Methodological Rigor in Management Research Reviews

Review research in management, like other research traditions, demands a methodological compass to advance coherent and credible knowledge claims. Yet, the established landscape of review research lacks a common framework for guiding and assessing its methodological rigor. We conducted an explorator...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of management Ročník 51; číslo 1; s. 103 - 131
Hlavní autoři: Simsek, Zeki, Fox, Brian C, Heavey, Ciaran, Liu, Shuang
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2025
Sage Publications Ltd
Témata:
Frame analysis
Literature reviews
Management
Research design
Research methodology
mixed methods
philosophy of science
research design
ISSN:0149-2063, 1557-1211
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Review research in management, like other research traditions, demands a methodological compass to advance coherent and credible knowledge claims. Yet, the established landscape of review research lacks a common framework for guiding and assessing its methodological rigor. We conducted an exploratory scoping review, analyzing a large sample of review articles published in the Journal of Management. The review focuses on reported practices dealing with five themes embedded within all review articles: their purpose, type, design, execution, and internal alignment. By comprehensively examining manifest practices, the review reveals crucial insights into the progress and evolving methods employed in management research reviews. Synthesizing those insights with existing conceptions of rigor, we present a conceptual framework including promising research directions on the methodological rigor of review articles.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0149-2063
1557-1211
DOI:10.1177/01492063241237222