Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet treatment for secondary stroke prevention in patients with active cancer

Approximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in neurology Jg. 16; S. 1530775
Hauptverfasser: Kielkopf, Moritz C., Göcmen, Jayan, Venzin, Selina B., Steinauer, Fabienne, Branca, Mattia, Boronylo, Anna, Göldlin, Martina B., Kaesmacher, Johannes, Mujanovic, Adnan, Costamagna, Gianluca, Meinel, Thomas R., Seiffge, David J., Bücke, Philipp, Heldner, Mirjam R., Liberman, Ava L., Kamel, Hooman, Fischer, Urs, Arnold, Marcel, Pabst, Thomas, Berger, Martin D., Jung, Simon, Scutelnic, Adrian, Navi, Babak B., Beyeler, Morin
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1664-2295, 1664-2295
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract Approximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with cancer-related stroke treated with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. We identified consecutive patients with AIS and active cancer hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from 2015 through 2020. Patients with cardioembolic mechanisms were excluded. We used Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to evaluate the associations between type of antithrombotic therapy at discharge (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy) and the main outcomes of 1-year mortality and long-term recurrent AIS. Among 5,012 AIS patients, 306 had active cancer. After applying study eligibility criteria, we analyzed 135 patients (median age 72 years; 44% women), of whom 58 (43%) were treated with anticoagulant and 77 (57%) with antiplatelet therapy. The median follow-up time was 495 days (IQR, 57-1,029). Patients treated with anticoagulants, compared to patients treated with antiplatelet therapy, were younger (median 69 versus 75 years), had more metastatic disease (72% versus 41%), and higher median baseline D-dimer levels (median 8,536 μg/L versus 1,010 μg/L). Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy was associated with similar risks of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.63) and long-term recurrent AIS (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.08-2.83). The IPTW analyses for 1-year mortality confirmed the results of the main analyses (HR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.39-1.72,  = 0.61). Factors associated with anticoagulant use in patients with cancer-related stroke include younger age, more advanced cancer, and elevated D-dimer. Similar outcomes were seen with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these patients highlighting the need for future randomized trials to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy.
AbstractList Approximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with cancer-related stroke treated with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. We identified consecutive patients with AIS and active cancer hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from 2015 through 2020. Patients with cardioembolic mechanisms were excluded. We used Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to evaluate the associations between type of antithrombotic therapy at discharge (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy) and the main outcomes of 1-year mortality and long-term recurrent AIS. Among 5,012 AIS patients, 306 had active cancer. After applying study eligibility criteria, we analyzed 135 patients (median age 72 years; 44% women), of whom 58 (43%) were treated with anticoagulant and 77 (57%) with antiplatelet therapy. The median follow-up time was 495 days (IQR, 57-1,029). Patients treated with anticoagulants, compared to patients treated with antiplatelet therapy, were younger (median 69 versus 75 years), had more metastatic disease (72% versus 41%), and higher median baseline D-dimer levels (median 8,536 μg/L versus 1,010 μg/L). Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy was associated with similar risks of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.63) and long-term recurrent AIS (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.08-2.83). The IPTW analyses for 1-year mortality confirmed the results of the main analyses (HR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.39-1.72,  = 0.61). Factors associated with anticoagulant use in patients with cancer-related stroke include younger age, more advanced cancer, and elevated D-dimer. Similar outcomes were seen with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these patients highlighting the need for future randomized trials to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy.
Approximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with cancer-related stroke treated with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention.BackgroundApproximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with cancer-related stroke treated with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention.We identified consecutive patients with AIS and active cancer hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from 2015 through 2020. Patients with cardioembolic mechanisms were excluded. We used Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to evaluate the associations between type of antithrombotic therapy at discharge (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy) and the main outcomes of 1-year mortality and long-term recurrent AIS.MethodsWe identified consecutive patients with AIS and active cancer hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from 2015 through 2020. Patients with cardioembolic mechanisms were excluded. We used Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to evaluate the associations between type of antithrombotic therapy at discharge (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy) and the main outcomes of 1-year mortality and long-term recurrent AIS.Among 5,012 AIS patients, 306 had active cancer. After applying study eligibility criteria, we analyzed 135 patients (median age 72 years; 44% women), of whom 58 (43%) were treated with anticoagulant and 77 (57%) with antiplatelet therapy. The median follow-up time was 495 days (IQR, 57-1,029). Patients treated with anticoagulants, compared to patients treated with antiplatelet therapy, were younger (median 69 versus 75 years), had more metastatic disease (72% versus 41%), and higher median baseline D-dimer levels (median 8,536 μg/L versus 1,010 μg/L). Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy was associated with similar risks of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.63) and long-term recurrent AIS (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.08-2.83). The IPTW analyses for 1-year mortality confirmed the results of the main analyses (HR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.39-1.72, p = 0.61).ResultsAmong 5,012 AIS patients, 306 had active cancer. After applying study eligibility criteria, we analyzed 135 patients (median age 72 years; 44% women), of whom 58 (43%) were treated with anticoagulant and 77 (57%) with antiplatelet therapy. The median follow-up time was 495 days (IQR, 57-1,029). Patients treated with anticoagulants, compared to patients treated with antiplatelet therapy, were younger (median 69 versus 75 years), had more metastatic disease (72% versus 41%), and higher median baseline D-dimer levels (median 8,536 μg/L versus 1,010 μg/L). Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy was associated with similar risks of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.63) and long-term recurrent AIS (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.08-2.83). The IPTW analyses for 1-year mortality confirmed the results of the main analyses (HR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.39-1.72, p = 0.61).Factors associated with anticoagulant use in patients with cancer-related stroke include younger age, more advanced cancer, and elevated D-dimer. Similar outcomes were seen with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these patients highlighting the need for future randomized trials to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy.ConclusionFactors associated with anticoagulant use in patients with cancer-related stroke include younger age, more advanced cancer, and elevated D-dimer. Similar outcomes were seen with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these patients highlighting the need for future randomized trials to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy.
BackgroundApproximately 5–10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major bleeding. The optimal antithrombotic strategy for cancer-related stroke is uncertain. This study compared clinical outcomes among patients with cancer-related stroke treated with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention.MethodsWe identified consecutive patients with AIS and active cancer hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from 2015 through 2020. Patients with cardioembolic mechanisms were excluded. We used Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to evaluate the associations between type of antithrombotic therapy at discharge (anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy) and the main outcomes of 1-year mortality and long-term recurrent AIS.ResultsAmong 5,012 AIS patients, 306 had active cancer. After applying study eligibility criteria, we analyzed 135 patients (median age 72 years; 44% women), of whom 58 (43%) were treated with anticoagulant and 77 (57%) with antiplatelet therapy. The median follow-up time was 495 days (IQR, 57–1,029). Patients treated with anticoagulants, compared to patients treated with antiplatelet therapy, were younger (median 69 versus 75 years), had more metastatic disease (72% versus 41%), and higher median baseline D-dimer levels (median 8,536 μg/L versus 1,010 μg/L). Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy was associated with similar risks of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–1.63) and long-term recurrent AIS (aHR 0.49; 95% CI 0.08–2.83). The IPTW analyses for 1-year mortality confirmed the results of the main analyses (HR 0.82; 95%CI: 0.39–1.72, p = 0.61).ConclusionFactors associated with anticoagulant use in patients with cancer-related stroke include younger age, more advanced cancer, and elevated D-dimer. Similar outcomes were seen with anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these patients highlighting the need for future randomized trials to determine the preferred antithrombotic strategy.
Author Heldner, Mirjam R.
Arnold, Marcel
Venzin, Selina B.
Jung, Simon
Pabst, Thomas
Mujanovic, Adnan
Branca, Mattia
Beyeler, Morin
Göcmen, Jayan
Seiffge, David J.
Fischer, Urs
Göldlin, Martina B.
Bücke, Philipp
Scutelnic, Adrian
Kielkopf, Moritz C.
Kaesmacher, Johannes
Kamel, Hooman
Boronylo, Anna
Berger, Martin D.
Navi, Babak B.
Liberman, Ava L.
Costamagna, Gianluca
Meinel, Thomas R.
