Clinic vs. daily life gait characteristics in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia

Recent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility. We compared gait measures that best differentiated individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) from age-matched healthy controls (HC) during a supervised gait test in the clinic vs. a week of unsup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in digital health Jg. 7; S. 1590150
Hauptverfasser: Shah, Vrutangkumar V., Muzyka, Daniel, Jagodinsky, Adam, Casey, Hannah, McNames, James, El-Gohary, Mahmoud, Sowalsky, Kristen, Safarpour, Delaram, Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia, Horak, Fay B., Gomez, Christopher M.
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:2673-253X, 2673-253X
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Recent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility. We compared gait measures that best differentiated individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) from age-matched healthy controls (HC) during a supervised gait test in the clinic vs. a week of unsupervised gait during daily life. Twenty-six individuals with SCA types 1, 2, 3, and 6, and 13 (HC) wore three Opal inertial sensors (on both feet and lower back) during a 2-minute walk in the clinic and for seven days in daily life. Seventeen gait measures were analyzed to investigate the group differences using Mann-Whitney -tests and area under the curve (AUC). Ten gait measures were significantly worse in SCA than HC for the clinic test (  < 0.003), but only 3 were worse in daily life (  < 0.003). Only a few gait measures consistently discriminated groups in both environments. Specifically, variability in Swing Time and Double Support Time had AUCs of 0.99 (  < 0.0001) and 0.96 (  < 0.0001) in the clinic, and 0.84 (  < 0.0003) and 0.80 (  < 0.002) in daily life, respectively. Clinical gait measures showed stronger correlations with clinical outcomes (ie, SARA and FARS-ADL; r = 0.50-0.77) than between daily life gait measures (r = 0.31-0.49). Gait activity in daily life was not statistically significant between the SCA and HC groups (  > 0.06). Digital gait measures discriminate SCA in both environments. In-clinic measures are more sensitive, while daily life measures provide ecological validity, highlighting a trade-off and offering complementary insights.
AbstractList Recent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility. We compared gait measures that best differentiated individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) from age-matched healthy controls (HC) during a supervised gait test in the clinic vs. a week of unsupervised gait during daily life. Twenty-six individuals with SCA types 1, 2, 3, and 6, and 13 (HC) wore three Opal inertial sensors (on both feet and lower back) during a 2-minute walk in the clinic and for seven days in daily life. Seventeen gait measures were analyzed to investigate the group differences using Mann-Whitney -tests and area under the curve (AUC). Ten gait measures were significantly worse in SCA than HC for the clinic test (  < 0.003), but only 3 were worse in daily life (  < 0.003). Only a few gait measures consistently discriminated groups in both environments. Specifically, variability in Swing Time and Double Support Time had AUCs of 0.99 (  < 0.0001) and 0.96 (  < 0.0001) in the clinic, and 0.84 (  < 0.0003) and 0.80 (  < 0.002) in daily life, respectively. Clinical gait measures showed stronger correlations with clinical outcomes (ie, SARA and FARS-ADL; r = 0.50-0.77) than between daily life gait measures (r = 0.31-0.49). Gait activity in daily life was not statistically significant between the SCA and HC groups (  > 0.06). Digital gait measures discriminate SCA in both environments. In-clinic measures are more sensitive, while daily life measures provide ecological validity, highlighting a trade-off and offering complementary insights.
