The synchrony effect revisited: chronotype, time of day and cognitive performance in a semantic analogy task
The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of circadian rhythms. Whether one chronotype copes better with the synchrony effect than the other received only insufficient empirical attention....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chronobiology international Jg. 35; H. 12; S. 1647 - 1662 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
England
02.12.2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0742-0528, 1525-6073, 1525-6073 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of circadian rhythms. Whether one chronotype copes better with the synchrony effect than the other received only insufficient empirical attention. We report on an applied experimental study investigating the impact of chronotype on the synchrony effect in a semantic analogy task. To detect an analogy, 36 participants (12 males) aged between 18 and 40 had to decide whether the relation between events of a source pair was mirrored by the relation between events of a target pair (e.g. to cook: to eat = to saddle: to ride). Temporal orientation of the relation within each event pair was varied corresponding either to the chronological or reverse order. Response times (RTs), error rates, as well as the psychophysiological parameters pre-experimental pupil baseline and peak pupil dilation replicate findings of a synchrony effect (shorter RTs and allocation of less cognitive resources at optimal times of day) and show an impact of chronotype (morning types generally outperforming evening types). Most importantly, morning types appeared to cope better with the synchrony effect than evening types: At suboptimal times, morning types solved the analogy detection task more efficient; that is faster with the same accuracy and without the investment of more cognitive resources. They also showed greater alertness and wakefulness indexed by greater pre-experimental pupil baselines. At optimal times of day, morning types have more cognitive resources available to allocate these to the more demanding conditions to outperform evening types. We interpret these findings to suggest that morning types are more able to adapt to unfavourable circumstances (for instance, by avoiding wasteful resource allocation when there are less cognitive resources available). Evening types appear less able to adapt to suboptimal times than morning types, because they have to deal with social jetlag and decreased self-control. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of circadian rhythms. Whether one chronotype copes better with the synchrony effect than the other received only insufficient empirical attention. We report on an applied experimental study investigating the impact of chronotype on the synchrony effect in a semantic analogy task. To detect an analogy, 36 participants (12 males) aged between 18 and 40 had to decide whether the relation between events of a source pair was mirrored by the relation between events of a target pair (e.g. to cook: to eat = to saddle: to ride). Temporal orientation of the relation within each event pair was varied corresponding either to the chronological or reverse order. Response times (RTs), error rates, as well as the psychophysiological parameters pre-experimental pupil baseline and peak pupil dilation replicate findings of a synchrony effect (shorter RTs and allocation of less cognitive resources at optimal times of day) and show an impact of chronotype (morning types generally outperforming evening types). Most importantly, morning types appeared to cope better with the synchrony effect than evening types: At suboptimal times, morning types solved the analogy detection task more efficient; that is faster with the same accuracy and without the investment of more cognitive resources. They also showed greater alertness and wakefulness indexed by greater pre-experimental pupil baselines. At optimal times of day, morning types have more cognitive resources available to allocate these to the more demanding conditions to outperform evening types. We interpret these findings to suggest that morning types are more able to adapt to unfavourable circumstances (for instance, by avoiding wasteful resource allocation when there are less cognitive resources available). Evening types appear less able to adapt to suboptimal times than morning types, because they have to deal with social jetlag and decreased self-control.The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of circadian rhythms. Whether one chronotype copes better with the synchrony effect than the other received only insufficient empirical attention. We report on an applied experimental study investigating the impact of chronotype on the synchrony effect in a semantic analogy task. To detect an analogy, 36 participants (12 males) aged between 18 and 40 had to decide whether the relation between events of a source pair was mirrored by the relation between events of a target pair (e.g. to cook: to eat = to saddle: to ride). Temporal orientation of the relation within each event pair was varied corresponding either to the chronological or reverse order. Response times (RTs), error rates, as well as the psychophysiological parameters pre-experimental pupil baseline and peak pupil dilation replicate findings of a synchrony effect (shorter RTs and allocation of less cognitive resources at optimal times of day) and show an impact of chronotype (morning types generally outperforming evening types). Most importantly, morning types appeared to cope better with the synchrony effect than evening types: At suboptimal times, morning types solved the analogy detection task more efficient; that is faster with the same accuracy and without the investment