Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for the diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes prior to undergoing corneal refract...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current eye research Jg. 45; H. 2; S. 118 - 123
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Mingyue, Zhang, Fengju, Li, Yu, Song, Yanzheng, Wang, Zhiqun
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Taylor & Francis 01.02.2020
Schlagworte:
Adolescent
Adult
Asian Continental Ancestry Group - ethnology
bilateral keratoconus
Biomechanical Phenomena
China - epidemiology
Cornea - physiopathology
Corneal Pachymetry
Corneal Topography
Corvis ST
Early Diagnosis
Elasticity - physiology
Female
forme fruste keratoconus
Humans
Keratoconus - diagnosis
Keratoconus - ethnology
Keratoconus - physiopathology
Male
Myopia - diagnosis
Myopia - ethnology
Myopia - physiopathology
Pentacam
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
unilateral keratoconus
Young Adult
China
Pentacam
bilateral keratoconus
unilateral keratoconus
Corvis ST
forme fruste keratoconus
ISSN:0271-3683, 1460-2202, 1460-2202
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for the diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes prior to undergoing corneal refractive surgery. Methods: A total of 125 patients (185 eyes) planned to undergo corneal refractive surgery were selected from the Refractive Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between December 2017 and December 2018. They were divided into four groups: the normal group, bilateral keratoconus (BK) group, unilateral keratoconus (UK) group, and the forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) group. After determining the BADD, CBI, and TBI for each eye using the Corvis ST combined with Pentacam, the sensitivity and specificity of these three indices in diagnosing keratoconus were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The TBI exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. UK (area under the ROC curve [AUROC]: 0.992), normal vs. UK+BK (AUROC: 0.988), normal vs. UK+BK* (*stand randomly selecting one eye of each patient in BK group) (AUROC: 0.982), normal vs. UK+BK+FFK (AUROC: 0.965), and normal vs. UK+BK*+FFK (AUROC: 0.953). The CBI demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. FFK (AUROC: 0.897). Finally, the BADD showed the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. BK (AUROC: 0.998) and normal vs. BK* (AUROC: 0.996). Conclusion: The BADD, CBI, and TBI performed well in diagnosing keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes. The CBI showed the highest diagnostic efficiency compared with normal for FFK. In addition, the TBI offered the greatest accuracy in detecting keratoconus and FFK eyes vs. the other parameters.
AbstractList Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for the diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes prior to undergoing corneal refractive surgery.Methods: A total of 125 patients (185 eyes) planned to undergo corneal refractive surgery were selected from the Refractive Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between December 2017 and December 2018. They were divided into four groups: the normal group, bilateral keratoconus (BK) group, unilateral keratoconus (UK) group, and the forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) group. After determining the BADD, CBI, and TBI for each eye using the Corvis ST combined with Pentacam, the sensitivity and specificity of these three indices in diagnosing keratoconus were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results: The TBI exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. UK (area under the ROC curve [AUROC]: 0.992), normal vs. UK+BK (AUROC: 0.988), normal vs. UK+BK* (*stand randomly selecting one eye of each patient in BK group) (AUROC: 0.982), normal vs. UK+BK+FFK (AUROC: 0.965), and normal vs. UK+BK*+FFK (AUROC: 0.953). The CBI demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. FFK (AUROC: 0.897). Finally, the BADD showed the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. BK (AUROC: 0.998) and normal vs. BK* (AUROC: 0.996).Conclusion: The BADD, CBI, and TBI performed well in diagnosing keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes. The CBI showed the highest diagnostic efficiency compared with normal for FFK. In addition, the TBI offered the greatest accuracy in detecting keratoconus and FFK eyes vs. the other parameters.Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for the diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes prior to undergoing corneal refractive surgery.Methods: A total of 125 patients (185 eyes) planned to undergo corneal refractive surgery were selected from the Refractive Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between December 2017 and December 2018. They were divided into four groups: the normal group, bilateral keratoconus (BK) group, unilateral keratoconus (UK) group, and the forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) group. After determining the BADD, CBI, and TBI for each eye using the Corvis ST combined with Pentacam, the sensitivity and specificity of these three indices in diagnosing keratoconus were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results: The TBI exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. UK (area under the ROC curve [AUROC]: 0.992), normal vs. UK+BK (AUROC: 0.988), normal vs. UK+BK* (*stand randomly selecting one eye of each patient in BK group) (AUROC: 0.982), normal vs. UK+BK+FFK (AUROC: 0.965), and normal vs. UK+BK*+FFK (AUROC: 0.953). The CBI demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. FFK (AUROC: 0.897). Finally, the BADD showed the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. BK (AUROC: 0.998) and normal vs. BK* (AUROC: 0.996).Conclusion: The BADD, CBI, and TBI performed well in diagnosing keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes. The CBI showed the highest diagnostic efficiency compared with normal for FFK. In addition, the TBI offered the greatest accuracy in detecting keratoconus and FFK eyes vs. the other parameters.
