Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Offering students formative feedback on their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. Recent advances in AI (i.e., ChatGPT) may function as an automated writing evaluation tool, increasing the amount of feedback students receive and diminishing the burden on teachers to provid...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Learning and instruction Vol. 91; p. 101894 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0959-4752 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Offering students formative feedback on their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. Recent advances in AI (i.e., ChatGPT) may function as an automated writing evaluation tool, increasing the amount of feedback students receive and diminishing the burden on teachers to provide frequent feedback to large classes.
We examined the ability of generative AI (ChatGPT) to provide formative feedback. We compared the quality of human and AI feedback by scoring the feedback each provided on secondary student essays. We scored the degree to which feedback (a) was criteria-based, (b) provided clear directions for improvement, (c) was accurate, (d) prioritized essential features, and (e) used a supportive tone.
200 pieces of human-generated formative feedback and 200 pieces of AI-generated formative feedback for the same essays.
We examined whether ChatGPT and human feedback differed in quality for the whole sample, for compositions that differed in overall quality, and for native English speakers and English learners by comparing descriptive statistics and effect sizes.
Human raters were better at providing high-quality feedback to students in all categories other than criteria-based. AI and humans showed differences in feedback quality based on essay quality. Feedback did not vary by language status for humans or AI.
Well-trained evaluators provided higher quality feedback than ChatGPT. Considering the ease of generating feedback through ChatGPT and its overall quality, generative AI may still be useful in some contexts, particularly in formative early drafts or instances where a well-trained educator is unavailable.
•Human feedback was better than ChatGPT feedback for ⅘ elements of formative feedback.•Differences between ChatGPT and humans were modest when considering the overall quality of feedback and time-savings•ChatGPT and human feedback varied in quality based on the score of the targeted essay.•ChatGPT has potential as an evaluative tool given tradeoffs between quality and time. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Offering students formative feedback on their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. Recent advances in AI (i.e., ChatGPT) may function as an automated writing evaluation tool, increasing the amount of feedback students receive and diminishing the burden on teachers to provide frequent feedback to large classes.
We examined the ability of generative AI (ChatGPT) to provide formative feedback. We compared the quality of human and AI feedback by scoring the feedback each provided on secondary student essays. We scored the degree to which feedback (a) was criteria-based, (b) provided clear directions for improvement, (c) was accurate, (d) prioritized essential features, and (e) used a supportive tone.
200 pieces of human-generated formative feedback and 200 pieces of AI-generated formative feedback for the same essays.
We examined whether ChatGPT and human feedback differed in quality for the whole sample, for compositions that differed in overall quality, and for native English speakers and English learners by comparing descriptive statistics and effect sizes.
Human raters were better at providing high-quality feedback to students in all categories other than criteria-based. AI and humans showed differences in feedback quality based on essay quality. Feedback did not vary by language status for humans or AI.
Well-trained evaluators provided higher quality feedback than ChatGPT. Considering the ease of generating feedback through ChatGPT and its overall quality, generative AI may still be useful in some contexts, particularly in formative early drafts or instances where a well-trained educator is unavailable.
•Human feedback was better than ChatGPT feedback for ⅘ elements of formative feedback.•Differences between ChatGPT and humans were modest when considering the overall quality of feedback and time-savings•ChatGPT and human feedback varied in quality based on the score of the targeted essay.•ChatGPT has potential as an evaluative tool given tradeoffs between quality and time. |
| ArticleNumber | 101894 |
| Author | Steiss, Jacob Graham, Steve Cruz, Jazmin Olson, Carol Booth Wang, Jiali Tseng, Waverly Tate, Tamara Warschauer, Mark Moon, Youngsun Hebert, Michael |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jacob orcidid: 0000-0002-8987-1990 surname: Steiss fullname: Steiss, Jacob email: jsteiss@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Tamara surname: Tate fullname: Tate, Tamara email: tatet@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Steve surname: Graham fullname: Graham, Steve email: steve.graham@asu.edu organization: Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Jazmin surname: Cruz fullname: Cruz, Jazmin email: jcruz2@wested.org organization: WestEd, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Michael surname: Hebert fullname: Hebert, Michael email: mhebert1@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: Jiali surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Jiali email: jialiw8@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: Youngsun surname: Moon fullname: Moon, Youngsun email: moonys@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 8 givenname: Waverly surname: Tseng fullname: Tseng, Waverly email: waverlyt@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 9 givenname: Mark surname: Warschauer fullname: Warschauer, Mark email: markw@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA – sequence: 10 givenname: Carol Booth surname: Olson fullname: Olson, Carol Booth email: cbolson@uci.edu organization: School of Education University of California, Irvine, USA |
