Impact of past obstetric history and cervical excision on preterm birth rate

Introduction To determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)‐alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth‐alone (PPTB) or a history of both (LLETZ+PPTB). Secondary analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of anten...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica Ročník 100; číslo 11; s. 1995 - 2002
Hlavní autoři: Collins, Anna, Motiwale, Tanushree, Barney, Olivia, Dudbridge, Frank, McParland, Penelope C., Moss, Esther L.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Reykjavik John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2021
Témata:
ISSN:0001-6349, 1600-0412, 1600-0412
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Introduction To determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)‐alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth‐alone (PPTB) or a history of both (LLETZ+PPTB). Secondary analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of antenatal interventions, depth of cervical excision, and patient risk factors on PTB rate in each cohort. Material and methods A retrospective observational cohort study of women referred to a tertiary Antenatal Prematurity Prevention Clinic with a history of LLETZ, PPTB, or LLETZ+PPTB. Information was collated from routinely collected clinical data on patient demographics, previous obstetric history, LLETZ dimensions, antenatal investigations/interventions, and gestation at delivery. Results A total of 1231 women with singleton pregnancies were included, 543 with history of LLETZ‐alone, 607 with a history of PPTB‐alone and 81 with a history of LLETZ+PPTB. PTB rates were 8.8% in the LLETZ‐alone group, which mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population (8.9%) compared with 28.7% in the PPTB‐alone and 37.0% in the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. PTB rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of PTB in post‐excision patients with identified shortened mid‐trimester cervical length. Logistic regression modeling identified PPTB as a strong predictor of recurrent PTB. Excision depth was correlated with gestation at delivery in the LLETZ‐alone group (r = −0.183, p < 0.01) although this only reached statistical significance at depths of 20 mm or more (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% CI 1.04–1.11, p = 0.04). Depth of excision was not correlated with delivery gestation in the LLETZ+PPTB group (r = −0.031, p = 0.82). Conclusions PPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post‐excision population. A retrospective observational cohort study to determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of LLETZ‐alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth alone or a history of both LLETZ +PPTB was performed. PTB rates in the LLETZ‐alone group mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population compared with higher rates in the PPTB‐alone and the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. Preterm birth rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of preterm birth in post‐excision patients with identified shortened mid‐trimester cervical length. PPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post‐excision population.
AbstractList Introduction To determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)‐alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth‐alone (PPTB) or a history of both (LLETZ+PPTB). Secondary analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of antenatal interventions, depth of cervical excision, and patient risk factors on PTB rate in each cohort. Material and methods A retrospective observational cohort study of women referred to a tertiary Antenatal Prematurity Prevention Clinic with a history of LLETZ, PPTB, or LLETZ+PPTB. Information was collated from routinely collected clinical data on patient demographics, previous obstetric history, LLETZ dimensions, antenatal investigations/interventions, and gestation at delivery. Results A total of 1231 women with singleton pregnancies were included, 543 with history of LLETZ‐alone, 607 with a history of PPTB‐alone and 81 with a history of LLETZ+PPTB. PTB rates were 8.8% in the LLETZ‐alone group, which mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population (8.9%) compared with 28.7% in the PPTB‐alone and 37.0% in the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. PTB rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of PTB in post‐excision patients with identified shortened mid‐trimester cervical length. Logistic regression modeling identified PPTB as a strong predictor of recurrent PTB. Excision depth was correlated with gestation at delivery in the LLETZ‐alone group (r = −0.183, p < 0.01) although this only reached statistical significance at depths of 20 mm or more (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% CI 1.04–1.11, p = 0.04). Depth of excision was not correlated with delivery gestation in the LLETZ+PPTB group (r = −0.031, p = 0.82). Conclusions PPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post‐excision population. A retrospective observational cohort study to determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of LLETZ‐alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth alone or a history of both LLETZ +PPTB was performed. PTB rates in the LLETZ‐alone group mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population compared with higher rates in the PPTB‐alone and the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. Preterm birth rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of preterm birth in post‐excision patients with identified shortened mid‐trimester cervical length. PPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post‐excision population.