: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for the diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes prior to undergoing corneal refractive surgery. : A total of 125 patients (185 eyes) planned to undergo corneal refractive surgery were selected from the Refractive Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between December 2017 and December 2018. They were divided into four groups: the normal group, bilateral keratoconus (BK) group, unilateral keratoconus (UK) group, and the forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) group. After determining the BADD, CBI, and TBI for each eye using the Corvis ST combined with Pentacam, the sensitivity and specificity of these three indices in diagnosing keratoconus were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. : The TBI exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. UK (area under the ROC curve [AUROC]: 0.992), normal vs. UK+BK (AUROC: 0.988), normal vs. UK+BK* (*stand randomly selecting one eye of each patient in BK group) (AUROC: 0.982), normal vs. UK+BK+FFK (AUROC: 0.965), and normal vs. UK+BK*+FFK (AUROC: 0.953). The CBI demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. FFK (AUROC: 0.897). Finally, the BADD showed the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. BK (AUROC: 0.998) and normal vs. BK* (AUROC: 0.996). : The BADD, CBI, and TBI performed well in diagnosing keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes. The CBI showed the highest diagnostic efficiency compared with normal for FFK. In addition, the TBI offered the greatest accuracy in detecting keratoconus and FFK eyes vs. the other parameters.
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for the diagnosis of keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes prior to undergoing corneal refractive surgery. Methods: A total of 125 patients (185 eyes) planned to undergo corneal refractive surgery were selected from the Refractive Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital between December 2017 and December 2018. They were divided into four groups: the normal group, bilateral keratoconus (BK) group, unilateral keratoconus (UK) group, and the forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) group. After determining the BADD, CBI, and TBI for each eye using the Corvis ST combined with Pentacam, the sensitivity and specificity of these three indices in diagnosing keratoconus were analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The TBI exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. UK (area under the ROC curve [AUROC]: 0.992), normal vs. UK+BK (AUROC: 0.988), normal vs. UK+BK* (*stand randomly selecting one eye of each patient in BK group) (AUROC: 0.982), normal vs. UK+BK+FFK (AUROC: 0.965), and normal vs. UK+BK*+FFK (AUROC: 0.953). The CBI demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. FFK (AUROC: 0.897). Finally, the BADD showed the highest diagnostic efficiency in normal vs. BK (AUROC: 0.998) and normal vs. BK* (AUROC: 0.996). Conclusion: The BADD, CBI, and TBI performed well in diagnosing keratoconus in Chinese myopic eyes. The CBI showed the highest diagnostic efficiency compared with normal for FFK. In addition, the TBI offered the greatest accuracy in detecting keratoconus and FFK eyes vs. the other parameters.
