Which way of design programming activities is more effective to promote K‐12 students' computational thinking skills? A meta‐analysis

Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K‐12 curriculum, however, there is no unified conclusion on how to design programming activities to promote the acquisition of CT skills more effectively. The purpose of this study...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of computer assisted learning Ročník 37; číslo 4; s. 1048 - 1062
Hlavní autoři: Sun, Lihui, Hu, Linlin, Zhou, Danhua
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.08.2021
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Témata:
ISSN:0266-4909, 1365-2729
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K‐12 curriculum, however, there is no unified conclusion on how to design programming activities to promote the acquisition of CT skills more effectively. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using programming to enhance K‐12 students' CT skills and explore the influence of various programming instructional design factors on the acquisition of CT skills. This study presents a quantitative meta‐analysis. A systematic search of randomized controlled studies on the influence of programming on CT skills. A total of 86 empirical studies with 114 effect sizes met the study selection criterion. The results showed that programming improved K‐12 students' CT skills in general (Hedges' g = 0.601, 95% CI [0.505, 0.697], p < 0.001). No publication bias was detected. Besides, we found that the interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within 1 week to 1 month, the class size of less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and CT assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills. Based on these findings, we suggest that programming instructional design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. This will be of great significance to programming teaching and CT education in K‐12. Lay Description What is already known about this topic The cultivation of computational thinking (CT) in K‐12 has become a key issue. One of the latest trends in the education field is computer programming in K‐12 classrooms to cultivate students' CT skills. Programming teaching design may affect the influence of programming education on students' CT skills. However, there is a lack of overall quantitative synthesis of existing empirical research. What this paper adds A meta‐analysis of 86 studies was conducted to provide systematic evidence that programming education is effective to promote K‐12 students' CT skills. Programming teaching design factors such as subjects, intervention duration, sample size, programming instruments and assessment types can affect CT skills in programming activities. Programming activity forms cannot affect CT skills in programming activities. Implications for practice and/or policy The implementation of programming education in K‐12 schooling can effectively cultivate students' CT skills. Programming teaching design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. The interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within one week to one month, control of class size to less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills.
AbstractList Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K‐12 curriculum, however, there is no unified conclusion on how to design programming activities to promote the acquisition of CT skills more effectively. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using programming to enhance K‐12 students' CT skills and explore the influence of various programming instructional design factors on the acquisition of CT skills. This study presents a quantitative meta‐analysis. A systematic search of randomized controlled studies on the influence of programming on CT skills. A total of 86 empirical studies with 114 effect sizes met the study selection criterion. The results showed that programming improved K‐12 students' CT skills in general (Hedges' g = 0.601, 95% CI [0.505, 0.697], p < 0.001). No publication bias was detected. Besides, we found that the interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within 1 week to 1 month, the class size of less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and CT assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills. Based on these findings, we suggest that programming instructional design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. This will be of great significance to programming teaching and CT education in K‐12. Lay Description What is already known about this topic The cultivation of computational thinking (CT) in K‐12 has become a key issue. One of the latest trends in the education field is computer programming in K‐12 classrooms to cultivate students' CT skills. Programming teaching design may affect the influence of programming education on students' CT skills. However, there is a lack of overall quantitative synthesis of existing empirical research. What this paper adds A meta‐analysis of 86 studies was conducted to provide systematic evidence that programming education is effective to promote K‐12 students' CT skills. Programming teaching design factors such as subjects, intervention duration, sample size, programming instruments and assessment types can affect CT skills in programming activities. Programming activity forms cannot affect CT skills in programming activities. Implications for practice and/or policy The implementation of programming education in K‐12 schooling can effectively cultivate students' CT skills. Programming teaching design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. The interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within one week to one month, control of class size to less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills.
Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K‐12 curriculum, however, there is no unified conclusion on how to design programming activities to promote the acquisition of CT skills more effectively. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using programming to enhance K‐12 students' CT skills and explore the influence of various programming instructional design factors on the acquisition of CT skills. This study presents a quantitative meta‐analysis. A systematic search of randomized controlled studies on the influence of programming on CT skills. A total of 86 empirical studies with 114 effect sizes met the study selection criterion. The results showed that programming improved K‐12 students' CT skills in general (Hedges' g = 0.601, 95% CI [0.505, 0.697], p < 0.001). No publication bias was detected. Besides, we found that the interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within 1 week to 1 month, the class size of less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and CT assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills. Based on these findings, we suggest that programming instructional design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. This will be of great significance to programming teaching and CT education in K‐12.
Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K-12 curriculum, however, there is no unified conclusion on how to design programming activities to promote the acquisition of CT skills more effectively. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using programming to enhance K-12 students' CT skills and explore the influence of various programming instructional design factors on the acquisition of CT skills. This study presents a quantitative meta-analysis. A systematic search of randomized controlled studies on the influence of programming on CT skills. A total of 86 empirical studies with 114 effect sizes met the study selection criterion. The results showed that programming improved K-12 students' CT skills in general (Hedges' "g" = 0.601, 95% CI [0.505, 0.697], p < 0.001). No publication bias was detected. Besides, we found that the interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within 1 week to 1 month, the class size of less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and CT assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills. Based on these findings, we suggest that programming instructional design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. This will be of great significance to programming teaching and CT education in K-12.
Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K‐12 curriculum, however, there is no unified conclusion on how to design programming activities to promote the acquisition of CT skills more effectively. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using programming to enhance K‐12 students' CT skills and explore the influence of various programming instructional design factors on the acquisition of CT skills. This study presents a quantitative meta‐analysis. A systematic search of randomized controlled studies on the influence of programming on CT skills. A total of 86 empirical studies with 114 effect sizes met the study selection criterion. The results showed that programming improved K‐12 students' CT skills in general (Hedges' g  = 0.601, 95% CI [0.505, 0.697], p  < 0.001). No publication bias was detected. Besides, we found that the interdisciplinary integration of programming, the duration of programming intervention within 1 week to 1 month, the class size of less than 50 students, and a reasonable selection of programming instruments and CT assessment types may be more conducive to promoting students' CT skills. Based on these findings, we suggest that programming instructional design should be planned reasonably to make the best use of technology towards developing students' CT skills. This will be of great significance to programming teaching and CT education in K‐12.
Audience Elementary Secondary Education
Author Hu, Linlin
Zhou, Danhua
Sun, Lihui
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lihui
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9188-9022
  surname: Sun
  fullname: Sun, Lihui
  email: sunlihui@tju.edu.cn
  organization: Tianjin University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Linlin
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Linlin
  organization: Tianjin University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Danhua
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Danhua
  organization: Tianjin University
BackLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1301801$$DView record in ERIC
BookMark eNp9kcFLHDEUxoModNVeehcCHgRhNMlMMjMnkcXWrkIvLT2GbOZlN7szkzXJKnvrtTf_Rv-SZpx6KdJcAu_7fY_33neI9nvXA0KfKLmg6V2utGovKOMF30MTmguesZLV-2hCmBBZUZP6AzoMYUUIKWtRTdDvn0url_hJ7bAzuIFgFz3eeLfwqutsv8BKR_too4WAbcCd84DBGBiqgKMb2M5FwHcvv54pwyFuG-hjOMPadZttVNG6XrU4Lm2_HvqFtW3bcIWvcQdRJZNK8i7YcIwOjGoDfPz7H6Efn2--T2-z-29fvk6v7zOdVzXPAIpKNXNqaCFYyVUtOK8NzBttUmmuNFQUBAhdMgpN3hTzsmqYMlxTzbXi-RE6HfumyR-2EKJcua1PQwSZ7lYLltOqStTJSIG3Wm687ZTfyZsZzQmtCE06GXXtXQgejNR2XDZ6ZVtJiRwCkUMg8jWQZDn_x_LW9l2YjvCTbWH3H1LO0m1Gzx8nyaHa
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2022_104457
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12904
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241293163
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_023_00434_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci12110793
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_11583_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2023_101458
crossref_primary_10_22430_22565337_2950
crossref_primary_10_1002_cae_22588
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11423_024_10364_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_edurev_2023_100520
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2021_100926
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104939
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10209_024_01127_w
crossref_primary_10_1145_3706120
crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2022_2042311
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12869_8
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_023_01712_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_mti6020013
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12750
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241236744
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12448_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_024_00498_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2022_104445
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2025_102699
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12818
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12939
crossref_primary_10_1002_tea_21899
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241303067
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_03991_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40489_023_00369_3
crossref_primary_10_4000_12xon
