Comparison of clustering algorithms on generalized propensity score in observational studies: a simulation study

In observational studies, unbalanced observed covariates between treatment groups often cause biased inferences on the estimation of treatment effects. Recently, generalized propensity score (GPS) has been proposed to overcome this problem; however, a practical technique to apply the GPS is lacking....

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Journal of statistical computation and simulation Ročník 83; číslo 12; s. 2206 - 2218
Hlavní autoři: Tu, Chunhao, Jiao, Shuo, Koh, Woon Yuen
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Abingdon Taylor & Francis 01.12.2013
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Témata:
Algorithms
Cluster analysis
Clustering
Clusters
Comparative analysis
Computer simulation
Fuzzy
fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy set theory
generalized propensity score
k-means clustering algorithm
model-based clustering algorithm
observational studies
partitioning around medoids algorithm
Performance indices
ISSN:0094-9655, 1563-5163
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In observational studies, unbalanced observed covariates between treatment groups often cause biased inferences on the estimation of treatment effects. Recently, generalized propensity score (GPS) has been proposed to overcome this problem; however, a practical technique to apply the GPS is lacking. This study demonstrates how clustering algorithms can be used to group similar subjects based on transformed GPS. We compare four popular clustering algorithms: k-means clustering (KMC), model-based clustering, fuzzy c-means clustering and partitioning around medoids based on the following three criteria: average dissimilarity between subjects within clusters, average Dunn index and average silhouette width under four various covariate scenarios. Simulation studies show that the KMC algorithm has overall better performance compared with the other three clustering algorithms. Therefore, we recommend using the KMC algorithm to group similar subjects based on the transformed GPS.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0094-9655
1563-5163
DOI:10.1080/00949655.2012.685169