Author Zhang, Fengju
Li, Yu
Song, Yanzheng
Zhang, Mingyue
Wang, Zhiqun
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Mingyue
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4719-1911
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Mingyue
  organization: Ophthalmology Department, Civil Aviation Medical Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Fengju
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3715-4164
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Fengju
  email: wxw93@hotmail.com
  organization: Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and science Key Lab, Capital Medical University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Yu
  organization: Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and science Key Lab, Capital Medical University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yanzheng
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Yanzheng
  organization: Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and science Key Lab, Capital Medical University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Zhiqun
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Zhiqun
  organization: Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and science Key Lab, Capital Medical University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31466466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkE1P3DAQhi0EKgvtT6DysZcs_kicrLhQLdtSFQRS6aUXa-LY4CqxF9sLyr_H0e5eeiiSpbFGzzszek7QofNOI3RGyZyShpwTVlMuGj5nhC7mVFRN3dQHaEZLQQrGCDtEs4kpJugYncT4l5CpUX5AxzxTIr8Z-rOC0I_4ysKj89FG7A3-qQMkr7zbRGwdXj5Zp6PGt6NfW4VXo464HfHSD6111j3mX3jJyV8P-NWmJ3yvXQIFw0d0ZKCP-tOunqLf31YPy-vi5u77j-XXm0JxIVKh8n2Ka9aaRQWMtJ0yvBUCKlJzI0hbLmrDGXSCtarStOxUTStWQt3xRdWVJT9FX7Zz18E_b3RMcrBR6b4Hp_0mSsYaTknFOcvo5x26aQfdyXWwA4RR7n1k4GILqOBjDNpIZRMk610KYHtJiZzsy719OdmXO_s5Xf2T3i94L3e5zVlnfBjg1Ye-kwnG3gcTwCkb84n_HfEGrLmaQQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_021_01929_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_15636
crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2022_2035402
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2130_7503
crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20210330_01
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_021_02144_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_025_03975_z
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_81809_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clae_2025_102382
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_020_01704_6
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_022_02183_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2022_12_016
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13082378
crossref_primary_10_4103_tjo_TJO_D_24_00147
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_022_02543_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optlaseng_2024_108124
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_022_02218_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_08164622_2023_2300297
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICO_0000000000003910
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2021_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICO_0000000000003816
crossref_primary_10_1155_joph_3678453
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_021_00241_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICO_0000000000003273
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2025_1598546
crossref_primary_10_4274_tjo_galenos_2023_68188
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000629
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijo_IJO_1377_22
crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721211063740
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10091905
crossref_primary_10_4103_IJO_IJO_766_24
crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2021_1896752
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40123_021_00383_w
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_70011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2023_04_002
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2025_1518889
crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2022_2103569
Cites_doi 10.1097/01.icu.0000233954.86723.25
10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.026
10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01
10.3928/1081597X-20100428-02
10.3928/1081597X-20170807-02
10.1016/j.joco.2017.05.002
10.3928/1081597X-20170621-09
10.1016/j.zemedi.2015.11.001
10.1097/00004397-199703710-00005
10.1167/iovs.12-10984
10.5935/0004-2749.20160075
10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02
10.3928/1081597X-20181012-01
10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.02.004
10.3928/1081597X-20180103-01
10.1055/s-0042-100626
10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009
10.1167/iovs.10-5369
10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.030
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/02713683.2019.1658787
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1460-2202
EndPage 123
ExternalDocumentID 31466466
10_1080_02713683_2019_1658787
1658787
Genre Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: 215 High-Level Talent Fund of Beijing Health Government
  grantid: 2013-2-023
GroupedDBID ---
00X
03L
0R~
29F
36B
4.4
5GY
5RE
AAGDL
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLJU
ABLKL
ABUPF
ABWVI
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACNCT
ACUHS
ADCVX
ADRBQ
ADXPE
AECIN
AENEX
AEOZL
AFKVX
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
AQTUD
BABNJ
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CS3
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
ESX
F5P
H13
HZ~
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
LJTGL
M4Z
O9-
P2P
PQQKQ
RNANH
RVRKI
SV3
TASJS
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
TUROJ
TUS
UEQFS
V1S
~1N
AAYXX
CITATION
.55
.GJ
0BK
34G
39C
53G
5VS
AALIY
AAORF
AAPXX
ABWCV
ABZEW
ACKZS
ADFOM
ADFZZ
ADYSH
AEIIZ
AFFNX
AFLEI
AJVHN
AWYRJ
BRMBE
CAG
CGR
COF
CUY
CVF
CYYVM
CZDIS
DRXRE
DWTOO
ECM
EIF
EJD
JENTW
M44
NPM
NUSFT
QQXMO
RIG
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c683c3e2bf95a20bdcf3b66a5073f60b497f32ad62bc5e14dc71524a7d395d443
IEDL.DBID TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount 39
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000484326800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0271-3683
1460-2202
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 08:38:44 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:28:59 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 20:32:07 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 01:48:46 EST 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:49:18 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Pentacam
bilateral keratoconus
unilateral keratoconus
Corvis ST
forme fruste keratoconus
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c366t-c683c3e2bf95a20bdcf3b66a5073f60b497f32ad62bc5e14dc71524a7d395d443
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-4719-1911
0000-0002-3715-4164
PMID 31466466
PQID 2283105332
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2283105332
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_02713683_2019_1658787
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02713683_2019_1658787
pubmed_primary_31466466
crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2019_1658787
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2/1/2020
2020-02-01
2020-02-00
20200201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2020
  text: 2/1/2020
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Current eye research
PublicationTitleAlternate Curr Eye Res
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
References CIT0010
CIT0020
CIT0001
CIT0012
CIT0011
Roshdy MMS (CIT0018) 2018; 2018
CIT0003
CIT0014
CIT0002
CIT0013
CIT0005
CIT0016
CIT0004
CIT0015
CIT0007
CIT0006
CIT0017
CIT0009
CIT0008
CIT0019
References_xml – ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000233954.86723.25
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.026
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100428-02
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170807-02
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.05.002
– ident: CIT0020
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-09
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2015.11.001
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1097/00004397-199703710-00005
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10984
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160075
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181012-01
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.02.004
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180103-01
– volume: 2018
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: CIT0018
  publication-title: J Ophthalmol
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100626
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009
– ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5369
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.030
SSID ssj0002714
Score 2.4270902
Snippet Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index...
: This study was designed to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Belin/Ambrósio Deviation (BADD), Corneal Biomechanical Index (CBI) and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 118
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Asian Continental Ancestry Group - ethnology
bilateral keratoconus
Biomechanical Phenomena
China - epidemiology
Cornea - physiopathology
Corneal Pachymetry
Corneal Topography
Corvis ST
Early Diagnosis
Elasticity - physiology
Female
forme fruste keratoconus
Humans
Keratoconus - diagnosis
Keratoconus - ethnology
Keratoconus - physiopathology
Male
Myopia - diagnosis
Myopia - ethnology
Myopia - physiopathology
Pentacam
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
unilateral keratoconus
Young Adult
Title Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02713683.2019.1658787
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31466466
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2283105332
Volume 45
WOSCitedRecordID wos000484326800001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1460-2202
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002714
  issn: 0271-3683
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 19810101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB7apYRemjTpY_NChZKbU1vSyvZxabME0oRAt-nSi9ETFhI7RLuF_fcZyfaSHEIOzck-eGxZGo1mRp--AfiKKuI4lWWSa5UmXNo8ka7IEkONdVwqx2NO9-pnfnFRzGblZYcm9B2sMsTQriWKiLY6TG6pfI-I-4aRVMZEwQIwqzzOcA1FrUMrjJ590PHp5M_aFuOTkUAKr0kQ6c_wPPWWR6vTI-7Spz3QuBJNNl_gH7bgXeeGknGrN-_hla23YWdcYwh-syJHJAJDY8Z9GzbOu_33Hfgb-ZDJjxafN_ekceQs0DI3GFYvPZnXJBTktt6S81VzO9fkZGU9USuCdkfFWhR4h9bJk19TEnLA5DKA17W8-QC_JyfT76dJV50h0UyIRaKx9ZpZqlw5kjRVRjumhJDoYDInUsXL3DEqjaBKj2zGjc7RV-AyN6wcGc7ZRxjUTW0_AzFUMMO4ztEe8JSVilOqUnR0ZFGgf-eGwPtRqXRHXR4qaFxXWc9w2nVnFbqz6rpzCMdrsduWu-M5gfLhkFeLmDRxbYWTij0j-6XXjwpnaNh2kbVtlr4KBENZOPJMh_CpVZx1c1gW6P2F2P2PL-_BWxqSABFKvg-Dxd3SHsAb_W8x93eH8DqfFYdxVtwD5w8D8w
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB5BQcCFR8tjeRoJcUub2F4nOVbQVVF3V0gsUHGxbMeWVqJJ1ewi7b9nxklW7aHqAU7JIZM49ng8M_78DcAHVJEguSmT3Nk0kcbniQlFllS88kEaG2TM6f6Y5vN5cXpaXj4LQ7BKiqFDRxQRbTVNbkpGD5C4AwylMqEKQciscj_DRRTV7jbcGeNaS7C-xeTn1hrjo5FCCq8JyQyneK57zZX16Qp76fU-aFyLJo_-x188hoe9J8oOO9V5Ard8vQt7hzVG4Wcb9pFFbGhMuu_CvVm_Bb8HvyIlMvvcQfSWLWsCOyFm5gYj63XLljWjmty-9Wy2ac6Xjh1tfMvshqHpsbEcBd6hgWrZtwWjNDD7Svh1Z86ewvfJ0eLTcdIXaEicUGqVOGy9E57bUI4NT23lgrBKGfQxRVCplWUeBDeV4taNfSYrl6O7IE1eiXJcSSmewU7d1P4FsIorUQnpcjQJMhWllZzbFH0dUxTo4oURyGFYtOvZy6mIxm-dDSSnfXdq6k7dd-cI9rdi5x19x00C5eUx16uYNwldkRMtbpB9PyiIxklKOy-m9s261cQxlNGpZz6C553mbJsjMmL4V-rlP3z5Hdw_XsymevplfvIKHnDKCURk-WvYWV2s_Ru46_6slu3F2zg5_gIsmgcs
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwEB2VFlVcoLQUFigYCXFLm9heJzlWtKuitquVWKDiYvlTWqlNVs0u0v57xk6yooeqB3pKDpnEscfjmfHzG4DPqCKeU1UmudFpwpXLE-WLLLHUOs-V9jzmdH9e5ONxcXVVTjo0YdPBKkMM7VuiiGirw-SeW98j4o4wksqYKFgAZpWHGa6hqHVPYCuSY6FKT0e_1sYYH40MUnhNgkx_iOe-19xZnu6Ql97vgsalaPTiEX5iB553fig5bhXnJWy4ahf2jiuMwW9W5AuJyNCYct-F7ctuA34PfkdCZHLSAvRmDak9OQ-8zDXG1cuGzCoSKnK7xpHLVT2fGXK6cg3RK4KGR8diFHiH5qkh36ckJIHJJKDXjbp5BT9Gp9OvZ0lXniExTIhFYrD1hjmqfTlUNNXWeKaFUOhhMi9SzcvcM6qsoNoMXcatydFZ4Cq3rBxaztk-bFZ15d4AsVQwy7jJ0SDwlJWaU6pT9HRUUaCD5wfA-1GRpuMuDyU0rmXWU5x23SlDd8quOwdwuBabt-QdDwmU_w65XMSsiW9LnEj2gOynXj8kTtGw76IqVy8bGRiGsnDmmQ7gdas46-awLPD7C_H2P778EbYnJyN58W18_g6e0ZAQiLDy97C5uF26A3hq_ixmze2HODX-AtIEBdA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early+Diagnosis+of+Keratoconus+in+Chinese+Myopic+Eyes+by+Combining+Corvis+ST+with+Pentacam&rft.jtitle=Current+eye+research&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Mingyue&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Fengju&rft.au=Li%2C+Yu&rft.au=Song%2C+Yanzheng&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=0271-3683&rft.eissn=1460-2202&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F02713683.2019.1658787&rft.externalDocID=1658787
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0271-3683&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0271-3683&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0271-3683&client=summon