A comparative study of two automated solutions for cross‐sectional skeletal muscle measurement from abdominal computed tomography images

Background Measurement of cross‐sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research....

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Medical physics (Lancaster) Ročník 50; číslo 8; s. 4973 - 4980
Hlavní autori: Charrière, Katia, Boulouard, Quentin, Artemova, Svetlana, Vilotitch, Antoine, Ferretti, Gilbert R., Bosson, Jean‐Luc, Moreau‐Gaudry, Alexandre, Giai, Joris, Fontaine, Eric, Bétry, Cécile
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States American Association of Physicists in Medicine 01.08.2023
Predmet:
ISSN:0094-2405, 2473-4209, 2473-4209
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Background Measurement of cross‐sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research. Automated solutions are required for use in clinical practice. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two automated solutions for the measurement of CSMA. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of CT images in our hospital database. We included consecutive individuals hospitalized at the Grenoble University Hospital in France between January and May 2018 with abdominal CT images and sagittal reconstruction. We used two types of software to automatically segment skeletal muscle: ABACS, a module of the SliceOmatic software solution “ABACS‐SliceOmatic,” and a deep learning‐based solution called “AutoMATiCA.” Manual segmentation was performed by a medical expert to generate reference data using “SliceOmatic.” The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between the results of the manual and the automated segmentations. The DSC value for each method was compared with the Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 676 hospitalized individuals was retrospectively included (365 males [53.8%] and 312 females [46.2%]). The median DSC for SliceOmatic vs AutoMATiCA (0.969 [5th percentile: 0.909]) was greater than the median DSC for SliceOmatic vs. ABACS‐SliceOmatic (0.949 [5th percentile: 0.836]) (p < 0.001). Conclusions AutoMATiCA, which used artificial intelligence, was more reliable than ABACS‐SliceOmatic for skeletal muscle segmentation at the L3 level in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. The next step is to develop and validate a neural network that can identify L3 slices, which is currently a fastidious process.
AbstractList Measurement of cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research. Automated solutions are required for use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two automated solutions for the measurement of CSMA. We conducted a retrospective analysis of CT images in our hospital database. We included consecutive individuals hospitalized at the Grenoble University Hospital in France between January and May 2018 with abdominal CT images and sagittal reconstruction. We used two types of software to automatically segment skeletal muscle: ABACS, a module of the SliceOmatic software solution "ABACS-SliceOmatic," and a deep learning-based solution called "AutoMATiCA." Manual segmentation was performed by a medical expert to generate reference data using "SliceOmatic." The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between the results of the manual and the automated segmentations. The DSC value for each method was compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. A total of 676 hospitalized individuals was retrospectively included (365 males [53.8%] and 312 females [46.2%]). The median DSC for SliceOmatic vs AutoMATiCA (0.969 [5th percentile: 0.909]) was greater than the median DSC for SliceOmatic vs. ABACS-SliceOmatic (0.949 [5th percentile: 0.836]) (p < 0.001). AutoMATiCA, which used artificial intelligence, was more reliable than ABACS-SliceOmatic for skeletal muscle segmentation at the L3 level in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. The next step is to develop and validate a neural network that can identify L3 slices, which is currently a fastidious process.
