Inclusion of Orogastric Tube in the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: an Avoidable Complication
Purpose Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery Jg. 31; H. 6; S. 2835 - 2836 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Springer US
01.06.2021
Springer Nature B.V |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0960-8923, 1708-0428, 1708-0428 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Purpose
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the OGT during creation of the gastric pouch.
Materials and Methods
A 37-year old man with body mass index (BMI) of 52.5 kg/m
2
and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, underwent LRYGB, with a biliopancreatic limb of 70 cm and an alimentary limb of 130 cm. Before firing the stapler for gastric pouch, the anaesthesia team was requested to withdraw the OGT, and they confirmed that it was done. The stapler was fired without any difficulty. Gastrojejunostomy was also done using linear stapler without any hindrance. The enterotomies were closed with absorbable sutures. Methylene blue leak test was found to be negative. Just before extubation, the anaesthesia team asked us if the OGT could be removed! To our horror, the OGT could not be pulled out on gentle tugging, confirming inclusion of the OGT in the staple line. The patient was induced again and re-explored immediately, with endoscopic guidance. Both the pouch and remnant stomach were opened, the cut ends of OGT freed from both staple lines, and the tube removed. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with stapler. Methylene blue leak test and air insufflation test were done and found to be negative.
Results
Postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 5. Review of the recorded video was done but the OGT was not visualised through the initial gastrotomy as the OGT had possibly been stapled during the last vertical firing higher up near the fundus.
Discussion
Stapler firing over the OGT can occur insidiously without the surgeon’s awareness. In this case, it was only suspected when the anaesthesia team asked us matter-of-factly whether the OGT could be removed. We had presumed that it had been removed before the first firing. Some surgeons prefer to keep the OGT for a day after surgery. Had that been our practice, this complication would have mandated a re-surgery in the early postoperative period.
Such complications occur when the surgeon fails to request the anaesthesia team to remove the OGT or if there is poor communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. Sometimes, it can be due to change in the anaesthesia team during the procedure. In our case, though the anaesthesia team was the same, there was a new anaesthesia registrar who was involved in a bariatric surgical case for the first time.
Use of transparent drapes, if available, may be advantageous, enabling the surgical team to see the OGT.
The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with a stapler, as it was thought to be a more secure and faster method than oversewing. However, if the pouch is too small to allow stapler closure, simple suture closure should be done.
Conclusion
Inclusion of orogastric tube in the staple line should be a ‘never event’. This case report highlights the importance of good communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams, not only during the staple fire, but throughout the procedure. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the OGT during creation of the gastric pouch.
A 37-year old man with body mass index (BMI) of 52.5 kg/m
and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, underwent LRYGB, with a biliopancreatic limb of 70 cm and an alimentary limb of 130 cm. Before firing the stapler for gastric pouch, the anaesthesia team was requested to withdraw the OGT, and they confirmed that it was done. The stapler was fired without any difficulty. Gastrojejunostomy was also done using linear stapler without any hindrance. The enterotomies were closed with absorbable sutures. Methylene blue leak test was found to be negative. Just before extubation, the anaesthesia team asked us if the OGT could be removed! To our horror, the OGT could not be pulled out on gentle tugging, confirming inclusion of the OGT in the staple line. The patient was induced again and re-explored immediately, with endoscopic guidance. Both the pouch and remnant stomach were opened, the cut ends of OGT freed from both staple lines, and the tube removed. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with stapler. Methylene blue leak test and air insufflation test were done and found to be negative.
Postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 5. Review of the recorded video was done but the OGT was not visualised through the initial gastrotomy as the OGT had possibly been stapled during the last vertical firing higher up near the fundus.
Stapler firing over the OGT can occur insidiously without the surgeon's awareness. In this case, it was only suspected when the anaesthesia team asked us matter-of-factly whether the OGT could be removed. We had presumed that it had been removed before the first firing. Some surgeons prefer to keep the OGT for a day after surgery. Had that been our practice, this complication would have mandated a re-surgery in the early postoperative period. Such complications occur when the surgeon fails to request the anaesthesia team to remove the OGT or if there is poor communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. Sometimes, it can be due to change in the anaesthesia team during the procedure. In our case, though the anaesthesia team was the same, there was a new anaesthesia registrar who was involved in a bariatric surgical case for the first time. Use of transparent drapes, if available, may be advantageous, enabling the surgical team to see the OGT. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with a stapler, as it was thought to be a more secure and faster method than oversewing. However, if the pouch is too small to allow stapler closure, simple suture closure should be done.
