A Game Approach for Charging Station Placement Based on User Preferences and Crowdedness
The placement of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs), which encourages the rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs), should be considered from not only operational perspective such as minimizing installation costs, but also user perspective so that their strategic and competitive charging...
Saved in:
| Published in: | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 3654 - 3669 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
IEEE
01.04.2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1524-9050, 1558-0016, 1558-0016 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The placement of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs), which encourages the rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs), should be considered from not only operational perspective such as minimizing installation costs, but also user perspective so that their strategic and competitive charging behaviors can be reflected. This paper proposes a methodological framework to consider crowdedness and individual preferences of electric vehicle users (EVUs) in the selection of locations for fast-charging stations. The electric vehicle charging station placement problem (EVCSPP) is solved via a decentralized game theoretical decision-making algorithm and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">k </tex-math></inline-formula>-means clustering algorithm. The proposed algorithm, referred to as <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">k </tex-math></inline-formula>-GRAPE, determines the locations of charging stations to maximize the sum of utilities of EVUs. In particular, we analytically present that 50% of suboptimality of the solution can be at least guaranteed, which is about 17% better than the existing game theoretical based framework. We show a few variants to describe the utility functions that may capture the difference in preferences of EVUs. Finally, we demonstrate the viability of the decision framework via three real-world data-based experiments. The results of the experiments, including a comparison with a baseline method are then discussed. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 1524-9050 1558-0016 1558-0016 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TITS.2020.3038938 |