Both Arthroscopically Assisted Suture Button and Hook Plate Are Effective in Treating Acute High-grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review
To conduct a systematic review of clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted suture button (AASB) and hook plate (HP) in the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation to determine which technique provides superior clinical benefits. Tw...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Arthroscopy Ročník 41; číslo 9; s. 3733 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
United States
01.09.2025
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1526-3231, 1526-3231 |
| On-line prístup: | Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | To conduct a systematic review of clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted suture button (AASB) and hook plate (HP) in the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation to determine which technique provides superior clinical benefits.
Two independent researchers conducted literature searches on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that compared AASB and HP in treating acute high-grade (grade Ⅲ and greater) ACJ dislocation. Inclusion criteria included clinical studies that compared AASB and HP for acute Rockwood type III or greater dislocations with evaluations of functional outcomes (Constant score [CS], pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Studies were excluded if they were case reports, reviews, or had missing data, revision procedures, or had loss to follow-up >20%. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed on the basis of Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
In this systematic review, 14 studies with 782 participants were included, all of which were classified as Level III-IV evidence. The analysis of 12 studies showed that the AASB group (81.9-95.31) had only slightly greater postoperative CS compared with the HP group (77.5-92.38), with 9 studies reporting significant improvements, whereas 3 studies found no significant difference compared with the HP group. For pain outcomes, 4 studies showed lower pain score in the AASB group, whereas the rest found no significant difference; the visual analog scale scores ranged from 0.3 to 3.61 in the AASB group and 0.5 to 4.9 in the HP group. Operation time was generally longer in the AASB group (AASB: 48.3-89.39 minutes; HP: 40.77-76.5 minutes). Complication rates were similar (AASB: 0%-50%; HP: 0%-36.36%), with only 1 study reporting a greater incidence in the AASB group. Minimal clinically important difference analysis from 3 studies showed clinically significant improvements in CS with AASB, but no significant difference between AASB and HP for pain outcomes.
AASB shows comparable outcomes to HP for acute high-grade ACJ dislocations, with similar ranges in clinical scores and complication rates. Although AASB shows some advantages in functional outcomes, the differences between the 2 methods are minimal, suggesting that both approaches are effective and safe.
Level IV, systematic review of Level Ⅲ-IV studies. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To conduct a systematic review of clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted suture button (AASB) and hook plate (HP) in the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation to determine which technique provides superior clinical benefits.
Two independent researchers conducted literature searches on the basis of Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that compared AASB and HP in treating acute high-grade (grade Ⅲ and greater) ACJ dislocation. Inclusion criteria included clinical studies that compared AASB and HP for acute Rockwood type III or greater dislocations with evaluations of functional outcomes (Constant score [CS], pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Studies were excluded if they were case reports, reviews, or had missing data, revision procedures, or had loss to follow-up >20%. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed on the basis of Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
In this systematic review, 14 studies with 782 participants were included, all of which were classified as Level III-IV evidence. The analysis of 12 studies showed that the AASB group (81.9-95.31) had only slightly greater postoperative CS compared with the HP group (77.5-92.38), with 9 studies reporting significant improvements, whereas 3 studies found no significant difference compared with the HP group. For pain outcomes, 4 studies showed lower pain score in the AASB group, whereas the rest found no significant difference; the visual analog scale scores ranged from 0.3 to 3.61 in the AASB group and 0.5 to 4.9 in the HP group. Operation time was generally longer in the AASB group (AASB: 48.3-89.39 minutes; HP: 40.77-76.5 minutes). Complication rates were similar (AASB: 0%-50%; HP: 0%-36.36%), with only 1 study reporting a greater incidence in the AASB group. Minimal clinically important difference analysis from 3 studies showed clinically significant improvements in CS with AASB, but no significant difference between AASB and HP for pain outcomes.
AASB shows comparable outcomes to HP for acute high-grade ACJ dislocations, with similar ranges in clinical scores and complication rates. Although AASB shows some advantages in functional outcomes, the differences between the 2 methods are minimal, suggesting that both approaches are effective and safe.