of more cognitive resources. They also showed greater alertness and wakefulness indexed by greater pre-experimental pupil baselines. At optimal times of day, morning types have more cognitive resources available to allocate these to the more demanding conditions to outperform evening types. We interpret these findings to suggest that morning types are more able to adapt to unfavourable circumstances (for instance, by avoiding wasteful resource allocation when there are less cognitive resources available). Evening types appear less able to adapt to suboptimal times than morning types, because they have to deal with social jetlag and decreased self-control. The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of circadian rhythms. Whether one chronotype copes better with the synchrony effect than the other received only insufficient empirical attention. We report on an applied experimental study investigating the impact of chronotype on the synchrony effect in a semantic analogy task. To detect an analogy, 36 participants (12 males) aged between 18 and 40 had to decide whether the relation between events of a source pair was mirrored by the relation between events of a target pair (e.g. to cook: to eat = to saddle: to ride). Temporal orientation of the relation within each event pair was varied corresponding either to the chronological or reverse order. Response times (RTs), error rates, as well as the psychophysiological parameters pre-experimental pupil baseline and peak pupil dilation replicate findings of a synchrony effect (shorter RTs and allocation of less cognitive resources at optimal times of day) and show an impact of chronotype (morning types generally outperforming evening types). Most importantly, morning types appeared to cope better with the synchrony effect than evening types: At suboptimal times, morning types solved the analogy detection task more efficient; that is faster with the same accuracy and without the investment of more cognitive resources. They also showed greater alertness and wakefulness indexed by greater pre-experimental pupil baselines. At optimal times of day, morning types have more cognitive resources available to allocate these to the more demanding conditions to outperform evening types. We interpret these findings to suggest that morning types are more able to adapt to unfavourable circumstances (for instance, by avoiding wasteful resource allocation when there are less cognitive resources available). Evening types appear less able to adapt to suboptimal times than morning types, because they have to deal with social jetlag and decreased self-control. |
| Author | Nowack, Kati Van Der Meer, Elke |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kati orcidid: 0000-0002-7242-9565 surname: Nowack fullname: Nowack, Kati organization: Department of Applied Media Science, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany – sequence: 2 givenname: Elke surname: Van Der Meer fullname: Van Der Meer, Elke organization: Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kU1PwzAMhiMEgm3wE0A5cqAjTZumwAkhvqRJXOAcpYkDgTYZSYbUf08G24UDJ9vy89qy3ynadd4BQsclmZekJeeE15Qw2s4pKdt5yQipOd9Bk5JRVjSEV7tosmaKNXSApjG-E5KFTbWPDqqcsbYqJ6h_fgMcR6fegncjBmNAJRzgy0abQF_in4ZP4xLOcLIDYG-wliOWTmPlX51N9gvwEoLxYZBOAbYOSxwhF8mqzMnev444yfhxiPaM7CMcbeIMvdzdPt88FIun-8eb60WhKs5SwUDyTtfMGK4ao7uaE1kbQlXV0Lak6qJRRCsqNddd09GWG8g_oKzVSoHpmmqGTn_nLoP_XEFMYrBRQd9LB34VBc3XN4zVLc3oyQZddQNosQx2kGEU2w9l4OoXUMHHGMAIZZNM1rsUpO1FScTaD7H1Q6z9EBs_spr9UW8X_K_7Bkx3jpc |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_clockssleep6030022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2023_10_122 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrp_2020_104055 crossref_primary_10_1080_07420528_2023_2185151 crossref_primary_10_1145_3359162 crossref_primary_10_18863_pgy_1140109 crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13179 crossref_primary_10_1080_09291016_2021_1890366 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_96803 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2019_05_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cedpsych_2023_102199 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs14040310 crossref_primary_10_1080_10400419_2024_2394316 crossref_primary_10_1093_sleep_zsaf233 crossref_primary_10_1080_09291016_2021_1972522 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2020_01_151 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2024_09_121 crossref_primary_10_1080_09291016_2022_2081400 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhtm_2024_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_09291016_2020_1822053 crossref_primary_10_1002_adbi_202200235 crossref_primary_10_1080_07420528_2025_2490495 crossref_primary_10_1080_07420528_2021_1929279 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_82628_z crossref_primary_10_1080_07420528_2021_1979995 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2023_112116 crossref_primary_10_1111_jsr_14097 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjment_2024_301045 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17165810 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_96803_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1022731 crossref_primary_10_1080_13218719_2021_1976298 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11133892 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bcp_2021_114438 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.009 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039 10.1126/science.472746 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.001 10.1177/0748730402239679 10.1038/sj.mp.4001733 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01607 10.1080/14639220210159735 10.1371/journal.pone.0056519 10.1037/a0019679 