The individual systematic difference between CoaguChek and STA-SPA+

Using CoaguChek to measure PT-INR and comparing the results with those from the hospital laboratory, some patients get consistent results while others do not. The extent of this problem is unknown. Our study aimed to quantify the between-subject variation of the systematic PT-INR difference between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation Vol. 79; no. 3; pp. 143 - 147
Main Authors: Åsberg, Arne, Hegseth, Hilde, Averina, Maria, Løfblad, Lena
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Taylor & Francis 03.04.2019
Subjects:
ISSN:0036-5513, 1502-7686, 1502-7686
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Using CoaguChek to measure PT-INR and comparing the results with those from the hospital laboratory, some patients get consistent results while others do not. The extent of this problem is unknown. Our study aimed to quantify the between-subject variation of the systematic PT-INR difference between CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method. We used register data with PT-INR results from both CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method (STA-SPA+) in samples taken simultaneously from 108 patients. After excluding five patients with outlying results, we used mixed-effects models to estimate individual slopes and intercepts to describe the systematic relationship between the two methods for each patient, and calculated the fraction of patients having a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units. The included 103 patients had from 3 to 16, median seven data pairs measured over a time span from 15 to 2319, median 234 days. The mean of individual slopes was 1.113, with a standard deviation of 0.137. Corresponding values for the intercept were -0.151 and 0.208, respectively. Adjusted for the average systematic difference, the proportion of patients with a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units increased from 15% at a PT-INR level of 2.5 to 50% at a PT-INR level of 4. The systematic difference between CoaguChek and STA-SPA + varies considerably between patients. This precludes using a single, common formula to make the CoaguChek results directly comparable to the results from the hospital laboratory.
AbstractList Using CoaguChek to measure PT-INR and comparing the results with those from the hospital laboratory, some patients get consistent results while others do not. The extent of this problem is unknown. Our study aimed to quantify the between-subject variation of the systematic PT-INR difference between CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method. We used register data with PT-INR results from both CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method (STA-SPA+) in samples taken simultaneously from 108 patients. After excluding five patients with outlying results, we used mixed-effects models to estimate individual slopes and intercepts to describe the systematic relationship between the two methods for each patient, and calculated the fraction of patients having a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units. The included 103 patients had from 3 to 16, median seven data pairs measured over a time span from 15 to 2319, median 234 days. The mean of individual slopes was 1.113, with a standard deviation of 0.137. Corresponding values for the intercept were -0.151 and 0.208, respectively. Adjusted for the average systematic difference, the proportion of patients with a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units increased from 15% at a PT-INR level of 2.5 to 50% at a PT-INR level of 4. The systematic difference between CoaguChek and STA-SPA + varies considerably between patients. This precludes using a single, common formula to make the CoaguChek results directly comparable to the results from the hospital laboratory.
Using CoaguChek to measure PT-INR and comparing the results with those from the hospital laboratory, some patients get consistent results while others do not. The extent of this problem is unknown. Our study aimed to quantify the between-subject variation of the systematic PT-INR difference between CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method. We used register data with PT-INR results from both CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method (STA-SPA+) in samples taken simultaneously from 108 patients. After excluding five patients with outlying results, we used mixed-effects models to estimate individual slopes and intercepts to describe the systematic relationship between the two methods for each patient, and calculated the fraction of patients having a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units. The included 103 patients had from 3 to 16, median seven data pairs measured over a time span from 15 to 2319, median 234 days. The mean of individual slopes was 1.113, with a standard deviation of 0.137. Corresponding values for the intercept were -0.151 and 0.208, respectively. Adjusted for the average systematic difference, the proportion of patients with a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units increased from 15% at a PT-INR level of 2.5 to 50% at a PT-INR level of 4. The systematic difference between CoaguChek and STA-SPA + varies considerably between patients. This precludes using a single, common formula to make the CoaguChek results directly comparable to the results from the hospital laboratory.Using CoaguChek to measure PT-INR and comparing the results with those from the hospital laboratory, some patients get consistent results while others do not. The extent of this problem is unknown. Our study aimed to quantify the between-subject variation of the systematic PT-INR difference between CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method. We used register data with PT-INR results from both CoaguChek and a hospital laboratory method (STA-SPA+) in samples taken simultaneously from 108 patients. After excluding five patients with outlying results, we used mixed-effects models to estimate individual slopes and intercepts to describe the systematic relationship between the two methods for each patient, and calculated the fraction of patients having a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units. The included 103 patients had from 3 to 16, median seven data pairs measured over a time span from 15 to 2319, median 234 days. The mean of individual slopes was 1.113, with a standard deviation of 0.137. Corresponding values for the intercept were -0.151 and 0.208, respectively. Adjusted for the average systematic difference, the proportion of patients with a systematic difference greater than 0.3 INR units increased from 15% at a PT-INR level of 2.5 to 50% at a PT-INR level of 4. The systematic difference between CoaguChek and STA-SPA + varies considerably between patients. This precludes using a single, common formula to make the CoaguChek results directly comparable to the results from the hospital laboratory.