BackgroundRecent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility.ObjectiveWe compared gait measures that best differentiated individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) from age-matched healthy controls (HC) during a supervised gait test in the clinic vs. a week of unsupervised gait during daily life.MethodsTwenty-six individuals with SCA types 1, 2, 3, and 6, and 13 (HC) wore three Opal inertial sensors (on both feet and lower back) during a 2-minute walk in the clinic and for seven days in daily life. Seventeen gait measures were analyzed to investigate the group differences using Mann–Whitney U-tests and area under the curve (AUC).ResultsTen gait measures were significantly worse in SCA than HC for the clinic test (p < 0.003), but only 3 were worse in daily life (p < 0.003). Only a few gait measures consistently discriminated groups in both environments. Specifically, variability in Swing Time and Double Support Time had AUCs of 0.99 (p < 0.0001) and 0.96 (p < 0.0001) in the clinic, and 0.84 (p < 0.0003) and 0.80 (p < 0.002) in daily life, respectively. Clinical gait measures showed stronger correlations with clinical outcomes (ie, SARA and FARS-ADL; r = 0.50–0.77) than between daily life gait measures (r = 0.31–0.49). Gait activity in daily life was not statistically significant between the SCA and HC groups (p > 0.06).ConclusionsDigital gait measures discriminate SCA in both environments. In-clinic measures are more sensitive, while daily life measures provide ecological validity, highlighting a trade-off and offering complementary insights.
Recent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility.BackgroundRecent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility.We compared gait measures that best differentiated individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) from age-matched healthy controls (HC) during a supervised gait test in the clinic vs. a week of unsupervised gait during daily life.ObjectiveWe compared gait measures that best differentiated individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) from age-matched healthy controls (HC) during a supervised gait test in the clinic vs. a week of unsupervised gait during daily life.Twenty-six individuals with SCA types 1, 2, 3, and 6, and 13 (HC) wore three Opal inertial sensors (on both feet and lower back) during a 2-minute walk in the clinic and for seven days in daily life. Seventeen gait measures were analyzed to investigate the group differences using Mann-Whitney U-tests and area under the curve (AUC).MethodsTwenty-six individuals with SCA types 1, 2, 3, and 6, and 13 (HC) wore three Opal inertial sensors (on both feet and lower back) during a 2-minute walk in the clinic and for seven days in daily life. Seventeen gait measures were analyzed to investigate the group differences using Mann-Whitney U-tests and area under the curve (AUC).Ten gait measures were significantly worse in SCA than HC for the clinic test (p < 0.003), but only 3 were worse in daily life (p < 0.003). Only a few gait measures consistently discriminated groups in both environments. Specifically, variability in Swing Time and Double Support Time had AUCs of 0.99 (p < 0.0001) and 0.96 (p < 0.0001) in the clinic, and 0.84 (p < 0.0003) and 0.80 (p < 0.002) in daily life, respectively. Clinical gait measures showed stronger correlations with clinical outcomes (ie, SARA and FARS-ADL; r = 0.50-0.77) than between daily life gait measures (r = 0.31-0.49). Gait activity in daily life was not statistically significant between the SCA and HC groups (p > 0.06).ResultsTen gait measures were significantly worse in SCA than HC for the clinic test (p < 0.003), but only 3 were worse in daily life (p < 0.003). Only a few gait measures consistently discriminated groups in both environments. Specifically, variability in Swing Time and Double Support Time had AUCs of 0.99 (p < 0.0001) and 0.96 (p < 0.0001) in the clinic, and 0.84 (p < 0.0003) and 0.80 (p < 0.002) in daily life, respectively. Clinical gait measures showed stronger correlations with clinical outcomes (ie, SARA and FARS-ADL; r = 0.50-0.77) than between daily life gait measures (r = 0.31-0.49). Gait activity in daily life was not statistically significant between the SCA and HC groups (p > 0.06).Digital gait measures discriminate SCA in both environments. In-clinic measures are more sensitive, while daily life measures provide ecological validity, highlighting a trade-off and offering complementary insights.ConclusionsDigital gait measures discriminate SCA in both environments. In-clinic measures are more sensitive, while daily life measures provide ecological validity, highlighting a trade-off and offering complementary insights.
Author Shah, Vrutangkumar V.
Sowalsky, Kristen
Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia
Safarpour, Delaram
Jagodinsky, Adam
Horak, Fay B.
Gomez, Christopher M.
