Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Asian-Type and Conventional Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient's body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder function. Asian patients, who have a short stature, could find the conventional RSA implant too big and tight. This study aimed to eval...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Clinics in orthopedic surgery Jg. 17; H. 4; S. 664 - 672
Hauptverfasser:	Park, In, Oh, Joo Han, Yoo, Jae Chul, Kim, Yang-Soo, Shin, Sang-Jin
Format:	Journal Article
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	Korea (South) The Korean Orthopaedic Association 01.08.2025 대한정형외과학회
Schlagworte:	Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - instrumentation Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods Asian People Female Humans Male Middle Aged Original Osteoarthritis - ethnology Osteoarthritis - surgery Prospective Studies Prosthesis Design Range of Motion, Articular Rotator Cuff Injuries - diagnostic imaging Rotator Cuff Injuries - ethnology Rotator Cuff Injuries - surgery Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy - surgery Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Joint - surgery Shoulder Prosthesis Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome 정형외과학 Arthroplasty Implant Asian Body size Shoulder
ISSN:	2005-291X, 2005-4408, 2005-4408
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Abstract	In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient's body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder function. Asian patients, who have a short stature, could find the conventional RSA implant too big and tight. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after RSA in Asian patients using a new implant designed to fit the body size of Asian patients. We also aimed to compare these outcomes with those who received a conventional implant. This prospective study enrolled 120 patients who underwent RSA for a symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, or primary osteoarthritis with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Patients were randomly allocated 2:1 to receive an Asian-type RSA implant (group I) or conventional RSA implant (group II). All patients underwent plain radiography to evaluate acromiohumeral distance, acromion-deltoid tuberosity distance, lateral humeral offset, and center of rotation distance. Postoperative 1-year computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for all patients to evaluate the position of peg screws and baseplates and the presence of scapular notching. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and active range of motion. Finally, 112 patients (80 in group I and 32 in group II) were included in this study. The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 5.5 years, and the mean patient height was 154.6 ± 8.1 cm. At the last visit, clinical scores and active range of motion significantly improved in both groups; however, the improvements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. On the postoperative 1-year CT scan, the glenoid baseplate was more anteriorly placed in group II than in group I. The supero-inferior position of the glenoid baseplate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Other radiological parameters obtained through plain radiography showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. No differences were found in scapular notching ( = 0.999) and acromial stress fracture ( = 0.872) between the 2 groups. Asian-type RSA implants showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes with conventional RSA implants. Asian-type RSA implants allowed more accurate positioning of the glenoid baseplate, although that did not translate into superior clinical and radiological outcomes.
AbstractList	Background: In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient’s body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder function. Asian patients, who have a short stature, could find the conventional RSA implant too big and tight. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after RSA in Asian patients using a new implant designed to fit the body size of Asian patients. We also aimed to compare these outcomes with those who received a conventional implant. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 120 patients who underwent RSA for a symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, or primary osteoarthritis with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Patients were randomly allocated 2:1 to receive an Asian-type RSA implant (group I) or conventional RSA implant (group II). All patients underwent plain radiography to evaluate acromiohumeral distance, acromion-deltoid tuberosity distance, lateral humeral offset, and center of rotation distance. Postoperative 1-year computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for all patients to evaluate the position of peg screws and baseplates and the presence of scapular notching. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and active range of motion. Results: Finally, 112 patients (80 in group I and 32 in group II) were included in this study. The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 5.5 years, and the mean patient height was 154.6 ± 8.1 cm. At the last visit, clinical scores and active range of motion significantly improved in both groups; however, the improvements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. On the postoperative 1-year CT scan, the glenoid baseplate was more anteriorly placed in group II than in group I. The supero-inferior position of the glenoid baseplate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Other radiological parameters obtained through plain radiography showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. No differences were found in scapular notching (p = 0.999) and acromial stress fracture (p = 0.872) between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Asian-type RSA implants showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes with conventional RSA implants. Asian-type RSA implants allowed more accurate positioning of the glenoid baseplate, although that did not translate into superior clinical and radiological outcomes. KCI Citation Count: 0 In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient's body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder function. Asian patients, who have a short stature, could find the conventional RSA implant too big and tight. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after RSA in Asian patients using a new implant designed to fit the body size of Asian patients. We also aimed to compare these outcomes with those who received a conventional implant. This prospective study enrolled 120 patients who underwent RSA for a symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, or primary osteoarthritis with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Patients were randomly allocated 2:1 to receive an Asian-type RSA implant (group I) or conventional RSA implant (group II). All patients underwent plain radiography to evaluate acromiohumeral distance, acromion-deltoid tuberosity distance, lateral humeral offset, and center of rotation distance. Postoperative 1-year computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for all patients to evaluate the position of peg screws and baseplates and the presence of scapular notching. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and active range of motion. Finally, 112 patients (80 in group I and 32 in group II) were included in this study. The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 5.5 years, and the mean patient height was 154.6 ± 8.1 cm. At the last visit, clinical scores and active range of motion significantly improved in both groups; however, the improvements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. On the postoperative 1-year CT scan, the glenoid baseplate was more anteriorly placed in group II than in group I. The supero-inferior position of the glenoid baseplate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Other radiological parameters obtained through plain radiography showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. No differences were found in scapular notching ( = 0.999) and acromial stress fracture ( = 0.872) between the 2 groups. Asian-type RSA implants showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes with conventional RSA implants. Asian-type RSA implants allowed more accurate positioning of the glenoid baseplate, although that did not translate into superior clinical and radiological outcomes. In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient's body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder function. Asian patients, who have a short stature, could find the conventional RSA implant too big and tight. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after RSA in Asian patients using a new implant designed to fit the body size of Asian patients. We also aimed to compare these outcomes with those who received a conventional implant.BackgroundIn patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient's body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder function. Asian patients, who have a short stature, could find the conventional RSA implant too big and tight. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after RSA in Asian patients using a new implant designed to fit the body size of Asian patients. We also aimed to compare these outcomes with those who received a conventional implant.This prospective study enrolled 120 patients who underwent RSA for a symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, or primary osteoarthritis with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Patients were randomly allocated 2:1 to receive an Asian-type RSA implant (group I) or conventional RSA implant (group II). All patients underwent plain radiography to evaluate acromiohumeral distance, acromion-deltoid tuberosity distance, lateral humeral offset, and center of rotation distance. Postoperative 1-year computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for all patients to evaluate the position of peg screws and baseplates and the presence of scapular notching. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and active range of motion.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 120 patients who underwent RSA for a symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy, or primary osteoarthritis with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Patients were randomly allocated 2:1 to receive an Asian-type RSA implant (group I) or conventional RSA implant (group II). All patients underwent plain radiography to evaluate acromiohumeral distance, acromion-deltoid tuberosity distance, lateral humeral offset, and center of rotation distance. Postoperative 1-year computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for all patients to evaluate the position of peg screws and baseplates and the presence of scapular notching. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and active range of motion.Finally, 112 patients (80 in group I and 32 in group II) were included in this study. The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 5.5 years, and the mean patient height was 154.6 ± 8.1 cm. At the last visit, clinical scores and active range of motion significantly improved in both groups; however, the improvements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. On the postoperative 1-year CT scan, the glenoid baseplate was more anteriorly placed in group II than in group I. The supero-inferior position of the glenoid baseplate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Other radiological parameters obtained through plain radiography showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. No differences were found in scapular notching (p = 0.999) and acromial stress fracture (p = 0.872) between the 2 groups.ResultsFinally, 112 patients (80 in group I and 32 in group II) were included in this study. The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 5.5 years, and the mean patient height was 154.6 ± 8.1 cm. At the last visit, clinical scores and active range of motion significantly improved in both groups; however, the improvements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. On the postoperative 1-year CT scan, the glenoid baseplate was more anteriorly placed in group II than in group I. The supero-inferior position of the glenoid baseplate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Other radiological parameters obtained through plain radiography showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. No differences were found in scapular notching (p = 0.999) and acromial stress fracture (p = 0.872) between the 2 groups.Asian-type RSA implants showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes with conventional RSA implants. Asian-type RSA implants allowed more accurate positioning of the glenoid baseplate, although that did not translate into superior clinical and radiological outcomes.ConclusionsAsian-type RSA implants showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes with conventional RSA implants. Asian-type RSA implants allowed more accurate positioning of the glenoid baseplate, although that did not translate into superior clinical and radiological outcomes.
