Comparison of clustering algorithms on generalized propensity score in observational studies: a simulation study

In observational studies, unbalanced observed covariates between treatment groups often cause biased inferences on the estimation of treatment effects. Recently, generalized propensity score (GPS) has been proposed to overcome this problem; however, a practical technique to apply the GPS is lacking....

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Journal of statistical computation and simulation Ročník 83; číslo 12; s. 2206 - 2218
Hlavní autori: Tu, Chunhao, Jiao, Shuo, Koh, Woon Yuen
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Abingdon Taylor & Francis 01.12.2013
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Predmet:
ISSN:0094-9655, 1563-5163
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:In observational studies, unbalanced observed covariates between treatment groups often cause biased inferences on the estimation of treatment effects. Recently, generalized propensity score (GPS) has been proposed to overcome this problem; however, a practical technique to apply the GPS is lacking. This study demonstrates how clustering algorithms can be used to group similar subjects based on transformed GPS. We compare four popular clustering algorithms: k-means clustering (KMC), model-based clustering, fuzzy c-means clustering and partitioning around medoids based on the following three criteria: average dissimilarity between subjects within clusters, average Dunn index and average silhouette width under four various covariate scenarios. Simulation studies show that the KMC algorithm has overall better performance compared with the other three clustering algorithms. Therefore, we recommend using the KMC algorithm to group similar subjects based on the transformed GPS.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0094-9655
1563-5163
DOI:10.1080/00949655.2012.685169