Casey, Hannah
Muzyka, Daniel
El-Gohary, Mahmoud
McNames, James
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Vrutangkumar V.
  surname: Shah
  fullname: Shah, Vrutangkumar V.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Muzyka
  fullname: Muzyka, Daniel
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Adam
  surname: Jagodinsky
  fullname: Jagodinsky, Adam
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hannah
  surname: Casey
  fullname: Casey, Hannah
– sequence: 5
  givenname: James
  surname: McNames
  fullname: McNames, James
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Mahmoud
  surname: El-Gohary
  fullname: El-Gohary, Mahmoud
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Kristen
  surname: Sowalsky
  fullname: Sowalsky, Kristen
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Delaram
  surname: Safarpour
  fullname: Safarpour, Delaram
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Patricia
  surname: Carlson-Kuhta
  fullname: Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Fay B.
  surname: Horak
  fullname: Horak, Fay B.
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Christopher M.
  surname: Gomez
  fullname: Gomez, Christopher M.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40970140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkU9vEzEQxS1UREvpF-CAfOSSMB57s94jivhTqRISAombNWuPE1eb3WA7QL89myZUnGY0-um9mXkvxcU4jSzEawVLrW33LoZN3S4RsFmqpgPVwDNxhatWL7DRPy7-6y_FTSn3ADOqEKF5IS4NdC0oA1fi63pIY_LyV1nKQGl4kEOKLDeUqvRbyuQr51Rq8kWmUe6pJh5rkb9T3cqyT-PkOXPPw0BZUqU_iV6J55GGwjfnei2-f_zwbf15cffl0-36_d3C69WqLhrso4rGBm3A2sCRg1bBUoDQGu0tKdQeWEGnoja96lErC3b26rRue6uvxe1JN0x07_Y57Sg_uImSexxMeeMoz4sP7HxcMdi2N2y0MU1nqWs9UvBoAWaHWevtSWufp58HLtXtUvHHq0aeDsVpbBCxgxZn9M0ZPfQ7Dk_G_346A3gCfJ5KyRyfEAXumJ17zM4ds3Pn7PRfGH2L5Q
Cites_doi 10.1002/mds.28313
10.1002/mds.28343
10.1007/s00415-020-09696-5
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.031
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.267
10.1002/mds.28740
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.008
10.1007/s13311-018-00696-y
10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.004
10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00202-1
10.1038/s41582-018-0051-6
10.1007/s12311-011-0296-8
10.1002/mds.29757
10.1002/mds.25706
10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92
10.3233/JPD-201914
10.1186/s40673-015-0028-9
10.1088/1361-6579/ab4023
10.1007/s11910-021-01101-6
10.1186/s12984-020-00781-4
10.1002/mds.29742
10.1002/mds.30230
10.1002/mds.27372
10.1002/mds.22288
10.1016/j.nrleng.2015.09.002
10.1007/s12311-016-0837-2
10.1093/brain/awaf154
10.4172/2155-9538.s1-007
10.1007/s12311-016-0836-3
10.1007/s12311-023-01608-3
10.1007/s00415-013-7189-3
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.019
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.013
10.1111/ncn3.12174
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.024
10.1007/s12311-023-01625-2
10.1007/s12311-014-0583-2
10.1212/WNL.0000000000010176
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 Shah, Muzyka, Jagodinsky, Casey, McNames, El-Gohary, Sowalsky, Safarpour, Carlson-Kuhta, Horak and Gomez.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 Shah, Muzyka, Jagodinsky, Casey, McNames, El-Gohary, Sowalsky, Safarpour, Carlson-Kuhta, Horak and Gomez.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1590150
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2673-253X
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_cf6e087b4e4344598a97c2adc2800109
40970140
10_3389_fdgth_2025_1590150
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
9T4
AAFWJ
AAYXX
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
EIHBH
GROUPED_DOAJ
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-52bf1f48d34088defed31d8ad0d743c8a123c0e1091f34b1b231808ebe9337b83
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001573883600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2673-253X
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:51:41 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 19 21:01:00 EDT 2025
Mon Sep 22 02:45:08 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:31:23 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords IMUs
wearable technology
gait
spinocerebellar ataxia
daily life monitoring
Language English
License 2025 Shah, Muzyka, Jagodinsky, Casey, McNames, El-Gohary, Sowalsky, Safarpour, Carlson-Kuhta, Horak and Gomez.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c366t-52bf1f48d34088defed31d8ad0d743c8a123c0e1091f34b1b231808ebe9337b83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/cf6e087b4e4344598a97c2adc2800109
