Balancing ecology and practicality to rank waterbodies for preventative invasive species management
‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. An approach that ranks individual locations, such as waterbodies, for EDRR by combining an invasiv...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Ecological solutions and evidence Ročník 5; číslo 3 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Hoboken
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.07.2024
Wiley |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 2688-8319, 2688-8319 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. An approach that ranks individual locations, such as waterbodies, for EDRR by combining an invasive species' establishment risk with the practicality of managing it could help set reasonable priorities.
Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA, and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that (1) estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, (2) scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced and (3) combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. As our focal species, we used giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta), a floating aquatic fern ranked among the worst weeds in the world due to its negative socio‐ecological impacts and difficulty to eradicate once established.
Current establishment risk is low for much of our study area, but under future climate scenarios (RCP 8.5), areas with >60% giant salvinia establishment risk increased from 546 km2 to 30,219 km2 between 2023 and 2040 in Arkansas.
We found giant salvinia establishment risk and eradication difficulty are independent of each other (r = 0.28), and it follows that, alone, early detection tools such as species distribution models are insufficient for managers to prioritize sites for EDRR.
Practical implication: We envision our approach fitting into a potential EDRR workflow that cascades from broad‐ to local‐scale. To illustrate, (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. Given that climate change makes predicting invasive species' distributions a moving target, combining co‐produced eradication difficulty scoring with species distribution modelling will balance rigour with practicality when prioritizing locations for EDRR.
“Early detection and rapid response” (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced, and combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. We envision our approach fitting into this potential EDRR workflow (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Abstract ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. An approach that ranks individual locations, such as waterbodies, for EDRR by combining an invasive species' establishment risk with the practicality of managing it could help set reasonable priorities. Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA, and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that (1) estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, (2) scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced and (3) combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. As our focal species, we used giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta), a floating aquatic fern ranked among the worst weeds in the world due to its negative socio‐ecological impacts and difficulty to eradicate once established. Current establishment risk is low for much of our study area, but under future climate scenarios (RCP 8.5), areas with >60% giant salvinia establishment risk increased from 546 km2 to 30,219 km2 between 2023 and 2040 in Arkansas. We found giant salvinia establishment risk and eradication difficulty are independent of each other (r = 0.28), and it follows that, alone, early detection tools such as species distribution models are insufficient for managers to prioritize sites for EDRR. Practical implication: We envision our approach fitting into a potential EDRR workflow that cascades from broad‐ to local‐scale. To illustrate, (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. Given that climate change makes predicting invasive species' distributions a moving target, combining co‐produced eradication difficulty scoring with species distribution modelling will balance rigour with practicality when prioritizing locations for EDRR. ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. An approach that ranks individual locations, such as waterbodies, for EDRR by combining an invasive species' establishment risk with the practicality of managing it could help set reasonable priorities. Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA, and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that (1) estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, (2) scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced and (3) combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. As our focal species, we used giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta), a floating aquatic fern ranked among the worst weeds in the world due to its negative socio‐ecological impacts and difficulty to eradicate once established. Current establishment risk is low for much of our study area, but under future climate scenarios (RCP 8.5), areas with >60% giant salvinia establishment risk increased from 546 km2 to 30,219 km2 between 2023 and 2040 in Arkansas. We found giant salvinia establishment risk and eradication difficulty are independent of each other (r = 0.28), and it follows that, alone, early detection tools such as species distribution models are insufficient for managers to prioritize sites for EDRR. Practical implication: We envision our approach fitting into a potential EDRR workflow that cascades from broad‐ to local‐scale. To illustrate, (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. Given that climate change makes predicting invasive species' distributions a moving target, combining co‐produced eradication difficulty scoring with species distribution modelling will balance rigour with practicality when prioritizing locations for EDRR. ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. An approach that ranks individual locations, such as waterbodies, for EDRR by combining an invasive species' establishment risk with the practicality of managing it could help set reasonable priorities. Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA, and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that (1) estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, (2) scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced and (3) combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. As our focal species, we used giant salvinia ( Salvinia molesta ), a floating aquatic fern ranked among the worst weeds in the world due to its negative socio‐ecological impacts and difficulty to eradicate once established. Current establishment risk is low for much of our study area, but under future climate scenarios (RCP 8.5), areas with >60% giant salvinia establishment risk increased from 546 km 2 to 30,219 km 2 between 2023 and 2040 in Arkansas. We found giant salvinia establishment risk and eradication difficulty are independent of each other ( r = 0.28), and it follows that, alone, early detection tools such as species distribution models are insufficient for managers to prioritize sites for EDRR. Practical implication : We envision our approach fitting into a potential EDRR workflow that cascades from broad‐ to local‐scale. To illustrate, (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. Given that climate change makes predicting invasive species' distributions a moving target, combining co‐produced eradication difficulty scoring with species distribution modelling will balance rigour with practicality when prioritizing locations for EDRR. ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. An approach that ranks individual locations, such as waterbodies, for EDRR by combining an invasive species' establishment risk with the practicality of managing it could help set reasonable priorities. Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA, and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that (1) estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, (2) scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced and (3) combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. As our focal species, we used giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta), a floating aquatic fern ranked among the worst weeds in the world due to its negative socio‐ecological impacts and difficulty to eradicate once established. Current establishment risk is low for much of our study area, but under future climate scenarios (RCP 8.5), areas with >60% giant salvinia establishment risk increased from 546 km2 to 30,219 km2 between 2023 and 2040 in Arkansas. We found giant salvinia establishment risk and eradication difficulty are independent of each other (r = 0.28), and it follows that, alone, early detection tools such as species distribution models are insufficient for managers to prioritize sites for EDRR. Practical implication: We envision our approach fitting into a potential EDRR workflow that cascades from broad‐ to local‐scale. To illustrate, (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. Given that climate change makes predicting invasive species' distributions a moving target, combining co‐produced eradication difficulty scoring with species distribution modelling will balance rigour with practicality when prioritizing locations for EDRR. “Early detection and rapid response” (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR actions with limited resources is challenging. Here, we worked with regional practitioners in Arkansas, USA and the broader Southeastern USA to co‐produce a workflow for preventative aquatic invasive species management that estimates establishment risk under current and future climates with a species distribution model, scores waterbodies according to difficulty of eradicating an aquatic invasive species if it were introduced, and combines establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores to rank waterbodies according to preventative management priority. We envision our approach fitting into this potential EDRR workflow (1) horizon scanning and/or climate matching generates lists of high‐risk invasive species; (2) species lists are narrowed according to eradication feasibility scores; (3) for all remaining species, all waterbodies across a geography of interest receive prioritization rankings based on establishment risk and eradication difficulty scores. |
| Author | Rogosch, Jane S. Roberts, Caleb P. Peterson, Miranda R. LaBrie, Lindsey A. P. Horton, Matthew L. Grant, William E. Wang, Hsiao‐Hsuan |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Caleb P. orcidid: 0000-0002-8716-0423 surname: Roberts fullname: Roberts, Caleb P. email: cr065@uark.edu organization: University of Arkansas – sequence: 2 givenname: William E. surname: Grant fullname: Grant, William E. organization: Texas A&M University – sequence: 3 givenname: Matthew L. surname: Horton fullname: Horton, Matthew L. organization: Arkansas Game & Fish Commission – sequence: 4 givenname: Lindsey A. P. orcidid: 0000-0002-9401-925X surname: LaBrie fullname: LaBrie, Lindsey A. P. organization: University of Arkansas – sequence: 5 givenname: Miranda R. surname: Peterson fullname: Peterson, Miranda R. organization: Texas A&M University – sequence: 6 givenname: Jane S. orcidid: 0000-0002-1748-4991 surname: Rogosch fullname: Rogosch, Jane S. organization: Texas Tech University – sequence: 7 givenname: Hsiao‐Hsuan surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Hsiao‐Hsuan organization: Texas A&M University |
| BookMark | eNqFkUtP4zAUha0RSDzXbCOxLvUrjrMEBDNISCyYWVvXzk3lTmoXOxT13-M0IzQ7Vr46-s7xfZyRoxADEnLF6A2jlC-50nqhBWtvGBeK_yCnX8rRf_UJucx5TYtDsJq19JS4OxggOB9WFbo4xNW-gtBV2wRu9A4GP-6rMVYJwt_qA0ZMNnYec9XHVCDcYRhh9DusfNhBnoq8RTcRGwiwwk0BLshxD0PGy3_vOfnz-PD7_tfi-eXn0_3t88KJpuEL0WvWOtkBaialsp2WljdOQYuo6x4lBe0c5bQVsme0lgcbCMud1ZRZcU6e5twuwtpsk99A2psI3hyEmFYGUplqQIM9l61UqtaukcL2rbW17CgWhWlLm5J1PWdtU3x7xzyadXxPobRvBGOMKlWaLdRyplyKOSfsv35l1EyHMdPqzbR6czhMcajZ8eEH3H-Hm4fXFzEbPwEXyZGn |
