Chromatographic comparison of bupivacaine imprinted polymers prepared in crushed monolith, microsphere, silica-based composite and capillary monolith formats

A comprehensive comparison of five chromatographic stationary phases based on molecularly imprinted polymers is presented. Efficiency, imprinting factors, water compatibility and batch-to-batch reproducibility are discussed for crushed monolith, microspheres, two silica-based composites and capillar...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of Chromatography A Ročník 1160; číslo 1; s. 215 - 226
Hlavní autoři: Oxelbark, Joakim, Legido-Quigley, Cristina, Aureliano, Carla S.A., Titirici, Maria-Magdalena, Schillinger, Eric, Sellergren, Börje, Courtois, Julien, Irgum, Knut, Dambies, Laurent, Cormack, Peter A.G., Sherrington, David C., De Lorenzi, Ersilia
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 10.08.2007
Elsevier
Témata:
ISSN:0021-9673
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:A comprehensive comparison of five chromatographic stationary phases based on molecularly imprinted polymers is presented. Efficiency, imprinting factors, water compatibility and batch-to-batch reproducibility are discussed for crushed monolith, microspheres, two silica-based composites and capillary monoliths, all imprinted with the local anaesthetic bupivacaine. Synthesis protocol and chromatographic test conditions have been kept fixed within certain limits, in order to provide further insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the different formats. Excluding microparticles, all formats give satisfactory performance, especially in aqueous mobile phases. An assessment of batch-to-batch reproducibility in different mobile phases adds further value to this comparison study.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9673
DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.057