Synthesis of Graphene Oxide using Modified Hummers Method: Solvent Influence

The aim of this study is to study the influence of different solvents on the structure and electrical properties of graphene oxide. GO was obtained from graphite flakes by using modified hummers method in which different from conventional hummer's method. In this method, the experiment was synt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Procedia engineering Vol. 184; pp. 469 - 477
Main Authors: Zaaba, N.I., Foo, K.L., Hashim, U., Tan, S.J., Liu, Wei-Wen, Voon, C.H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2017
Subjects:
electrical characteristic
functional group
Graphene oxide
modified hummer's method
structure characateristic
modified hummer's method
Graphene oxide
functional group
structure characateristic
electrical characteristic
ISSN:1877-7058, 1877-7058
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study is to study the influence of different solvents on the structure and electrical properties of graphene oxide. GO was obtained from graphite flakes by using modified hummers method in which different from conventional hummer's method. In this method, the experiment was synthesized without sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and ice bath, but carried out at room temperature. Prepared GO powders were then dissolved into different solvents, namely acetone and ethanol. Then spin-coated onto silicon wafer and IDE to produce acetone-GO (A-GO) and ethanol-GO (E-GO). SEM result shows that several square micron GO were obtained. In addition, due to the large agglomerates and contact between the flakes in E-GO sample, current-voltage pattern indicated the E-GO produced higher current flow than A-GO. Meanwhile, GO characterized using FTiR shows that both samples contain several functional groups such as hydroxyl, epoxy, carboxyl and carbonyl. Besides that, due to the lower diffraction peak of A-GO, XRD result shows the interlayer spacing of A-GO sample is slightly higher than E-GO sample.
ISSN:1877-7058
1877-7058
DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.118