Measurement of cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research. Automated solutions are required for use in clinical practice.BACKGROUNDMeasurement of cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research. Automated solutions are required for use in clinical practice.The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two automated solutions for the measurement of CSMA.PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two automated solutions for the measurement of CSMA.We conducted a retrospective analysis of CT images in our hospital database. We included consecutive individuals hospitalized at the Grenoble University Hospital in France between January and May 2018 with abdominal CT images and sagittal reconstruction. We used two types of software to automatically segment skeletal muscle: ABACS, a module of the SliceOmatic software solution "ABACS-SliceOmatic," and a deep learning-based solution called "AutoMATiCA." Manual segmentation was performed by a medical expert to generate reference data using "SliceOmatic." The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between the results of the manual and the automated segmentations. The DSC value for each method was compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of CT images in our hospital database. We included consecutive individuals hospitalized at the Grenoble University Hospital in France between January and May 2018 with abdominal CT images and sagittal reconstruction. We used two types of software to automatically segment skeletal muscle: ABACS, a module of the SliceOmatic software solution "ABACS-SliceOmatic," and a deep learning-based solution called "AutoMATiCA." Manual segmentation was performed by a medical expert to generate reference data using "SliceOmatic." The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between the results of the manual and the automated segmentations. The DSC value for each method was compared with the Mann-Whitney U test.A total of 676 hospitalized individuals was retrospectively included (365 males [53.8%] and 312 females [46.2%]). The median DSC for SliceOmatic vs AutoMATiCA (0.969 [5th percentile: 0.909]) was greater than the median DSC for SliceOmatic vs. ABACS-SliceOmatic (0.949 [5th percentile: 0.836]) (p < 0.001).RESULTSA total of 676 hospitalized individuals was retrospectively included (365 males [53.8%] and 312 females [46.2%]). The median DSC for SliceOmatic vs AutoMATiCA (0.969 [5th percentile: 0.909]) was greater than the median DSC for SliceOmatic vs. ABACS-SliceOmatic (0.949 [5th percentile: 0.836]) (p < 0.001).AutoMATiCA, which used artificial intelligence, was more reliable than ABACS-SliceOmatic for skeletal muscle segmentation at the L3 level in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. The next step is to develop and validate a neural network that can identify L3 slices, which is currently a fastidious process.CONCLUSIONSAutoMATiCA, which used artificial intelligence, was more reliable than ABACS-SliceOmatic for skeletal muscle segmentation at the L3 level in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. The next step is to develop and validate a neural network that can identify L3 slices, which is currently a fastidious process.
Background Measurement of cross‐sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research. Automated solutions are required for use in clinical practice. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two automated solutions for the measurement of CSMA. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of CT images in our hospital database. We included consecutive individuals hospitalized at the Grenoble University Hospital in France between January and May 2018 with abdominal CT images and sagittal reconstruction. We used two types of software to automatically segment skeletal muscle: ABACS, a module of the SliceOmatic software solution “ABACS‐SliceOmatic,” and a deep learning‐based solution called “AutoMATiCA.” Manual segmentation was performed by a medical expert to generate reference data using “SliceOmatic.” The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between the results of the manual and the automated segmentations. The DSC value for each method was compared with the Mann–Whitney U test. Results A total of 676 hospitalized individuals was retrospectively included (365 males [53.8%] and 312 females [46.2%]). The median DSC for SliceOmatic vs AutoMATiCA (0.969 [5th percentile: 0.909]) was greater than the median DSC for SliceOmatic vs. ABACS‐SliceOmatic (0.949 [5th percentile: 0.836]) (p < 0.001). Conclusions AutoMATiCA, which used artificial intelligence, was more reliable than ABACS‐SliceOmatic for skeletal muscle segmentation at the L3 level in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. The next step is to develop and validate a neural network that can identify L3 slices, which is currently a fastidious process.
Background: Measurement of cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the reference methods for sarcopenia diagnosis. However, manual skeletal muscle segmentation is tedious and is thus restricted to research. Automated solutions are required for use in clinical practice. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two automated solutions for the measurement of CSMA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of CT images in our hospital database.We included consecutive individuals hospitalized at the Grenoble University Hospital in France between January and May 2018 with abdominal CT images and sagittal reconstruction. We used two types of software to automatically segment skeletal muscle: ABACS, a module of the SliceOmatic software solution "ABACS-SliceOmatic,"and a deep learning-based solution called "Auto-MATiCA." Manual segmentation was performed by a medical expert to generate reference data using "SliceOmatic." The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure overlap between the results of the manual and the automated segmentations. The DSC value for each method was compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A total of 676 hospitalized individuals was retrospectively included (365 males [53.8%] and 312 females [46.2%]).The median DSC for SliceOmatic vs AutoMATiCA (0.969 [5th percentile: 0.909]) was greater than the median DSC for SliceOmatic vs. ABACS-SliceOmatic (0.949 [5th percentile: 0.836]) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: AutoMATiCA, which used artificial intelligence, was more reliable than ABACS-SliceOmatic for skeletal muscle segmentation at the L3 level in a cohort of hospitalized individuals. The next step is to develop and validate a neural network that can identify L3 slices, which is currently a fastidious process.