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12564_024_09931_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13638_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40594_021_00311_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331231210560
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331211027387
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_70012
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241227793
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41239_024_00446_5
crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331211035182
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tsc_2023_101340
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2023_104962
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_70074
crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13482
Cites_doi 10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8
10.15388/infedu.2014.03
10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.04.003
10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
10.1145/1592761.1592779
10.1111/1468-0297.00098
10.1037/a0033242
10.1111/bjet.12685
10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
10.15388/infedu.2020.01
10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.010
10.1145/1516046.1516054
10.1109/MC.2013.229
10.1111/jcal.12155
10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
10.1002/0470870168.ch11
10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832
10.28945/3521
10.3102/0034654317710096
10.1145/3137065.3137072
10.1177/0735633119887187
10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
10.1007/s10956-019-09800-z
10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.10.004
10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142
10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807
10.1080/1049482900010102
10.3102/0013189X12463051
10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
10.1111/bjet.12496
10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022
10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2
10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027
10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.047
10.3102/00346543060001065
10.1177/0735633115608444
10.1007/s10956-019-09799-3
10.1136/bmj.g7647
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
10.1080/15391523.2016.1146561
10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
10.1007/s10758-010-9163-9
10.1111/jcal.12493
10.1080/15391523.2014.888272
10.1016/j.chb.2020.106349
10.1007/s10758-017-9328-x
10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
10.3102/0034654316628645
10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
10.1145/2996201
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005
10.3102/0034654318791584
10.1145/1118178.1118215
10.4135/9781412984997
10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02364.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
7SC
8FD
AHOVV
JQ2
L7M
L~C
L~D
DOI 10.1111/jcal.12545
DatabaseName CrossRef
ERIC
ERIC (Ovid)
ERIC
ERIC
ERIC (Legacy Platform)
ERIC( SilverPlatter )
ERIC
ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)
Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
ERIC
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Education Research Index
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ERIC
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
DatabaseTitleList
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
ERIC
CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 1365-2729
ERIC EJ1301801
EndPage 1062
ExternalDocumentID EJ1301801
10_1111_jcal_12545
JCAL12545
Genre article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Social Science Foundation Youth Project in Pedagogy of China
  funderid: CCA190261
GroupedDBID .3N
.DC
.GA
.GO
.Y3
05W
07C
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29K
31~
33P
3EH
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52S
52T
52U
52W
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A04
AABNI
AAESR
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAHSB
AAMNL
AANHP
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYOK
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABSOO
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADNMO
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFYRF
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIAGR
AIFKG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ASTYK
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-C
D-D
D-I
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMBU
DRSSH
DU5
EBS
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
G50
GODZA
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MXFUL
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2Y
P4C
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TWZ
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WGMDG
WH7
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WQZ
WRC
WSUWO
WXSBR
XG1
ZZTAW
~IA
~WP
AAMMB
AAYXX
ADMLS
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
O8X
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
7SC
8FD
AHOVV
JQ2
L7M
L~C
L~D
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3895-ee48adb1f146275a96559febdcff14bace81e6e6c721ed3d4b78d2af5c1c5ca53
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 51
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000632870200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0266-4909
IngestDate Wed Aug 13 07:10:27 EDT 2025
Tue Dec 02 16:40:44 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:29:04 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:05:14 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:28:17 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess false
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3895-ee48adb1f146275a96559febdcff14bace81e6e6c721ed3d4b78d2af5c1c5ca53
Notes Funding information
