Self-adaptive Equilibrium Optimizer for solving global, combinatorial, engineering, and Multi-Objective problems
This paper proposes a self-adaptive Equilibrium Optimizer (self-EO) to perform better global, combinatorial, engineering, and multi-objective optimization problems. The new self-EO algorithm integrates four effective exploring phases, which address the potential shortcomings of the original EO. We v...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Expert systems with applications Ročník 195; s. 116552 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
New York
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2022
Elsevier BV |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0957-4174, 1873-6793 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Shrnutí: | This paper proposes a self-adaptive Equilibrium Optimizer (self-EO) to perform better global, combinatorial, engineering, and multi-objective optimization problems. The new self-EO algorithm integrates four effective exploring phases, which address the potential shortcomings of the original EO. We validate the performances of the proposed algorithm over a large spectrum of optimization problems, i.e., ten functions of the CEC’20 benchmark, three engineering optimization problems, two combinatorial optimization problems, and three multi-objective problems. We compare the self-EO results to those obtained with nine other metaheuristic algorithms (MAs), including the original EO. We employ different metrics to analyze the results thoroughly. The self-EO analyses suggest that the self-EO algorithm has a greater ability to locate the optimal region, a better trade-off between exploring and exploiting mechanisms, and a faster convergence rate to (near)-optimal solutions than other algorithms. Indeed, the self-EO algorithm reaches better results than the other algorithms for most of the tested functions.
•An enhanced algorithm called the self-EO that employs three strategies is proposed.•Self-EO efficiency and performance are verified on several benchmarks.•CEC’20 suite and 3 engineering problems are used for algorithm validation.•Two combinatorial problems, and ten CEC’20 multi-objective problems are solved.•Self-EO performance is analyzed with many metrics and compared to 30 algorithms. |
|---|---|
| Bibliografie: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0957-4174 1873-6793 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116552 |