Author Boulouard, Quentin
Vilotitch, Antoine
Charrière, Katia
Artemova, Svetlana
Giai, Joris
Fontaine, Eric
Ferretti, Gilbert R.
Bosson, Jean‐Luc
Bétry, Cécile
Moreau‐Gaudry, Alexandre
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Katia
  surname: Charrière
  fullname: Charrière, Katia
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Quentin
  surname: Boulouard
  fullname: Boulouard, Quentin
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Svetlana
  surname: Artemova
  fullname: Artemova, Svetlana
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Antoine
  surname: Vilotitch
  fullname: Vilotitch, Antoine
  organization: Cellule d'ingénierie des données
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Gilbert R.
  surname: Ferretti
  fullname: Ferretti, Gilbert R.
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jean‐Luc
  surname: Bosson
  fullname: Bosson, Jean‐Luc
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Alexandre
  surname: Moreau‐Gaudry
  fullname: Moreau‐Gaudry, Alexandre
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Joris
  surname: Giai
  fullname: Giai, Joris
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Eric
  surname: Fontaine
  fullname: Fontaine, Eric
  organization: INSERM U1055, LBFA, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Université Grenoble Alpes
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Cécile
  surname: Bétry
  fullname: Bétry, Cécile
  email: cbetry@chu-grenoble.fr
  organization: Université Grenoble Alpes
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36724170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://hal.science/hal-04303471$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp1kU1v1DAQhi3Uim4LEr8A-UgPWfyVr-OqghZpET3A2Zo4kzZgx8F2Wu2t5574jfwSkm4pEoLTjEbPPCO9c0wOBj8gIa84W3PGxFs3rnkhCv6MrIQqZaYEqw_IirFaZUKx_Igcx_iVMVbInD0nR7IoheIlW5H7DTXejRAg9TdIY5raHfUdTbeewpS8g4Qtjd5OqfdDpJ0P1AQf48-7HxHNMgRL4ze0mObGTdFYpA4hTgEdDol2wTsKTetdv6DLtWlxzm5_FWC83tHewRXGF-SwAxvx5WM9IV_ev_t8dpFtP51_ONtsMyOrmmdVAUKWIBoFkqsaK97VolJFyXLEGqoK26LmVaNYJ_Oyq5sG6sYUhhthciZzeUJO995rsHoM8_Gw0x56fbHZ6mXGlGRSlfyGz-ybPTsG_33CmLTro0FrYUA_RS3Kks-ZVkU1o68f0alx2D6Zf2f9x_WQX8DuCeFML2_UbtQPb5zR9V-o6RMsYacAvf3XQrZfuO0t7v4r1h8v9_wveZqvdw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nut_2024_112592
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2025_102555
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnesp_2023_07_082
crossref_primary_10_20960_nh_05699
crossref_primary_10_1002_ncp_11150
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_109622
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcsm_70023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnu_2025_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnesp_2024_07_1054
crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zraf016
Cites_doi 10.1186/s41747‐021‐00210‐8
10.1002/rco2.37
10.1016/j.avsg.2021.02.022
10.1007/s00330‐019‐06573‐2
10.2307/1932409
10.1117/12.812412
10.1016/j.clnu.2020.01.008
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.05.018
10.1159/000517099
10.1016/S1470‐2045(08)70153‐0
10.1093/ageing/afy169
10.1038/ejcn.2015.207
10.1016/j.clnu.2020.09.017
10.1016/j.clnu.2017.07.007
10.1093/gerona/glz034
10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
10.3348/kjr.2020.0914
10.1002/jpen.1067
10.1002/jcsm.12752
10.1002/jcsm.12573
10.1016/j.diii.2020.04.011
10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.009
10.1093/gerona/glaa141
10.1109/TMI.2015.2479252
10.1109/TMI.2019.2927289
10.3233/SHTI190464
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
1XC
VOOES
DOI 10.1002/mp.16261
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physics
EISSN 2473-4209
EndPage 4980
ExternalDocumentID oai:HAL:hal-04303471v1
36724170
10_1002_mp_16261
MP16261
Genre article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Délégation Régionale à la Recherche Clinique du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes
GroupedDBID ---
--Z
-DZ
.GJ
0R~
1OB
1OC
29M
2WC
33P
36B
3O-
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAQQT
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABDPE
ABEFU
ABFTF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQWH
ABTAH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBEA
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACPOU
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADKYN
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFWVQ
AHBTC
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMYDB
ASPBG
BFHJK
C45
CS3
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F5P
HDBZQ
HGLYW
I-F
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
MEWTI
O9-
OVD
P2P
P2W
PALCI
PHY
RJQFR
RNS
ROL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TN5
TWZ
USG
WOHZO
WXSBR
XJT
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
ZY4
ZZTAW
AAMMB
AAYXX
ABUFD
ADMLS
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
LH4
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
1XC
VOOES
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3891-86a237a2b4a3149e81f92846705ee9a88ed6918b40f357f9bba9bc6c1c2c50353
IEDL.DBID DRFUL
ISICitedReferencesCount 9
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000937337100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0094-2405
2473-4209
IngestDate Tue Oct 14 20:58:56 EDT 2025
Sun Nov 09 10:17:27 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:06:15 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:35:58 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:37:03 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:20:51 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords body composition
software validation
skeletal muscle
artificial intelligence
computational neural networks
sarcopenia
Language English
License 2023 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3891-86a237a2b4a3149e81f92846705ee9a88ed6918b40f357f9bba9bc6c1c2c50353
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5204-9477
0000-0001-6729-2704
OpenAccessLink https://hal.science/hal-04303471
PMID 36724170
PQID 2771635868
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04303471v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2771635868
pubmed_primary_36724170
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16261
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_mp_16261
wiley_primary_10_1002_mp_16261_MP16261
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2023
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2023
  text: August 2023
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Medical physics (Lancaster)
PublicationTitleAlternate Med Phys
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
References 2021; 5
2021; 4
2021; 22
2022; 290
2019; 74
2017; 87
2008; 9
2020; 39
2022; 68
2009; 7261
2020; 101
2016; 70
2020; 11
2020; 76
2018; 42
2016; 15
2016; 35
2021; 75
2021; 12
2020; 30
1945; 26
2019; 48
2020; 27
2015
2021; 40
2018; 37
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
References_xml – volume: 290
  start-page: 1068
  year: 2022
  end-page: 1069
  article-title: PREDIMED: clinical data warehouse of Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1203
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1213
  article-title: The impact of sarcopenia and acute muscle mass loss on long‐term outcomes in critically ill patients with intra‐abdominal sepsis
  publication-title: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
– volume: 15
  start-page: 155
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 163
  article-title: A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
  publication-title: J Chiropr Med
– volume: 48
  start-page: 16
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 31
  article-title: Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis
  publication-title: Age Ageing
– volume: 4
  start-page: 103
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  end-page: 110
  article-title: Sarcopenia diagnosis: comparison of automated with manual computed tomography segmentation in clinical routine
  publication-title: JCSM Rapid Commun
– volume: 7261
  year: 2009
  article-title: Automated segmentation of muscle and adipose tissue on CT images for human body composition analysis
  publication-title: Med Imaging. Visualization, Image‐Guided Procedures, and Modeling
– volume: 39
  start-page: 387
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 399
  article-title: Vertebrae identification and localization utilizing fully convolutional networks and a hidden markov model
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Med Imaging
– volume: 42
  issue: 7
  year: 2018
  article-title: Influence of contrast administration on computed tomography‐based analysis of visceral adipose and skeletal muscle tissue in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  publication-title: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
– volume: 27
  start-page: 132
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  end-page: 135
  article-title: The algorithmic audit: working with vendors to validate radiology‐AI algorithms‐how we do it
  publication-title: Acad Radiol
– volume: 39
  start-page: 3049
  issue: 10
  year: 2020
  end-page: 3055
  article-title: Automated body composition analysis of clinically acquired computed tomography scans using neural networks