National Social Science Foundation Youth Project in Pedagogy of China, Grant/Award Number: CCA190261
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ORCID 0000-0002-9188-9022
PQID 2549623188
PQPubID 37794
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2549623188
eric_primary_EJ1301801
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jcal_12545
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12545
wiley_primary_10_1111_jcal_12545_JCAL12545
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2021
  text: August 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Chichester, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chichester, UK
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Journal of computer assisted learning
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: Wiley
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 1997; 315
2019; 93
2010; 15
2019; 50
2017; 48
2017; 87
2004; 9
2016; 32
2019; 19
1974
2020; 58
2019; 128
2015; 349
2018; 88
2003; 113
2020; 19
1990; 60
2020; 18
2017; 72
2009; 13
2021; 37
2009; 52
2003; 327
2001
2000
1992; 112
2019; 28
2016; 86
1985
2014; 13
1980
2016; 48
2012
2013; 46
2015; 50
2017; 22
2015; 52
2013; 42
2020; 148
2020; 105
2008
2016; 97
2016; 53
2020; 106
2010; 120
2014; 46
2005
1991
2014; 41
2019; 141
2016; 15
2020; 109
1990; 1
2018; 18
2015; 25
2020; 2020
2020; 30
2017; 17
2006; 49
2020; 150
2017
2015
2009; 6
1979; 86
2014; 143
2014; 34
2017; 105
2016; 9
2020; 29
Olasen V. M. (e_1_2_9_50_1) 2020; 18
e_1_2_9_75_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_73_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_56_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_54_1
Cooper H. (e_1_2_9_16_1) 2017
Kalelioğlu F. (e_1_2_9_40_1) 2014; 13
Wei X. (e_1_2_9_71_1) 2020; 106
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_37_1
Papatga E. (e_1_2_9_52_1) 2016; 9
e_1_2_9_58_1
e_1_2_9_41_1
e_1_2_9_64_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_62_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_45_1
e_1_2_9_68_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_43_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_60_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
Gagne R. M. (e_1_2_9_29_1) 1974
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_49_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_47_1
Demir Ö. (e_1_2_9_23_1) 2020; 2020
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_74_1
e_1_2_9_51_1
e_1_2_9_72_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_57_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_55_1
Bell T. C. (e_1_2_9_8_1) 2009; 13
e_1_2_9_76_1
Cumming G. (e_1_2_9_18_1) 2012
e_1_2_9_70_1
Hedges L. V. (e_1_2_9_33_1) 1985
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_59_1
Stemler S. E. (e_1_2_9_66_1) 2004; 9
e_1_2_9_19_1
Lipsey M. W. (e_1_2_9_44_1) 2001
e_1_2_9_42_1
e_1_2_9_63_1
e_1_2_9_61_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_46_1
e_1_2_9_67_1
e_1_2_9_65_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
Borenstein M. (e_1_2_9_10_1) 2000
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
Papert S. (e_1_2_9_53_1) 1980
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_48_1
e_1_2_9_69_1
References_xml – year: 1985
– volume: 50
  start-page: 313
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  end-page: 334
  article-title: Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning
  publication-title: Educational Psychologist
– year: 2005
– volume: 150
  year: 2020
  article-title: Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of primary education
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 86
  start-page: 638
  issue: 3
  year: 1979
  end-page: 641
  article-title: The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– volume: 29
  start-page: 189
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 214
  article-title: Improving and assessing computational thinking in maker activities: The integration with physics and engineering learning
  publication-title: Journal of Science Education and Technology
– volume: 30
  year: 2020
  article-title: Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta‐analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts
  publication-title: Educational Research Review
– year: 2001
– volume: 48
  start-page: 84
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 104
  article-title: Development, implementation, and outcomes of an equitable computer science after‐school program: Findings from middle‐school students
  publication-title: Journal of Research on Technology in Education
– volume: 148
  year: 2020
  article-title: The effects of coding on children's planning and inhibition skills
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 2020
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 19
  article-title: A comparison of solo and pair programming in terms of flow experience, coding quality, and coding achievement
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1990
  end-page: 32
  article-title: Software design as a learning environment
  publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments
– volume: 18
  start-page: 47
  year: 2018
  end-page: 58
  article-title: Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the computational thinking test
  publication-title: International Journal of Child‐Computer Interaction
– volume: 34
  start-page: 51
  year: 2014
  end-page: 57
  article-title: Evidence that class size matters in 4th grade mathematics: An analysis of TIMSS 2007 data for Colombia
  publication-title: International Journal of Educational Development
– volume: 58
  start-page: 891
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  end-page: 918
  article-title: Persistence in a game‐based learning environment: The case of elementary school students learning computational thinking
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research