IntroductionTo determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)‐alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth‐alone (PPTB) or a history of both (LLETZ+PPTB). Secondary analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of antenatal interventions, depth of cervical excision, and patient risk factors on PTB rate in each cohort.Material and methodsA retrospective observational cohort study of women referred to a tertiary Antenatal Prematurity Prevention Clinic with a history of LLETZ, PPTB, or LLETZ+PPTB. Information was collated from routinely collected clinical data on patient demographics, previous obstetric history, LLETZ dimensions, antenatal investigations/interventions, and gestation at delivery.ResultsA total of 1231 women with singleton pregnancies were included, 543 with history of LLETZ‐alone, 607 with a history of PPTB‐alone and 81 with a history of LLETZ+PPTB. PTB rates were 8.8% in the LLETZ‐alone group, which mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population (8.9%) compared with 28.7% in the PPTB‐alone and 37.0% in the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. PTB rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of PTB in post‐excision patients with identified shortened mid‐trimester cervical length. Logistic regression modeling identified PPTB as a strong predictor of recurrent PTB. Excision depth was correlated with gestation at delivery in the LLETZ‐alone group (r = −0.183, p < 0.01) although this only reached statistical significance at depths of 20 mm or more (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% CI 1.04–1.11, p = 0.04). Depth of excision was not correlated with delivery gestation in the LLETZ+PPTB group (r = −0.031, p = 0.82).ConclusionsPPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post‐excision population.
To determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth-alone (PPTB) or a history of both (LLETZ+PPTB). Secondary analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of antenatal interventions, depth of cervical excision, and patient risk factors on PTB rate in each cohort.INTRODUCTIONTo determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-alone compared with a history of previous preterm birth-alone (PPTB) or a history of both (LLETZ+PPTB). Secondary analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of antenatal interventions, depth of cervical excision, and patient risk factors on PTB rate in each cohort.A retrospective observational cohort study of women referred to a tertiary Antenatal Prematurity Prevention Clinic with a history of LLETZ, PPTB, or LLETZ+PPTB. Information was collated from routinely collected clinical data on patient demographics, previous obstetric history, LLETZ dimensions, antenatal investigations/interventions, and gestation at delivery.MATERIAL AND METHODSA retrospective observational cohort study of women referred to a tertiary Antenatal Prematurity Prevention Clinic with a history of LLETZ, PPTB, or LLETZ+PPTB. Information was collated from routinely collected clinical data on patient demographics, previous obstetric history, LLETZ dimensions, antenatal investigations/interventions, and gestation at delivery.A total of 1231 women with singleton pregnancies were included, 543 with history of LLETZ-alone, 607 with a history of PPTB-alone and 81 with a history of LLETZ+PPTB. PTB rates were 8.8% in the LLETZ-alone group, which mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population (8.9%) compared with 28.7% in the PPTB-alone and 37.0% in the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. PTB rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of PTB in post-excision patients with identified shortened mid-trimester cervical length. Logistic regression modeling identified PPTB as a strong predictor of recurrent PTB. Excision depth was correlated with gestation at delivery in the LLETZ-alone group (r = -0.183, p < 0.01) although this only reached statistical significance at depths of 20 mm or more (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.11, p = 0.04). Depth of excision was not correlated with delivery gestation in the LLETZ+PPTB group (r = -0.031, p = 0.82).RESULTSA total of 1231 women with singleton pregnancies were included, 543 with history of LLETZ-alone, 607 with a history of PPTB-alone and 81 with a history of LLETZ+PPTB. PTB rates were 8.8% in the LLETZ-alone group, which mirrored the PTB rate in the local background obstetric population (8.9%) compared with 28.7% in the PPTB-alone and 37.0% in the LLETZ+PPTB cohorts. PTB rates were higher in LLETZ cohorts treated with antenatal intervention (cervical cerclage or progesterone pessary) and there was no evidence of an effect of intervention on risk of PTB in post-excision patients with identified shortened mid-trimester cervical length. Logistic regression modeling identified PPTB as a strong predictor of recurrent PTB. Excision depth was correlated with gestation at delivery in the LLETZ-alone group (r = -0.183, p < 0.01) although this only reached statistical significance at depths of 20 mm or more (odds ratio [OR] 3.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.11, p = 0.04). Depth of excision was not correlated with delivery gestation in the LLETZ+PPTB group (r = -0.031, p = 0.82).PPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post-excision population.CONCLUSIONSPPTB has a greater impact on subsequent PTB risk compared with depth of cervical excisional treatment. The value and nature of antenatal interventions should be investigated in the post-excision population.