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Sarcopenia is associated with mortality in adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Gerontology
– volume: 76
  start-page: 277
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 285
  article-title: Automated muscle measurement on chest CT predicts all‐cause mortality in older adults from the national lung screening trial
  publication-title: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
– volume: 22
  start-page: 624
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  end-page: 633
  article-title: Reliability of skeletal muscle area measurement on CT with different parameters: a phantom study
  publication-title: Korean J Radiol
– volume: 35
  start-page: 512
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 520
  article-title: Body composition assessment in axial CT images using FEM‐based automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Med Imaging
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1671
  issue: 10
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1678
  article-title: Approaches to assessment of muscle mass and myosteatosis on computed tomography: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
– volume: 75
  start-page: 227
  year: 2021
  end-page: 236
  article-title: Sarcopenia in patients undergoing lower limb bypass surgery is associated with higher mortality and major amputation rates
  publication-title: Ann Vasc Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 297
  issue: 3
  year: 1945
  end-page: 302
  article-title: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 101
  start-page: 789
  issue: 12
  year: 2020
  end-page: 794
  article-title: Abdominal musculature segmentation and surface prediction from CT using deep learning for sarcopenia assessment
  publication-title: Diagn Interv Imaging
– volume: 87
  start-page: 95
  year: 2017
  end-page: 103
  article-title: Spotting L3 slice in CT scans using deep convolutional network and transfer learning
  publication-title: Comput Biol Med
– volume: 9
  start-page: 629
  issue: 7
  year: 2008
  end-page: 635
  article-title: Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: a population‐based study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1258
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1269
  article-title: Evaluation of automated computed tomography segmentation to assess body composition and mortality associations in cancer patients
  publication-title: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2199
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2208
  article-title: Imaging of sarcopenia: old evidence and new insights
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
– volume: 70
  start-page: 595
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  article-title: Sarcopenia and length of hospital stay
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1707
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1714
  article-title: Contrast‐enhancement influences skeletal muscle density, but not skeletal muscle mass, measurements on computed tomography
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
– volume: 5
  year: 2021
  article-title: Artificial intelligence‐aided CT segmentation for body composition analysis: a validation study
  publication-title: Eur Radiol Exp
– year: 2015
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1711
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1718
  article-title: Is sarcopenia a predictor of prognosis for patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer? A meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1186/s41747‐021‐00210‐8
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/rco2.37
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.02.022
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330‐019‐06573‐2
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.2307/1932409
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1117/12.812412
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.01.008
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.05.018
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1159/000517099
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1470‐2045(08)70153‐0
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.207
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.09.017
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.07.007
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz034
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0914
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.1002/jpen.1067
