer+utilization+and+clinical+judgment+in+psychological+assessment+reports&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+clinical+psychology&rft.au=Lichtenberger%2C+Elizabeth+O.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc.%2C+A+Wiley+Company&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=32&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjclp.20197&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_2J192J73_V |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-9762&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-9762&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-9762&client=summon |