Author	Park, In Yoo, Jae Chul Shin, Sang-Jin Kim, Yang-Soo Oh, Joo Han
AuthorAffiliation	Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml	– name: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea – name: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea – name: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: In orcidid: 0000-0003-2177-6142 surname: Park fullname: Park, In organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Joo Han orcidid: 0000-0002-4962-3175 surname: Oh fullname: Oh, Joo Han organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Jae Chul orcidid: 0000-0001-8378-1583 surname: Yoo fullname: Yoo, Jae Chul organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Yang-Soo orcidid: 0000-0003-4267-7880 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Yang-Soo organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Sang-Jin orcidid: 0000-0003-0215-2860 surname: Shin fullname: Shin, Sang-Jin organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40785760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003230214$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark	eNpVks1u1DAQgC1URH_gwAugHAEp4MRO7HBBUQRtpVZIyyJxsxxn0jV17GAni5a34I1xs9sVXDwjzzffyPKcoxPrLCD0MsPvKC6K90q7kFNa8CfoLMe4SCnF_OSQ51X2_RSdh_AD47IoGX6GTilmvGAlPkN_GqOtVtIk0nbJSnbaGXe3XDRuGKXXwdmkhekXgE3qoKVN17sRFrxxdgt20s5GfAVb8AGSrxs3mw58Uvtp491oZJh2H5I6uZ3NpFXkY20V292gf8MimbwzJqZrr6V5jp720gR4cYgX6NvnT-vmKr35cnnd1DepIoxMaUslZ32uelrxDgpQQKDnLVNVSXpJaCsV4ApYCZj0BEiLc5WRFgrZ5l2hGLlAb_de63txr7RwUi_xzol7L-rV-lpkmNGMMB7hj3t4nNsBuodXeGnE6PUg_W5p_b9i9SaKtiLLSc6zjETD64PBu58zhEkMOigwRlpwcxAkJ5zGo8IRffXvsOOUx1-LwJs9oLwLwUN_RDIsHjZCHDeC_AU6_K0p
Cites_doi	10.1007/s00264-022-05328-x 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.015 10.2340/17453674.2024.41344 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.014 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.019 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.004 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14024 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01265 10.1016/j.jse.2016.04.011 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005019 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.145 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00238 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005438 10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z 10.1016/j.jos.2022.11.008 10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.034 10.5397/cise.2023.00577 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.003 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.04.006 10.1016/j.jos.2018.11.019 10.4055/cios20301 10.4055/cios.2016.8.3.280 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.010
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association. Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2025 The Korean Orthopaedic Association
Copyright_xml	– notice: Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association. – notice: Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2025 The Korean Orthopaedic Association
DBID	AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR
DOI	10.4055/cios24458
DatabaseName	CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN	2005-4408
EndPage	672
ExternalDocumentID	oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10741378 PMC12328113 40785760 10_4055_cios24458
Genre	Multicenter Study Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml	– fundername: ; grantid: RS-2020-KD000301; 1711138974
GroupedDBID	--- 5-W 53G 8JR 8XY AAYXX ADBBV ADRAZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV C1A CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. EMOBN F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ HYE KQ8 M48 O5R O5S OK1 PGMZT RPM SV3 TR2 W2D 9ZL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b4a87f2cf498de5ece3ef8b7c963fa34bace09e76e03f3e3b02c13be5ab2d5c73
ISICitedReferencesCount	0
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001542393700012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	2005-291X 2005-4408
IngestDate	Sun Aug 03 03:10:41 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:03:54 EST 2025 Mon Aug 11 17:30:53 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 16 01:30:55 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:36:07 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess	true
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	4
Keywords	Arthroplasty Implant Asian Body size Shoulder
Language	English
License	Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c373t-b4a87f2cf498de5ece3ef8b7c963fa34bace09e76e03f3e3b02c13be5ab2d5c73
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 https://ecios.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4055/cios24458
ORCID	0000-0001-8378-1583 0000-0002-4962-3175 0000-0003-4267-7880 0000-0003-2177-6142 0000-0003-0215-2860
OpenAccessLink	http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios24458
PMID	40785760
PQID	3238432390
PQPubID	23479
PageCount	9
ParticipantIDs	nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10741378 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12328113 proquest_miscellaneous_3238432390 pubmed_primary_40785760 crossref_primary_10_4055_cios24458
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2025-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 08 year: 2025 text: 2025-08-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle	Clinics in orthopedic surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate	Clin Orthop Surg
PublicationYear	2025
Publisher	The Korean Orthopaedic Association 대한정형외과학회
