A Boolean network model of the double-strand break repair pathway choice

•The Boolean network model (BNM) recapitulates HR pathway activity observed in response to DSBs.•The BNM recovers behaviors of BRCA1/FANCS mutants.•The BNM retrieves drug resistance mechanisms related to shifts in DNA repair pathway selections.•TIP60 complex and its corresponding histone acetylation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of theoretical biology Vol. 573; p. 111608
Main Authors: Ayala-Zambrano, Cecilia, Yuste, Mariana, Frias, Sara, Garcia-de-Teresa, Benilde, Mendoza, Luis, Azpeitia, Eugenio, Rodríguez, Alfredo, Torres, Leda
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 21.09.2023
Subjects:
ISSN:0022-5193, 1095-8541, 1095-8541
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The Boolean network model (BNM) recapitulates HR pathway activity observed in response to DSBs.•The BNM recovers behaviors of BRCA1/FANCS mutants.•The BNM retrieves drug resistance mechanisms related to shifts in DNA repair pathway selections.•TIP60 complex and its corresponding histone acetylation loss leads to activation of SSA in response to DSBs. Double strand break (DSB) repair is critical to maintaining the integrity of the genome. DSB repair deficiency underlies multiple pathologies, including cancer, chromosome instability syndromes, and, potentially, neurodevelopmental defects. DSB repair is mainly handled by two pathways: highly accurate homologous recombination (HR), which requires a sister chromatid for template-based repair, limited to S/G2 phases of the cell cycle, and canonical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ), available throughout the cell cycle in which minimum homology is sufficient for highly efficient yet error-prone repair. Some circumstances, such as cancer, require alternative highly mutagenic DSB repair pathways like microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA), which are triggered to attend to DNA damage. These non-canonical repair alternatives are emerging as prominent drivers of resistance in drug-based tumor therapies. Multiple DSB repair options require tight inter-pathway regulation to prevent unscheduled activities. In addition to this complexity, epigenetic modifications of the histones surrounding the DSB region are emerging as critical regulators of the DSB repair pathway choice. Modeling approaches to understanding DSBs repair pathway choice are advantageous to perform simulations and generate predictions on previously uncharacterized aspects of DSBs response. In this work, we present a Boolean network model of the DSB repair pathway choice that incorporates the knowledge, into a dynamic system, of the inter-pathways regulation involved in DSB repair, i.e., HR, c-NHEJ, SSA, and MMEJ. Our model recapitulates the well-characterized HR activity observed in wild-type cells in response to DSBs. It also recovers clinically relevant behaviors of BRCA1/FANCS mutants, and their corresponding drug resistance mechanisms ascribed to DNA repair gain-of-function pathogenic variants. Since epigenetic modifiers are dynamic and possible druggable targets, we incorporated them into our model to better characterize their involvement in DSB repair. Our model predicted that loss of the TIP60 complex and its corresponding histone acetylation activity leads to activation of SSA in response to DSBs. Our experimental validation showed that TIP60 effectively prevents activation of RAD52, a key SSA executor, and confirms the suitable use of Boolean network modeling for understanding DNA DSB repair.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-5193
1095-8541
1095-8541
DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111608