Author Collins, Anna
McParland, Penelope C.
Moss, Esther L.
Motiwale, Tanushree
Dudbridge, Frank
Barney, Olivia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anna
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6121-4948
  surname: Collins
  fullname: Collins, Anna
  organization: University of Leicester
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tanushree
  surname: Motiwale
  fullname: Motiwale, Tanushree
  organization: University of Leicester
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Olivia
  surname: Barney
  fullname: Barney, Olivia
  organization: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Frank
  surname: Dudbridge
  fullname: Dudbridge, Frank
  organization: University of Leicester
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Penelope C.
  surname: McParland
  fullname: McParland, Penelope C.
  organization: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Esther L.
  surname: Moss
  fullname: Moss, Esther L.
  email: em321@leicester.ac.uk
  organization: University of Leicester
BookMark eNp9kE9LAzEQxYNUsK1e_AQBLyJsTbLZf8dStAqFHtRzyGZnbcruZk1Std_etOupiMPAY-D3HsOboFFnOkDompIZDXMvzbubUc4SfobGNCUkIpyyERoTQmiUxry4QBPntuFiGc_HaPXc9lJ5bGrcSxe0dB681QpvtPPG7rHsKqzAfmolGwzfSjttOhy2t-DBtrjU1m-wlR4u0XktGwdXvzpFb48Pr4unaLVePi_mq0jFGeFRXdQqS_OKE5CgOE-oLEjBgOaFZCqtKS-ZiktWywOXMaXKlEMFdUqAVsDiKbodcntrPnbgvGi1U9A0sgOzc4IlecoTRtMioDcn6NbsbBe-O1IsS5KCBOpuoJQ1zlmoRW91K-1eUCIOxYpDseJYbIDJCay0lz604q3Uzd8WOli-dAP7f8LFfL18GTw_mmCNmg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines13092057
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01107.x
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03203.x
10.1016/j.jogc.2018.04.026
10.1136/bmj.h6283
10.1093/infdis/jiaa106
10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.230
10.3109/14767058.2013.871254
10.1371/journal.pone.0163793
10.1515/JPM.2009.083
10.1002/uog.15925
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2
10.1136/bmj.i3633
10.1136/bmj.a1284
10.5812/whb.12667
10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.225
10.1136/bmj.e5847
10.1002/pd.2662
10.1111/1471-0528.12512
10.1186/s12884-020-2731-7
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.09.003
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.025
10.1136/bmj.e5174
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG)
2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG)
– notice: 2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1111/aogs.14254
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1600-0412
EndPage 2002
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_aogs_14254
AOGS14254
Genre article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
1OB
1OC
23M
24P
31~
34G
36B
39C
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
52M
52O
52T
52U
52V
52W
53G
5GY
5HH
5RE
5VS
702
7PT
7X7
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8FI
8FJ
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAFWJ
AAHHS
AAKAS
AANHP
AAONW
AAPXX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABTOO
ABUWG
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACGFS
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADEOM
ADIYS
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADPDF
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFGKR
AFKRA
AFKVX
AFZJQ
AGQPQ
AHMBA
AI.