Steinauer, Fabienne
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Moritz C.
  surname: Kielkopf
  fullname: Kielkopf, Moritz C.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jayan
  surname: Göcmen
  fullname: Göcmen, Jayan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Selina B.
  surname: Venzin
  fullname: Venzin, Selina B.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Fabienne
  surname: Steinauer
  fullname: Steinauer, Fabienne
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mattia
  surname: Branca
  fullname: Branca, Mattia
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Anna
  surname: Boronylo
  fullname: Boronylo, Anna
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Martina B.
  surname: Göldlin
  fullname: Göldlin, Martina B.
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Johannes
  surname: Kaesmacher
  fullname: Kaesmacher, Johannes
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Adnan
  surname: Mujanovic
  fullname: Mujanovic, Adnan
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Gianluca
  surname: Costamagna
  fullname: Costamagna, Gianluca
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Thomas R.
  surname: Meinel
  fullname: Meinel, Thomas R.
– sequence: 12
  givenname: David J.
  surname: Seiffge
  fullname: Seiffge, David J.
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Philipp
  surname: Bücke
  fullname: Bücke, Philipp
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Mirjam R.
  surname: Heldner
  fullname: Heldner, Mirjam R.
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Ava L.
  surname: Liberman
  fullname: Liberman, Ava L.
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Hooman
  surname: Kamel
  fullname: Kamel, Hooman
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Urs
  surname: Fischer
  fullname: Fischer, Urs
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Marcel
  surname: Arnold
  fullname: Arnold, Marcel
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Pabst
  fullname: Pabst, Thomas
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Martin D.
  surname: Berger
  fullname: Berger, Martin D.
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Simon
  surname: Jung
  fullname: Jung, Simon
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Adrian
  surname: Scutelnic
  fullname: Scutelnic, Adrian
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Babak B.
  surname: Navi
  fullname: Navi, Babak B.
– sequence: 24
  givenname: Morin
  surname: Beyeler
  fullname: Beyeler, Morin
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41036269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkctuHCEQRVHkKHYc_0AWEctsZsKjgWZpWXlYspRNskZAFw6THugAPVH-3tgzscyGouroUlX3LTpLOQFC7ynZcj7qTyHBWraMMLGlghOlxCt0QaUcNoxpcfYiPkdXte5IP1xrLvkbdD5QwiWT-gLtrlOLPtv7dbap4QOUulbcw7jMtsEMDbcCtu2hV0MuuILPabLlH66t5N-AlwKHXow54ZjwYlvsr4r_xvYLW9_iAbC3yUN5h14HO1e4Ot2X6OeXzz9uvm3uvn-9vbm-23guZdsIppigkwxq0gH0CIQ5N03eeR7AyzFwx6hQdvCsjw2jI44BsYIxPlpLJn6Jbo-6U7Y7s5S4792abKN5SuRyb2zpQ89ggqZKwsgkG-jgRLDgFCUTFVrxQL3qWh-PWkvJf1aozexj9TD3ZUFeq-FMSK7FqIaOfjihq9vD9Pzx_113gB0BX3KtBcIzQol59NQ8eWoePTUnT_kDhkyXEw
Cites_doi 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7
10.1111/jth.14219
10.1042/BSR20130057
10.1093/ckj/sfab158
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106609
10.3174/ajnr.A4846
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.031
10.1002/ana.26129
10.1177/17562864221106362
10.1002/ana.25227
10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4211
10.1111/jth.15779
10.1161/01.str.24.1.35
10.1056/NEJMoa0804656
10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2101
10.1002/14651858.CD000187.pub2
10.3892/ijo.2019.4669
10.1002/brb3.2738
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.11.016
10.1177/1747493020971104
10.5853/jos.2023.03279
10.1002/onco.13584
10.3390/jcm8091457
10.3389/fneur.2023.1148152
10.5853/jos.2016.00570
10.1002/ana.22050
10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_55_19
10.1177/17474930241260589
10.2188/jea.JE20210145
10.1111/ene.16200
10.1111/ene.14172
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2025 Kielkopf, Göcmen, Venzin, Steinauer, Branca, Boronylo, Göldlin, Kaesmacher, Mujanovic, Costamagna, Meinel, Seiffge, Bücke, Heldner, Liberman, Kamel, Fischer, Arnold, Pabst, Berger, Jung, Scutelnic, Navi and Beyeler.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2025 Kielkopf, Göcmen, Venzin, Steinauer, Branca, Boronylo, Göldlin, Kaesmacher, Mujanovic, Costamagna, Meinel, Seiffge, Bücke, Heldner, Liberman, Kamel, Fischer, Arnold, Pabst, Berger, Jung, Scutelnic, Navi and Beyeler.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2025.1530775