Author Løfblad, Lena
Hegseth, Hilde
Averina, Maria
Åsberg, Arne
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Arne
  surname: Åsberg
  fullname: Åsberg, Arne
  email: arne.aasberg@stolav.no
  organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Trondheim University Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hilde
  surname: Hegseth
  fullname: Hegseth, Hilde
  organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Trondheim University Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Maria
  surname: Averina
  fullname: Averina, Maria
  organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tromsø University Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lena
  surname: Løfblad
  fullname: Løfblad, Lena
  organization: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Trondheim University Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVISHY3-QktPhaCN5L1YZteupg2LQQS2L0LWRpl1dpSKtkJ--_jZTc59NDMZRh43mHmmaNTHzwg9IngJcEVvsGYCs4JXRaY1EvCS4Hr8gTNCMdFXopKnKLZnsn30AWap_QbTzOt2Dm6oLicqqpmqNlsIXPeuGdnRtVlaZcG6NXgdGactRDBa8haGF4AfNYE9Tg2W_iTKW-y9WaVrx9W15fozKouwdWxL9Dmx_dN8zO_u7_91azuck2FGHJOVaksUGCEG6IZWKqhsIoYrdvpYGYE1KyA6XhTWmK55gwbVtuWtRgbukBfDmufYvg7Qhpk75KGrlMewphkQSoqWF2KYkI_H9Gx7cHIp-h6FXfy7e8J4AdAx5BSBPuOECz3fuWbX7n3K49-p9zXf3LaDZOt4IeoXPdh-tsh7bwNsVcvIXZGDmrXhWij8tolSf-_4hXOVpI1
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_09612033221086134
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thromres_2021_02_018
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijlh_13466
Cites_doi 10.2147/PPA.S164680
10.1007/s00277-015-2374-3
10.1515/cclm-2011-0820
10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05856.x
10.1016/S0140-6736(59)90857-8
10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.037
10.1016/j.cca.2017.07.027
10.1373/clinchem.2010.146233
10.2146/ajhp150813
10.1055/s-2003-44460
10.1515/cclm-2016-0381
10.1055/s-0038-1657371
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Medisinsk Fysiologisk Forenings Forlag (MFFF) 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Medisinsk Fysiologisk Forenings Forlag (MFFF) 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/00365513.2019.1576097
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1502-7686
EndPage 147
ExternalDocumentID 30777788
10_1080_00365513_2019_1576097
1576097
Genre Article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
00X
03L
0R~
123
36B
4.4
5RE
AAGDL
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLJU
ABLKL
ABOCM
ABUPF
ABWVI
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACUHS
ADCVX
ADRBQ
ADXPE
AECIN
AENEX
AEOZL
AFKVX
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
AQTUD
BABNJ
BLEHA
BOHLJ
CCCUG
COF
CS3
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EAS
EBB
EBC
EBD
EBS
EBX
EHN
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
EPT
ESX
F5P
H13
HZ~
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
L7B
LJTGL
M4Z
O9-
P2P
Q~Q
RNANH
RVRKI
SV3
TASJS
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
TUROJ
TUS
UEQFS
UHWXJ
V1S
WH7
~1N
AAYXX
CITATION
.55
.GJ
0BK
34G
39C
3O-
53G
5VS
AALIY
AAORF
AAPXX
AAQQT
ABWCV
ABZEW
ACKZS
ADFOM
ADFZZ
ADYSH
AEIIZ
AFFNX
AFLEI
AJVHN
AWYRJ
BRMBE
CAG
