The importance of procedural justice in Human–Machine Interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations

In the present study, the effects of procedural justice (fair or unfair) and the type of decision agent (human, robot, or computer) on employee behavior and attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, or counterproductive work behaviors) were examined. It was predicted th...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Computers in human behavior Ročník 89; s. 27 - 39
Hlavní autoři: Ötting, Sonja K., Maier, Günter W.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Elmsford Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd
Témata:
Attitudes
Behavior
Between-subjects design
Decision agent
Employee attitude
Employee behavior and attitudes
Experimental vignette study
Experiments
Human behavior
Humanoid
Human–machine interaction
Intelligent systems
Job satisfaction
Organizational aspects
Organizations
Procedural justice
Research methodology
Robots
Source of justice
Human–machine interaction
Employee behavior and attitudes
Decision agent
Procedural justice
Source of justice
Experimental vignette study
ISSN:0747-5632, 1873-7692
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In the present study, the effects of procedural justice (fair or unfair) and the type of decision agent (human, robot, or computer) on employee behavior and attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, or counterproductive work behaviors) were examined. It was predicted that the type of decision agent (or the source of justice) would moderate the relationship between procedural justice and employee behavior and attitudes, with the relationship being strongest when the decision agent is a human team leader, medium when the decision agent is a humanoid robot, and weakest when the agent is a computer system. This research question was investigated with a between-subjects design in two experiments (N1 = 149 and N2 = 145) that displayed two different decision situations in organizations (allocation of new tasks and allocation of further vocational trainings). Results of both studies showed significant effects of procedural justice on employee behavior and attitudes, confirming the importance of procedural justice at the workplace for both human and system decision agents. Furthermore, both studies failed to verify any interaction effects of procedural justice and the decision agent. This further emphasizes the importance of procedural justice in decision situations because there is no difference in reactions to procedural justice of human or system decisions. Limitations and implications for future research and the integration of justice and human–machine interaction research are discussed. •Procedural justice fosters beneficial attitudes and behaviors in organizations.•Procedural justice diminishes harmful behaviors in organizations.•Type of decision agent (human/intelligent system) does not moderate justice effects.•Procedural justice is important, no matter who has made the decision.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0747-5632
1873-7692
DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.022