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1664-2295
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f9176e8262414b5faeb710d15973f1c7
41036269
10_3389_fneur_2025_1530775
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
9T4
AAFWJ
AAKDD
AAYXX
ACGFO
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EMOBN
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
IPNFZ
M48
NPM
RIG
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-527251d6f7d9fe98e02bbddcbc3fec68f3b2157a4c2307e8b0b2e0a52238aa0d3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001583170000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1664-2295
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:48:29 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 02 19:13:46 EDT 2025
Sun Oct 05 01:50:40 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:31:59 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords cancer
secondary prevention
antithrombotic drugs
embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS)
acute ischemic stroke
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 Kielkopf, Göcmen, Venzin, Steinauer, Branca, Boronylo, Göldlin, Kaesmacher, Mujanovic, Costamagna, Meinel, Seiffge, Bücke, Heldner, Liberman, Kamel, Fischer, Arnold, Pabst, Berger, Jung, Scutelnic, Navi and Beyeler.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c366t-527251d6f7d9fe98e02bbddcbc3fec68f3b2157a4c2307e8b0b2e0a52238aa0d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/f9176e8262414b5faeb710d15973f1c7
PMID 41036269
PQID 3256395874
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f9176e8262414b5faeb710d15973f1c7
proquest_miscellaneous_3256395874
pubmed_primary_41036269
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2025_1530775
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2025
  text: 2025-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Frontiers in neurology
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Neurol
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Adams (ref18) 1993; 24
Chesnaye (ref34) 2022; 15
Lee (ref8) 2017; 19
Costamagna (ref15) 2024; 31
O’Connell (ref25) 2021; 26
Lima (ref4) 2013; 33
Kleindorfer (ref6) 2021
Hacke (ref22) 2008; 359
Parikh (ref33) 2014; 83
Navi (ref29) 2021; 90
Steinauer (ref19) 2024; 19
Navi (ref3) 2018; 83
Navi (ref9) 2024
Dardiotis (ref5) 2019; 54
Navi (ref21) 2018; 75
Choi (ref32) 2019; 8
Hsu (ref7) 2019; 31
Navi (ref30) 2022; 20
Shiba (ref24) 2021; 31
Khorana (ref11) 2018; 16
Hart (ref17) 2014; 13
Beyeler (ref12) 2022; 31
Rioux (ref13) 2021; 16
Fassbender (ref23) 1999; 30
Chen (ref26) 2022; 12
Sanossian (ref2) 2013; 22
Heo (ref20) 2024; 26
Beyeler (ref14) 2023; 14
Seok (ref28) 2010; 68
Saxena (ref31) 2004; 2004
Martinez-Majander (ref10) 2020; 27
Finelli (ref27) 2016; 37
Woock (ref1) 2022; 15
Rosen (ref16) 2023
References_xml – volume: 13
  start-page: 429
  year: 2014
  ident: ref17
  article-title: Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1891
  year: 2018
  ident: ref11
  article-title: Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH
  publication-title: J Thromb Haemost
  doi: 10.1111/jth.14219
– volume: 33
  start-page: 701
  year: 2013
  ident: ref4
  article-title: Activation of blood coagulation in cancer: implications for tumour progression
  publication-title: Biosci Rep
  doi: 10.1042/BSR20130057
– volume: 15
  start-page: 14
  year: 2022
  ident: ref34
  article-title: An introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting in observational research
  publication-title: Clin Kidney J
  doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab158
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: ref12
  article-title: Development of a score for prediction of occult malignancy in stroke patients (occult-5 score)
  publication-title: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106609
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2033
  year: 2016
  ident: ref27
  article-title: Three-territory DWI acute infarcts: diagnostic value in cancer-associated hypercoagulation stroke (trousseau syndrome)
  publication-title: Am J Neuroradiol
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4846
– volume: 83
  start-page: 26
  year: 2014
  ident: ref33
  article-title: Recurrent thromboembolic events after ischemic stroke in patients with cancer
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.031
– start-page: e364
  volume-title: Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  year: 2021
  ident: ref6
– volume: 90
  start-page: 159
  year: 2021
  ident: ref29
  article-title: Mechanisms of ischemic stroke in patients with cancer: a prospective study
  publication-title: Ann Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/ana.26129
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: ref1
  article-title: Cancer and stroke: commonly encountered by clinicians, but little evidence to guide clinical approach
  publication-title: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
  doi: 10.1177/17562864221106362
– volume: 83
  start-page: 873
  year: 2018
  ident: ref3
  article-title: Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: a review of an underappreciated pathology
  publication-title: Ann Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/ana.25227
– volume: 75
  start-page: 379
  year: 2018
  ident: ref21
  article-title: Enoxaparin vs aspirin in patients with cancer and ischemic stroke: the TEACH pilot randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4211
– volume: 20
  start-page: 2046
  year: 2022
  ident: ref30
  article-title: Ischemic stroke with cancer: hematologic and embolic biomarkers and clinical outcomes
  publication-title: J Thromb Haemost
  doi: 10.1111/jth.15779
– volume: 24
  start-page: 35
  year: 1993
  ident: ref18
  article-title: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke
  publication-title: Stroke
  doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35
– volume: 359
  start-page: 1317
  year: 2008
  ident: ref22
  article-title: Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2101
  year: 1999
  ident: ref23
  article-title: Changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis markers in acute ischemic stroke treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
  publication-title: Stroke
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2101
– volume: 2004
  start-page: CD000187
  year: 2004
  ident: ref31
  article-title: Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000187.pub2
– volume: 54
  start-page: 779
  year: 2019
  ident: ref5
  article-title: Cancer-associated stroke: pathophysiology, detection and management (review)
  publication-title: Int J Oncol
  doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4669
– start-page: 958
  volume-title: JAMA Neurol
  year: 2024
  ident: ref9
  article-title: Apixaban vs aspirin in patients with cancer and cryptogenic stroke a post hoc analysis of the ARCADIA randomized clinical trial
– volume: 12
  start-page: e2738
  year: 2022
  ident: ref26
  article-title: Cancer-related stroke: exploring personalized therapy strategies
  publication-title: Brain Behav
  doi: 10.1002/brb3.2738
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1146
  year: 2013
  ident: ref2
  article-title: Trends in cancer diagnoses among inpatients hospitalized with stroke
  publication-title: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.11.016
– volume: 16
  start-page: 12
  year: 2021
  ident: ref13
  article-title: Frequency and predictors of occult cancer in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Int J Stroke
  doi: 10.1177/1747493020971104
– volume: 26
  start-page: 164
  year: 2024
  ident: ref20
  article-title: Cancer-associated stroke: thrombosis mechanism, diagnosis, outcome, and therapeutic strategies
  publication-title: J Stroke
  doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.03279
– volume: 26
  start-page: e8
  year: 2021
  ident: ref25
  article-title: Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants: patient selection, controversies, and caveats
  publication-title: Oncologist
  doi: 10.1002/onco.13584
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1457
  year: 2019
  ident: ref32
  article-title: Baseline D-dimer levels as a risk assessment biomarker for recurrent stroke in patients with combined atrial fibrillation and atherosclerosis
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/jcm8091457
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: ref14
  article-title: Absence of susceptibility vessel sign and hyperdense vessel sign in patients with cancer-related stroke
  publication-title: Front Neurol
  doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1148152
– volume: 19
  start-page: 77
  year: 2017
  ident: ref8
  article-title: Hypercoagulability and mortality of patients with stroke and active cancer: the OASIS-CANCER study
  publication-title: J Stroke
  doi: 10.5853/jos.2016.00570
– volume: 68
  start-page: 213
  year: 2010
  ident: ref28
  article-title: Coagulopathy and embolic signal in cancer patients with ischemic stroke
  publication-title: Ann Neurol
  doi: 10.1002/ana.22050
– volume: 31
  start-page: 144
  year: 2019
  ident: ref7
  article-title: Anticoagulants for cancer-associated ischemic stroke
  publication-title: Tzu Chi Med J
  doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_55_19
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1020
  year: 2024
  ident: ref19
  article-title: Prevalence of right-to-left shunt in stroke patients with cancer
  publication-title: Int J Stroke
  doi: 10.1177/17474930241260589
– volume: 31
  start-page: 457
  year: 2021
  ident: ref24
  article-title: Using propensity scores for causal inference: pitfalls and tips
  publication-title: J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20210145
– volume-title: TNM classification
  year: 2023
  ident: ref16
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1
  year: 2024
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Acute ischaemic stroke in active cancer versus non-cancer patients: stroke characteristics, mechanisms and clinical outcomes
  publication-title: Eur J Neurol
  doi: 10.1111/ene.16200
– volume: 27
  start-page: 841
  year: 2020
  ident: ref10
  article-title: Rivaroxaban versus aspirin for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with cancer: a subgroup analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized trial
  publication-title: Eur J Neurol
  doi: 10.1111/ene.14172
SSID ssj0000399363
Score 2.3541996
Snippet Approximately 5-10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and major...
BackgroundApproximately 5–10% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have known active cancer. These patients are at high risk for both recurrent AIS and...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1530775
SubjectTerms acute ischemic stroke
antithrombotic drugs
cancer
embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS)
secondary prevention
Title Anticoagulant versus antiplatelet treatment for secondary stroke prevention in patients with active cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41036269
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3256395874
https://doaj.org/article/f9176e8262414b5faeb710d15973f1c7
Volume 16
WOSCitedRecordID wos001583170000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1664-2295
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000399363
  issn: 1664-2295
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1664-2295
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000399363
  issn: 1664-2295
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1NT9wwEB21qwr1UtEW6PIlV-qtCmTjJLaPUIF6KKgHqPZm-SvSUpSskiwSF347M05YwaHi0ksUJZFiz9h-b-zxM8C3NMcRT9iQIBUvEkT8LDFGiUQRnJSOOxt1C_78EpeXcj5Xv58d9UU5YYM88GC44wrjiTIgCUaoyW1RmWARFD2isODVzMV95Mh6ngVTcQwm3C35sEsGozB1XJE-JMaDWXGEnZyE314gURTs_zfLjGhzvgkfRprITobifYQ3of4EGxfjQvhnuDmp8U1j6CD5umeUW7HqGN4ulrfIHtEZbJ1CzpCXso4CX2_ae9b1bfM3sOWo3dTUbFGzUV61YzQvy0wcBJmjFtFuwfX52dWPn8l4bELieFn2GFoKJC2-rIRXVVAypJm13jvreBVcKStuEeeFyR0lgQdpU5uF1CAR49KY1PNtmNRNHb4Ay5VxboakRDiZO28UQp5IpbDCF8LybArfn0yol4M6hsaoggyuo8E1GVyPBp_CKVl5_SUpW8cH6G89-lu_5u8pfH3ykcaeQMsbpg7NqtMc2RtXhRT5FHYG561_lc-i7o7a_R9F2IP3VK1hImYfJn27Cgfwzt31i649hLdiLg9jc8TrxcPZI1j25Ks
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticoagulant+versus+antiplatelet+treatment+for+secondary+stroke+prevention+in+patients+with+active+cancer&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+neurology&rft.au=Kielkopf%2C+Moritz+C&rft.au=G%C3%B6cmen%2C+Jayan&rft.au=Venzin%2C+Selina+B&rft.au=Steinauer%2C+Fabienne&rft.date=2025&rft.issn=1664-2295&rft.eissn=1664-2295&rft.volume=16&rft.spage=1530775&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffneur.2025.1530775&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F41036269&rft.externalDocID=41036269
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1664-2295&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1664-2295&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1664-2295&client=summon