AIACR
AIJEM
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJWEG
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BENPR
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DUUFO
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F21
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FYUFA
G-S
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H.X
HF~
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
KBYEO
L7B
LATKE
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M44
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
MY~
N04
N05
NF~
O66
OK1
OVD
OVEED
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RPM
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TDBHL
TEORI
TFW
UKHRP
V9Y
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WVDHM
WXSBR
X7M
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AFPKN
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AQTUD
CITATION
O8X
PHGZM
WIN
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-f9fc768d40eaec4451a9092e189a2c6f14b2c3b2fafc7672ccb64edef60e1de23
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISICitedReferencesCount 2
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000710992800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0001-6349
1600-0412
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 11:09:57 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 14:35:35 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:19:46 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:43:03 EST 2025
Wed Jun 18 06:51:37 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3704-f9fc768d40eaec4451a9092e189a2c6f14b2c3b2fafc7672ccb64edef60e1de23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-6121-4948
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Faogs.14254
PQID 2586275590
PQPubID 1136361
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2586452169
proquest_journals_2586275590
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_14254
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_aogs_14254
wiley_primary_10_1111_aogs_14254_AOGS14254
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2021
2021-11-00
20211101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2021
  text: November 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Reykjavik
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Reykjavik
PublicationTitle Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
References 2007; 114
2010; 21
2017; 4
2020; 20
2019; 41
1997; 42
2015; 351
2014; 27
2019; 236
2011; 31
2016; 354
2008; 337
2020; 69
2020; 222
2012; 345
2014; 121
2016; 48
2009; 114
2009; 37
2012; 119
2006; 367
2016; 11
e_1_2_10_23_1
e_1_2_10_24_1
e_1_2_10_21_1
e_1_2_10_22_1
e_1_2_10_20_1
e_1_2_10_2_1
e_1_2_10_4_1
e_1_2_10_18_1
e_1_2_10_3_1
Zeisler H (e_1_2_10_15_1) 1997; 42
e_1_2_10_19_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_16_1
e_1_2_10_5_1
e_1_2_10_17_1
e_1_2_10_8_1
e_1_2_10_14_1
e_1_2_10_7_1
e_1_2_10_12_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_13_1
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_11_1
e_1_2_10_25_1
e_1_2_10_26_1
References_xml – volume: 42
  start-page: 390
  year: 1997
  end-page: 392
  article-title: Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy. Effect in women with a history of conization
  publication-title: J Reprod Med
– volume: 354
  start-page: i3633
  year: 2016
  article-title: Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 69
  start-page: 40
  year: 2020
  end-page: 49
  article-title: Preterm birth prevention
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 345
  year: 2012
  article-title: Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective‐prospective cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 119
  start-page: 692
  year: 2012
  end-page: 698
  article-title: Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery
  publication-title: BJOG
– volume: 20
  start-page: 58
  year: 2020
  article-title: The use of specialised preterm birth clinics for women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review
  publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1594
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1597
  article-title: The effect of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes in women following conization
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
– volume: 41
  start-page: 76
  year: 2019
  end-page: 88.e7
  article-title: Interventions to try to prevent preterm birth in women with a history of conization: a systematic review and meta‐analyses
