Effect of Glenoid Concavity Restoration on Surgical Failure after Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair
This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion. Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinics in orthopedic surgery Jg. 17; H. 3; S. 470 - 477 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Korea (South)
The Korean Orthopaedic Association
01.06.2025
대한정형외과학회 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 2005-291X, 2005-4408, 2005-4408 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion.
Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery.
The BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively,
< 0.001). Preoperative glenoid bone defect size was 16.2% ± 8.1%, and bony Bankart fragment size was 11.3% ± 7.2%. Four patients (9.8%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. In patients with surgical failure, the BSSR was not improved after surgery (18.2% ± 13.3% preoperatively and 23.1% ± 17.3% postoperatively,
= 0.24). In contrast, patients without surgical failure showed significantly improved BSSR after surgery (26.9% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 36.9% ± 12.2% postoperatively,
< 0.001). No significant differences were found in the final glenoid bone defect size (6.6% ± 5.9% in patients with surgical failure vs. 6.2% ± 5.7% in patients without surgical failure,
= 0.92) and bony Bankart fragment nonunion rate (0% in patients with surgical failure vs. 5.4% in patients without surgical failure,
= 0.99) between patients with and without surgical failure.
Glenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion.BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion.Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery.MethodsForty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery.The BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively, p < 0.001). Preoperative glenoid bone defect size was 16.2% ± 8.1%, and bony Bankart fragment size was 11.3% ± 7.2%. Four patients (9.8%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. In patients with surgical failure, the BSSR was not improved after surgery (18.2% ± 13.3% preoperatively and 23.1% ± 17.3% postoperatively, p = 0.24). In contrast, patients without surgical failure showed significantly improved BSSR after surgery (26.9% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 36.9% ± 12.2% postoperatively, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the final glenoid bone defect size (6.6% ± 5.9% in patients with surgical failure vs. 6.2% ± 5.7% in patients without surgical failure, p = 0.92) and bony Bankart fragment nonunion rate (0% in patients with surgical failure vs. 5.4% in patients without surgical failure, p = 0.99) between patients with and without surgical failure.ResultsThe BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively, p < 0.001). Preoperative glenoid bone defect size was 16.2% ± 8.1%, and bony Bankart fragment size was 11.3% ± 7.2%. Four patients (9.8%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. In patients with surgical failure, the BSSR was not improved after surgery (18.2% ± 13.3% preoperatively and 23.1% ± 17.3% postoperatively, p = 0.24). In contrast, patients without surgical failure showed significantly improved BSSR after surgery (26.9% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 36.9% ± 12.2% postoperatively, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the final glenoid bone defect size (6.6% ± 5.9% in patients with surgical failure vs. 6.2% ± 5.7% in patients without surgical failure, p = 0.92) and bony Bankart fragment nonunion rate (0% in patients with surgical failure vs. 5.4% in patients without surgical failure, p = 0.99) between patients with and without surgical failure.Glenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes.ConclusionsGlenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes. Background: This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion. Methods: Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery. Results: The BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively, p < 0.001). Preoperative glenoid bone defect size was 16.2% ± 8.1%, and bony Bankart fragment size was 11.3% ± 7.2%. Four patients (9.8%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. In patients with surgical failure, the BSSR was not improved after surgery (18.2% ± 13.3% preoperatively and 23.1% ± 17.3% postoperatively, p = 0.24). In contrast, patients without surgical failure showed significantly improved BSSR after surgery (26.9% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 36.9% ± 12.2% postoperatively, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the final glenoid bone defect size (6.6% ± 5.9% in patients with surgical failure vs. 6.2% ± 5.7% in patients without surgical failure, p = 0.92) and bony Bankart fragment nonunion rate (0% in patients with surgical failure vs. 5.4% in patients without surgical failure, p = 0.99) between patients with and without surgical failure. Conclusions: Glenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes. KCI Citation Count: 0 This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion. Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery. The BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively, < 0.001). Preoperative glenoid bone defect size was 16.2% ± 8.1%, and bony Bankart fragment size was 11.3% ± 7.2%. Four patients (9.8%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. In patients with surgical failure, the BSSR was not improved after surgery (18.2% ± 13.3% preoperatively and 23.1% ± 17.3% postoperatively, = 0.24). In contrast, patients without surgical failure showed significantly improved BSSR after surgery (26.9% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 36.9% ± 12.2% postoperatively, < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the final glenoid bone defect size (6.6% ± 5.9% in patients with surgical failure vs. 6.2% ± 5.7% in patients without surgical failure, = 0.92) and bony Bankart fragment nonunion rate (0% in patients with surgical failure vs. 5.4% in patients without surgical failure, = 0.99) between patients with and without surgical failure. Glenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes. |
