A review of popular smartphone apps for depression and anxiety: Assessing the inclusion of evidence-based content

Smartphone applications for the treatment of depression and anxiety have acquired millions of users, yet little is known about whether they include evidence-based therapeutic content. We examined the extent to which popular mental health applications (MH apps) for depression and anxiety contain trea...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Behaviour research and therapy Ročník 123; s. 103498
Hlavní autori: Wasil, Akash R., Venturo-Conerly, Katherine E., Shingleton, Rebecca M., Weisz, John R.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2019
Elsevier Science Ltd
Predmet:
Anxiety
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Cognitive restructuring
Depression
Digital health
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-based practice
Meditation
Mental depression
Mental disorders
Mental health
mHealth
Mindfulness
Mobile health
Problem solving
Psychoeducational treatment
Psychological treatment
Psychotherapy
Relaxation
Smartphone apps
Smartphones
Software
Telemedicine
Treatment methods
Treatment needs
Smartphone apps
Telemedicine
Mobile health
Evidence-based practice
mHealth
Depression
Digital health
Anxiety
Psychological treatment
ISSN:0005-7967, 1873-622X, 1873-622X
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:Smartphone applications for the treatment of depression and anxiety have acquired millions of users, yet little is known about whether they include evidence-based therapeutic content. We examined the extent to which popular mental health applications (MH apps) for depression and anxiety contain treatment elements found in empirically supported psychotherapy protocols (i.e., “common elements”). Of the 27 MH apps reviewed, 23 included at least one common element, with a median of three elements. Psychoeducation (in 52% of apps), relaxation (44%), meditation (41%), mindfulness (37%), and assessment (37%) were the most frequent elements, whereas several elements (e.g., problem solving) were not found in any apps. We also identified gaps between app content and empirically supported treatments. Cognitive restructuring was more common in depression protocols than in depression apps (75% of protocols vs. 31% of apps), as was problem solving (34% vs. 0%). For anxiety, exposure (85%, 12%), cognitive restructuring (60%, 12%), and problem solving (25%, 0%) were more common in protocols than apps. Overall, our findings highlight empirically supported treatment elements that are poorly represented in current MH apps. The absence of several core treatment elements underscores the need for future research, including randomized trials testing the effectiveness of popular MH apps. •Do popular mobile apps for depression and anxiety include evidence-based content?•To find out, we coded 27 popular apps for empirically supported treatment elements.•Apps included between 0 and 12 evidence-based elements (median = 3).•Core anxiety and depression elements (e.g., exposure, restructuring) were rare.•Content limitations suggest a need for new apps and rigorous tests of app effects.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0005-7967
1873-622X
1873-622X
DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103498