CGR
CUY
CVF
CYYVM
CZDIS
DRXRE
DWTOO
ECM
EIF
JENTW
M44
NPM
NUSFT
OVD
QQXMO
TEORI
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-53a7afe3e415d1c4ef3ce2fa1dccb6864d6e942e768d7f1f5c540d49fb4b00d3
IEDL.DBID TFW
ISICitedReferencesCount 4
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000465174400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0036-5513
1502-7686
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 12:34:17 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:31:13 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:24:38 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 02:41:42 EST 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:49:19 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords point-of-care testing
Between-subject variation
method comparison
CoaguChek
international normalized ratio
warfarin
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c366t-53a7afe3e415d1c4ef3ce2fa1dccb6864d6e942e768d7f1f5c540d49fb4b00d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 30777788
PQID 2183649762
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1080_00365513_2019_1576097
proquest_miscellaneous_2183649762
pubmed_primary_30777788
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_00365513_2019_1576097
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_00365513_2019_1576097
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-04-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-04-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-04-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation
PublicationTitleAlternate Scand J Clin Lab Invest
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
References CIT0001
CIT0012
CIT0011
Quick AJ (CIT0010) 1935; 109
CIT0003
CIT0014
CIT0002
CIT0013
CIT0005
CIT0004
CIT0007
CIT0006
CIT0009
CIT0008
References_xml – ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.2147/PPA.S164680
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2374-3
– ident: CIT0012
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0820
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05856.x
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(59)90857-8
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.037
– volume: 109
  start-page: 73
  year: 1935
  ident: CIT0010
  publication-title: J Biol Chem
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.07.027
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.146233
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.2146/ajhp150813
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44460
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0381
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1657371
SSID ssj0003384
Score 2.211852
Snippet Using CoaguChek to measure PT-INR and comparing the results with those from the hospital laboratory, some patients get consistent results while others do not....
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 143
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Between-subject variation
Blood Coagulation Tests - methods
Child
Child, Preschool
CoaguChek
Female
Humans
International Normalized Ratio
Male
method comparison
Middle Aged
Point-of-Care Systems