Inclusion of orogastric tube in the staple line should be a 'never event'. This case report highlights the importance of good communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams, not only during the staple fire, but throughout the procedure. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the OGT during creation of the gastric pouch.PURPOSELaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the OGT during creation of the gastric pouch.A 37-year old man with body mass index (BMI) of 52.5 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, underwent LRYGB, with a biliopancreatic limb of 70 cm and an alimentary limb of 130 cm. Before firing the stapler for gastric pouch, the anaesthesia team was requested to withdraw the OGT, and they confirmed that it was done. The stapler was fired without any difficulty. Gastrojejunostomy was also done using linear stapler without any hindrance. The enterotomies were closed with absorbable sutures. Methylene blue leak test was found to be negative. Just before extubation, the anaesthesia team asked us if the OGT could be removed! To our horror, the OGT could not be pulled out on gentle tugging, confirming inclusion of the OGT in the staple line. The patient was induced again and re-explored immediately, with endoscopic guidance. Both the pouch and remnant stomach were opened, the cut ends of OGT freed from both staple lines, and the tube removed. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with stapler. Methylene blue leak test and air insufflation test were done and found to be negative.MATERIALS AND METHODSA 37-year old man with body mass index (BMI) of 52.5 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, underwent LRYGB, with a biliopancreatic limb of 70 cm and an alimentary limb of 130 cm. Before firing the stapler for gastric pouch, the anaesthesia team was requested to withdraw the OGT, and they confirmed that it was done. The stapler was fired without any difficulty. Gastrojejunostomy was also done using linear stapler without any hindrance. The enterotomies were closed with absorbable sutures. Methylene blue leak test was found to be negative. Just before extubation, the anaesthesia team asked us if the OGT could be removed! To our horror, the OGT could not be pulled out on gentle tugging, confirming inclusion of the OGT in the staple line. The patient was induced again and re-explored immediately, with endoscopic guidance. Both the pouch and remnant stomach were opened, the cut ends of OGT freed from both staple lines, and the tube removed. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with stapler. Methylene blue leak test and air insufflation test were done and found to be negative.Postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 5. Review of the recorded video was done but the OGT was not visualised through the initial gastrotomy as the OGT had possibly been stapled during the last vertical firing higher up near the fundus.RESULTSPostoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 5. Review of the recorded video was done but the OGT was not visualised through the initial gastrotomy as the OGT had possibly been stapled during the last vertical firing higher up near the fundus.Stapler firing over the OGT can occur insidiously without the surgeon's awareness. In this case, it was only suspected when the anaesthesia team asked us matter-of-factly whether the OGT could be removed. We had presumed that it had been removed before the first firing. Some surgeons prefer to keep the OGT for a day after surgery. Had that been our practice, this complication would have mandated a re-surgery in the early postoperative period. Such complications occur when the surgeon fails to request the anaesthesia team to remove the OGT or if there is poor communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. Sometimes, it can be due to change in the anaesthesia team during the procedure. In our case, though the anaesthesia team was the same, there was a new anaesthesia registrar who was involved in a bariatric surgical case for the first time. Use of transparent drapes, if available, may be advantageous, enabling the surgical team to see the OGT. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with a stapler, as it was thought to be a more secure and faster method than oversewing. However, if the pouch is too small to allow stapler closure, simple suture closure should be done.DISCUSSIONStapler firing over the OGT can occur insidiously without the surgeon's awareness. In this case, it was only suspected when the anaesthesia team asked us matter-of-factly whether the OGT could be removed. We had presumed that it had been removed before the first firing. Some surgeons prefer to keep the OGT for a day after surgery. Had that been our practice, this complication would have mandated a re-surgery in the early postoperative period. Such complications occur when the surgeon fails to request the anaesthesia team to remove the OGT or if there is poor communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. Sometimes, it can be due to change in the anaesthesia team during the procedure. In our case, though the anaesthesia team was the same, there was a new anaesthesia registrar who was involved in a bariatric surgical case for the first time. Use of transparent drapes, if available, may be advantageous, enabling the surgical team to see the OGT. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with a stapler, as it was thought to be a more secure and faster method than oversewing. However, if the pouch is too small to allow stapler closure, simple suture closure should be done.Inclusion of orogastric tube in the staple line should be a 'never event'. This case report highlights the importance of good communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams, not only during the staple fire, but throughout the procedure.CONCLUSIONInclusion of orogastric tube in the staple line should be a 'never event'. This case report highlights the importance of good communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams, not only during the staple fire, but throughout the procedure. PurposeLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the OGT during creation of the gastric pouch.Materials and MethodsA 37-year old man with body mass index (BMI) of 52.5 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, underwent LRYGB, with a biliopancreatic limb of 70 cm and an alimentary limb of 130 cm. Before firing the stapler for gastric pouch, the anaesthesia team was requested to withdraw the OGT, and they confirmed that it was done. The stapler was fired without any difficulty. Gastrojejunostomy was also done using linear stapler without any hindrance. The enterotomies were closed with absorbable sutures. Methylene blue leak test was found to be negative. Just before extubation, the anaesthesia team asked us if the OGT could be removed! To our horror, the OGT could not be pulled out on gentle tugging, confirming inclusion of the OGT in the staple line. The patient was induced again and re-explored immediately, with endoscopic guidance. Both the pouch and remnant stomach were opened, the cut ends of OGT freed from both staple lines, and the tube removed. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with stapler. Methylene blue leak test and air insufflation test were done and found to be negative.ResultsPostoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 5. Review of the recorded video was done but the OGT was not visualised through the initial gastrotomy as the OGT had possibly been stapled during the last vertical firing higher up near the fundus.DiscussionStapler firing over the OGT can occur insidiously without the surgeon’s awareness. In this case, it was only suspected when the anaesthesia team asked us matter-of-factly whether the OGT could be removed. We had presumed that it had been removed before the first firing. Some surgeons prefer to keep the OGT for a day after surgery. Had that been our practice, this complication would have mandated a re-surgery in the early postoperative period.Such complications occur when the surgeon fails to request the anaesthesia team to remove the OGT or if there is poor communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. Sometimes, it can be due to change in the anaesthesia team during the procedure. In our case, though the anaesthesia team was the same, there was a new anaesthesia registrar who was involved in a bariatric surgical case for the first time.Use of transparent drapes, if available, may be advantageous, enabling the surgical team to see the OGT.The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with a stapler, as it was thought to be a more secure and faster method than oversewing. However, if the pouch is too small to allow stapler closure, simple suture closure should be done.ConclusionInclusion of orogastric tube in the staple line should be a ‘never event’. This case report highlights the importance of good communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams, not only during the staple fire, but throughout the procedure. Purpose Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric tube (OGT) needs to be withdrawn to avoid inclusion in the staple line. We report a rare complication of inadvertent stapling of the OGT during creation of the gastric pouch. Materials and Methods A 37-year old man with body mass index (BMI) of 52.5 kg/m 2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnoea, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, underwent LRYGB, with a biliopancreatic limb of 70 cm and an alimentary limb of 130 cm. Before firing the stapler for gastric pouch, the anaesthesia team was requested to withdraw the OGT, and they confirmed that it was done. The stapler was fired without any difficulty. Gastrojejunostomy was also done using linear stapler without any hindrance. The enterotomies were closed with absorbable sutures. Methylene blue leak test was found to be negative. Just before extubation, the anaesthesia team asked us if the OGT could be removed! To our horror, the OGT could not be pulled out on gentle tugging, confirming inclusion of the OGT in the staple line. The patient was induced again and re-explored immediately, with endoscopic guidance. Both the pouch and remnant stomach were opened, the cut ends of OGT freed from both staple lines, and the tube removed. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with stapler. Methylene blue leak test and air insufflation test were done and found to be negative. Results Postoperative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on day 5. Review of the recorded video was done but the OGT was not visualised through the initial gastrotomy as the OGT had possibly been stapled during the last vertical firing higher up near the fundus. Discussion Stapler firing over the OGT can occur insidiously without the surgeon’s awareness. In this case, it was only suspected when the anaesthesia team asked us matter-of-factly whether the OGT could be removed. We had presumed that it had been removed before the first firing. Some surgeons prefer to keep the OGT for a day after surgery. Had that been our practice, this complication would have mandated a re-surgery in the early postoperative period. Such complications occur when the surgeon fails to request the anaesthesia team to remove the OGT or if there is poor communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams. Sometimes, it can be due to change in the anaesthesia team during the procedure. In our case, though the anaesthesia team was the same, there was a new anaesthesia registrar who was involved in a bariatric surgical case for the first time. Use of transparent drapes, if available, may be advantageous, enabling the surgical team to see the OGT. The openings in the pouch and remnant stomach were closed with a stapler, as it was thought to be a more secure and faster method than oversewing. However, if the pouch is too small to allow stapler closure, simple suture closure should be done. Conclusion Inclusion of orogastric tube in the staple line should be a ‘never event’. This case report highlights the importance of good communication between the surgical and anaesthesia teams, not only during the staple fire, but throughout the procedure. |
| Author | Jain, Sandeep Baksi, Aditya Kumar, Amardeep Aggarwal, Sandeep |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sandeep surname: Jain fullname: Jain, Sandeep organization: Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences – sequence: 2 givenname: Aditya surname: Baksi fullname: Baksi, Aditya organization: Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences – sequence: 3 givenname: Amardeep surname: Kumar fullname: Kumar, Amardeep organization: Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences – sequence: 4 givenname: Sandeep orcidid: 0000-0001-9540-0303 surname: Aggarwal fullname: Aggarwal, Sandeep email: sandeep_aiims@yahoo.co.in organization: Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33694055$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kc1PFDEYhxuDkQX8BzyYJl68VN9-7cx4w1WRZBMShYOnptMPLJltx3YGhL_ewi4x4UB66OV53q_fAdqLKTqE3lD4QAGaj4XSZScJMEpAcsbI3Qu0oA20BARr99ACuiWQtmN8Hx2UcgWVXDL2Cu1zvuwESLlAN6fRDHMJKeLk8VlOl7pMORh8PvcOh4in3w7_nPQ4OLwO0eEvcw7xEq_1qHMqJo2V_ZHmv8RF8guf7OzPt6Mu5RPWER9fp2B1X_1V2oxDMHqq3Y7QS6-H4l7v_kN08e3r-eo7WZ-dnK6O18TwRk5Eyo6xXnTUNkA918yChdYY4WzPGuml8NR2vRcChPfaSu97K-uSHes5SM0P0ftt3TGnP7Mrk9qEYtww6OjSXBSTALVT04iKvnuCXqU5xzpdperjHFhTqbc7au43zqoxh43Ot-rxpBVot4Cp9ynZeWXC9LDzlHUYFAV1n57apqdqJuohPXVXVfZEfaz-rMS3Uhnvk3H5_9jPWP8AM-6snQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05490_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05489_5 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-021-05322-z |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Proquest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1708-0428 |
| EndPage | 2836 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 33694055 10_1007_s11695_021_05322_z |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 1SB 203 28- 29N 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 53G 5RE 5VS 67Z 6NX 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AAQQT AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGVAE AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GRRUI H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ KDC KOV KPH LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q NDZJH NF0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RNI ROL RPX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJN SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7W Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8Q Z8V Z91 Z92 ZMTXR ZOVNA ZXE ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFFHD AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY NPM 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-55922b491d701f3a2d0d08cc4edb275f54f1d9bf4404ffad5ffbd562292b305a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 3 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000627183100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:35:38 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 23:32:00 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:50 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:55:05 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:48:07 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:48:27 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | Complication Iatrogenic RYGB Ryle’s tube |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-55922b491d701f3a2d0d08cc4edb275f54f1d9bf4404ffad5ffbd562292b305a3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Case Study-2 ObjectType-Feature-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Report-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9540-0303 |
| PMID | 33694055 |
| PQID | 2525233027 |
| PQPubID | 55143 |
| PageCount | 2 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2500375774 proquest_journals_2525233027 pubmed_primary_33694055 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11695_021_05322_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05322_z springer_journals_10_1007_s11695_021_05322_z |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20210600 2021-06-00 2021-Jun 20210601 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 6 year: 2021 text: 20210600 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | New York |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
| PublicationSubtitle | The Journal of Metabolic Surgery and Allied Care |
| PublicationTitle | Obesity surgery |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | OBES SURG |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Obes Surg |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| SSID | ssj0021622 |
| Score | 2.3536534 |
| Snippet | Purpose
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the... Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the orogastric... PurposeLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) involves creation of a small gastric pouch by sequential firing of stapler. During stapler firing, the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 2835 |
| SubjectTerms | Gastroesophageal reflux Gastrointestinal surgery Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multimedia Article Surgery Teams |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB5RqCouPNoC4VEZiVtraePYeXDj3UMLCGhFT5Ed22ilVbLa3fD69Yy9yS6ItlKrnKKMHcsez3zj8cwA7IhEhwblPkV1Kijn3NBUGnxFMBsXHR4pqXyxieT0NL2-zs6boLBhe9u9dUl6ST0NdgtjH02M5q9wJtTjG5gTLtuMs9Evf07MrDAe-w4Qm9MU8UsTKvP7Pl6qo1cY85V_1Kud48X_G_ASLDQwk-yN-WIZZkz5Ht59bxzpH-AO5UKvdidlpLLkbFDdSFfAoyBXtTKkWxLEhQSBaL9nCJqrhhz6cEbyDXWry39Z9ZH2oqrvqSnpL3LStN5_6CMY3yWyJHu3VVe7uCxy8OzW-kf4cXx0dfCVNjUYaBElYkTR4GBM8SzUSSe0kWS6oztpUXCjFUuEFdyGOlPWpRm0VmphrdKIqVjGFIoSGa3AbFmVZg0ILr_QSJfZLOPaclUwaWMd2Tg1LE5MAGG7FHnRJCh3dTJ6-TS1spvRHGc09zOaPwbwedKmP07P8VfqzXaF82arDnMm8Imc-zaA7cln3GTOcyJLU9WOxtcKRqgcwOqYMya_i6I4Q9QrAvjSssG08z-PZf3fyDdgnnlOcuc_mzA7GtRmC94Wt6PucPDJb4AnQpf-gQ priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Inclusion of Orogastric Tube in the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: an Avoidable Complication |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-021-05322-z https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33694055 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2525233027 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2500375774 |
| Volume | 31 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000627183100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1708-0428 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0021622 issn: 0960-8923 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED_BxgMvG4ivbGMyEm9g0ThxPnhBW9ngAZWpDFSeIn-iSlWStc0G--s5O24LmtgLimTJip1YuvP5d3e-O4CXPNexQblP8TjlNE1TQwthsItgNlODNJFC-mIT-WhUTCblWTC4LcK1ypVM9IJaN8rZyN8wjk_ivGzv2gvqqkY572oooXEXtl3ZbMfn-WSjcMVZ70VAlE4LRDIhaKYPnYszH5uMyjR3Ctn13wfTDbR5w1PqD6DT3f9d-gPYCdCTHPW88hDumPoRXKGAmHXOZEYaSz7Pmx_CVfJQ5LyThkxrggCRICJtZ4ag3mrIex_XSD7hIesSYTYtjh033U9qavqdfAizj3-1iMrfElGTo8tmql2AFhn-cX39MXw9PTkffqShGANVSc6XFDUPxmRaxjofxDYRTA_0oFAqNVqynFue2liX0rp8g9YKza2VGsEVK5lEmSKSJ7BVN7V5BgT5gGscV9qyTLVNpWLCZjqxWWFYlpsI4hUlKhUylbuCGbNqk2PZUa9C6lWeetV1BK_Wc9o-T8etow9WlKrCnl1UGzJF8GL9Gnebc6GI2jSdG-OLBiNmjuBpzxjr3yVJViL85RG8XnHK5uP_Xsve7WvZh_vMc6kz_BzA1nLemedwT10up4v5oed33xbYFsP4ELaPT0ZnY-yNv3z7DSzxCMg |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9NAEB6VgkRfKIjLUMoiwROsiPfwgVShNqW0aggIBal9MvYeVaTINknc0v4ofiOzPhJQRd_6gPxkeb0-9pvZb3Z2ZgBeylD7BvU-xelUUiGEoVFq8BTJbKB6gmdpVhebCIfD6Ogo_rICv7pYGLetstOJtaLWhXJr5G-ZxIM7L9v78gd1VaOcd7UrodHA4tCcn6HJNts62MXxfcXY3odRf5-2VQWo4qGcU6TQjGUi9nXY8y1Pme7pXqSUMDpjobRSWF_HmXWJ86xNtbQ208gSWMwyFI6UY7834KbgjDspivqLLSXMDxqvBVoFNELm1AbpNKF6flDHQqPxLp0BePH3RHiJ3V7yzNYT3t76__ar7sKdllqT7UYW7sGKye_DGSrASeWWBElhyedpcZK6SiWKjKrMkHFOkAATZNzlxBC0yw3ZreM2yQBJhEv0WZTY9mtR_aQmp8fkY3v3znmJVsc7kuZk-7QYaxeARvp_bM9_AN-u5Vsfwmpe5OYxEMS51NgutnEstBWZYqkNNLdBZFgQGg_8buQT1WZidwVBJskyh7RDS4JoSWq0JBcevF7cUzZ5SK5svdEhI2l10ixZwsKDF4vLqE2ciyjNTVG5NnVRZLQJPHjUAHHxOM6DGOm99OBNh8xl5_9-lydXv8tzuL0_-jRIBgfDw6ewxmoJcYtcG7A6n1bmGdxSp_PxbLpZyxqB79eN2N9cK2G_ |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1LbxMxEB6VFCEuPMRroYCR4ARWs157H0gItU0DVasQVUVqT4u9tlGkaHdJsi3tT-PXMd5HAqrorQeU0yreV_LN-Ps8nhmA1yLSvkG_T3E6FZRzbmgsDR4imQ2zPg-UVHWziWg0io-Pk_Ea_OpyYdy2ys4n1o5aF5lbI99kAj-Bi7Jt2nZbxHgw_Fj-oK6DlIu0du00Gojsm_MzlG_zD3sD_K_fMDbcPdr5TNsOAzQLIrGgSKcZUzzxddT3bSCZ7ut-nGXcaMUiYQW3vk6UdUX0rJVaWKs0MgaWMIWGIgO87g1YjwIUPT1Y394djQ-Xcs8PmxgGagQaI49qU3aaxD0_rDOjUcoLJwcv_p4WL3HdS3Haevob3v2ff7h7cKcl3WSrsZL7sGbyB3CGrnFaucVCUljyZVZ8l66HSUaOKmXIJCdIjQly8XJqCCp2QwZ1Ric5QHrhSoAWJY49LKqf1OT0hHxqz94-L1GPvCcyJ1unxUS71DSy88fG_Yfw9Vre9RH08iI3T4CgBQiN4xKbJFxbrjImbagDG8aGhZHxwO9QkGZtjXbXKmSarqpLO-SkiJy0Rk564cHb5TllU6HkytEbHUrS1lvN0xVEPHi1_Br9jAseydwUlRtTt0tGteDB4waUy9sFQZgg8RcevOtQurr4v5_l6dXP8hJuIVDTg73R_jO4zWpjcatfG9BbzCrzHG5mp4vJfPaiNTwC364bsr8B52hsHQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusion+of+Orogastric+Tube+in+the+Staple+Line+During+Laparoscopic+Roux-en-Y+Gastric+Bypass%3A+an+Avoidable+Complication&rft.jtitle=Obesity+surgery&rft.au=Jain+Sandeep&rft.au=Baksi+Aditya&rft.au=Kumar%2C+Amardeep&rft.au=Aggarwal+Sandeep&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2835&rft.epage=2836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11695-021-05322-z&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon |