A Robust Aerodynamic Design Optimization Methodology for UAV Airfoils Based on Stochastic Surrogate Model and PPO-Clip Algorithm

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are widely used in meteorology and logistics due to their unique advantages nowadays. During their lifecycle, uncertainties—such as flight condition variations—can significantly affect both design and performance, making Robust Aerodynamic Design Optimization (RADO) e...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Drones (Basel) Ročník 9; číslo 9; s. 607
Hlavní autoři: Wang, Yiyu, Huo, Yuxin, Zhong, Zhilong, Ji, Renxing, Chen, Yang, Wang, Bo, Ma, Xiaoping
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2025
Témata:
ISSN:2504-446X, 2504-446X
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are widely used in meteorology and logistics due to their unique advantages nowadays. During their lifecycle, uncertainties—such as flight condition variations—can significantly affect both design and performance, making Robust Aerodynamic Design Optimization (RADO) essential. However, existing RADO methodologies face high computational cost of uncertainty analysis and inefficiency of conventional optimization algorithms. To address these challenges, this paper proposed a novel RADO methodology integrating a Stochastic Kriging (SK) surrogate model with the PPO-Clip reinforcement learning algorithm, targeting atmospheric uncertainties encountered by turbojet-powered UAVs in transonic cruise. The SK surrogate model, constructed via Maximin Latin Hypercube Sampling and refined using the Expected Improvement infill criterion, enabled efficient uncertainty quantification. Based on the trained surrogate model, a PPO-Clip-based RADO framework with tailored reward and state transition functions was established. Applied to the RAE2822 airfoil under Mach number perturbations, the methodology demonstrated superior reliability and efficiency compared with L-BFGS-B and PSO algorithms.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2504-446X
2504-446X
DOI:10.3390/drones9090607