PMID 40970140
PQID 3252229072
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cf6e087b4e4344598a97c2adc2800109
proquest_miscellaneous_3252229072
pubmed_primary_40970140
crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2025_1590150
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2025
  text: 2025-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Frontiers in digital health
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Digit Health
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Matsushima (B24) 2015; 2
Rochester (B15) 2014; 29
Velázquez-Pérez (B21) 2020; 36
Shah (B31) 2020; 267
Schmitz-Hubsch (B5) 2006; 66
Sánchez-López (B4) 2017; 32
Buijsen (B1) 2019; 16
Morris (B35) 2019; 40
Shirai (B13) 2015; 358
Zesiewicz (B10) 2017; 55
Ilg (B11) 2020; 95
Terayama (B14) 2018; 6
Fox (B28) 2018; 33
Luo (B2) 2017; 16
Globas (B3) 2008; 23
Adams (B39) 2021; 21
Schniepp (B22) 2014; 261
Milne (B12) 2018; 61
Washabaugh (B34) 2017; 55
Ilg (B18) 2024; 23
Wan (B36) 2000
Ashizawa (B7) 2018; 14
Buckley (B17) 2018; 60
Shah (B30) 2021; 17
Van Der Merwe (B37) 2004
Shah (B32); 10
Perez-Lloret (B8) 2021; 36
Seemann (B27) 2024; 39
Seemann (B29) 2025; 40
Caliandro (B19) 2017; 57
Shah (B40) 2024; 39
Manohar (B26) 2024
Shah (B16) 2021; 36
Geh (B38) 2011; 70
Mancini (B33) 2013
Milne (B20) 2014; 13
Jacobi (B6) 2015; 14
Serrao (B9) 2012; 11
Németh (B25) 2024; 23
Serrao (B23) 2017; 16
References_xml – volume: 36
  start-page: 283
  year: 2021
  ident: B8
  article-title: Assessment of ataxia rating scales and cerebellar functional tests: critique and recommendations
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.28313
– volume: 36
  start-page: 471
  year: 2020
  ident: B21
  article-title: Prodromal spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 subjects have quantifiable gait and postural sway deficits
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.28343
– volume: 267
  start-page: 1188
  year: 2020
  ident: B31
  article-title: Quantity and quality of gait and turning in people with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and matched controls during daily living
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09696-5
– volume: 61
  start-page: 149
  year: 2018
  ident: B12
  article-title: Psychometric properties of outcome measures evaluating decline in gait in cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review
  publication-title: Gait and Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.031
– volume: 57
  start-page: 252
  year: 2017
  ident: B19
  article-title: Trunk-lower limb coordination pattern during gait in patients with ataxia
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.267
– volume: 36
  start-page: 2922
  year: 2021
  ident: B16
  article-title: Gait variability in spinocerebellar ataxia assessed using wearable inertial sensors
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.28740
– volume: 70
  start-page: 45
  year: 2011
  ident: B38
  article-title: Assessed and distressed: white-coat effects on clinical balance performance
  publication-title: J Psychosom Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.008
– volume: 16
  start-page: 263
  year: 2019
  ident: B1
  article-title: Genetics, mechanisms, and therapeutic progress in polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias
  publication-title: Neurotherapeutics
  doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-00696-y
– start-page: 153
  year: 2000
  ident: B36
  article-title: The unscented kalman filter for nonlinear estimation
– volume: 358
  start-page: 253
  year: 2015
  ident: B13
  article-title: Quantitative evaluation of gait ataxia by accelerometers
  publication-title: J Neurol Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.004
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1101
  year: 2015
  ident: B6
  article-title: Long-term disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: a longitudinal cohort study
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00202-1
– volume: 14
  start-page: 590
  year: 2018
  ident: B7
  article-title: Spinocerebellar ataxias: prospects and challenges for therapy development
  publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol
  doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0051-6
– volume: 11
  start-page: 194
  year: 2012
  ident: B9
  article-title: Gait pattern in inherited cerebellar ataxias
