Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework

Purpose The study of supply chain resilience (SCRES) continues to gain interest in the academic and practitioner communities. The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of physical distribution & logistics management Jg. 48; H. 8; S. 842 - 865
Hauptverfasser: Kochan, Cigdem Gonul, Nowicki, David R.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 12.09.2018
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Schlagworte:
Decision making
Integer programming
Keywords
Linear programming
Literature reviews
Logistics
Monte Carlo simulation
Research methodology
Resilience
Studies
Supply chain management
Supply chains
Systematic review
Supply chain vulnerability
Supply chain resilience
Supply chain risk
Systematic literature review
ISSN:0960-0035, 1758-664X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The study of supply chain resilience (SCRES) continues to gain interest in the academic and practitioner communities. The purpose of this paper is to present a focused review of the SCRES literature by investigating supply chain (SC) capabilities, their relationship to SCRES outcomes and the underpinning theoretical mechanisms of this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses the systematic literature review approach to examine 383 articles published between 2000 and 2017, ultimately down selecting to the most relevant 228 peer-reviewed studies. Context-interventions-mechanisms-outcomes (CIMO) logic is applied to organize and synthesize these peer-reviewed studies. A typological framework is developed from the CIMO-based classification of the SCRES literature. Findings The findings of this study outline the gaps in the SCRES literature and present an agenda for future research. Research limitations/implications This paper presents an exploratory research; therefore, the typological model presented is just one of the possible perspectives. Practical implications The typology of SCRES literature can help practitioners to understand SCRES and to measure and assess the resilience of SCs. Originality/value The paper provides clear definitions of SCRES constructs, develops a typological framework to further understand SCRES and identifies SCRES measures and assessment techniques.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0960-0035
1758-664X
DOI:10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0099