| Cites_doi | 10.1002/joc.3413 10.1111/1365-2664.12599 10.3391/mbi.2020.11.1.05 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113318 10.1890/070073 10.1017/S0030605312001263 10.1016/0304-3770(83)90019-0 10.1890/07-2153.1 10.1111/wre.12136 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1961.tb00030.x 10.1111/gcb.15280 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.052 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.013 10.1007/s10530-019-02156-w 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00485.x 10.1111/ecog.04890 10.1007/s10530‐020‐02453‐9 10.1111/test.12204 10.1145/1015330.1015412 10.1890/090029 10.1073/pnas.2004289117 10.1007/s10530-011-0160-2 10.3897/neobiota.60.54579 10.1073/pnas.1609633114 10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00020.1 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x 10.1079/PAVSNNR201914020 10.1111/cobi.12347 10.1111/gcb.15313 10.1007/s10530-022-02976-3 10.1111/aec.12528 10.1111/ecog.01881 10.1086/697966 10.1371/journal.pone.0033877 10.1007/s10750-021-04697-5 10.3390/d6040652 10.5849/jof.13‐089 10.1007/s10530-015-0959-3 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0518:DRFIIL]2.0.CO;2 10.1002/fsh.10512 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165606 10.1093/biosci/biz154 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. – notice: 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYCSY DOA |
| DOI | 10.1002/2688-8319.12362 |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Environmental Science Database Proquest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Environmental Science Collection DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 3 dbid: PIMPY name: Publicly Available Content Database url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Environmental Sciences Geography |
| EISSN | 2688-8319 |
| EndPage | n/a |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ef24946658c743bf9bb54d0e66518b07 1010022688831912362 10_1002_2688_8319_12362 ESO312362 |
| Genre | researchArticle |
| GeographicLocations | United States--US Arkansas |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Arkansas – name: United States--US |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Arkansas Game & Fish Commission funderid: AWD 102947; 1434‐04HQRU1567 |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 1OC 24P AAHHS ACCFJ ACCMX ACXQS ADKYN ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUYN AFKRA AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ATCPS AVUZU BENPR BHPHI CCPQU EBS EDH GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ IAO IEP ITC M~E OK1 PATMY PIMPY PYCSY WIN AAMMB AAYXX AEFGJ AFFHD AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY BANNL CITATION PHGZM PHGZT ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3772-3f819c4dae81446bd84b27c6a9ee85fe40a8cc020934f1054c3772a3b2cb801b3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001284995300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2688-8319 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 14 18:57:59 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 01:11:02 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:20:17 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:16:19 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution-NonCommercial http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3772-3f819c4dae81446bd84b27c6a9ee85fe40a8cc020934f1054c3772a3b2cb801b3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8716-0423 0000-0002-1748-4991 0000-0002-9401-925X |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/ef24946658c743bf9bb54d0e66518b07 |
| PQID | 3111066819 |
| PQPubID | 5066172 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef24946658c743bf9bb54d0e66518b07 proquest_journals_3111066819 crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12362 wiley_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12362_ESO312362 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | July–September 2024 2024-07-00 20240701 2024-07-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: July–September 2024 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken |
| PublicationTitle | Ecological solutions and evidence |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc Wiley |
| Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc – name: Wiley |