| BookMark | eNqNkLFOwzAURT0UibbwDxF7ih07ccMEClBAlWAos_XqPFOX1Cm2C-rGb_B7fAmNyoCYOt3h6h7pngHpudYhIWeMjhhlxfly1CB4Z12IfqNHGc1EV4xL0SN9WuZlKmSeHZNBCEtKqRhL0ScPVbtag7fuJYkLTN420Ni4TVqTLDYrcAm4OqkWECdPs8Qg1nPQr10b4qZGF8P351fy4W3cAU7IkYEm4OlvDsnz7c2sukunj5P76mqaai6LmBopAEuda1oXwDGXGc-RZ8BZLoUpDatzLAHnGrRhbF5mkgteFGZsCiaBGj4kl3uu9m0IHo3SNkK0rYsebKMYVZ0PtVR_fajOh9r72CEu_iHW3q7Abw8bX-_HuDv5btGroC06jbX1qKOqW3sI5gdPAIpZ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s13384_025_00856_y crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2024_2430865 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41239_025_00511_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_025_00660_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2024_100975 crossref_primary_10_1177_02601060241273627 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_caeo_2025_100249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2024_105224 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejed_70014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2024_103502 crossref_primary_10_1080_03634523_2024_2398105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_caeai_2025_100380 crossref_primary_10_1080_1475939X_2025_2480807 crossref_primary_10_1515_dsll_2025_0007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13488_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2025_2519639 crossref_primary_10_1080_02602938_2025_2553104 crossref_primary_10_1002_tesq_70011 crossref_primary_10_1515_jccall_2024_0011 crossref_primary_10_1002_tesq_3390 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10956_024_10177_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amper_2025_100237 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijme_2025_101252 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2025_1644209 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2024_101130 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13609 crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_70038 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10643_024_01823_5 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_024_02004_5 crossref_primary_10_1080_17501229_2025_2525341 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_70134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acorp_2024_100106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2025_101040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103737 crossref_primary_10_19126_suje_1475474 crossref_primary_10_56893_pajes2025v06i01_03 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1049096524000817 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0261444825000199 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_79208_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2025_101003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2024_101161 crossref_primary_10_1093_elt_ccaf020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asw_2025_100960 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2025_101203 crossref_primary_10_1177_21582440251352907 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_03522_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13457_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amper_2025_100224 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_025_09875_1 crossref_primary_10_1140_epjqt_s40507_025_00310_z crossref_primary_10_1177_02655322251349217 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13649_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmal_2025_100210 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41539_024_00291_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2024_2373512 crossref_primary_10_12677_ces_2025_135316 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_70043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compcom_2025_102921 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331251365187 crossref_primary_10_36680_j_itcon_2025_058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chbah_2024_100113 crossref_primary_10_30935_cedtech_15607 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2025_102079 crossref_primary_10_1080_00098655_2025_2510298 crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_202564506014 crossref_primary_10_1515_iral_2024_0196 crossref_primary_10_3390_educsci15050567 crossref_primary_10_1177_07356331241307297 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0272263125100934 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_03543_y crossref_primary_10_1080_2331186X_2025_2559159 crossref_primary_10_3390_app15020671 crossref_primary_10_1080_14703297_2025_2536609 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_caeai_2024_100349 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jslw_2025_101181 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2025_105385 crossref_primary_10_1080_1750399X_2025_2541486 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103820 crossref_primary_10_1080_14703297_2025_2499174 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2025_105386 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejed_70172 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2025_2539797 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_12912_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_13231_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2025_105600 crossref_primary_10_70401_jbde_2025_0009 crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_3085910 crossref_primary_10_1177_00336882251357675 crossref_primary_10_1002_rrq_591 crossref_primary_10_1080_17501229_2025_2509759 crossref_primary_10_2174_0118743501364500250515043823 crossref_primary_10_3389_feduc_2024_1378564 crossref_primary_10_1080_17501229_2025_2503890 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103771 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2024_102035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compedu_2025_105414 crossref_primary_10_25100_lenguaje_v53i1S_14433 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_024_13148_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_09588221_2025_2453205 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40593_025_00484_8 crossref_primary_10_1108_MRR_11_2024_0913 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejed_12913 crossref_primary_10_3390_s25185640 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_025_13417_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_09588221_2025_2454541 crossref_primary_10_1080_14703297_2024_2437122 