Level IV, systematic review of Level Ⅲ-IV studies. To conduct a systematic review of clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted suture button (AASB) and hook plate (HP) in the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation to determine which technique provides superior clinical benefits.PURPOSETo conduct a systematic review of clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted suture button (AASB) and hook plate (HP) in the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation to determine which technique provides superior clinical benefits.Two independent researchers conducted literature searches based on Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing AASB and HP in treating acute high-grade (grade Ⅲ and above) ACJ dislocation. Inclusion criteria included clinical studies comparing AASB and HP for acute Rockwood Type ≥ III dislocations with evaluations of functional outcomes (Constant score (CS), pain score, American shoulder and elbow, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Studies were excluded if they were case reports, reviews, or had missing data, revision procedures, or loss to follow-up >20%. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed based on Newcastle-Ottawa scale.METHODSTwo independent researchers conducted literature searches based on Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing AASB and HP in treating acute high-grade (grade Ⅲ and above) ACJ dislocation. Inclusion criteria included clinical studies comparing AASB and HP for acute Rockwood Type ≥ III dislocations with evaluations of functional outcomes (Constant score (CS), pain score, American shoulder and elbow, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). Studies were excluded if they were case reports, reviews, or had missing data, revision procedures, or loss to follow-up >20%. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed based on Newcastle-Ottawa scale.In this systematic review, 14 studies with 782 participants were included, all of which were classified as level III-IV evidence. The analysis of 12 studies showed that the AASB group (81.9 to 95.31) had only slightly higher postoperative CS compared to the HP group (77.5 to 92.38), with nine studies reporting significant improvements, while three studies found no significant difference compared to the HP group. For pain outcomes, four studies showed lower pain score in the AASB group, while the rest found no significant difference; the VAS scores ranged from 0.3 to 3.61 in the AASB group and 0.5 to 4.9 in the HP group. Operation time was generally longer in the AASB group (AASB: 48.3 to 89.39 min; HP: 40.77 to 76.5 min). Complication rates were similar (AASB: 0% to 50%; HP: 0% to 36.36%), with only one study reporting a higher incidence in the AASB group. Minimal Clinically Important Difference analysis from three studies showed clinically significant improvements in CS with AASB, but no significant difference between AASB and HP for pain outcomes.RESULTSIn this systematic review, 14 studies with 782 participants were included, all of which were classified as level III-IV evidence. The analysis of 12 studies showed that the AASB group (81.9 to 95.31) had only slightly higher postoperative CS compared to the HP group (77.5 to 92.38), with nine studies reporting significant improvements, while three studies found no significant difference compared to the HP group. For pain outcomes, four studies showed lower pain score in the AASB group, while the rest found no significant difference; the VAS scores ranged from 0.3 to 3.61 in the AASB group and 0.5 to 4.9 in the HP group. Operation time was generally longer in the AASB group (AASB: 48.3 to 89.39 min; HP: 40.77 to 76.5 min). Complication rates were similar (AASB: 0% to 50%; HP: 0% to 36.36%), with only one study reporting a higher incidence in the AASB group. Minimal Clinically Important Difference analysis from three studies showed clinically significant improvements in CS with AASB, but no significant difference between AASB and HP for pain outcomes.Despite longer operation times, AASB demonstrates comparable outcomes to HP for acute high-grade ACJ dislocations, with similar ranges in clinical scores and complication rates. Although AASB shows some advantages in functional outcomes, the differences between the two methods are minimal, suggesting that both approaches are effective and safe.CONCLUSIONSDespite longer operation times, AASB demonstrates comparable outcomes to HP for acute high-grade ACJ dislocations, with similar ranges in clinical scores and complication rates. Although AASB shows some advantages in functional outcomes, the differences between the two methods are minimal, suggesting that both approaches are effective and safe. |