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00054-9 10.1192/bjp.162.3.413 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010 10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_9 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.003 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62448-6 10.1177/0956797612450883 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.003 10.1080/09291016.2012.656248 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00884.x 10.1017/s0140525X99002149 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01071.x 10.3758/BF03193146 10.3109/07420528.2014.914035 10.1007/7854_2014_274 10.1080/09291010600645780 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb52356.x 10.3758/BF03210822 10.1080/07420520500545979 10.3109/07420528.2010.490314 10.3109/07420528.2013.876428 10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.008 10.1016/j.neures.2017.04.008 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.001 10.2466/pms.104.1.335-338 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.353 10.3109/10826080903498952 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.02.004 10.3758/PBR.17.4.569 10.1007/978-94-017-3536-0_32 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.005 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.006 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1080/07420528.2018.1500477 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Biology |
| EISSN | 1525-6073 |
| EndPage | 1662 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 30085831 10_1080_07420528_2018_1500477 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 00X 03L 0BK 0R~ 29B 30N 36B 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE AAGDL AAHIA AAJMT AALDU AAMIU AAPUL AAPXX AAQRR AAYXX ABCCY ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABLKL ABPAQ ABXUL ABXYU ACGEJ ACGFS ACKOT ACTIO ADCVX ADGTB ADRBQ ADXPE AEISY AENEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AFKVX AFRVT AGDLA AHDZW AIJEM AIYEW AIZAD AJWEG AKBVH AKOOK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AQRUH AWYRJ BABNJ BLEHA CCCUG CITATION CS3 DGEBU DKSSO DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN F5P H13 HZ~ KRBQP KWAYT KYCEM M4Z O9- P2P RNANH ROSJB RTWRZ TASJS TBQAZ TDBHL TFDNU TFL TFT TFW TQWBC TTHFI TUROJ V1S ZGOLN ~02 ~1N .GJ 0VX 5VS AAAVZ AAGME AALIY AAOAP ABFMO ABTAA ACBBU ACDHJ ACQMU ACZPZ ADGTR ADOPC ADYSH AFDYB APNXG AURDB BFWEY CAG COF CWRZV FA8 HGUVV IPNFZ JEPSP LJTGL M44 NPM NUSFT OWHGL PCLFJ RIG UAP XJT YHZ ZXP 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-5ea7bd45ff7c6fdb470a4f02c362812c96c0dc2ad7db6b287fe018258dccefb63 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 41 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000451611300003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0742-0528 1525-6073 |
| IngestDate | Thu Oct 02 12:00:02 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:34:28 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:11:59 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:38:57 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | cognitive resource allocation pupillary response Morningness/eveningness social jetlag time succession |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-5ea7bd45ff7c6fdb470a4f02c362812c96c0dc2ad7db6b287fe018258dccefb63 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7242-9565 |
| PMID | 30085831 |
| PQID | 2085655482 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2085655482 pubmed_primary_30085831 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_07420528_2018_1500477 crossref_primary_10_1080_07420528_2018_1500477 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2018-12-02 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-12-02 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2018 text: 2018-12-02 day: 02 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | Chronobiology international |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Chronobiol Int |
| PublicationYear | 2018 |
| References | CIT0030 CIT0032 CIT0034 CIT0033 Zavada A (CIT0060) 2005; 22 CIT0036 Gilzenrat MS (CIT0013) 2003 CIT0038 CIT0037 Nowack K (CIT0035) 2013 Lehrl S (CIT0026) 2005; 5 CIT0039 Beatty J (CIT0005) 2000 Schmidt C (CIT0050) 2012; 7 CIT0041 CIT0040 CIT0043 Hasher L (CIT0017) 2005 CIT0001 CIT0045 CIT0044 Krüger F (CIT0025) 2000 CIT0003 CIT0047 CIT0046 CIT0049 CIT0004 CIT0048 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0052 CIT0051 CIT0010 CIT0054 CIT0053 CIT0012 CIT0056 CIT0011 CIT0055 Loewenfeld IE (CIT0027) 1993 Heller KA (CIT0018) 1998 Dix A (CIT0008) 2012; 7 CIT0014 CIT0058 CIT0057 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0059 CIT0061 CIT0021 CIT0020 CIT0023 CIT0022 Alhola P (CIT0002) 2007; 3 Horne J (CIT0019) 1976; 4 CIT0024 McRae K (CIT0031) 2001 Randler C (CIT0042) 2017 CIT0029 CIT0028 |
| References_xml | – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.009 – ident: CIT0047 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1126/science.472746 – volume-title: Matrizen-test-manual (Band 2): ein handbuch mit deutschen normen zu den advanced progressive matrices von jc.raven year: 1998 ident: CIT0018 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.04.001 – ident: CIT0049 doi: 10.1177/0748730402239679 – ident: CIT0038 doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001733 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01607 – ident: CIT0021 doi: 10.1080/14639220210159735 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056519 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1037/a0019679 – ident: CIT0045 doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00054-9 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.3.413 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7_9 – ident: CIT0048 