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13544 crossref_primary_10_1080_09588221_2025_2561608 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2025_1615752 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs15050600 crossref_primary_10_1002_tesq_70032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2025_102363 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iheduc_2025_101054 crossref_primary_10_24833_2687_0126_2025_7_1_70_88 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10212_025_00951_9 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_025_04919_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_leap_1650 crossref_primary_10_1093_applin_amaf045 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10791_025_09563_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2024_103498 crossref_primary_10_59863_FAMJ7696 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10758_024_09744_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2025_102156 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_system_2025_103837 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjet_13540 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejed_70262 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989 10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275 10.1007/s11145-018-9853-6 10.1002/tesq.340 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 10.1002/JAAL.219 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752 10.58680/ej201116413 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 10.1177/003172171309400512 10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004 10.3102/00028312221106773 10.1086/681947 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004 10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4 10.1177/0741088318819473 10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_8 10.1111/cdev.13708 10.1007/s11145-020-10046-0 10.1191/1362168806lr190oa 10.1177/0735633119830764 10.1037/a0029185 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.076 10.1504/IJLT.2013.059131 10.1037/a0013097 10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.05 10.1080/10888438.2018.1561700 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668 10.3102/003465430298487 10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019 10.3102/0091732X18821125 10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024 The Authors |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Authors |
| DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 |
| DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Education Psychology |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_learninstruc_2024_101894 S0959475224000215 |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 07C 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29L 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 6I. 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JO AABNK AACTN AADFP AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAFTH AAGJA AAGUQ AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAXKI AAXUO ABIVO ABJNI ABMAC ABMMH ABOYX ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACRLP ACRPL ACXNI ADBBV ADEZE ADHUB ADMHG ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AFJKZ AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC CS3 DU5 E.L EBS EFJIC EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HMY HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM M3Y M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OHT OKEIE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SES SEW SPCBC SSB SSO SSS SSY SSZ T5K TN5 ULY UQL VJK WUQ ~G- 9DU AATTM AAYWO AAYXX ABUFD ACLOT ACVFH ADCNI AEUPX AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKYEP APXCP CITATION EFKBS EFLBG ~HD |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-f74ae9c5c0d6a3e57235e32a31574f9f1d5e9aebcacf11b92734366f8f617a0f3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 151 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001211115000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0959-4752 |
| IngestDate | Sat Nov 29 08:14:22 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:30:28 EST 2025 Sat Mar 15 15:42:23 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Writing instruction Formative feedback Automated writing evaluation |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c376t-f74ae9c5c0d6a3e57235e32a31574f9f1d5e9aebcacf11b92734366f8f617a0f3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8987-1990 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2024_101894 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2024_101894 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2024_101894 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | June 2024 2024-06-00 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2024 text: June 2024 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Learning and instruction |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
| References | Clare, Valdes, Patthey-Chavez (bib29) 2000 Warschauer, Tseng, Yim, Webster, Jacob, Du, Tate (bib66) 2023; 62 Goldman, Britt, Brown, Cribb, George, Greenleaf, Lee, Project (bib31) 2016; 51 Underwood, Tregidgo (bib52) 2006; 22 (bib47) 2024 Xu, Aubele, Vigil, Bustamante, Kim, Warschauer (bib59) 2022; 93 Zhu, Liu, Lee (bib61) 2020; 143 Andrade, Du (bib2) 2005; 10 Black, Wiliam (bib22) 1998; 5 Graham (bib13) 2019; 43 Graham (bib63) 2018; 53 Graham, Hebert, Harris (bib9) 2015; 115 Beach, Friedrich (bib20) 2006 Grimes, Warschauer (bib6) 2010; 8 Busse (bib25) 2013; 22 (bib30) 2012 Panadero, Jonsson (bib41) 2013; 9 Warschauer, Ware (bib4) 2006; 10 Lawrence, Galloway, Yim, Lin (bib35) 2013; 57 Bai, Hu (bib19) 2017; 37 Stevenson, Phakiti (bib49) 2014; 19 Camping, Graham, Ng, Aitken, Wilson, Wdowin (bib26) 2020; 33 Kluger, DeNisi (bib68) 1996; 119 Graham (bib15) 2023 Graham, McKeown, Kiuhara, Harris (bib8) 2012; 104 Shermis (bib48) 2014; 20 (bib1) 2015 Du, Q., & Tate, T.. (in press). ChatGPT, plagiarism, and multilingual students learning to write. CATESOL Journal. Zhai, Ma (bib60) 2022; 35 Tate, Collins, Xu, Yau, Krishnan, Prado, Warschauer (bib64) 2019; 23 Black, Wiliam (bib23) 2009; 21 Kiuhara, Graham, Hawken (bib5) 2009; 101 Wilson, Roscoe (bib58) 2020; 58 Roscoe, Varner, Crossley, McNamara (bib45) 2013; 8 Wilson, Czik (bib56) 2016; 100 MacArthur (bib37) 2016 Graham, Harris, Hebert (bib7) 2011 Graham, Harris, Chambers (bib10) 2016; 2 Macarthur, Graham, Harris (bib69) 2004 Moore, MacArthur (bib39) 2016; 8 Chen, Hebert, Wilson (bib27) 2022; 59 Roscoe, Wilson, Johnson, Mayra (bib46) 2017; 70 Hillocks (bib33) 1986 Su, Lin, Lai (bib50) 2023; 57 Tate, Doroudi, Ritchie, Xu (bib65) Wilson, MacArthur (bib55) 2024 Van Steendam, Rijlaarsdam, Sercu, Van den Bergh (bib53) 2010; 20 Wilson, Myers, Potter (bib57) 2022 Breakstone, Smith, Wineburg (bib24) 2013; 94 Wagner, Parra, Proctor (bib54) 2017; 51 Parr, Timperley (bib43) 2010; 15 Kluger, DeNisi (bib34) 1998; 7 Applebee, Langer (bib3) 2011; 100 Panadero, Jonsson, Pinedo, Fernández-Castilla (bib42) 2023; 35 Ranalli (bib44) 2018; 31 MacArthur, Jennings, Philippakos (bib38) 2019; 32 Troia, Shen, Brandon (bib51) 2019; 36 Hattie, Timperley (bib32) 2007; 77 Motz, Canning, Green, Mallon, Quick (bib40) 2021; 2 Cho, MacArthur (bib28) 2010; 20 Biber, Nekrasova, Horn (bib21) 2011; 2011 Graham (bib62) 2018 Kluger (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib68) 1996; 119 Wilson (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib55) 2024 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib10) 2016; 2 Black (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib22) 1998; 5 Macarthur (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib69) 2004 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib7) 2011 MacArthur (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib37) 2016 Troia (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib51) 2019; 36 Motz (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib40) 2021; 2 Van Steendam (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib53) 2010; 20 Clare (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib29) 2000 (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib30) 2012 Parr (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib43) 2010; 15 Chen (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib27) 2022; 59 MacArthur (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib38) 2019; 32 Zhu (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib61) 2020; 143 Panadero (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib42) 2023; 35 Stevenson (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib49) 2014; 19 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib67 (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib47) 2024 Roscoe (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib45) 2013; 8 Roscoe (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib46) 2017; 70 Grimes (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib6) 2010; 8 Xu (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib59) 2022; 93 Beach (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib20) 2006 Shermis (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib48) 2014; 20 Zhai (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib60) 2022; 35 (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib1) 2015 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib8) 2012; 104 Camping (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib26) 2020; 33 Underwood (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib52) 2006; 22 Moore (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib39) 2016; 8 Black (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib23) 2009; 21 Goldman (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib31) 2016; 51 Biber (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib21) 2011; 2011 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib13) 2019; 43 Kluger (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib34) 1998; 7 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib63) 2018; 53 Applebee (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib3) 2011; 100 Ranalli (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib44) 2018; 31 Busse (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib25) 2013; 22 Breakstone (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib24) 2013; 94 Wagner (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib54) 2017; 51 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib15) 2023 Hillocks (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib33) 1986 Su (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib50) 2023; 57 Wilson (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib57) 2022 Hattie (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib32) 2007; 77 Tate (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib65) Bai (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib19) 2017; 37 Tate (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib64) 2019; 23 Panadero (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib41) 2013; 9 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib62) 2018 Warschauer (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib4) 2006; 10 Andrade (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib2) 2005; 10 Warschauer (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib66) 2023; 62 Wilson (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib56) 2016; 100 Cho (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib28) 2010; 20 Graham (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib9) 2015; 115 Wilson (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib58) 2020; 58 Lawrence (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib35) 2013; 57 Kiuhara (10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib5) 2009; 101 |