Publisher_xml	– name: The Korean Orthopaedic Association – name: 대한정형외과학회
References	Kim (10.4055/cios24458_ref10) 2022; 14 Haase (10.4055/cios24458_ref19) 2024; 12 Kriechling (10.4055/cios24458_ref20) 2023; 7 Mizuno (10.4055/cios24458_ref8) 2017; 103 Lee (10.4055/cios24458_ref9) 2021; 30 Ji (10.4055/cios24458_ref3) 2013; 22 Cho (10.4055/cios24458_ref1) 2025; 34 Shah (10.4055/cios24458_ref17) 2020; 29 Cho (10.4055/cios24458_ref24) 2025; 50 Schenk (10.4055/cios24458_ref4) 2024; 33 Sirveaux (10.4055/cios24458_ref11) 2004; 86 Cabezas (10.4055/cios24458_ref13) 2016; 8 Park (10.4055/cios24458_ref25) 2024; 49 Waheed (10.4055/cios24458_ref23) 2024; 16 Hirakawa (10.4055/cios24458_ref2) 2024; 29 Matsuki (10.4055/cios24458_ref14) 2019; 24 Hao (10.4055/cios24458_ref21) 2024; 27 Wong (10.4055/cios24458_ref18) 2016; 25 Tashiro (10.4055/cios24458_ref15) 2022; 46 Matsumura (10.4055/cios24458_ref7) 2016; 25 Haislup (10.4055/cios24458_ref16) 2022; 6 Shah (10.4055/cios24458_ref6) 2025; 33 Hole (10.4055/cios24458_ref5) 2024; 95 Oh (10.4055/cios24458_ref22) 2023; 26 Werner (10.4055/cios24458_ref12) 2016; 474
References_xml	– volume: 46 start-page: 1063 issue: 5 year: 2022 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref15 publication-title: Int Orthop doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05328-x – volume: 103 start-page: 1271 issue: 8 year: 2017 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref8 publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.015 – volume: 95 start-page: 463 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref5 publication-title: Acta Orthop doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41344 – volume: 34 start-page: e280 issue: 5 year: 2025 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref1 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.014 – volume: 22 start-page: 1102 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref3 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.019 – volume: 29 start-page: 2395 issue: 11 year: 2020 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref17 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.004 – volume: 86 start-page: 388 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref11 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14024 – volume: 33 start-page: e61 issue: 2 year: 2025 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref6 publication-title: J Am Acad Orthop Surg doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01265 – volume: 25 start-page: 1889 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref18 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.04.011 – volume: 49 start-page: 246 issue: 3 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref25 publication-title: Clin Nucl Med doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005019 – volume: 30 start-page: 2533 issue: 11 year: 2021 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref9 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.145 – volume: 12 start-page: e23.00238 issue: 4 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref19 publication-title: JBJS Rev doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00238 – volume: 50 start-page: 66 issue: 1 year: 2025 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref24 publication-title: Clin Nucl Med doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005438 – volume: 16 start-page: e60041 issue: 5 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref23 publication-title: Cureus – volume: 474 start-page: 2672 issue: 12 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref12 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z – volume: 29 start-page: 128 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref2 publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.11.008 – volume: 33 start-page: 2718 issue: 12 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref4 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.034 – volume: 26 start-page: 93 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref22 publication-title: Clin Shoulder Elb – volume: 27 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref21 publication-title: Clin Shoulder Elb doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00577 – volume: 25 start-page: 493 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref7 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.003 – volume: 7 start-page: 812 issue: 5 year: 2023 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref20 publication-title: JSES Int doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.04.006 – volume: 24 start-page: 624 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref14 publication-title: J Orthop Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.11.019 – volume: 14 start-page: 119 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref10 publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg doi: 10.4055/cios20301 – volume: 8 start-page: 280 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref13 publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg doi: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.3.280 – volume: 6 start-page: 884 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 10.4055/cios24458_ref16 publication-title: JSES Int doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.010
SSID	ssj0065670
Score	2.345855
Snippet	In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient's body size and implant size is important for postoperative shoulder... Background: In patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), the relationship between the patient’s body size and implant size is important for...