| References | e_1_2_9_2_4_1 e_1_2_9_1_15_1 e_1_2_9_1_36_1 e_1_2_9_2_2_1 e_1_2_9_1_13_1 e_1_2_9_1_34_1 e_1_2_9_1_32_1 e_1_2_9_1_2_1 e_1_2_9_1_4_1 e_1_2_9_1_6_1 Chomchalow N. (e_1_2_9_1_7_1) 2011; 15 Oliver J. D. (e_1_2_9_1_33_1) 1993; 31 e_1_2_9_1_29_1 e_1_2_9_1_27_1 e_1_2_9_1_25_1 e_1_2_9_1_48_1 e_1_2_9_1_23_1 e_1_2_9_1_46_1 e_1_2_9_1_21_1 e_1_2_9_1_44_1 e_1_2_9_1_42_1 e_1_2_9_1_40_1 EDDMapS (e_1_2_9_2_5_1) 2023 e_1_2_9_2_11_1 e_1_2_9_1_8_1 e_1_2_9_1_18_1 e_1_2_9_2_8_1 e_1_2_9_1_16_1 e_1_2_9_1_39_1 e_1_2_9_2_6_1 e_1_2_9_1_14_1 e_1_2_9_1_37_1 e_1_2_9_1_12_1 e_1_2_9_1_35_1 e_1_2_9_2_3_1 e_1_2_9_1_10_1 e_1_2_9_1_31_1 e_1_2_9_1_3_1 e_1_2_9_1_5_1 McFarland D. G. (e_1_2_9_1_30_1) 2004 Cozad A. (e_1_2_9_1_11_1) 2019; 57 e_1_2_9_1_28_1 e_1_2_9_1_49_1 e_1_2_9_1_26_1 e_1_2_9_1_47_1 e_1_2_9_1_24_1 e_1_2_9_1_45_1 e_1_2_9_1_22_1 e_1_2_9_1_43_1 e_1_2_9_1_20_1 e_1_2_9_1_41_1 e_1_2_9_2_12_1 e_1_2_9_2_10_1 Coetzee J. A. (e_1_2_9_1_9_1) 2020; 15 e_1_2_9_1_19_1 e_1_2_9_2_9_1 e_1_2_9_1_17_1 e_1_2_9_1_38_1 e_1_2_9_2_7_1 |
| References_xml | – ident: e_1_2_9_1_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_2_1 doi: 10.1002/joc.3413 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_22_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12599 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_3_1 doi: 10.3391/mbi.2020.11.1.05 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113318 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_49_1 doi: 10.1890/070073 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_12_1 doi: 10.1017/S0030605312001263 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_16_1 doi: 10.1016/0304-3770(83)90019-0 – volume: 15 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_9_1_7_1 article-title: Giant Salvinia—An invasive alien aquatic plant in Thailand publication-title: AU Journal of Technology – ident: e_1_2_9_1_37_1 doi: 10.1890/07-2153.1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_35_1 doi: 10.1111/wre.12136 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_20_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1961.tb00030.x – ident: e_1_2_9_1_6_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.15280 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_34_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.052 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.013 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_40_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-019-02156-w – ident: e_1_2_9_1_8_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00485.x – ident: e_1_2_9_1_19_1 doi: 10.1111/ecog.04890 – start-page: 33 volume-title: Salvinia molesta DS Mitchell (Giant salvinia) in the United States: A review of species ecology and approaches to management year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_9_1_30_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_42_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530‐020‐02453‐9 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_28_1 doi: 10.1111/test.12204 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_38_1 doi: 10.1145/1015330.1015412 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_15_1 doi: 10.1890/090029 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_12_1 – volume: 57 start-page: 62 year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_9_1_11_1 article-title: Integrated management of giant salvinia using herbicides and the salvinia weevil publication-title: Journal of Aquatic Plant Management – ident: e_1_2_9_2_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_11_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_27_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004289117 – volume-title: Early Detection & Distribution Mapping System year: 2023 ident: e_1_2_9_2_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_45_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_10_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_39_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-011-0160-2 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_17_1 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.60.54579 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_31_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609633114 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_44_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_26_1 doi: 10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00020.1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x – volume: 31 start-page: 227 year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_9_1_33_1 article-title: A review of the biology of giant salvinia publication-title: Journal of Aquatic Plant Management – ident: e_1_2_9_1_43_1 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201914020 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_14_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.12347 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_18_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.15313 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_24_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-022-02976-3 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_41_1 doi: 10.1111/aec.12528 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_32_1 doi: 10.1111/ecog.01881 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_7_1 doi: 10.1086/697966 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_48_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033877 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_23_1 doi: 10.1007/s10750-021-04697-5 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_47_1 doi: 10.3390/d6040652 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_46_1 doi: 10.5849/jof.13‐089 – ident: e_1_2_9_2_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_4_1 doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-0959-3 – volume: 15 start-page: 1 issue: 33 year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_9_1_9_1 article-title: Salvinia molesta D. Mitch. (Salviniaceae): Impact and control publication-title: CABI Reviews – ident: e_1_2_9_1_21_1 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0518:DRFIIL]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_10_1 doi: 10.1002/fsh.10512 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_29_1 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165606 – ident: e_1_2_9_1_36_1 doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz154 |
| SSID | ssj0002315190 |
| Score | 2.260599 |
| Snippet | ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized EDRR... Abstract ‘Early detection and rapid response’ (EDRR) is the most successful framework for preventative invasive species management, but prioritizing localized... |
| SourceID | doaj proquest crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| SubjectTerms | Aquatic plants aquatic weeds biological invasions Climate change Climate models Climate prediction co‐production early detection and rapid response Eradication eradication feasibility Ferns Floating plants Geographical distribution Geography Introduced species Invasive species Moving targets Nonnative species species distribution models Workflow |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NT9wwEB21UKm9lEKL2AKVDxx6SdeJvYlzqrpoEact6ofEzfJny4EEdrdU_PvOeL0LXMqBW-Q4VqI343l2xm8AjiKSAmVcWzQhykJGJwrjyrKItWxdKQx3nqdiE810qs7P27O84TbPaZWrOTFN1L53tEc-FOiUGB4xgH2-ui6oahT9Xc0lNJ7DJimVoZ1vjifTs2_rXRZkL0hR-ErTh1fDqkbTUGh4n0h3pHoQjpJq_wOqeZ-wpohzsvXUd30DrzPXZF-WxrENz0K3A7uTu6NteDP79nwHXuZ66L9v34IbU8ajw7DGQpK1vmWm8ywfqUrUnS16RgXf2V9D0PSUjciQAWOnJAqVBMXZRXdjKEGe0YlO6nG5Trd5Bz9PJj-OT4tcjqFwAjl4ISJ-kJPeBEWLSOuVtFXjatOGoEYxSG6Uc0g_WyEj0jaZHjPCVs5iHLRiFza6vgt7wPjIlnXtS4PsR0qvWhNwNBWqGBrOfRjAxxUq-mqpuqGX-sqVJgA1AagTgAMYE2rrbiSXnRr62S-dvU-HiKtMWSPbcsiYbGytHUnPA7aUyvJmAAcrIHX24bm-Q3EAw2QHj72Lnnz_KtLV-_8PuA-vKiRHy7TfA9hYzP6EQ3jhbhYX89mHbMT_APaw-XI priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access dbid: 24P link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ2_T8QgFMeJUQcXfxurp2FwcKlHC9fSUc0ZJzVRk9sIUDAO9sz1PON_73u011MXY-LWUGhaHq_vA3l8IeTEAxRIbYs4d17Ewlsea5sksc9EYROumS1ZOGwiv7mRo1Fx12YT4l6YRh-iW3BDzwj_a3Rwber-QjQ0zcDGEkbQGQqIwF94JUl4jgM7FXfdMgvgCzAKrrR09ecCPyzt_3jGt9gUJPy_cedXeg3h52rjH158k6y37EnPm8GyRZZctU32houtbnCz9fV6h9gLzHq0ENqoC9LWH1RXJW23VQV8p9MxxUPf6btG84wxI5ECBUOlIAwVRMXpczXTmCRPcVcn1njpUm52yePV8OHyOm6PZIgtBw6PuQeCsKLUTuJE0pRSmDS3mS6ckwPvBNPSWkDQggsP6CZCM81Nag3EQsP3yHI1rtw-oWxgkiwrEw0EJEQpC-3gadKl3uWMlS4ip3NjqNdGeUM1Gsupwi5U2IUqdGFELtBYXTWUzA4F48mTaj1QOQ8zTZEBcVmgJuMLYwaiZA5KEmlYHpHe3NSq9eNacQgFAGXw0RHpB6P-9i5qeH_Lw9XBn1sckrUUmKnJBu6R5enkzR2RVTubPteT4zCwPwF4f_XI priority: 102 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| Title | Balancing ecology and practicality to rank waterbodies for preventative invasive species management |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2F2688-8319.12362 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3111066819 https://doaj.org/article/ef24946658c743bf9bb54d0e66518b07 |
| Volume | 5 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001284995300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20200101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20200101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Environmental Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: PATMY dateStart: 20200701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/environmentalscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20200701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20200701 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Free Content customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: WIN dateStart: 20200101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 2688-8319 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002315190 issn: 2688-8319 databaseCode: 24P dateStart: 20200101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1BT9swFH5iwGEXtMEQHVD5wIFLqGO7iX1cUREcKBEbgp0s27ElJi2daGHav-fZSUs59bJb7DiR856d77P03vcATgKSAmmcykofRCaC45lxeZ6FQiiXc0NdTVOxiXIykQ8Pqlop9RVjwlp54NZwAx_wgCAKBEqHYGeDsnYoauqxJ5e2zSOnpVo5TP1KIi6IZIoutHwoG7ACl4TEBXcW9UbYOxhKav3vKOYqUU1Ic_EJdjqKSL61U_sMG77Zhf3xW0Ya3uy25GwP3CgGJzpEIOKTAvU_YpqadNlPiWWT-ZTE2uzkr4lWnMbAQYJkFQcl_aak_U0emxcTY9lJTL6MI34vI2O-wN3F-Mf5ZdZVTsgcR7qc8YBA70RtvIznPVtLYVnpCqO8l8PgBTXSOWSKiouADEukxwy3zFmELMv3YbOZNv4ACB3avCjq3CBREaKWynh8m_Qs-JLS2vfgdGFI_acVyNCtFDLT0eY62lwnm_dgFA29HBaVrVMH-lt3_tbr_N2Do4WbdLfdZprjHxu5E350DwbJdevmosffb3i6-vo_ZnUIHxmynTaO9wg250_P_hi23cv8cfbUhw9MVH3YGo0n1W0_rVRsVVfX1U9s3V9NXgHoX-sN |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwEB6VLVK58ChULBTwASQuYR3HmzgHhChs1VXbZSWKVE7GT9pDk7K7tNo_xW9k7CRbeoFTD9wixxnl8XnmG2ceAC89kgKhTJkUzvOEe5MlyqRp4nNemjRT1Fgam00Uk4k4Pi6na_Cry4UJYZWdToyK2tYm7JEPMlyUaB7RgL07_5GErlHh72rXQqOBxb5bXqLLNn87_ojf9xVju6OjD3tJ21UgMRlSySTzKMNwq5wIvpC2gmtWmFyVzomhd5wqYQyyqDLjHtkHj5epTDOjUZ3rDOXegnUewN6D9en4cPp1tauDbAkpEe1qCFE2YDlCUSDQ34Q6J-ya-YtdAq5R2z8JcrRwu_f-t3dzH-62XJq8b8D_ANZctQlbo6vUPTzZ6q75Jmy0_d5Plg_B7ISIToNmm7hYtntJVGVJmzIWXROyqEloaE8uVYBeHaItCTJ8nBSLXsWC6eS0ulAhAYCEjNUw42wVTvQIvtzIw29Br6or9xgIHeo0z22qkN1xbkWpHEoTjnlXUGpdH153KJDnTVUR2dSPZjIARgbAyAiYPuwElKymhXLgcaCefZetdpHOoxfNc2STBhmh9qXWQ26pw5FUaFr0YbsDjmx11FxeoaYPg4i7f92LHH3-lMWjJ38X-AI29o4OD-TBeLL_FO4wJIJNiPM29Bazn-4Z3DYXi9P57Hm7gAh8u2lc_ga0HFVy |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9QwEB6VLQIuPApVFwr4ABKXsI7tTZwDQi3dFVVhWYkilZNrOzb00KTsLq32r_HrGDvJll7g1AO3yHFGeXye-caZB8ALj6RAalskufMiEd7yRNs0TXwmCptyTW1JY7OJfDKRR0fFdA1-dbkwIayy04lRUZe1DXvkA46LEs0jGrCBb8Mipnvjt2c_ktBBKvxp7dppNBA5cMsLdN_mb_b38Fu_ZGw8Onz3Pmk7DCSWI61MuEd5VpTayeAXmVIKw3Kb6cI5OfROUC2tRUZVcOGRiYh4meaGWYOq3XCUewPWZZZT2YP16c7hx6-rHR5kTkiPaFdPiLIByxCWEkH_OtQ8YVdMYewYcIXm_kmWo7Ub3_uf39N9uNtybLLTLIoHsOaqDdgcXab04clWp8034HbbB_778iHY3RDpadGcExfLeS-JrkrSppJFl4UsahIa3ZMLHSBZhyhMgswfJ8ViWLGQOjmpznVIDCAhkzXMOF2FGT2CL9fy8JvQq-rKbQGhQ5NmWZlqZH1ClLLQDqVJx7zLKS1dH151iFBnTbUR1dSVZiqARwXwqAiePuwGxKymhTLhcaCefVOt1lHOo3ctMmSZFpmi8YUxQ1FShyOpNDTvw3YHItXqrrm6RFAfBhGD_7oXNfr8icejx38X-BxuIRjVh_3JwRO4w5AfNpHP29BbzH66p3DTni9O5rNn7VoicHzdsPwNVdVeLw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing+ecology+and+practicality+to+rank+waterbodies+for+preventative+invasive+species+management&rft.jtitle=Ecological+solutions+and+evidence&rft.au=Caleb+P.+Roberts&rft.au=William+E.+Grant&rft.au=Matthew+L.+Horton&rft.au=Lindsey+A.+P.+LaBrie&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.pub=Wiley&rft.eissn=2688-8319&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n%2Fa&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2F2688-8319.12362&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_ef24946658c743bf9bb54d0e66518b07 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2688-8319&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2688-8319&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2688-8319&client=summon |