– volume: 13
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 50
  article-title: The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners' perspective
  publication-title: Informatics in Education
– volume: 113
  start-page: 34
  issue: 485
  year: 2003
  end-page: 63
  article-title: Economic considerations and class size
  publication-title: The Economic Journal
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1979
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1995
  article-title: Gamifying programming education in K‐12: A review of programming curricula in seven countries and programming games
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 46
  start-page: 52
  issue: 9
  year: 2013
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Learning computing through creating and connecting
  publication-title: Computer
– volume: 93
  start-page: 99
  year: 2019
  end-page: 105
  article-title: Group roles matter in computational robotic activities
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 141
  year: 2019
  article-title: A systematic review of learning computational thinking through scratch in K‐9
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– start-page: 19
  year: 2008
  end-page: 30
– volume: 15
  start-page: 99
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  end-page: 127
  article-title: Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten children's construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors
  publication-title: International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning
– volume: 32
  start-page: 576
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  end-page: 593
  article-title: An analysis of young students' thinking when completing basic coding tasks using ScratchJnr on the iPad
  publication-title: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
– volume: 41
  start-page: 51
  year: 2014
  end-page: 61
  article-title: Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K 12?
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 18
  start-page: 26
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 30
  article-title: Experimenting the effect of class size on mathematics based performance: A case study of selected public secondary school in Akure
  publication-title: Nigeria
– volume: 9
  start-page: 124
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  end-page: 150
  article-title: Improving reading comprehension skills through the SCRATCH program
  publication-title: International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
– volume: 37
  start-page: 346
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  end-page: 358
  article-title: STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students
  publication-title: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
– volume: 87
  start-page: 834
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 860
  article-title: Changing a generation's way of thinking: Teaching computational thinking through programming
  publication-title: Review of Educational Research
– volume: 13
  start-page: 20
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 29
  article-title: Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers
  publication-title: The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology
– volume: 349
  start-page: 7647
  year: 2015
  end-page: 7672
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analysis protocols (PRISMA‐P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation
  publication-title: BMJ Clinical Research
– volume: 22
  start-page: 443
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  end-page: 463
  article-title: Introducing computational thinking to young learners: Practicing computational perspectives through embodiment in mathematics education
  publication-title: Technology, Knowledge, and Learning
– year: 2015
– volume: 97
  start-page: 129
  year: 2016
  end-page: 141
  article-title: Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “scratch” in five schools
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 105
  start-page: 14
  year: 2017
  end-page: 30
  article-title: A meta‐analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 315
  start-page: 629
  issue: 7109
  year: 1997
  end-page: 634
  article-title: Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
  publication-title: British Medical Journal
– volume: 72
  start-page: 558
  year: 2017
  end-page: 569
  article-title: A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1464
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1474
  article-title: Relation between Alice software and programming learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology
– volume: 46
  start-page: 277
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  end-page: 296
  article-title: Pair programming: Under what conditions is it advantageous for middle school students?
  publication-title: Journal of Research on Technology in Education
– volume: 109
  year: 2020
  article-title: A meta‐analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1
  issue: 7
  year: 2009
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: The PRISMA statement
  publication-title: PLoS Medicine
– volume: 52
  start-page: 28
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  end-page: 30
  article-title: The profession of it beyond computational thinking
  publication-title: Communications of the ACM
– volume: 60
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 1990
  end-page: 89
  article-title: Programming language/problem‐solving research: A review of relevant issues
  publication-title: Review of Educational Research
– volume: 15
  start-page: 283
  year: 2016
  end-page: 303
  article-title: Code to learn: Where does it belong in the K‐12 curriculum?