| Author | Luo, Hua Liang, Junbo Han, Dawei Chen, Cong Ying, Xiaofang |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Junbo surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Junbo organization: Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Dawei surname: Han fullname: Han, Dawei organization: Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Xiaofang surname: Ying fullname: Ying, Xiaofang organization: Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Cong surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Cong organization: Department of Orthopedic, Suqian First People's Hospital, Suqian, Jiangsu, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Hua surname: Luo fullname: Luo, Hua email: 18732196660@163.com organization: Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China. Electronic address: 18732196660@163.com |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40180135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkNtq3DAQhkVJyfkNStFlb7zVwXK8vXPStNsSSMjhepE1412lsrSV5C37NHnViCaBwMDMz3z_PzBHZM8Hj4R84mzGGW--Ps50zOsYZoIJNWOylPpADrkSTSWF5Hvv5gNylNIjY0zKVu6Tg5rxlnGpDsnTechr2v1PSiZsrNHO7WiXkk0Zgd5NeYpIz6ecg6faA12E8IfeOJ2x2JBeDgOabLdIraf3EXW2fkU7M5X9wq7W1SpqKKiJYbTBOL21ZnI60t_B-ky_2-SCKabgv9GO3u3K1bFIQ29xa_HfCfk4aJfw9LUfk4cfl_cXi-rq-uevi-6qMrJpctWoed_UHABqlKLuB3XWtggw8FrOQcmiz0w_hx4QBgAzoOJK1lAr2TcKtDgmX15yNzH8nTDl5WiTQee0xzClpeRtIxWbC1HQz6_o1I8Iy020o4675dtTxTOyGIBe |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2025 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2025 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.03.035 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1526-3231 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40180135 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --K .1- .FO .GJ 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO AAYWO ABLJU ABMAC ABWVN ACRPL ADBBV ADMUD ADNMO AEVXI AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGQPQ AHHHB AITUG AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY C5W CAG CGR COF CUY CVF EBS ECM EFJIC EFKBS EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB G-2 GBLVA HEE HEK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M28 M31 M41 MO0 N9A NPM NQ- O9- OF~ OR- R2- ROL RPZ SAE SEL SES SEW SJN SSZ UHS UV1 WUQ XH2 Z5R ZXP 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-659b641ddd4e324bf5788eddf1439d53f577cb9dbdedfddcfe51534d453b65da2 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001584306000049&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1526-3231 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 00:35:08 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 24 03:04:55 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 9 |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2025 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c366t-659b641ddd4e324bf5788eddf1439d53f577cb9dbdedfddcfe51534d453b65da2 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 40180135 |
| PQID | 3186350922 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3186350922 pubmed_primary_40180135 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2025 text: 2025-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Arthroscopy |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| SSID | ssj0003383 |
| Score | 2.4765062 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | To conduct a systematic review of clinical studies comparing the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted suture button (AASB) and hook plate (HP) in the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 3733 |
| SubjectTerms | Acromioclavicular Joint - injuries Acromioclavicular Joint - surgery Arthroscopy - methods Bone Plates Humans Joint Dislocations - surgery Suture Techniques - instrumentation Treatment Outcome |
| Title | Both Arthroscopically Assisted Suture Button and Hook Plate Are Effective in Treating Acute High-grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40180135 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3186350922 |
| Volume | 41 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001584306000049&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3BatwwEBVp00MvTUvTNk1aptCryNqy5HUuYZs0hJIuC0lgb4ukkRPDIm93N4F8TX-1M7I3ufRQ6MVgywKjedI8a0ZvhPha1iErdLDSmUEtCyystEhETofMhdIZlbt0UPiiHI-H02k16TfcVn1a5WZNTAs1tp73yA8Je-QbB1WeHy9-Sa4axdHVvoTGM7GtiMowqsvpk1q46mQ4yUUZqYjIbI7Opfwussztko__5TrJnPYF3_5KMpOzOdv53898LV71NBNGHS7eiK0Q34rf38gs_OyWJSzbBdtn_gBkIbY1wmXSFwGuXd1GsBHhnCg4TObER6lbgE7qmNZHaCJcJboZb2Dk76idE0bkzdIivco5fk3r5_a-SWmu8KNt4hpOmxW7TobCEYzg8lFEGroIxa64Pvt-dXIu-wIN0itj1tLoypkiQ8QiEDFzNU3_YUCsiYRVqBXdl95V6DBgjejrQOxJESC0ckajzd-J57GN4YOAwnrjVeZ0yLPCmoHFgXPohlWNpaXfmj3xZTPeM5oAHNWwMbR3q9nTiO-J953RZotOqWNWsDxZpvTHf-i9L14yFrr8sQOxXdP0D5_EC3-_blbLzwlZdB1Pfv4BkyXdgA |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Both+Arthroscopically+Assisted+Suture+Button+and+Hook+Plate+Are+Effective+in+Treating+Acute+High-grade+Acromioclavicular+Joint+Dislocation%3A+A+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Liang%2C+Junbo&rft.au=Han%2C+Dawei&rft.au=Ying%2C+Xiaofang&rft.au=Chen%2C+Cong&rft.date=2025-09-01&rft.issn=1526-3231&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.arthro.2025.03.035&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1526-3231&client=summon |