| References_xml | – volume: 22 start-page: 73 year: 2006 end-page: 98 ident: bib52 article-title: Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations publication-title: Journal of Teaching Writing – volume: 70 start-page: 207 year: 2017 end-page: 221 ident: bib46 article-title: Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior – volume: 59 start-page: 1122 year: 2022 end-page: 1156 ident: bib27 article-title: Examining human and automated ratings of elementary students' writing quality: A multivariate generalizability theory application publication-title: American Educational Research Journal – volume: 101 start-page: 136 year: 2009 ident: bib5 article-title: Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology – volume: 37 start-page: 67 year: 2017 end-page: 81 ident: bib19 article-title: In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? publication-title: Educational Psychology – volume: 57 start-page: 151 year: 2013 end-page: 161 ident: bib35 article-title: Learning to write in middle school? Insights into adolescent writers' instructional experiences across content areas publication-title: Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy – year: 2024 ident: bib47 publication-title: Routledge international handbook of automated essay evaluation – volume: 8 start-page: 149 year: 2016 end-page: 175 ident: bib39 article-title: Student use of automated essay evaluation technology during revision publication-title: Journal of Writing Research – volume: 51 start-page: 438 year: 2017 end-page: 449 ident: bib54 article-title: The interplay between student-led discussions and argumentative writing publication-title: Tesol Quarterly – volume: 100 start-page: 94 year: 2016 end-page: 109 ident: bib56 article-title: Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality publication-title: Computers & Education – start-page: 1 year: 2022 end-page: 17 ident: bib57 article-title: Investigating the promise of automated writing evaluation for supporting formative writing assessment at scale publication-title: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice – volume: 100 start-page: 14 year: 2011 end-page: 27 ident: bib3 article-title: "EJ" extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools publication-title: English Journal – volume: 57 year: 2023 ident: bib50 article-title: Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms publication-title: Assessing Writing – volume: 32 start-page: 1553 year: 2019 end-page: 1574 ident: bib38 article-title: Which linguistic features predict quality of argumentative writing for college basic writers, and how do those features change with instruction? publication-title: Reading and Writing – volume: 8 start-page: 362 year: 2013 end-page: 381 ident: bib45 article-title: Developing pedagogically-guided algorithms for intelligent writing feedback publication-title: International Journal of Learning Technology – volume: 7 start-page: 67 year: 1998 end-page: 72 ident: bib34 article-title: Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword publication-title: Current Directions in Psychological Science – year: 2015 ident: bib1 article-title: Top 20 principles from psychology for preK–12 teaching and learning – start-page: 222 year: 2006 end-page: 234 ident: bib20 article-title: Response to writing publication-title: Handbook of writing research – volume: 119 start-page: 254 year: 1996 ident: bib68 article-title: The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory publication-title: Psychological bulletin – volume: 19 start-page: 51 year: 2014 end-page: 65 ident: bib49 article-title: The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing publication-title: Assessing Writing – volume: 10 start-page: 157 year: 2006 end-page: 180 ident: bib4 article-title: Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda publication-title: Language Teaching Research – volume: 58 start-page: 87 year: 2020 end-page: 125 ident: bib58 article-title: Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research – volume: 10 start-page: 3 year: 2005 ident: bib2 article-title: Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment publication-title: Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation – year: 2000 ident: bib29 article-title: (No. 526) – volume: 22 start-page: 406 year: 2013 end-page: 424 ident: bib25 article-title: How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration publication-title: Journal of Second Language Writing – volume: 20 start-page: 328 year: 2010 end-page: 338 ident: bib28 article-title: Student revision with peer and expert reviewing publication-title: Learning and Instruction – volume: 35 start-page: 2817 year: 2022 end-page: 2842 ident: bib60 article-title: Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students' acceptance publication-title: Computer Assisted Language Learning – volume: 115 start-page: 523 year: 2015 end-page: 547 ident: bib9 article-title: Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis publication-title: The Elementary School Journal – volume: 8 year: 2010 ident: bib6 article-title: Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation publication-title: The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment – volume: 35 start-page: 113 year: 2023 ident: bib42 article-title: Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review publication-title: Educational Psychology Review – volume: 23 start-page: 287 year: 2019 end-page: 304 ident: bib64 article-title: Visual-syntactic text format: Improving adolescent literacy publication-title: Scientific Studies of Reading – start-page: 272 year: 2016 end-page: 287 ident: bib37 article-title: Instruction in evaluation and revision publication-title: Handbook of writing research – volume: 143 year: 2020 ident: bib61 article-title: The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing publication-title: Computers & Education – volume: 21 start-page: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 31 ident: bib23 article-title: Developing the theory of formative assessment publication-title: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability – volume: 77 start-page: 81 year: 2007 end-page: 112 ident: bib32 article-title: The power of feedback publication-title: Review of Educational Research – start-page: 145 year: 2018 end-page: 168 ident: bib62 article-title: Instructional feedback in writing – volume: 93 start-page: e149 year: 2022 end-page: e167 ident: bib59 article-title: Dialogue with a conversational agent promotes children's story comprehension via enhancing engagement publication-title: Child Development – volume: 94 start-page: 53 year: 2013 end-page: 57 ident: bib24 article-title: Beyond the bubble in history/social studies assessments publication-title: Phi Delta Kappan – year: 1986 ident: bib33 article-title: Research on written composition: New directions for teaching – volume: 51 start-page: 219 year: 2016 end-page: 246 ident: bib31 article-title: Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy publication-title: Educational Psychologist – volume: 15 start-page: 68 year: 2010 end-page: 85 ident: bib43 article-title: Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress publication-title: Assessing Writing – volume: 31 start-page: 653 year: 2018 end-page: 674 ident: bib44 article-title: Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? publication-title: Computer Assisted Language Learning – reference: Du, Q., & Tate, T.. (in press). ChatGPT, plagiarism, and multilingual students learning to write. CATESOL Journal. – volume: 62 start-page: 101071 year: 2023 ident: bib66 article-title: The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language publication-title: Journal of Second Language Writing – volume: 2011 start-page: i year: 2011 end-page: 99 ident: bib21 article-title: The effectiveness of feedback for L1‐English and L2‐writing development: A meta‐analysis publication-title: ETS Research Report Series – volume: 43 start-page: 277 year: 2019 end-page: 303 ident: bib13 article-title: Changing how writing is taught publication-title: Review of Research in Education – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 12 ident: bib40 article-title: The influence of automated praise on behavior and performance publication-title: Technology, Mind, and Behavior – start-page: 337 year: 2023 end-page: 350 ident: bib15 article-title: Writer (s)-Within-Community model of writing as a lens for studying the teaching of writing – volume: 5 start-page: 7 year: 1998 end-page: 74 ident: bib22 article-title: Assessment and classroom learning publication-title: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice – volume: 104 start-page: 879 year: 2012 ident: bib8 article-title: A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology – volume: 9 start-page: 129 year: 2013 end-page: 144 ident: bib41 article-title: The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review publication-title: Educational Research Review – volume: 36 start-page: 231 year: 2019 end-page: 266 ident: bib51 article-title: Multidimensional levels of language writing measures in grades four to six publication-title: Written Communication – volume: 33 start-page: 2361 year: 2020 end-page: 2390 ident: bib26 article-title: Writing motivational incentives of middle school emergent bilingual students publication-title: Reading and Writing – start-page: 125 year: 2004 end-page: 137 ident: bib69 article-title: Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers publication-title: Revision cognitive and instructional processes – volume: 2 start-page: 211 year: 2016 end-page: 226 ident: bib10 publication-title: Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. Handbook of Writing Research – volume: 20 start-page: 53 year: 2014 end-page: 76 ident: bib48 article-title: State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration publication-title: Assessing Writing – ident: bib65 article-title: Educational research and AI-generated writing: Confronting the coming tsunami – volume: 20 start-page: 316 year: 2010 end-page: 327 ident: bib53 article-title: The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL publication-title: Learning and Instruction – volume: 53 start-page: 258 year: 2018 end-page: 279 ident: bib63 article-title: A revised writer (s)-within-community model of writing publication-title: Educational Psychologist – year: 2012 ident: bib30 article-title: Implementing the Common Core state standards – year: 2011 ident: bib7 publication-title: . – year: 2024 ident: bib55 article-title: Exploring the role of automated writing evaluation as a formative assessment tool supporting self-regulated learning and writing publication-title: Routledge international handbook of automated essay evaluation – volume: 20 start-page: 316 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib53 article-title: The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL publication-title: Learning and Instruction doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009 – volume: 2011 start-page: i issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib21 article-title: The effectiveness of feedback for L1‐English and L2‐writing development: A meta‐analysis publication-title: ETS Research Report Series doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x – volume: 7 start-page: 67 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib34 article-title: Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword publication-title: Current Directions in Psychological Science doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989 – volume: 37 start-page: 67 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib19 article-title: In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? publication-title: Educational Psychology doi: 10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275 – volume: 32 start-page: 1553 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib38 article-title: Which linguistic features predict quality of argumentative writing for college basic writers, and how do those features change with instruction? publication-title: Reading and Writing doi: 10.1007/s11145-018-9853-6 – ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib65 – volume: 51 start-page: 438 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib54 article-title: The interplay between student-led discussions and argumentative writing publication-title: Tesol Quarterly doi: 10.1002/tesq.340 – start-page: 337 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib15 article-title: Writer (s)-Within-Community model of writing as a lens for studying the teaching of writing – volume: 21 start-page: 5 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib23 article-title: Developing the theory of formative assessment publication-title: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 – volume: 57 start-page: 151 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib35 article-title: Learning to write in middle school? Insights into adolescent writers' instructional experiences across content areas publication-title: Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy doi: 10.1002/JAAL.219 – volume: 20 start-page: 328 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib28 article-title: Student revision with peer and expert reviewing publication-title: Learning and Instruction doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 – volume: 57 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib50 article-title: Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms publication-title: Assessing Writing doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752 – volume: 100 start-page: 14 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib3 article-title: "EJ" extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools publication-title: English Journal doi: 10.58680/ej201116413 – volume: 62 start-page: 101071 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib66 article-title: The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language publication-title: Journal of Second Language Writing doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071 – volume: 22 start-page: 406 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib25 article-title: How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration publication-title: Journal of Second Language Writing doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005 – volume: 51 start-page: 219 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib31 article-title: Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy publication-title: Educational Psychologist doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741 – volume: 119 start-page: 254 issue: 2 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib68 article-title: The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory publication-title: Psychological bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 – volume: 19 start-page: 51 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib49 article-title: The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing publication-title: Assessing Writing doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007 – volume: 9 start-page: 129 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib41 article-title: The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review publication-title: Educational Research Review doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 – volume: 94 start-page: 53 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib24 article-title: Beyond the bubble in history/social studies assessments publication-title: Phi Delta Kappan doi: 10.1177/003172171309400512 – volume: 15 start-page: 68 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib43 article-title: Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress publication-title: Assessing Writing doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004 – volume: 59 start-page: 1122 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib27 article-title: Examining human and automated ratings of elementary students' writing quality: A multivariate generalizability theory application publication-title: American Educational Research Journal doi: 10.3102/00028312221106773 – volume: 5 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib22 article-title: Assessment and classroom learning publication-title: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice – volume: 115 start-page: 523 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib9 article-title: Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis publication-title: The Elementary School Journal doi: 10.1086/681947 – year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib33 – volume: 100 start-page: 94 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib56 article-title: Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004 – volume: 2 start-page: 211 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib10 publication-title: Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. Handbook of Writing Research – volume: 35 start-page: 113 issue: 4 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib42 article-title: Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review publication-title: Educational Psychology Review doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4 – volume: 36 start-page: 231 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib51 article-title: Multidimensional levels of language writing measures in grades four to six publication-title: Written Communication doi: 10.1177/0741088318819473 – start-page: 125 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib69 article-title: Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers publication-title: Revision cognitive and instructional processes doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_8 – start-page: 1 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib57 article-title: Investigating the promise of automated writing evaluation for supporting formative writing assessment at scale publication-title: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice – volume: 93 start-page: e149 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib59 article-title: Dialogue with a conversational agent promotes children's story comprehension via enhancing engagement publication-title: Child Development doi: 10.1111/cdev.13708 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib1 – volume: 33 start-page: 2361 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib26 article-title: Writing motivational incentives of middle school emergent bilingual students publication-title: Reading and Writing doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10046-0 – volume: 10 start-page: 157 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib4 article-title: Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda publication-title: Language Teaching Research doi: 10.1191/1362168806lr190oa – volume: 58 start-page: 87 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib58 article-title: Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research doi: 10.1177/0735633119830764 – volume: 104 start-page: 879 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib8 article-title: A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1037/a0029185 – volume: 53 start-page: 258 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib63 article-title: A revised writer (s)-within-community model of writing publication-title: Educational Psychologist doi: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406 – volume: 70 start-page: 207 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib46 article-title: Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.076 – volume: 8 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib6 article-title: Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation publication-title: The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment – volume: 8 start-page: 362 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib45 article-title: Developing pedagogically-guided algorithms for intelligent writing feedback publication-title: International Journal of Learning Technology doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2013.059131 – start-page: 222 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib20 article-title: Response to writing – volume: 101 start-page: 136 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib5 article-title: Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1037/a0013097 – volume: 20 start-page: 53 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib48 article-title: State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration publication-title: Assessing Writing doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001 – volume: 8 start-page: 149 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib39 article-title: Student use of automated essay evaluation technology during revision publication-title: Journal of Writing Research doi: 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.05 – year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib55 article-title: Exploring the role of automated writing evaluation as a formative assessment tool supporting self-regulated learning and writing – volume: 23 start-page: 287 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib64 article-title: Visual-syntactic text format: Improving adolescent literacy publication-title: Scientific Studies of Reading doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1561700 – volume: 143 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib61 article-title: The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing publication-title: Computers & Education doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668 – volume: 22 start-page: 73 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib52 article-title: Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations publication-title: Journal of Teaching Writing – volume: 77 start-page: 81 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib32 article-title: The power of feedback publication-title: Review of Educational Research doi: 10.3102/003465430298487 – volume: 35 start-page: 2817 issue: 9 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib60 article-title: Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students' acceptance publication-title: Computer Assisted Language Learning doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019 – ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib67 – volume: 43 start-page: 277 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib13 article-title: Changing how writing is taught publication-title: Review of Research in Education doi: 10.3102/0091732X18821125 – start-page: 272 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib37 article-title: Instruction in evaluation and revision – year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib47 – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib29 – start-page: 145 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib62 article-title: Instructional feedback in writing – volume: 31 start-page: 653 issue: 7 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib44 article-title: Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? publication-title: Computer Assisted Language Learning doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib7 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib30 – volume: 2 start-page: 1 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib40 article-title: The influence of automated praise on behavior and performance publication-title: Technology, Mind, and Behavior – volume: 10 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894_bib2 article-title: Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment publication-title: Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation |
| SSID | ssj0004874 |
| Score | 2.703298 |
| Snippet | Offering students formative feedback on their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. Recent advances in AI (i.e., ChatGPT) may function... |
| SourceID | crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 101894 |
| SubjectTerms | Automated writing evaluation Formative feedback Writing instruction |
| Title | Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 |
| Volume | 91 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001211115000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 issn: 0959-4752 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19960101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true dateEnd: 99991231 titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004874 providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEF6l0AMXRGmr8mi1h96QIzv2encPHFBEW6IKcQhVbtZ6s6uCwKAkQMKpf6N_j1_CrPfh8KiaVuJiWbZ2HWc-74zHM9-H0OdEQBCdEhkpyVSUacWikkka0VxwqcpSxzWR9o_v9PCQDQb8qNWa-V6Y6zNaVWw65Zcvamo4BsY2rbP_YO4wKRyAfTA6bMHssF3I8F2rLOi6oGzTZP0Z3crxmUR596eYfD3q72hwXaWQdW352JJcjn31A9-5MXxHzrH5jmmfSLGcTYF8NuRpJurEqrD3YKUtm7SAFeHri3MxCn6gadKupdXC15DR1a2d4fbc0YK7rEQna6qn5tKLGSUPVlqry-WWSkMVZvWNn6ziNqFw2nbCGfXNtM1V2s2gh9TZj1xaKDT0NWynxfxchZmrsHO9QssdSjgsiMt7B_uDXtNUyyyFt78Rz1hbFwf-6Zc9H93MRSz9NbTqXjXwnoXIG9RS1bpR6XYVPetoJXi_2VvUC7jBgBvscIMvNK5xg8Hi2OEGe9yYsx43d79-Y4eYd-j4y36_-y1yQhuRBP8yiTTNhOKSyHiYi1QR2kmJSjsiTQjNNNfJkCguTNmc1ElSckOJlOa5ZhriXxHr9D1aqi4q9QHhjMELRa7iWDKZDRVjGmLQXOshJ6XOdb6BuP-DCulY6I0Yylnxd1NtoDSMvbRcLAuN2vV2KFxUaaPFAuC2wPjN_7rqFlppHotttATn1Uf0Wl5PTsajTw5r98Byo1E |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+the+quality+of+human+and+ChatGPT+feedback+of+students%E2%80%99+writing&rft.jtitle=Learning+and+instruction&rft.au=Steiss%2C+Jacob&rft.au=Tate%2C+Tamara&rft.au=Graham%2C+Steve&rft.au=Cruz%2C+Jazmin&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.issn=0959-4752&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=101894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.learninstruc.2024.101894&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_learninstruc_2024_101894 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-4752&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-4752&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-4752&client=summon |