point-of-care testing
Regression Analysis
warfarin
Young Adult
Title The individual systematic difference between CoaguChek and STA-SPA+
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00365513.2019.1576097
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777788
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2183649762
Volume 79
WOSCitedRecordID wos000465174400001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Online Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1502-7686
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003384
  issn: 0036-5513
  databaseCode: TFW
  dateStart: 19490101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELagQoiF96M8KiOxoVRN4jjxWEVUDFBVagTdIscPqEApalJ-P-e8SoeqA2TLcIlzvvN9F5-_Q-guEDblzIW0hElmEc6ExXpgyw7nPvWF1LToDfjy5A-HwWTCRlU1YVaVVZocWpdEEcVabZybJ1ldEWf6j1HTl8QUZrGuDYi5x8x5cgj9xjWjwWuzFkMCRmraXSNSn-FZ95SV6LTCXboegRaRaHDwD99wiPYrGIr7pd0coS2VHqPd52qj_QSFYD542hzWwkvCZ1y3VBEKV0VeOJzxt0X4rj4wjAePo741HvXvT1E0eIjCR6vqt2AJl9Lc8lzuc61cBUFd2oIo7QrlaG5LIRIaUCKpYsRRkKFIX9vaEwD3JGE6IeC80j1DrXSWqguEbS20gqSbgCBxpJcYGJEIGSSel3giaCNSqzkWFRe5aYnxGdtLytJCP7HRT1zpp426jdhXScaxSYD9nsM4L_6C6LJlSexukL2tJzwGlzP7KDxVs0UWG1RJCeA4p43OS0tohgNLJlxBcPmHN1-hPXNb1Ae516iVzxfqBu2I73yazTto258EncLMfwAJafSd
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JTsMwEB2xCbiwL2U1EjcURBLHiY9VRVVEWyERQW-W4wUqUItKy_czzlLggHqAXKNxnPHYM2OP3wM4T5TPJA8xLeGae1Ry5fErtOVAypjFSluWcwM-tONuN-n1-Pe7MK6s0uXQtgCKyNdqN7ndZnRVEucIyJgjJnGVWfzSx5D5isfzsBihr3X4-WnzcboaYwpGK-BdJ1Pd4vmtmR_-6Qd66e8xaO6Lmuv_8RcbsFZGoqRemM4mzJnBFix3yrP2bWigBZH-9L4W-cJ8JhWrijKkrPMijaF8mjSezQvBDpH7tO7d39UvdiBtXqeNlldSLngqZGzsRaGMpTWhQb-ufUWNDZUJrPS1UhlLGNXMcBoYTFJ0bH0bKYz4NOU2ozh_dbgLC4PhwOwD8a2yBvNuioI00FHmIolM6SSLoixSSQ1opWehSjhyx4rxKvwv1NJcP8LpR5T6qcHlVOytwOOYJcC_D6IY5xshtmAtEeEM2bNqxAXOOneUIgdmOHkXLrBkFEO5oAZ7hSlMu4OrJj5JcvCHL5_CSivttEX7pnt7CKvuVV4uFB7Bwng0McewpD7G_ffRSW7tn9Fm998
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3JTsMwEB1BQYgL-1JWI3FDqZrEceJjVahAQFWJCnqzHC-AQC3qwvczzlLgUPUAOUWKJst4bL-Jx-8BnCfKZ5KHmJZwzT0qufJ4HWM5kDJmsdKWZdqAj3dxu530erxTVBOOirJKl0PbnCgiG6td5_7QtqyIc_pjzOmSuMIsXvMRMdd5vAhLeMJckHdbT9PBGDMwWvLuOptyE8-s2_yann6Rl86GoNlU1Fr_h4_YgLUCh5JGHjibsGD6W7ByX6y0b0MT44e8TndrkW_GZ1JqqihDiiov0hzI50nzxbwRfB_y0G14D53GxQ50W1fd5rVXCC54KmRs7EWhjKU1ocFZXfuKGhsqE1jpa6VSljCqmeE0MJii6Nj6NlKI9zTlNqXYe3W4C5X-oG_2gfhWWYNZN0VDGugodTgiVTpJoyiNVFIFWrpZqIKM3GlivAv_m7M0849w_hGFf6pQm5p95Gwc8wz4zzYU4-w3iM01S0Q4x_asbHCBfc4tpMi-GUxGwsFKRhHIBVXYyyNh-jo4ZuKRJAd_ePIprHQuW-Lupn17CKvuSlYrFB5BZTycmGNYVp_j19HwJIv1L-Be9pE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+individual+systematic+difference+between+CoaguChek+and+STA-SPA&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian+journal+of+clinical+and+laboratory+investigation&rft.au=%C3%85sberg%2C+Arne&rft.au=Hegseth%2C+Hilde&rft.au=Averina%2C+Maria&rft.au=L%C3%B8fblad%2C+Lena&rft.date=2019-04-03&rft.issn=1502-7686&rft.eissn=1502-7686&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F00365513.2019.1576097&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0036-5513&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0036-5513&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0036-5513&client=summon