  publication-title: Journal of Information Technology Education
– volume: 28
  start-page: 316
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  end-page: 327
  article-title: Computational thinking and mathematics using scratch: An experiment with sixth‐grade students
  publication-title: Interactive Learning Environments
– volume: 112
  start-page: 115
  issue: 1
  year: 1992
  end-page: 159
  article-title: Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– year: 2000
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  end-page: 11
  article-title: A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability
  publication-title: Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation
– volume: 327
  start-page: 557
  issue: 7414
  year: 2003
  end-page: 560
  article-title: Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses
  publication-title: BMJ: British Medical Journal
– volume: 143
  start-page: 534
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 547
  article-title: P‐curve: A key to the file‐Drawer
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
– volume: 86
  start-page: 1052
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1084
  article-title: Learning in one‐to‐one laptop environments: A meta‐analysis and research synthesis
  publication-title: Review of Educational Research
– volume: 120
  start-page: 1365
  issue: 549
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1398
  article-title: Heterogeneous class size effects: New evidence from a panel of university students
  publication-title: The Economic Journal
– year: 2012
– volume: 53
  start-page: 562
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  end-page: 590
  article-title: An exploration of three‐dimensional integrated assessment for computational thinking
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research
– volume: 28
  start-page: 651
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  end-page: 676
  article-title: A scoping review of empirical research on recent computational thinking assessments
  publication-title: Journal of Science Education and Technology
– volume: 52
  start-page: 200
  year: 2015
  end-page: 210
  article-title: A new way of teaching programming skills to K‐12 students: Code.org
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 105
  year: 2020
  article-title: Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 88
  start-page: 799
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  end-page: 843
  article-title: The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Review of Educational Research
– volume: 25
  start-page: 199
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  end-page: 237
  article-title: Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students
  publication-title: Computer Science Education
– year: 1980
– volume: 29
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 82
  article-title: Exploring force and motion concepts in middle grades using computational modeling: A classroom intervention study
  publication-title: Journal of Science Education and Technology
– volume: 106
  year: 2020
  article-title: The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students' computational thinking skills and self‐efficacy
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  end-page: 13
  article-title: A meta‐analysis of pair‐programming in computer programming courses: Implications for educational practice
  publication-title: ACM Transactions on Computing Education
– year: 1974
– volume: 105
  start-page: 105849
  year: 2020
  article-title: Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children?
  publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior
– volume: 49
  start-page: 33
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Computational thinking
  publication-title: Communications of the ACM
– volume: 52
  start-page: 60
  issue: 11
  year: 2009
  end-page: 67
  article-title: Scratch: Programming for all
  publication-title: Communications of the ACM
– year: 2017
– year: 1991
– volume: 19
  start-page: 30
  year: 2019
  end-page: 55
  article-title: Assessing computational thinking process using a multiple evaluation approach
  publication-title: International Journal of Child‐Computer Interaction
– volume: 128
  start-page: 365
  year: 2019
  end-page: 376
  article-title: Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Developing middle school students' computational thinking skills using unplugged computing activities
  publication-title: Informatics in Education
– volume: 42
  start-page: 38
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 43
  article-title: Computational thinking in K‐12: A review of the state of the field
  publication-title: Educational Researcher
– ident: e_1_2_9_73_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8
– volume: 13
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_9_40_1
  article-title: The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners' perspective