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol Can
– volume: 236
  start-page: 210
  year: 2019
  end-page: 213
  article-title: Obstetric outcomes in patients who have undergone excisional treatment for high‐grade cervical squamous intra‐epithelial neoplasia
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 225
  year: 2010
  end-page: 229
  article-title: Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage
  publication-title: J Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 230
  year: 2010
  end-page: 236
  article-title: The role of prophylactic cerclage in preventing preterm delivery after electrosurgical conization
  publication-title: J Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 222
  start-page: 499
  year: 2020
  end-page: 508
  article-title: Has human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevented adverse pregnancy outcomes? Population‐level analysis after 8 years of a national HPV vaccination program in Australia
  publication-title: J Infect Dis
– volume: 11
  year: 2016
  article-title: Preterm birth prevention post‐conization: a model of cervical length screening with targeted cerclage
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1232
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1238
  article-title: Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 121
  start-page: 417
  year: 2014
  end-page: 421
  article-title: Provision and practice of specialist preterm labour clinics: a UK survey of practice
  publication-title: BJOG
– volume: 367
  start-page: 489
  year: 2006
  end-page: 498
  article-title: Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 31
  start-page: 75
  year: 2011
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from maternal factors, obstetric history and placental perfusion and function at 11–13 weeks
  publication-title: Prenat Diagn
– volume: 48
  start-page: 38
  year: 2016
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 114
  start-page: 70
  year: 2007
  end-page: 80
  article-title: Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth
  publication-title: BJOG
– volume: 4
  year: 2017
  article-title: The role of PTB clinics: a review of the screening methods, interventions and evidence for preterm birth surveillance clinics for high‐risk asymptomatic women
  publication-title: Women Health Bull
– volume: 345
  year: 2012
  article-title: Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 337
  start-page: a1284
  year: 2008
  article-title: Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta‐analysis
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 351
  start-page: h6283
  year: 2015
  article-title: Preterm labour: summary of NICE guidance
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 37
  start-page: 473
  year: 2009
  end-page: 479
  article-title: A randomized trial of cerclage vs. 17 α‐hydroxyprogesterone caproate for treatment of short cervix
  publication-title: J Perinat Med
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01107.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03203.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.04.026
– ident: e_1_2_10_18_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6283
– ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
  doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa106
– ident: e_1_2_10_14_1
  doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.230
– volume: 42
  start-page: 390
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_2_10_15_1
  article-title: Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy. Effect in women with a history of conization
  publication-title: J Reprod Med
– ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
  doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.871254
– ident: e_1_2_10_25_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163793
– ident: e_1_2_10_17_1
  doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.083
– ident: e_1_2_10_24_1
  doi: 10.1002/uog.15925
– ident: e_1_2_10_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_26_1
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bf1ef2
– ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633
– ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1284
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.5812/whb.12667
– ident: e_1_2_10_13_1
  doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.225
– ident: e_1_2_10_20_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5847
– ident: e_1_2_10_23_1
  doi: 10.1002/pd.2662
– ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12512