| Author | Park, In Shin, Sang-Jin Kim, Dong-Hyeon |
| AuthorAffiliation | Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: In orcidid: 0000-0003-2177-6142 surname: Park fullname: Park, In organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Dong-Hyeon orcidid: 0009-0001-1007-4885 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Dong-Hyeon organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Sang-Jin orcidid: 0000-0003-0215-2860 surname: Shin fullname: Shin, Sang-Jin organization: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40454130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003205322$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
| BookMark | eNpVkVtLJDEQhYMo3tYH_8CSx11h3Fy7p5-WcfAGguC64FuopBPNTk8yJmlh_v22M-OgUFAF9dU5UOcI7YYYLEKnlJwLIuUv42Nmgot6Bx0yQuRICDLe3cysoU8H6Cjnf4RUsqrJPjoQREhBOTlE-tI5awqODl93NkTf4mkMBt58WeIHm0tMUHwMeKg_fXr2Bjp8Bb7rk8Xgik14kspLitnEhTf4IoYlvoAwg1SG-wX49A3tOeiyPdn0Y_T36vJxejO6u7--nU7uRobXvIw4s7RlVGoBDXeMOhBCQjW2XDaaSqqbpgUHmghXt7qqa92MhTBCN5Qzw1p-jM7WuiE5NTNeRfCr_hzVLKnJw-OtoqSmshrLAf69hhe9ntvW2FASdGqR_BzScnX6dRP8yyD0piijRBDWDAo_NgopvvbDp9TcZ2O7DoKNfVacUVFzQlZm3z-bbV0-YhiAn2vADI_MybotQol6j1htI-b_AZSnmWE |
| Cites_doi | 10.1186/s12891-016-1210-9 10.3390/jcm10194316 10.1177/0363546515571555 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.009 10.1007/s00167-023-07389-w 10.1177/23259671211029239 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00016 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.029 10.1177/0363546517700864 10.1007/s00167-021-06562-3 10.1177/0363546518819102 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.004 10.1177/0363546513499304 10.1007/s00167-022-06968-7 10.1177/0363546518773317 10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0043 10.1177/03635465231203152 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.026 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association. Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2025 The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association. – notice: Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2025 The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
| DOI | 10.4055/cios24347 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 2005-4408 |
| EndPage | 477 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10715685 PMC12104029 40454130 10_4055_cios24347 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; grantid: NRF-2022R1A2C1009316 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 53G 8JR 8XY AAYXX ADBBV ADRAZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV C1A CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. EMOBN F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ HYE KQ8 M48 O5R O5S OK1 PGMZT RPM SV3 TR2 W2D 9ZL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-32e1d215b4a93f21fa445a68e359b151b99dafab04f7db677b9844c4b9132c2d3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001496184200012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2005-291X 2005-4408 |
| IngestDate | Sun Jun 01 03:17:55 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:02:20 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 15:57:07 EDT 2025 Wed Jun 04 01:36:43 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:54:25 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Bony Bankart lesion Shoulder Concavity Dislocation |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c373t-32e1d215b4a93f21fa445a68e359b151b99dafab04f7db677b9844c4b9132c2d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 https://ecios.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4055/cios24347 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0215-2860 0009-0001-1007-4885 0000-0003-2177-6142 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios24347 |
| PMID | 40454130 |
| PQID | 3214730085 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10715685 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12104029 proquest_miscellaneous_3214730085 pubmed_primary_40454130 crossref_primary_10_4055_cios24347 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-06-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2025 text: 2025-06-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
| PublicationTitle | Clinics in orthopedic surgery |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Orthop Surg |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | The Korean Orthopaedic Association 대한정형외과학회 |
| Publisher_xml | – name: The Korean Orthopaedic Association – name: 대한정형외과학회 |
| References | Ernstbrunner (10.4055/cios24347_ref16) 2016; 5 Moroder (10.4055/cios24347_ref2) 2016; 17 Park (10.4055/cios24347_ref12) 2023; 31 Souleiman (10.4055/cios24347_ref19) 2022; 30 Sugaya (10.4055/cios24347_ref15) 2005; 87 Nakagawa (10.4055/cios24347_ref5) 2015; 43 Wermers (10.4055/cios24347_ref3) 2021; 10 Nakagawa (10.4055/cios24347_ref7) 2023; 32 Park (10.4055/cios24347_ref10) 2023; 51 Simão (10.4055/cios24347_ref14) 2021; 54 Eren (10.4055/cios24347_ref20) 2023; 32 Wermers (10.4055/cios24347_ref9) 2021; 29 Guo (10.4055/cios24347_ref17) 2021; 9 Moroder (10.4055/cios24347_ref1) 2019; 47 Sugaya (10.4055/cios24347_ref11) 2003; 85 Moroder (10.4055/cios24347_ref8) 2015; 31 Park (10.4055/cios24347_ref4) 2018; 46 Nakagawa (10.4055/cios24347_ref6) 2017; 45 Bhatia (10.4055/cios24347_ref13) 2022; 31 Jiang (10.4055/cios24347_ref18) 2013; 41 |