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.003 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62448-6 – ident: CIT0044 doi: 10.1177/0956797612450883 – ident: CIT0056 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.003 – ident: CIT0052 doi: 10.1080/09291016.2012.656248 – ident: CIT0061 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 – volume: 22 start-page: 267 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: CIT0060 publication-title: Comparison Of The Munich Chronotype Questionnaire with The Horne–östberg’s Morningness–eveningness Score. Chronobiol Int – volume: 7 issue: 29658 year: 2012 ident: CIT0050 publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 5 volume-title: Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest MWT-B year: 2005 ident: CIT0026 – volume-title: Chronobiology International year: 2013 ident: CIT0035 – ident: CIT0055 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00884.x – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1017/s0140525X99002149 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01071.x – volume: 4 start-page: 97 year: 1976 ident: CIT0019 publication-title: Int J Chronobiol – start-page: 142 volume-title: Handbook of psychophysiology year: 2000 ident: CIT0005 – start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: CIT0042 publication-title: SAGE Open – start-page: 199 volume-title: Human learning and memory: Advances in theory and application year: 2005 ident: CIT0017 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.914035 – ident: CIT0054 doi: 10.1007/7854_2014_274 – ident: CIT0041 doi: 10.1080/09291010600645780 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb52356.x – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.3758/BF03210822 – ident: CIT0057 doi: 10.1080/07420520500545979 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.490314 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.876428 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.008 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.04.008 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.001 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.2466/pms.104.1.335-338 – ident: CIT0051 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.353 – year: 2003 ident: CIT0013 publication-title: Soc Neurosciences – ident: CIT0058 doi: 10.3109/10826080903498952 – volume: 7 start-page: 61 volume-title: Interdisciplinary perspectives on cognition, education and the brain year: 2012 ident: CIT0008 – ident: CIT0036 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.02.004 – start-page: 617 volume-title: Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society year: 2001 ident: CIT0031 – volume-title: The pupil year: 1993 ident: CIT0027 – ident: CIT0053 doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.569 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3536-0_32 – ident: CIT0046 doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.005 – ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.006 – volume-title: Coding of temporal relations in semantic memory: Cognitive Load and task-evoked pupillary response year: 2000 ident: CIT0025 – volume: 3 start-page: 553 issue: 5 year: 2007 ident: CIT0002 publication-title: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat – ident: CIT0059 |
| SSID | ssj0008063 |
| Score | 2.4096096 |
| Snippet | The synchrony effect (i.e. superior performance at optimal, inferior performance at suboptimal times of day) has been broadly studied within the context of... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 1647 |
| Title | The synchrony effect revisited: chronotype, time of day and cognitive performance in a semantic analogy task |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085831 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2085655482 |
| Volume | 35 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000451611300003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor and Francis Online Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1525-6073 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0008063 issn: 0742-0528 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 19840101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELa25SEuCAqF5VEZiVtJ5SSOnXBDQIWEqDgssLfIcRxp1VWyaral-0_4uczEj6a8e-ASbRzFznq-jGecmW8IeW7ABTCcNRFYxyriaaUjJbI64sjVrpIUXOhqKDYhj47y-bz4OJl887kwZ0vZtvn5ebH6r6KGNhA2ps5eQdyhU2iA3yB0OILY4fjPgu83rUbW242L1xgyVPA78VDRebjU4eYrTjBWl0eTERNCbJKbDyhajZIKFu2-2u8NnFiGVzVQN61Vfzw2bweq3UDstBjvNoZd5-6rsir4PVzxrZ9BzbwxSCnk8m-Wx2a8IRHnQ3DHeI8SvO2IZS7n2zi9mmSRYLZqiVe8lqfEAywZqVEkORstybGwGvsnde_iI2FAHA8D9fIDsHAZd6VhLtFr_7DshWDE2LOkum5K7KZ03WyRa4nMCtSXs8MvYY3PXY0-_1d9bhiytv_qaS5bPb9xZQaTZnaH3Ha-CH1lMXSXTEy7Q27Y6qSbHXLzg4u7uEeWACoaQEUtqGgA1Ut6AakXFAFFu4YCoCgAigZA0RGg6KKlinpAUQcoioC6Tz4dvp29fhe5Oh2RTmW2jjKjZFXzrGmkFk1dcckUb1iiwTgC-1EXQrNaJ6qWdSUqcNEbA1OTZHmttWkqke6S7bZrzUNCZVPHsmI5T0XBBWuqwmRgMzMpFHgSOp0S7uex1I7EHmupLMs_SnFKDsJtK8vi8rcbnnkhlaBv8SOaak132pdY01aADZ4nU_LASi90maIDk6fxo6sO95jcuniTnpDt9cmpeUqu67P1oj_ZI1tynu8NAPwOBE-khA |
| linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+synchrony+effect+revisited%3A+chronotype%2C+time+of+day+and+cognitive+performance+in+a+semantic+analogy+task&rft.jtitle=Chronobiology+international&rft.au=Nowack%2C+Kati&rft.au=Van+Der+Meer%2C+Elke&rft.date=2018-12-02&rft.issn=0742-0528&rft.eissn=1525-6073&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1647&rft.epage=1662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F07420528.2018.1500477&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_07420528_2018_1500477 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0742-0528&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0742-0528&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0742-0528&client=summon |