Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review

Provider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency. To review the UK evidence on whether provider financial incentives are an effective way of improving the quality of health care. Systematic review of UK evidence, undertaken in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of general practice Vol. 67; no. 664; p. e800
Main Authors: Mandavia, Rishi, Mehta, Nishchay, Schilder, Anne, Mossialos, Elias
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01.11.2017
Subjects:
Health Personnel - economics
Health Personnel - standards
Health Policy
Humans
Motivation
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Quality Improvement - economics
Quality of Health Care - economics
Quality of Health Care - standards
Reimbursement, Incentive
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
hospitals
efficiency
quality of health care
health policy
general practice
motivation
ISSN:1478-5242, 1478-5242
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Provider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency. To review the UK evidence on whether provider financial incentives are an effective way of improving the quality of health care. Systematic review of UK evidence, undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched in August 2016. Original articles that assessed the relationship between UK provider financial incentives and a quantitative measure of quality of health care were included. Studies showing improvement for all measures of quality of care were defined as 'positive', those that were 'intermediate' showed improvement in some measures, and those classified as 'negative' showed a worsening of measures. Studies showing no effect were documented as such. Quality was assessed using the Downs and Black quality checklist. Of the 232 published articles identified by the systematic search, 28 were included. Of these, nine reported positive effects of incentives on quality of care, 16 reported intermediate effects, two reported no effect, and one reported a negative effect. Quality assessment scores for included articles ranged from 15 to 19, out of a maximum of 22 points. The effects of UK provider financial incentives on healthcare quality are unclear. Owing to this uncertainty and their significant costs, use of them may be counterproductive to their goal of improving healthcare quality and efficiency. UK policymakers should be cautious when implementing these incentives - if used, they should be subject to careful long-term monitoring and evaluation. Further research is needed to assess whether provider financial incentives represent a cost-effective intervention to improve the quality of care delivered in the UK.
AbstractList Provider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency.BACKGROUNDProvider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency.To review the UK evidence on whether provider financial incentives are an effective way of improving the quality of health care.AIMTo review the UK evidence on whether provider financial incentives are an effective way of improving the quality of health care.Systematic review of UK evidence, undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.DESIGN AND SETTINGSystematic review of UK evidence, undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched in August 2016. Original articles that assessed the relationship between UK provider financial incentives and a quantitative measure of quality of health care were included. Studies showing improvement for all measures of quality of care were defined as 'positive', those that were 'intermediate' showed improvement in some measures, and those classified as 'negative' showed a worsening of measures. Studies showing no effect were documented as such. Quality was assessed using the Downs and Black quality checklist.METHODMEDLINE and Embase databases were searched in August 2016. Original articles that assessed the relationship between UK provider financial incentives and a quantitative measure of quality of health care were included. Studies showing improvement for all measures of quality of care were defined as 'positive', those that were 'intermediate' showed improvement in some measures, and those classified as 'negative' showed a worsening of measures. Studies showing no effect were documented as such. Quality was assessed using the Downs and Black quality checklist.Of the 232 published articles identified by the systematic search, 28 were included. Of these, nine reported positive effects of incentives on quality of care, 16 reported intermediate effects, two reported no effect, and one reported a negative effect. Quality assessment scores for included articles ranged from 15 to 19, out of a maximum of 22 points.RESULTSOf the 232 published articles identified by the systematic search, 28 were included. Of these, nine reported positive effects of incentives on quality of care, 16 reported intermediate effects, two reported no effect, and one reported a negative effect. Quality assessment scores for included articles ranged from 15 to 19, out of a maximum of 22 points.The effects of UK provider financial incentives on healthcare quality are unclear. Owing to this uncertainty and their significant costs, use of them may be counterproductive to their goal of improving healthcare quality and efficiency. UK policymakers should be cautious when implementing these incentives - if used, they should be subject to careful long-term monitoring and evaluation. Further research is needed to assess whether provider financial incentives represent a cost-effective intervention to improve the quality of care delivered in the UK.CONCLUSIONThe effects of UK provider financial incentives on healthcare quality are unclear. Owing to this uncertainty and their significant costs, use of them may be counterproductive to their goal of improving healthcare quality and efficiency. UK policymakers should be cautious when implementing these incentives - if used, they should be subject to careful long-term monitoring and evaluation. Further research is needed to assess whether provider financial incentives represent a cost-effective intervention to improve the quality of care delivered in the UK.
Provider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency. To review the UK evidence on whether provider financial incentives are an effective way of improving the quality of health care. Systematic review of UK evidence, undertaken in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched in August 2016. Original articles that assessed the relationship between UK provider financial incentives and a quantitative measure of quality of health care were included. Studies showing improvement for all measures of quality of care were defined as 'positive', those that were 'intermediate' showed improvement in some measures, and those classified as 'negative' showed a worsening of measures. Studies showing no effect were documented as such. Quality was assessed using the Downs and Black quality checklist. Of the 232 published articles identified by the systematic search, 28 were included. Of these, nine reported positive effects of incentives on quality of care, 16 reported intermediate effects, two reported no effect, and one reported a negative effect. Quality assessment scores for included articles ranged from 15 to 19, out of a maximum of 22 points. The effects of UK provider financial incentives on healthcare quality are unclear. Owing to this uncertainty and their significant costs, use of them may be counterproductive to their goal of improving healthcare quality and efficiency. UK policymakers should be cautious when implementing these incentives - if used, they should be subject to careful long-term monitoring and evaluation. Further research is needed to assess whether provider financial incentives represent a cost-effective intervention to improve the quality of care delivered in the UK.