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2731-7
– ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6
– ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.09.003
– ident: e_1_2_10_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.025
– ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5174
SSID ssj0012748
Score 2.3421533
Snippet Introduction To determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)‐alone compared with a...
IntroductionTo determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)‐alone compared with a history...
To determine the impact on preterm birth (PTB) of a history of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-alone compared with a history of previous...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1995
SubjectTerms Cervical cancer
cervical excision
Cervix
Clinical outcomes
Gynecological surgery
Health risks
large loop excision of the transformation zone
Obstetrics
Premature birth
preterm birth
risk of preterm birth
Title Impact of past obstetric history and cervical excision on preterm birth rate
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Faogs.14254
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2586275590
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2586452169
Volume 100
WOSCitedRecordID wos000710992800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0412
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012748
  issn: 0001-6349
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 19220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Free Content
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0412
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012748
  issn: 0001-6349
  databaseCode: WIN
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1600-0412
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012748
  issn: 0001-6349
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9swED_appS-rNva0WxdUOleNjDIsmJbsJeyLlshzUq7rHkzkiytheKUOB3bf7872UkzGIMyMP7A5w90_p3uLN3vAN4I7uISu7KIG55H0ussUsb3I2FyI3iKGAnp0d-G2WiUTybqfA3eL3JhGn6I5Q83Qkaw1wRwbeoVkOvp9xpxjgHOOnTiOMmpcIOQ58sxBIy3GjuMAXOaSNWSk9I8nodr_-yOHnzMVU81dDWDnf97yafwpHUx2XHzTTyDNVc9h62zdhB9F4anITOSTT270zVuDWqaiPpZQz78i-mqZDYYEbyP-9lU4WG40OxENOXM3Mzm14xYJvZgPPj49cPnqC2qENkk4zLyylsMMUrJnXaW6Mm04kq4OFda2NTH0gibGOE1yWXCWpNKVzqfkladSF7ARjWt3D4wkSamdIp7FSvpUqcTosIRCXqUjpjcuvB20baFbRnHqfDFbbGIPKh5itA8XThayt41PBt_lTpYqKhosVYXop8T1XJf8S4cLk8jSmjoQ1duet_ISPRUUtWFd0Fh_3hKcfzl02XYe_kY4VewLWjCS0hUPICN-ezevYZN-2N-U8964dvEdTbJe9A5uRiMh3h0dTr6DQtA6eo
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3rS8MwED90ivrFtzifEf2iUMjSrGs-ivgYzin42reSpIkOpBvbFP3vzaXdpiCCCIUWen2Qy13ucne_Azhg1FRSt5QFVNE44FbWAqFsNWAqVoxGTkZ8efRDo9Zsxq2WuClyc7AWJseHGG24oWR4fY0CjhvSX6Rcdp76TtCdhzMJU9xZGti54bHeHAURnMOVK2LnMUchFwU6KSbyjJ_9vh6Njcyvpqpfa84W_vmXizBfGJnkOJ8VSzBhsmWYuSrC6CvQqPvaSNKxpCv77qwcrxGqn-Twwx9EZinRXo2495j3vA8PcQfmJzplTlS7N3gmiDOxCvdnp3cnF0HRViHQYY3ywAqrnZORcmqk0QhQJgUVzFRiIZmObIUrpkPFrES6GtNaRdykxkbIV8PCNShlncysA2FRqFIjqBUVwU1kZIhgOCx0NqVBLLcyHA4HN9EF5ji2vnhJhr4HDk_ih6cM-yPabo608SPV1pBHSSFt_YRVYwRbrgpahr3RbScnGPyQmem85jTc2SqRKMOR59gvX0mOr89v_dXGX4h3Yfbi7qqRNOrNy02YY5j-4ssWt6A06L2abZjWb4N2v7fjJ-onPu3qqw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fSxtBEB40ivSlalWaGnVL-6JwsNnbXG4fxRgVYypWxbdjd2_WBsolJLG0_3139i5RQQQRDu7g5n6wc9_szO3MNwDfBcdm7qeyiBueRtLpdqSMa0XCpEbwxGMklEff9tr9fnp3py6r3ByqhSn5IeY_3AgZwV4TwHGUuyco18P7iQe6j3AWYUlSF5kaLHWuuje9-TKCD7lKU-xj5iSWquInpVSex6ufz0iPbuZTZzXMNt3Vd77nGnys3Ex2WH4X67CAxSdYuagW0jegdxaqI9nQsZGe-L3x2iayflYSEP9jusiZDYbE3wf_lp14mN8oQ9Gbc2YG4-kvRkwTm3DTPb4-Oo2qxgqRjdtcRk4568OMXHLUaImiTCuuBDZTpYVNXFMaYWMjnCa5trDWJBJzdAlpFkW8BbViWOBnYCKJTY6KO9VUEhPUMdHhiNh7lUhsbnXYnw1uZivWcWp-8TubRR80PFkYnjp8m8uOSq6NF6UaMx1lFd4mmWilRLfcUrwOX-enPVJo-UMXOHwoZaT3VhJVh4OgsVeekh3-OPkZjr68RXgPVi473ax31j_fhg-C8l9C3WIDatPxA-7Asv0zHUzGu9WX-h-moOtU
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+past+obstetric+history+and+cervical+excision+on+preterm+birth+rate&rft.jtitle=Acta+obstetricia+et+gynecologica+Scandinavica&rft.au=Collins%2C+Anna&rft.au=Motiwale%2C+Tanushree&rft.au=Barney%2C+Olivia&rft.au=Dudbridge%2C+Frank&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1995&rft.epage=2002&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Faogs.14254&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Faogs.14254&rft.externalDocID=AOGS14254
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-6349&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-6349&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-6349&client=summon