| References_xml | – volume: 17 start-page: 357 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref2 publication-title: BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1210-9 – volume: 10 start-page: 4316 issue: 19 year: 2021 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref3 publication-title: J Clin Med doi: 10.3390/jcm10194316 – volume: 43 start-page: 1438 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref5 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546515571555 – volume: 87 start-page: 1752 issue: 8 year: 2005 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref15 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am – volume: 31 start-page: 1223 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref8 publication-title: Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.009 – volume: 31 start-page: 2681 issue: 7 year: 2023 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref12 publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07389-w – volume: 9 start-page: 23259671211029239 issue: 9 year: 2021 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref17 publication-title: Orthop J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/23259671211029239 – volume: 85 start-page: 878 issue: 5 year: 2003 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref11 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00016 – volume: 32 start-page: 1812 issue: 9 year: 2023 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref20 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.029 – volume: 45 start-page: 1967 issue: 9 year: 2017 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref6 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546517700864 – volume: 29 start-page: 2631 issue: 8 year: 2021 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref9 publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06562-3 – volume: 47 start-page: 688 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref1 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546518819102 – volume: 31 start-page: 553 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref13 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.004 – volume: 41 start-page: 2617 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref18 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546513499304 – volume: 30 start-page: 3626 issue: 11 year: 2022 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref19 publication-title: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06968-7 – volume: 46 start-page: 2177 issue: 9 year: 2018 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref4 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/0363546518773317 – volume: 54 start-page: 148 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref14 publication-title: Radiol Bras doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0043 – volume: 51 start-page: 3845 issue: 14 year: 2023 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref10 publication-title: Am J Sports Med doi: 10.1177/03635465231203152 – volume: 5 start-page: 453 issue: 10 year: 2016 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref16 publication-title: Bone Joint Res doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2016-0078.R1 – volume: 32 start-page: 1165 issue: 6 year: 2023 ident: 10.4055/cios24347_ref7 publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.026 |
| SSID | ssj0065670 |
| Score | 2.3400183 |
| Snippet | This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for... Background: This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair... |
| SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 470 |
| SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Arthroscopy - methods Bankart Lesions - diagnostic imaging Bankart Lesions - surgery Female Glenoid Cavity - diagnostic imaging Glenoid Cavity - surgery Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Joint Instability - diagnostic imaging Joint Instability - surgery Male Middle Aged Original Recurrence Reoperation Retrospective Studies Shoulder Dislocation - surgery Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Joint - surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Failure Young Adult 정형외과학 |
| Title | Effect of Glenoid Concavity Restoration on Surgical Failure after Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40454130 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3214730085 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12104029 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003205322 |
| Volume | 17 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001496184200012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2025, 17(3), , pp.470-477 |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2005-4408 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0065670 issn: 2005-291X databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLbawQMvaIhbYUzm8lYFGtup48dtYozbmLQh9S2yc9miDqdKL9r-BT-Z40vStOIBkJCqtHJSu_L5bH-n9vkOQm_SNMqAKGcBi2UUMJbzQBHBApKPRpKEhSpyq67_hZ-expOJOOv1fjaxMKtrrnV8cyNm_9XUUAbGNqGzf2HutlIogM9gdLiC2eH6R4b3esRAAj_AilKVmYnqS-XK0W1zGNKzRBjYy9pNfMeyvLY7CTZj-EFtkieYeJUyHR5W-nZ4KPUUmjJ0XZZ1l9A6XVF7qNbsAFUzs_EznHeCrX1otZuM1lv-Pxx915fByW2-PgtwfuVEDc4l3PnkZcH9vxIkWp-eetvEtX2uarOZ8M02Lm3r25Cz85wVQyXCZs6BJWldZpJhb0zUvANI2pl1mcs94hdw5vLCbK8NwEyNjEZaVnPCqJP53JLaPvt6ZPTUwKUWfXSH8EjEjZPu1nYgvzb9YPuTnVaVqfpdW_EGw-nruvid87J9BrdDai520X3vjeADh6IHqJfrh0g5BOGqwB5BuEUQ7iAIw6tBEPYIwhZBuIsgbBCEPYKwQ9Aj9P34_cXRSeBTcQQp5XQRUJKHGbBDxaSgBYxhyVgkx3FOI6GANCohMllINWIFz9SYcyVixlKmREhJSjL6GO3oSudPEY4oONmSjWSUSRYWYwlrDgU_hRXgvRIVDdCrpvuSmVNcScBTNX2ctH08QK-hY5NpWiZGH928X1bJtE7AC_wIj_MwGsdQ1cum4xOYNc1WmNR5tZwnNj0XNf7GAD1xhmgbY0aVEqjdAMUbJmofMC1u3tHllVVmb9Dz7N-_-hzdW4-nPbSzqJf5C3Q3XS3Keb2P-nwS71tM_gL8brmR |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+Glenoid+Concavity+Restoration+on+Surgical+Failure+after+Arthroscopic+Bony+Bankart+Repair&rft.jtitle=Clinics+in+orthopedic+surgery&rft.au=Park%2C+In&rft.au=Kim%2C+Dong-Hyeon&rft.au=Shin%2C+Sang-Jin&rft.date=2025-06-01&rft.pub=The+Korean+Orthopaedic+Association&rft.issn=2005-291X&rft.eissn=2005-4408&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=470&rft.epage=477&rft_id=info:doi/10.4055%2Fcios24347&rft.externalDocID=PMC12104029 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2005-291X&client=summon |