Author Schilder, Anne
Mossialos, Elias
Mandavia, Rishi
Mehta, Nishchay
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Rishi
  surname: Mandavia
  fullname: Mandavia, Rishi
  organization: EvidENT team, UCL Ear Institute, London
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Nishchay
  surname: Mehta
  fullname: Mehta, Nishchay
  organization: EvidENT team, UCL Ear Institute, London
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Anne
  surname: Schilder
  fullname: Schilder, Anne
  organization: EvidENT team, UCL Ear Institute, London
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Elias
  surname: Mossialos
  fullname: Mossialos, Elias
  organization: Centre for Health Policy, Imperial College London, London
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpN0MtLAzEQBvAgFVurR6-So5fVPHbz8CalPrDgxYKelmwykZTdtN3sVvrfu8UKnmbg-zF8zDkaxXUEhK4oueVc67tq9bWh8kNoTnN9giY0lyorWM5G__YxOk9pRQhjgpIzNGZKa85JMUGfc-_BdmEHEVLCa4-Xr3jTrnfBQYt9iCbaYGocooV4YIOJeNubOnT7A7emhXtscNqnDhrTBYtb2AX4vkCn3tQJLo9zipaP8_fZc7Z4e3qZPSwyy5XsMm0Vh8I55aWQhc4pIXkhQXpljKKOOwBWFbkQmnhfEeuGREhiClOBcoKwKbr5vTu03vaQurIJyUJdmwjrPpVU51poJrUa6PWR9lUDrty0oTHtvvx7B_sB0BJkkA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_add_15486
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_018_3765_7
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2020_001127
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2025_105335
crossref_primary_10_1017_S146342362500012X
crossref_primary_10_1111_add_14778
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40259_025_00736_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hrtlng_2025_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_msc_1735
crossref_primary_10_1177_10775587211035280
crossref_primary_10_12688_wellcomeopenres_15810_1
crossref_primary_10_2147_JAA_S274943
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2020_112908
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xinn_2025_101083
crossref_primary_10_1071_PY20241
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2019_000823
crossref_primary_10_12688_wellcomeopenres_15810_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_acem_13635
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2018_000402
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12875_021_01462_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_024_03588_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthpol_2022_05_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_022_04177_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_1475_6773_13274
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright British Journal of General Practice 2017.
Copyright_xml – notice: British Journal of General Practice 2017.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17X693149
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1478-5242
ExternalDocumentID 28993305
Genre Systematic Review
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Department of Health
  grantid: NIHR-RP-011-045
GroupedDBID ---
.GJ
23N
2WC
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
AAFWJ
AAWTL
ABOCM
ABSQV
ACDUE
ADBBV
ADDZX
ADMOG
AENEX
AFHIN
AFPMT
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
GX1
H13
HYE
K-O
KQ8
L7B
NPM
P2P
R0Z
RHI
RPM
SJN
SV3
TR2
WOQ
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-9c83e5dd8f767594100457e7f8aa81d3dee2b546690ffb0cd7f8670a5abe8d602
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 23
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000414008300009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1478-5242
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:49:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 24 01:31:45 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 664
Keywords hospitals
efficiency
quality of health care
health policy
general practice
motivation
Language English
License British Journal of General Practice 2017.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c387t-9c83e5dd8f767594100457e7f8aa81d3dee2b546690ffb0cd7f8670a5abe8d602
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
OpenAccessLink https://bjgp.org/content/bjgp/67/664/e800.full.pdf
PMID 28993305
PQID 1949692798
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1949692798
pubmed_primary_28993305
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle British journal of general practice
PublicationTitleAlternate Br J Gen Pract
PublicationYear 2017
SSID ssj0022610
Score 2.3351893
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Provider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency. To review the UK evidence on whether...
Provider financial incentives are being increasingly adopted to help improve standards of care while promoting efficiency.BACKGROUNDProvider financial...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage e800
SubjectTerms Health Personnel - economics
Health Personnel - standards
Health Policy
Humans
Motivation
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Quality Improvement - economics
Quality of Health Care - economics
Quality of Health Care - standards
Reimbursement, Incentive
United Kingdom
Title Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993305
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1949692798
Volume 67
WOSCitedRecordID wos000414008300009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qinjx_VhfRPBattskTeJFRFwE2WUPLtRTSZpE1kO7uqvgv3fStO5NBC-9NIUyTL6ZL5P5BqErlwpFHLeRM9REtIgd4KAxUUIZkcJ5uZYwbIKPRiLL5Lg5cJs31ypbTKyB2lSFPyPvAdmWqUy4FDezt8hPjfLV1WaExirqEEhlvFfz7KeKAJlFUCOgwJQYxKKgsUlgYU-_vsz6PEsl6dNfsss6ygy2__t_O2iryS_xbXCIXbRiyz20MWwq6PvoOcgVNxiHK4cnj7htx8Ou1d_A09Jf2_SatLgqcWi9_PLL_VWxa6zwUgIah_aXAzQZ3D_dPUTNeIWoIIIvIlkIYpkxwnlBF0m9dhzjljuhFGSxxFibaEZT4M_O6bgw8CblsWJKW2HSODlEa2VV2mOEZZpooEZMCW1oYWJNmNDUOgALmwBl6qLL1mg5uK-vSajSVh_zfGm2LjoKls9nQWcj91yQAB6d_OHrU7SZ-IBbdwmeoY6DzWvP0XrxuZjO3y9qv4DnaDz8Bs9Nw74
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+UK+provider+financial+incentives+on+quality+of+care%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+general+practice&rft.au=Mandavia%2C+Rishi&rft.au=Mehta%2C+Nishchay&rft.au=Schilder%2C+Anne&rft.au=Mossialos%2C+Elias&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.issn=1478-5242&rft.eissn=1478-5242&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=664&rft.spage=e800&rft_id=info:doi/10.3399%2Fbjgp17X693149&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1478-5242&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1478-5242&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1478-5242&client=summon