SourceID	nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref
SourceType	Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database
StartPage	664
SubjectTerms	Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - instrumentation Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods Asian People Female Humans Male Middle Aged Original Osteoarthritis - ethnology Osteoarthritis - surgery Prospective Studies Prosthesis Design Range of Motion, Articular Rotator Cuff Injuries - diagnostic imaging Rotator Cuff Injuries - ethnology Rotator Cuff Injuries - surgery Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy - surgery Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Joint - surgery Shoulder Prosthesis Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome 정형외과학
Title	Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Asian-Type and Conventional Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
URI	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40785760 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3238432390 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12328113 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003230214
Volume	17
WOSCitedRecordID	wos001542393700012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX	Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2025, 17(4), , pp.664-672
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2005-4408 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0065670 issn: 2005-291X databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Jj9MwFLbagQMXBGIry8gsOVURaZzUNrc2FA2DNKCZIpVTlLjONJpOUnUZDfwLfi8X3nOapRVCw4GLZTmW7fT7-vwcv4WQNxJ2daY1syOWOLbHeWxHvsttzLTtq6nPYi1Msgl-ciImE_ml1fpV-sJczXmWietrufivUEMbgI2us_8AdzUoNEAdQIcSYIfyRsAHpa-jcT2Mpmkl3oI652BpnjVAH0obD6Ome9C0QT_VaLKhu2czTIONtvRLk1QB9O3198Kj3bjvon0nPD2FAfLL9Ic2w6D9-xyqY3zjpgZcLM9Y4eKVUb7Am6LuquGdjUQFydxwIjrO8-4RCKLP1bfr40h3g9lm3v2W55XgirJzu3sGfT-ll82vGa5f2dIV_LNGQ0sEaOQxem9J35KBNQqsgYN1bBGmElhSWkNhjQbWkFnDoOwsTWUAI9RS1IRadaXJywMbXt2GqbYbkrtfBFPfKgH9Ip_Q_v4C2i2G4lBpvgK1qIg5vxvDe29v3YnifaHS8DwPL5YhnFU-hmgK22NctMktl_tSlt8DCjUC9GyT6bBafxEWC1fwtpp_R5lqZ8vkT-ekfXPfhv40vkfubg8-dFAQ9j5p6ewB-VmSlQJ5aJOstCYr3ZKV1mQ13ZtkpVuy0pKstEnWd3RAG1SlNVVpTVVqqPqQfP0wGgdH9jZJiK0YZ2s79iLBE1clnhRT7WulmU5EzBXsLEnEvDhS2pGa97XDEqZZ7LiqBxLIj2J36ivOHpGDLM_0E0JZr-9FClRq5fc9xXsydiIlfZBxjofGEh3yqvy1w0URCwZADBGSsIKkQ14DDgbrv2DeIS9LnEKQ53hJF2U636xCBjq0B4V0OuRxgVs1Gd65-7wPT8QOolUHnHH3SZbOTMx4PDmJXo89vdHynpE79Z_zOTlYLzf6BbmtrtbpanlI2nwiDg1bfwMoY-C_
linkProvider	Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+and+Radiological+Comparison+between+Asian-Type+and+Conventional+Reverse+Shoulder+Arthroplasty%3A+A+Multicenter+Randomized+Controlled+Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinics+in+orthopedic+surgery&rft.au=In+Park&rft.au=Joo+Han+Oh&rft.au=Jae+Chul+Yoo&rft.au=Yang-+Soo+Kim&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%A0%95%ED%98%95%EC%99%B8%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2005-291X&rft.eissn=2005-4408&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=672&rft_id=info:doi/10.4055%2Fcios24458&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10741378
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon