A theology of marriage: A biblical or a cultural construct?

This article argues that the contemporary mainline understanding of marriage (theology of marriage), especially in the local South African denominational context, is not 'based on the Bible', but rather on a cultural construct. Moreover, this construct is not based on Judeo-Christian value...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Hervormde teologiese studies Ročník 76; číslo 4; s. e1 - e8
Hlavní autor: van Eck, Ernest
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Pretoria African Online Scientific Information Systems (Pty) Ltd t/a AOSIS 04.12.2020
AOSIS (Pty) Ltd
AOSIS
Témata:
ISSN:0259-9422, 2072-8050
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:This article argues that the contemporary mainline understanding of marriage (theology of marriage), especially in the local South African denominational context, is not 'based on the Bible', but rather on a cultural construct. Moreover, this construct is not based on Judeo-Christian values and norms; it is the result of early Christianity's enculturation into the world of the Roman Empire. It is also argued that a definition of Christian marriage as being an institution originated by God, consisting of a monogamous and lifelong relationship between a man and a woman, cannot be based on the Bible. The reason for this is that the institution of marriage in ancient times was something totally different from what we understand today, the fact that the Bible also gives evidence of different understandings (forms) of marriage from the time of the patriarchs up to the 2nd century, and that Jesus, Paul and the Church Fathers preferred celibacy to marriage. Contribution This article aim to contribute to the current discussion, especially in the local South African denominational context, on the institution of marriage as being 'biblical', and its relationship to same sex-relations being typified as marriages.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0259-9422
2072-8050
DOI:10.4102/hts.v76i4.6027