  publication-title: Cerebellum
  doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0296-8
– volume: 39
  start-page: 788
  year: 2024
  ident: B27
  article-title: Digital gait measures capture 1-year progression in early-stage spinocerebellar ataxia type 2
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.29757
– volume: 29
  start-page: 252
  year: 2014
  ident: B15
  article-title: Gait impairment precedes clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.25706
– volume: 66
  start-page: 1717
  year: 2006
  ident: B5
  article-title: Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1099
  ident: B32
  article-title: Digital biomarkers of mobility in Parkinson’s disease during daily living
  publication-title: J Parkinsons Dis
  doi: 10.3233/JPD-201914
– volume: 2
  start-page: 9
  year: 2015
  ident: B24
  article-title: Clinical assessment of standing and gait in ataxic patients using a triaxial accelerometer
  publication-title: Cerebellum Ataxias
  doi: 10.1186/s40673-015-0028-9
– volume-title: Sigma-Point Kalman Filters for Probabilistic Inference in Dynamic State-Space Models
  year: 2004
  ident: B37
– volume: 40
  start-page: 0
  year: 2019
  ident: B35
  article-title: Validity of mobility lab (version 2) for gait assessment in young adults, older adults and Parkinson’s disease
  publication-title: Physiol Meas
  doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab4023
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: B39
  article-title: Digital technology in movement disorders: updates, applications, and challenges
  publication-title: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep
  doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01101-6
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: B30
  article-title: Laboratory versus daily life gait characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and matched controls
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil
  doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00781-4
– volume: 39
  start-page: 663
  year: 2024
  ident: B40
  article-title: Digital measures of postural sway quantify balance deficits in spinocerebellar ataxia
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.29742
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1343
  year: 2025
  ident: B29
  article-title: Capture of longitudinal change in real-life walking in cerebellar ataxia increases patient relevance and effect size
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.30230
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1248
  year: 2018
  ident: B28
  article-title: International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review: update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.27372
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2232
  year: 2008
  ident: B3
  article-title: Early symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6
  publication-title: Mov Disord
  doi: 10.1002/mds.22288
– volume: 32
  start-page: 143
  year: 2017
  ident: B4
  article-title: Health-related quality of life in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia
  publication-title: Neurología
  doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2015.09.002
– volume: 16
  start-page: 629
  year: 2017
  ident: B23
  article-title: Progression of gait ataxia in patients with degenerative cerebellar disorders: a 4-year follow-up study
  publication-title: Cerebellum
  doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0837-2
– start-page: awaf154
  year: 2024
  ident: B26
  article-title: At-home wearables and machine learning capture motor impairment and progression in adult ataxias
  publication-title: Brain
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf154
– start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: B33
  article-title: Mobility lab to assess balance and gait with synchronized body-worn sensors
  publication-title: Journal of Bioengineering and Biomedical Sciences
  doi: 10.4172/2155-9538.s1-007
– volume: 16
  start-page: 615
  year: 2017
  ident: B2
  article-title: The initial symptom and motor progression in spinocerebellar ataxias
  publication-title: Cerebellum
  doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0836-3
– volume: 23
  start-page: 912
  year: 2024
  ident: B25
  article-title: Using smartphone sensors for ataxia trials: consensus guidance by the ataxia global initiative working group on digital-motor biomarkers
  publication-title: Cerebellum
  doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01608-3
– volume: 261
  start-page: 213
  year: 2014
  ident: B22
  article-title: Increased gait variability is associated with the history of falls in patients with cerebellar ataxia
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7189-3
– volume: 55
  start-page: 25
  year: 2017
  ident: B10
  article-title: Longitudinal gait and balance decline in friedreich’s ataxia: a pilot study
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.019
– volume: 55
  start-page: 87
  year: 2017
  ident: B34
  article-title: Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.013
– volume: 6
  start-page: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: B14
  article-title: Wearable gait sensors to measure ataxia due to spinocerebellar degeneration
  publication-title: Neurol Clin Neurosci
  doi: 10.1111/ncn3.12174
– volume: 60
  start-page: 154
  year: 2018
  ident: B17
  article-title: A systematic review of the gait characteristics associated with cerebellar ataxia
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.024
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1566
  year: 2024
  ident: B18
  article-title: Quantitative gait and balance outcomes for ataxia trials: consensus recommendations by the ataxia global initiative working group on digital-motor biomarkers
  publication-title: Cerebellum
  doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01625-2
– volume: 13
  start-page: 677
  year: 2014
  ident: B20
  article-title: Sensitivity of spatiotemporal gait parameters in measuring disease severity in friedreich ataxia
  publication-title: Cerebellum
  doi: 10.1007/s12311-014-0583-2
– volume: 95
  start-page: e1199
  year: 2020
  ident: B11
  article-title: Real-life gait assessment in degenerative cerebellar ataxia: toward ecologically valid biomarkers
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010176
SSID ssj0002512205
Score 2.279305
Snippet Recent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility. We compared gait measures that best differentiated...
Recent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility.BackgroundRecent findings suggest that a single gait...
BackgroundRecent findings suggest that a single gait assessment in a clinic may not reflect everyday mobility.ObjectiveWe compared gait measures that best...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1590150
SubjectTerms daily life monitoring
gait
IMUs
spinocerebellar ataxia
wearable technology
Title Clinic vs. daily life gait characteristics in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40970140
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3252229072
https://doaj.org/article/cf6e087b4e4344598a97c2adc2800109
Volume 7
WOSCitedRecordID wos001573883600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2673-253X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002512205
  issn: 2673-253X
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20200101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2673-253X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002512205
  issn: 2673-253X
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20190101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NT9wwEB0VVCEuFbR8LLQrV-qtyq4TO7ZzhIoVh-6qQlTam-X4A0VCWbQJqFz47XiSgOCAuPSSQxQlzhtrZp7HfgPwg4qYQwvDkjI4nuDRzqQUwiWG5damDhlF17Xkt1ws1HJZ_HnR6gv3hPXywD1wUxuEp0qW3HPGeV4oU0ibGWcz1ZV10PvGrOcFmUIfjFE7o3l_SiaysGIa3FWLxYcsn6R5x_NfRaJOsP_tLLOLNrMd-DSkieSkH94ufPD1Z9iaD4XwL3DR63mSu2ZCnKmu78l1FTy5MlVL7GsNZlLVZFBPbQguu5Lmpqpj2Fp7LDqYNTGt-VeZPfg7O7v8dZ4M7RESy4RoI4UsQxq4coxHV-F88I6lThlHXUwLrDIxKFnqUfkzMF6mZUzlFFXx3QVjslRsHzbrVe0PgXinUMndyeA5D8KUUuTB0EBtsIUs6Ah-PkGlb3oVDB3ZAwKrO2A1AqsHYEdwimg-P4kK1t2NaFc92FW_Z9cRfH-yhY4zHssYpvar20azLMcm5FRmIzjojfT8KVTvQs549D-GcAzb-Fv9gstX2GzXt_4bfLR3bdWsx7Ahl2rcTbt4nT-cPQKoadqW
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinic+vs.+daily+life+gait+characteristics+in+patients+with+spinocerebellar+ataxia&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+digital+health&rft.au=Shah%2C+Vrutangkumar+V&rft.au=Muzyka%2C+Daniel&rft.au=Jagodinsky%2C+Adam&rft.au=Casey%2C+Hannah&rft.date=2025&rft.issn=2673-253X&rft.eissn=2673-253X&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=1590150&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffdgth.2025.1590150&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2673-253X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2673-253X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2673-253X&client=summon