Usage of digital media by people with intellectual disabilities: Contrasting individuals' and formal caregivers' perspectives

Although participation in the digital world is an important means for taking part in our society, people with intellectual disabilities are still largely excluded from the manifold possibilities of digital participation. In our study, we investigate attitudes of both formal caregivers and people wit...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of intellectual disabilities Ročník 26; číslo 2; s. 420
Hlavní autoři: Heitplatz, Vanessa N, Bühler, Christian, Hastall, Matthias R
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England 01.06.2022
Témata:
digital media
smartphone usage
digital participation
formal caregivers
intellectual disability
ISSN:1744-6309, 1744-6309
On-line přístup:Zjistit podrobnosti o přístupu
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Although participation in the digital world is an important means for taking part in our society, people with intellectual disabilities are still largely excluded from the manifold possibilities of digital participation. In our study, we investigate attitudes of both formal caregivers and people with intellectual disabilities in Germany regarding their usage of digital media. Our sample consisted of 24 formal caregivers working in residential or outpatient facilities in Germany, and 50 people with intellectual disabilities living in those settings. Data were collected during semi-structured interviews with formal caregivers and focus group discussions with people with intellectual disabilities, and analyzed using inductive content analysis. The findings illustrate that the perspectives on digital media usage differ between people with intellectual disabilities and formal caregivers regarding (i) interest in accessing the Internet and digital media, (ii) interest in education programs, and (iii) the variety of applications used. The perspectives of both target groups will be discussed and contrasted.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1744-6309
1744-6309
DOI:10.1177/1744629520971375