  publication-title: Informatics in Education
  doi: 10.15388/infedu.2014.03
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.04.003
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_65_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_56_1
  doi: 10.1145/1592761.1592779
– ident: e_1_2_9_42_1
  doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00098
– ident: e_1_2_9_64_1
  doi: 10.1037/a0033242
– ident: e_1_2_9_43_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.12685
– ident: e_1_2_9_57_1
  doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.15388/infedu.2020.01
– ident: e_1_2_9_61_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
– ident: e_1_2_9_69_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.010
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1145/1516046.1516054
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1109/MC.2013.229
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1111/jcal.12155
– ident: e_1_2_9_58_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
– volume: 106
  start-page: 104023
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_9_71_1
  article-title: The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students' computational thinking skills and self‐efficacy
  publication-title: Computers & Education
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1002/0470870168.ch11
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832
– ident: e_1_2_9_48_1
  doi: 10.28945/3521
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.3102/0034654317710096
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1145/3137065.3137072
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1177/0735633119887187
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
– volume: 2020
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  article-title: A comparison of solo and pair programming in terms of flow experience, coding quality, and coding achievement
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research
– volume: 9
  start-page: 124
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_9_52_1
  article-title: Improving reading comprehension skills through the SCRATCH program
  publication-title: International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09800-z
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.10.004
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.1080/1049482900010102
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.3102/0013189X12463051
– ident: e_1_2_9_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/bjet.12496
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
  doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2
– ident: e_1_2_9_54_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.047
– ident: e_1_2_9_51_1
  doi: 10.3102/00346543060001065
– ident: e_1_2_9_76_1
  doi: 10.1177/0735633115608444
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09799-3
– volume: 18
  start-page: 26
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_9_50_1
  article-title: Experimenting the effect of class size on mathematics based performance: A case study of selected public secondary school in Akure
  publication-title: Nigeria
– ident: e_1_2_9_63_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  issue: 4
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_9_66_1
  article-title: A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability
  publication-title: Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation
– ident: e_1_2_9_74_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
– volume: 13
  start-page: 20
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  article-title: Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers
  publication-title: The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology
– ident: e_1_2_9_47_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
– ident: e_1_2_9_49_1
  doi: 10.1080/15391523.2016.1146561
– volume-title: Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta‐analysis
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
– ident: e_1_2_9_46_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10758-010-9163-9
– volume-title: Statistical methods for meta‐analysis
  year: 1985
  ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_67_1
  doi: 10.1111/jcal.12493
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1080/15391523.2014.888272
– ident: e_1_2_9_62_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106349
– ident: e_1_2_9_68_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10758-017-9328-x
– ident: e_1_2_9_41_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_75_1
  doi: 10.3102/0034654316628645
– volume-title: Principles of instructional design
  year: 1974
  ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_60_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
– ident: e_1_2_9_70_1
  doi: 10.1145/2996201
– ident: e_1_2_9_55_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.3102/0034654318791584
– ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
– volume-title: Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas
  year: 1980
  ident: e_1_2_9_53_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_72_1
  doi: 10.1145/1118178.1118215
– volume-title: Comprehensive meta‐analysis: A computer program for research synthesis [computer software]
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
– volume-title: Practical meta‐analysis
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_9_44_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_59_1
  doi: 10.4135/9781412984997
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
– volume-title: Research synthesis and meta‐analysis
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02364.x
SSID ssj0007968
Score 2.5071752
Snippet Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K‐12 curriculum, however, there is no...
Promoting the cultivation of computational thinking (CT) skills in programming activities has become a key issue in the K-12 curriculum, however, there is no...
SourceID proquest
eric
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1048
SubjectTerms Class size
Computation
computational thinking
Computer programming
Cultivation
Curricula
Design factors
Education
Educational Technology
Effect Size
Elementary Secondary Education
Empirical analysis
Instructional design
Interdisciplinary aspects
Intervention
K‐12
Meta-analysis
Problem Solving
Programming
Skill Development
Skills
Students
teaching design
Technology Uses in Education
Technology utilization
Thinking Skills
Title Which way of design programming activities is more effective to promote K‐12 students' computational thinking skills? A meta‐analysis
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjcal.12545
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1301801
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2549623188
Volume 37
WOSCitedRecordID wos000632870200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1365-2729
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007968
  issn: 0266-4909
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1fa9RAEB_q1QdfqlaLV6sMKBSFyCXZTbIgSNEeUkspxWrfwmZ3wh1e70qTtvTNV9_8jH4SZzd7oQURxLcQZsNm5__ymxmAlymnXJmoVKSkzDhBEXmkqbBRUQuiVJva-kLaL_v5wUFxcqIOV-Dtsham6w_RX7g5zfD22im4rpqbSs7_8Ibds5B3YDVhwRUDWP1wND7e7y1xrnwpHKcZvA01UqE9qUfy9KtvOaTbmGcXbN4MWb3PGd__v90-gLUQa-JOJxwPYYXm625Mc4B0PIIfXydTM8ErfY2LGq0Hc2BAbJ2yT0NX9XDpe67itEGHycUOAMI2EtuFo2VWE3769f1nnGDTNcpsttH4YRHhohHbSTehAZtv09mseYc7eEqt5kU69ER5DMfj3c_vP0ZhNkNkOMSREZEotK3imi1tkkutMk5NaqqsqflVpQ0VMWWUGc4wyaZWVHlhE11LExtptEw3YDBfzOkJIFkaSW1SJSsjhEp0RhxFimSkE5OluRrCqyWDShMal7v5GbOyT2Cc1_eHO4QXPe1Z167jj1Qbjs89xe4ee_KYffUQtpacL4MuN6VLoTlIjItiCK89j__y6XKPz8g_bf4L8VO4lziwjEcWbsGgPb-gZ3DXXLbT5vx5kOvfVuH_DA
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB_0KuiL38XTqgMKopBySXaT7JMU7VHb8xBptW9hszvhjl7vShMrvvnqm3-jf4mzm21oQQTxLYTZsNnZ-eQ3MwDPUw65MlGpSEmZcYAi8khTYaOiFkSpNrX1hbSfJvl0Whweqg8Bm-NqYbr-EH3CzUmG19dOwF1C-qKU809ssn0W8iqsCb5HcgBrbz-ODya9Ks6Vr4XjOIP3oUYq9Cf1UJ5-9SWLdBn07LzNiz6rNzrjW_-53dtwM3ibuNVdjztwhZZ33aDmAOq4Bz8-z-Zmhl_1N1zVaD2cAwNm65itGrq6hzPfdRXnDTpULnYQENaS2K4cLTObcO_X959xgk3XKrN5gcaPiwipRmxn3YwGbI7mi0XzGrfwmFrNi3ToinIfDsbb-292ojCdITLs5MiISBTaVnHNujbJpVYZByc1VdbU_KrShoqYMsoMx5hkUyuqvLCJrqWJjTRapuswWK6W9ACQLI2kNqmSlRFCJToj9iNFMtKJydJcDeHlOYdKE1qXuwkai7IPYZzd94c7hGc97UnXsOOPVOuO0T3F9i7b8pit9RA2zllfBmluShdEs5sYF8UQXnkm_-XT5S6fkX96-C_ET-H6zv77STl5N917BDcSB53xOMMNGLSnX-gxXDNn7bw5fRIu-W-NjwML
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fa9RAEB60FfHF38XTVgcURCHlkuwm2adS2h7aHkcRq30Lm90Jd3i9K02s-Oarb_6N_Uuc3WxDCyKIbyHMhs3Ozs58yzczAK9ShlyZqFSkpMwYoIg80lTYqKgFUapNbX0i7adxPpkUx8fqMHBzXC5MVx-iv3BzluHPa2fgdGrrq1bOP7HJ_lnIm7AqpMrYLld3P4yOxv1RnCufC8c4g-ehhirUJ_VUnn70NY90nfTsos2rMat3OqN7_znd-3A3RJu43W2PB3CDFg9do-ZA6ngEPz9PZ2aK3_R3XNZoPZ0DA2frhL0auryHc191FWcNOlYudhQQPiWxXTpZVjbhwcWPX3GCTVcqs3mNxreLCFeN2E67Hg3YfJnN580WbuMJtZoH6VAV5TEcjfY-7ryLQneGyHCQIyMiUWhbxTWftUkutcoYnNRUWVPzq0obKmLKKDOMMcmmVlR5YRNdSxMbabRM12BlsVzQE0CyNJTapEpWRgiV6Iw4jhTJUCcmS3M1gDeXGipNKF3uOmjMyx7COL_vF3cAL3vZ065gxx-l1pyie4m9ffblMXvrAaxfqr4M1tyUDkRzmBgXxQDeeiX_5dPlPq-Rf3r6L8Iv4Pbh7qgcv58cPIM7iWPOeJrhOqy0Z19pA26Z83bWnD0Pe_w3Fj0Chg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which+Way+of+Design+Programming+Activities+Is+More+Effective+to+Promote+K-12+Students%27+Computational+Thinking+Skills%3F+A+Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+computer+assisted+learning&rft.au=Sun%2C+Lihui&rft.au=Hu%2C+Linlin&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Danhua&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.issn=0266-4909&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1048&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjcal.12545&rft.externalDocID=EJ1301801
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0266-4909&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0266-4909&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0266-4909&client=summon