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12752
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12573
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.04.011
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.009
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa141
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2479252
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2927289
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.3233/SHTI190464
SSID ssj0006350
Score 2.4776385
Snippet Background Measurement of cross‐sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one...
Measurement of cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one of the...
Background: Measurement of cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the mid third lumbar vertebra (L3) level from computed tomography (CT) images is becoming one...
SourceID hal
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 4973
SubjectTerms Artificial Intelligence
body composition
computational neural networks
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Food and Nutrition
Humans
Life Sciences
Male
Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
sarcopenia
skeletal muscle
software validation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Title A comparative study of two automated solutions for cross‐sectional skeletal muscle measurement from abdominal computed tomography images
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fmp.16261
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36724170
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2771635868
https://hal.science/hal-04303471
Volume 50
WOSCitedRecordID wos000937337100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2473-4209
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006350
  issn: 0094-2405
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7RFiouBUoLS6EyCMEpbWInjn1cAasetlWFqLS3yK-oFWSzajblypkTv5FfwtjJZlUBEhKnKIlficeeb-yZzwCvsYtNrhId6cRmUZpJFwnleCSlTTJBpTNxCBSe5mdnYjaT571XpY-F6fghhgU3PzLCfO0HuNLN8Zo0tFocJYjG0fLZ8jFVaHhtvf84uZgO8zCq0i4ARaZ-DyFbUc_G9HiV95Yy2rj0rpC_48zbsDXoncmD_2nxQ9jp0SYZd-LxCO64-S5sn_b76btwLziAmuYxfB8TsyYCJ4F1ltQlWX6tiWqXNQJbZ8kgqASxLgkf9fPbjya4c_mKms-oxRDOk6ptsEJSrVcgiQ9kIUrbOhwjFmprfZlYdk-bTa4qnN2aPbiYfPj07iTqz2mIjN_ljARXlOWK6lQxNLicSEpJPa6JM-ekEsJZLhOh07hkWV5KrZXUhpvEUJPFLGP7sDmv5-4pEEeVSbnlpXVouJeYyVLLNGelFgrvRvB21WGF6UnM_VkaX4qOfpkW1aIIP3kEL4eUi4644w9pXmGfD6890_bJeFr4Z54KjaHivvEFrUSiwKHn91PU3NVtU9AcjU2WCS5G8KSTlaEsxnPERnk8gjdBJP7ahuL0PFyf_WvCA7jvj7zvnBCfw-byunUv4K65WV4114ewkc_EYT8UfgF9ag0z
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwEB4tXV4XHsurPA1CcAqb2Ilji1MFVEW01QrtSnuLbMcRK0hTbZrlypkTv5Ffwth5VCtAQuIUJbHHTjzj-eyxPwM8xyY2qYp0oKM8CeJE2kAoywMp8ygRVFoT-o3C83S5FMfH8mAHXvd7YVp-iGHCzVmG76-dgbsJ6f0ta2i5fhUhHMehz27MWSpGsPv24_RoPnTE6EvbHSgydkGEpOeeDel-n_ecN7rwya2F_B1onset3vFMr_9XlW_AtQ5vkkmrIDdhx6724PKii6jvwSW_BNTUt-D7hJgtFTjxvLOkKsjma0VUs6kQ2tqcDKpKEO0S_1U_v_2o_YIuV1D9Gf0YAnpSNjUWSMrtHCRxW1mI0nnlDxLzpTVOJsruiLPJSYn9W30bjqbvDt_Mgu6khsC4OGcguKIsVVTHiuGQy4qokNQhmzCxViohbM5lJHQcFixJC6m1ktpwExlqkpAl7A6MVtXK3gNiqTIxz3mRWxy6F5gppznTnBVaKLwbw8u-xTLT0Zi70zS-ZC0BM83KdeZ_8hieDinXLXXHH9I8w0YfXjuu7dlknrlnjgyNoes-c4J6ncjQ-FxERa1s1dQZTXG4yRLBxRjutsoyyGI8RXSUhmN44XXir3XIFgf-ev9fEz6BK7PDxTybv19-eABXKcKudkniQxhtThv7CC6as81Jffq4s4hfM7kQOw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VLVRceBQKy9MgBKfQxIkTW5xWlFUR29UKUam3yK-IqmSzajblypkTv5Ffwth5rCpAQuIUJbE9Tjzj-WyPPwO8wCbWmYxUoCLDgoQJG3Bp00AIEzFOhdWh3yg8y-ZzfnIiFlvwpt8L0_JDDBNuzjJ8f-0M3K5Msb9hDS1XryOE4zj02UYZLBnB9sHH6fFs6IjRl7Y7UETiFhFYzz0b0v0-7yVvdOWzi4X8HWhexq3e8Uxv_leVb8GNDm-SSasgt2HLLndh56hbUd-Faz4EVNd34PuE6A0VOPG8s6QqyPprRWSzrhDaWkMGVSWIdon_qp_fftQ-oMsJqs_QjyGgJ2VTo0BSbuYgidvKQqQylT9IzEtrXJlYdkecTU5L7N_qu3A8fffp7WHQndQQaLfOGfBU0jiTVCUyxiGX5VEhqEM2IbNWSM6tSUXEVRIWMcsKoZQUSqc60lSzMGbxHoyW1dLeB2Kp1Elq0sJYHLoXmMlQE6s0LhSXeDeGV32L5bqjMXenaXzJWwJmmper3P_kMTwbUq5a6o4_pHmOjT68dlzbh5NZ7p45MrQYXfeFK6jXiRyNz62oyKWtmjqnGQ43Y8ZTPoZ7rbIMZcVphugoC8fw0uvEX-uQHy389cG_JnwKO4uDaT57P__wEK5TRF1tROIjGK3PG_sYruqL9Wl9_qQziF-olQ-2
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+comparative+study+of+two+automated+solutions+for+cross%E2%80%90sectional+skeletal+muscle+measurement+from+abdominal+computed+tomography+images&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Charri%C3%A8re%2C+Katia&rft.au=Boulouard%2C+Quentin&rft.au=Artemova%2C+Svetlana&rft.au=Vilotitch%2C+Antoine&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4973&rft.epage=4980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fmp.16261&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_mp_16261
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon